[Evaluation of AEC Consistency in Digital X-ray Imaging Systems].

The Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposures (J-RIME) established the diagnostic reference level (DRL) and is advancing optimization of radiation protection. We believe that the difference in the imaging dose between facilities may be due to the fact that automatic exposure control (AEC) adjustment is not unified among manufacturers. The consistency of AEC is specified in JIS 4751-2-54, but it is not applicable to digital X-ray imaging systems because it is for optical density of analog X-ray imaging systems. This article evaluates the consistency of AEC in digital X-ray imaging systems. The AEC consistency was compared with the AEC-estimated dose from the air kerma (KAEC) using the phosphor-based imaging plate placed at the back of the AEC detector. We measured the AEC tube voltage and subject thickness characteristics (tracking) of four types of digital X-ray imaging systems at three facilities. In the test of tube voltage characteristics, the average KAEC values at all tube voltages were 2.37±0.04 µGy for A system, 7.30±1.44 µGy for B system, 3.53±0.13 µGy for C system, and 5.70±0.18 µGy for D system. The relative errors were +2.6 to -1.8% for A system, +25.3 to -22.6% for B system, +5.2 to -1.4% for C system, and +2.5 to -4.4% for D system. In the subject thickness characteristics test, the average KAEC values for all Al thicknesses were 2.34±0.02 µGy for A system, 5.95±0.23 µGy for B system, 4.25±1.12 µGy for C system, and 5.03±1.27 µGy for D system. The relative errors were +1.0 to -0.9% for A system, +4.1 to -5.0% for B system, +40.5 to -28.1% for C system, and +19.7 to -42.9% for D system.

[Report Based on Fiscal 2015 Diagnostic X-ray Equipment Questionnaire Survey].

We have conducted a questionnaire survey every 5 years from 1974 to grasp the existing status of X-ray equipment. This time, we will report on the results of the fiscal 2015 diagnostic X-ray equipment questionnaire survey. Compared to the previous survey on X-ray equipment, there has been a progress in the introduction of inverter type X-ray generators and image receptor systems in digital systems. We think that this transition will be occurred when the X-ray equipment are updated. In addition, there has been an increase in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and the use of tungsten anodes in the X-ray tubes of mammography apparatuses. X-ray equipment management was performed in many facilities. It seems that the importance of quality control of X-ray equipment is being realized. Constancy tests corresponding to digital systems were conducted at each facility. Maintenance by manufacturers has also increased. This is considered to be because the equipment management of digital systems has become difficult. We believe that it is necessary to continue the survey on the status of diagnostic X-ray equipment.

[Report based on fiscal 2010 diagnostic X-ray equipment questionnaire survey (conditions of radiography)].

This is the eighth investigation which has been carried out every 5 years since 1974 for the purpose of grasping the trend of X-ray devices and the radiographic condition. We gathered it up mainly on a radiographic condition, in this report. As for the chest radiography and double contrast gastrography, introduction of the flat panel detector (FPD) advanced in comparison with the last survey. Ratio of the imaging system at chest radiography was 65% for computed radiography (CR), 33% for FPD, 1% for screen/film (S/F), and 1% for others. The radiographic condition of FPD was current time product less than CR. Ratio of the imaging system at gastrography was 3% for CR, 48% for FPD, 34% for image intensifier-digital radiography (I.I.-DR), and 15% for S/F. The tube voltage and the exposure time were similar to the last survey time, but the tube current became lower. Through this survey, the change of the radiographic condition was seen in the radiography part where introduction of the FPD advanced. We think the continuous survey is necessary in future.