Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 28(3): 288-293, 2022 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34001448

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential for evaluating treatment of ankle instability (AI). The aim was to assess the content validity and the measurement properties of all relevant PROMs for AI. METHODS: Relevant PROMs were identified from PubMed and SCOPUS. The development and validation quality of the PROMs was assessed according to established scientific standards. RESULTS: Seventeen PROMs and 56 validation studies were analyzed. Content validity, which ensures the PROM measures what is relevant, is obtained by involving target patients in the development process. Only three PROMs identified had some degree of patient involvement (Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), Lower Extremity Function Scale (LEFS), and the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM)). Of these, only FAAM was somewhat rigorously validated using modern psychometric validation methods, and exhibited superior measurement properties (construct validity). CONCLUSION: No existing PROM is completely adequate to evaluate AI. However, FAAM is the best choice.


Asunto(s)
Tobillo , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/terapia , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Foot Ankle Surg ; 28(5): 588-594, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34247919

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) was developed by involvement of patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) and has acceptable measurement properties, but is not available in Danish. METHODS: FAAM was translated and culturally adapted into Danish, and its measurement properties were assessed using Rasch analyses. RESULTS: A Danish version was produced with small adaptations, and content relevance was confirmed by Danish patients. The 21-item ADL domain showed misfit to the Rasch model, but after removing six items, the resulting 15-item scale displayed adequate fit. The Sports domain also exhibited misfit, but after removing one item and adjusting due to differential item functioning related to age for another item, a 7-item scale showed good fit. This resulted in a 22-item 2-dimensional Danish version of FAAM. CONCLUSION: The 22-item Danish FAAM exhibits robust measurement properties for patients with various conditions of the lower leg, ankle, and foot, including CAI.


Asunto(s)
Tobillo , Inestabilidad de la Articulación , Actividades Cotidianas , Dinamarca , Humanos , Inestabilidad de la Articulación/diagnóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA