Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors Stabilize Coronary Plaques in Acute Coronary Syndrome With Diabetes Mellitus.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are widely used in cardiology and are effective in treating acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Their effects on unstable plaque in patients with ACS remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of SGLT2is in coronary plaque based on optical coherence tomography (OCT) images and the prognosis of ACS with type 2 diabetes mellitus. This retrospective study included 109 patients in the total cohort and 29 patients in the OCT cohort. Based on SGLT2i administration after ACS, the total cohort was categorized into non-SGLT2i (n = 69) and SGLT2i (n = 40) groups. The OCT cohort had 15 and 14 patients in the non-SGLT2i and SGLT2i groups, respectively. The OCT images of unstable plaque were analyzed in nonstented lesions during ACS catheterization and at the 6-month follow-up. The total cohort was assessed after 1 year for major adverse cardiovascular events, including all-cause mortality, revascularization, cerebrovascular disease, and heart failure hospitalization. SGLT2is improved unstable lesions with a significantly thicker fibrous cap (48 ± 15 µm vs 26 ± 24 µm, p = 0.005), reduced lipid arc (-29 ± 12° vs -18 ± 14°, p = 0.028), higher % decrease in total lipid arc (-35 ± 13% vs -19 ± 18%, p = 0.01), and lower major adverse cardiovascular event incidence (log-rank p = 0.023, hazard ratio 4.72 [1.08 to 20.63]) and revascularization rate (adjusted hazard ratio 6.77 [1.08 to 42.52]) than the non-SGLT2i group. In conclusion, SGLT2is can improve the markers of plaque stability and may improve the prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Cusp overlap method for self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remains a common complication for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), particularly when self-expanding (SE) valves are used. AIMS: We compared in-hospital and 30-day rates of new PPM implantation between patients undergoing TAVR with SE valves using the conventional three-cusp coplanar implantation technique and the cusp-overlap technique. METHODS: We retrospectively compared patients without a pre-existing PPM who underwent a TAVR procedure with SE Evolut R or PRO valves using the cusp-overlap technique from July 2018 to September 2020 (n = 519) to patients who underwent TAVR using standard three-cusp technique from April 2016 to March 2017 (n = 128) in two high volume Canadian centers. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline RBBB between the groups (10.4% vs. 13.2; p = 0.35). The rate of in-hospital new complete heart block (9.4% vs. 23.4%; p ≤ 0.001) and PPM implantation (8% vs. 21%; p ≤ 0.001) were significantly reduced when using the cusp-overlap technique. The incidence of new LBBB (30.4% vs. 29%; p = 0.73) was similar. At 30 days, the rates of new complete heart block (11% vs. 23%; p ≤ 0.001) and PPM implantation (10% vs. 21%, p ≤ 0.001) remained significantly lower in the cusp-overlap group, while the rate of new LBBB (35% vs. 30%; p = 0.73) was similar. CONCLUSION: Cusp-overlap approach offers several potential technical advantages compared to standard three-cusp view, and may result in lower PPM rates in TAVR with SE Evolut valve.

Long-Term Assessment of Survival After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation　- Insights From the International Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Registry.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for severe aortic stenosis (AS), but despite estimates of life expectancy after TAVI being essential in heart team discussion, these data are scarce. Therefore, the current study sought to assess long-term survival and its trends in relation to chronological age, surgical risk, and treatment period.Methods and Results: We included 2,414 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI for severe symptomatic AS between 2008 and 2021 at 2 international centers. For the analysis, long-term survival was evaluated according to age, surgical risk, and treatment period categorized into 3 groups, respectively. The longest follow-up was 13.5 years. Overall survival was 67.6% at 5 years and 26.9% at 10 years. Younger patients, lower surgical risk, and later treatment period showed better survival (log-rank P<0.001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, age <75years, lower surgical risk, and later time period were significantly associated with better survival. The incidence of paravalvular leakage ≥moderate, red blood cell transfusion, and acute kidney injury were independently associated with increasing risk of 5-year death. CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world registry, survival was substantial following TAVI, especially in younger and lower surgical-risk patients, with improving outcomes over time. This should be considered in heart team discussions of life-long management for AS patients after TAVI.

Risk Assessment of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Preexisting Right Bundle Branch Block.

Preexisting right bundle branch block (RBBB) is the strongest predictor for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). However, the risk assessment for new PPI and effective procedural strategy for preventing new PPI in patients with preexisting RBBB are still unclear. This study stratified the new PPI risk after TAVI and investigated the impact of implantation strategy in a preexisting RBBB cohort. We analyzed 237 patients with preexisting RBBB who underwent TAVI. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new PPI. Multivariate analyses investigating predictors for new PPI were performed. The overall PPI rate was 33.3%. Significant baseline predictors for new PPI were combination of RBBB, left anterior or posterior fascicular block, and first-degree atrioventricular block (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 to 5.04), high calcium volume of noncoronary cusp (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.05 to 4.10), and membranous septum (MS) length <2 mm (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.09 to 3.75) in the univariate analysis and MS length <2 mm (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.82) in the multivariate analysis. On the multivariate analysis including procedural variables, predilatation (OR 2.41, 95% CI 1.01 to 5.83), self-expanding valves (Corevalve, Evolut R, and Evolut Pro/Pro+; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) or mechanical expanding valves (Lotus/Lotus Edge; Boston Scientifics, Marlborough, Massachusetts) (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.31 to 6.91), and implantation depth > MS length (OR 4.27, 95% CI 1.81 to 10.08) were significantly associated with new PPI. The incidence of new PPI increased according to the number of baseline predictors (0: 20.9%, 1: 34.3%, and ≥2: 52.0%) and procedural predictors (0: 3.7%, 1: 20.9%, 2: 40.5%, and 3: 60.0%). New PPI risk in a preexisting RBBB subset could be stratified by baseline factors. Device selection and implantation strategy considering MS length could prevent new PPI even in these high-risk population.

Hemodynamics and Conduction Disturbance After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With SAPIEN3 Ultra Versus SAPIEN3: The HomoSAPIEN 2 Study.

The optimal percent oversizing (%OS) using the SAPIEN3 Ultra (S3U) weighing the incidence of paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) ≥ mild against the risk of conduction disturbance (CD) is not known. This study sought to define an optimal extent of the annulus area %OS suitable for transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the S3U compared with the SAPIEN3 (S3). A total of 350 patients with the S3U were compared with 606 patients with the S3. Patients were categorized depending on the degree of %OS. PVR ≥ mild was observed in 8.9% of patients with the S3U and in 21.8% of those with the S3 (p <0.001). The S3U demonstrated a sustainably lower incidence of PVR ≥ mild than the S3 in any extent of %OS. There was an inverse proportional relation between the extent of %OS and frequency of PVR ≥ mild in the S3, whereas the S3U group provided little change. The incidences of PVR ≥ mild were steady >5%OS in the S3 (5% to 10%OS: 13.3%, and >10%OS: 12.1%) and >0%OS in the S3U (0% to 5%OS: 5.9%, 5% to 10%OS: 6.0%, and >10%OS: 6.1%). An increasing %OS was independently associated with the occurrence of CD (<0%OS: 9.8%, 0% to 5%OS: 13.1%, 5% to 10%OS: 16.6%, and >10%OS: 19.2%, p = 0.012). The incidence of PVR ≥ mild and/or CD was the lowest (10.1%) in the 0% to 5%OS in patients with the S3U. In conclusion, the HomoSAPIEN2 study suggests that the S3U tolerates a lesser degree of %OS for mitigating PVR ≥ mild than the S3. Minimal %OS, ranging from 0% to 5%, may be optimal for the S3U with balancing the risk of PVR and CD. Trial Identifier: UMIN000040413/URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000046115.

Infective endocarditis after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair for severe mitral regurgitation; a case report and a systematic review.

Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) is used extensively in patients with symptomatic severe mitral regurgitation and high surgical risk. While prosthetic valve endocarditis is well documented, infective endocarditis (IE) after TEER is a rare occurrence. To date, no study has been conducted on this complication. We report the case of an 85-year-old man who developed IE 3 months after undergoing TEER, and we systematically review 26 previously published cases of this complication. Our review findings indicate that discussion within the heart team is essential for the decision-making process and treatment strategy determination.

Impact of High Implantation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve on Subsequent Conduction Disturbances and Coronary Access.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the impact of high transcatheter heart valve (THV) implantation on coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as assessed by postimplantation computed tomography (CT) are scarce. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to assess the impact of high THV implantation on coronary access after TAVR. METHODS: We included 160 and 258 patients treated with Evolut R/PRO/PRO+ and SAPIEN 3 THVs, respectively. In the Evolut R/PRO/PRO+ group, the target implantation depth was 1 to 3 mm using the cusp overlap view with commissural alignment technique for the high implantation technique (HIT), whereas it was 3 to 5 mm using 3-cusp coplanar view for the conventional implantation technique (CIT). In the SAPIEN 3 group, the HIT employed the radiolucent line-guided implantation, whereas the central balloon marker-guided implantation was used for the CIT. Post-TAVR CT was performed to analyze coronary accessibility. RESULTS: HIT reduced the incidence of new conduction disturbances after TAVR for both THVs. In the Evolut R/PRO/PRO+ group, post-TAVR CT showed that the HIT group had a higher incidence of the interference of THV skirt (22.0% vs 9.1%; P = 0.03) and a lower incidence of the interference of THV commissural posts (26.0% vs 42.7%; P = 0.04) with access to 1 or both coronary ostia compared with the CIT group. These incidences were similar between the HIT and CIT groups in the SAPIEN 3 group (THV skirt: 0.9% vs 0.7%; P = 1.00; THV commissural tabs: 15.7% vs 15.3%; P = 0.93). In both THVs, CT-identified risk of sinus sequestration in TAVR-in-TAVR was significantly higher in the HIT group compared with the CIT group (Evolut R/PRO/PRO+ group: 64.0% vs 41.8%; P = 0.009; SAPIEN 3 group: 17.6% vs 5.3%; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: High THV implantation substantially reduced conduction disturbances after TAVR. However, post-TAVR CT revealed that there is a risk for unfavorable future coronary access after TAVR and sinus sequestration in TAVR-in-TAVR. (Impact of High Implantation of Transcatheter Heart Valve during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Future Coronary Access; UMIN000048336).

Impact of Mild Paravalvular Regurgitation on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

The impact of mild paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains controversial. We evaluated the impact of mild PVR after TAVI on long-term clinical outcomes. We included patients who underwent TAVI for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis between December 2008 and June 2019 at 2 international centers and compared all-cause death between the group with mild PVR (group 1) and the group with none or trace PVR (group 2). PVR was categorized using a 3-class grading scheme, and patients with PVR ≧ moderate and those who were lost to follow-up were excluded. This retrospective analysis included 1,404 patients (mean age 81.7 ± 6.5 years, 58.0% women). Three hundred fifty eight patients (25.5%) were classified into group 1 and 1,046 patients (74.5%) into group 2. At baseline, group 1 was older and had a lower body mass index, worse co-morbidities, and more severe aortic stenosis. To account for these differences, propensity score matching was performed, resulting in 332 matched pairs. Within these matched groups, during a mean follow-up of 3.2 years, group 1 had a significantly lower survival rate at 5 years (group 1: 62.0% vs group 2: 68.0%, log-rank p = 0.029, hazard ratio: 1.41 [95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 1.91]). In the matched cohort, patients with mild PVR had a significant 1.4-fold increased risk of mortality at 5 years after TAVI compared with those with none or trace PVR. Further studies with more patients are needed to evaluate the impact of longer-term outcomes.

Discordance between fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio in patients with severe aortic stenosis: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Discordance between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) occurs in approximately 20 % of cases. However, no studies have reported the discordance in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic discordance between FFR and iFR in patients with severe AS. METHODS: We examined 140 consecutive patients with severe AS (164 intermediate coronary artery stenosis vessels). FFR and iFR were calculated in four quadrants based on threshold FFR and iFR values of ≤0.8 and ≤0.89, respectively (Group 1: iFR >0.89, FFR >0.80; Group 2: iFR ≤0.89, FFR >0.80; Group 3: iFR >0.89, FFR ≤0.80; and Group 4: iFR ≤0.89, FFR ≤0.80). Concordant groups were Groups 1 and 4, and discordant groups were Groups 2 and 3. Positive and negative discordant groups were Groups 3 and 2, respectively. RESULTS: The median (Q1, Q3) FFR and iFR were 0.84 (0.76, 0.88) and 0.85 (0.76, 0.91), respectively. Discordance was observed in 48 vessels (29.3 %). In the discordant group, negative discordance (Group 2: iFR ≤0.89 and FFR >0.80) was predominant (45 cases, 93.6 %). Multivariate analysis showed that the left anterior descending artery [odds ratio (OR), 3.88; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.54-9.79, p = 0.004] and peak velocity ≥5.0 m/s (OR, 3.21; 95%CI: 1.36-7.57, p = 0.008) were independently associated with negative discordance (FFR >0.8 and iFR ≤0.89). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS, discordance between FFR and iFR was predominantly negative and observed in 29.3 % of vessels. The left anterior descending artery and peak velocity ≥5.0 m/s were independently associated with negative discordance.

Percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy and transcatheter aortic valve replacement for rheumatic mitral and aortic stenosis.

The indications for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have been expanding; however, treatment protocol for patients with severe aortic stenosis with other significant valve disease is still controversial. Furthermore, there are few randomized data to guide therapy in multivalvular disease. We describe a successful percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy and TAVR simultaneously. A 3-year follow-up echocardiography showed preserved valve function. Learning objective: A combination of percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy and transcatheter aortic valve replacement for multivalvular disease with severe mitral stenosis and aortic stenosis may be a treatment option. For multivalvular disease, heart team decisions can be valuable for an optimal management strategy.

Usefulness of computed tomography to predict residual mitral regurgitation after transcatheter mitral valve edge-to-edge repair.

BACKGROUND: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can provide valuable information for preprocedural planning of transcatheter mitral valve interventions. However, no data exist on MDCT parameters predicting residual mitral regurgitation (MR) post-MitraClip (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA). METHODS: We analyzed preprocedural MDCTs of 78 consecutive patients with secondary MR undergoing MitraClip implantation at our institution. Moderate-or-severe mitral leaflet calcification (MLC) was defined as calcification, with-or-without mitral annular calcification, extending beyond the mitral leaflet base. Residual MR was assessed by postprocedural transesophageal echocardiography, and clinical outcomes were assessed at 1-year. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (19 %) had residual MR ≥2+. Compared to patients with none-or-mild residual MR, MDCT-derived mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) to mitral annulus area (MAA) ratio was significantly lower (0.32 ±â€¯0.06 vs. 0.39 ±â€¯0.09; p = 0.003), and the prevalence of MLC was higher (40 % vs. 18 %; p = 0.057) in those with residual MR ≥2+. Furthermore, the MVOA/MAA ratio and MLC were independent predictors of residual MR ≥2+ post-MitraClip [adjusted odds ratio (ORadj): 0.88 (0.80-0.97) and 5.50 (1.16-26.23), respectively]. On receiver-operating-characteristic-curve analysis, MVOA/MAA ratio <0.31 had a sensitivity of 87 % and a specificity of 60 % for residual MR ≥2+. When patients were classified according to the presence of MLC and an MVOA/MAA ratio <0.31, those with both parameters had significantly higher rates of postprocedural residual MR ≥2+ and mitral reintervention at 1-year than those with only one, and those without both parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with secondary MR undergoing the MitraClip procedure, preprocedural MDCT parameters, specifically MVOA/MAA ratio and MLC, are useful to predict postprocedural residual MR.

Prognostic Value of Ventricular-Arterial Coupling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Midterm Clinical Outcomes.

Background Ventricular-arterial coupling predicts outcomes in patients with heart failure. The arterial elastance to end-systolic elastance ratio (Ea/Ees) is a noninvasively assessed index that reflects ventricular-arterial coupling. We aimed to determine the prognostic value of ventricular-arterial coupling assessed through Ea/Ees after transcatheter aortic valve replacement to predict clinical events. Methods and Results We retrieved data on 1378 patients (70% women) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement between October 2013 and May 2017 from the OCEAN-TAVI (Optimized transCathEter vAlvular iNtervention) Japanese multicenter registry. We determined the association between Ea/Ees and the composite end point of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death by classifying the patients into quartiles based on Ea/Ees values (group 1: <0.326; group 2: 0.326-0.453; group 3: 0.453-0.666; and group 4: >0.666) during the midterm follow-up after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. During a median follow-up period of 736 days (interquartile range, 414-956), there were 247 (17.9%) all-cause deaths, 89 (6.5%) cardiovascular deaths, 130 (9.4%) hospitalizations for heart failure, and 199 (14.4%) composite events of hospitalization for heart failure and cardiovascular death. The incidence of the composite end point was significantly higher in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.76; 95% CI, 1.08-2.87 [P=0.024]), group 3 (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.53-3.86 [P<0.001]), and group 4 (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.83-4.57 [P<0.001]) than that in group 1. On adjusted multivariable Cox analysis, Ea/Ees was significantly associated with composite events (HR, 1.47 per 1-unit increase; 95% CI, 1.08-2.01 [P=0.015]). Conclusions These findings suggest that a higher Ea/Ees at discharge after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with adverse clinical outcomes during midterm follow-up. Registration URL: https://www.upload.umin.ac.jp/. Unique identifier: UMIN000020423.

Usefulness of Computed Tomography to Predict Mitral Stenosis After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair.

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can provide valuable information for preprocedural planning of transcatheter mitral valve interventions. However, no data exists on pre-MDCT parameters predicting high transmitral pressure gradient (TMPG) post-MitraClip procedure. We analyzed the preprocedural MDCTs of 156 consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation undergoing MitraClip implantation at our institution. The mean TMPG was assessed by periprocedural transesophageal and pre-discharge transthoracic echocardiography. MDCT-derived mitral annulus area (MAA), anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) mitral annulus diameters, and mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) were smaller in patients with mean TMPG ≥5 mmHg than those with mean TMPG <5 mmHg after 1-or 2-clip implantation. Small MAA, AP and ML diameters, and MVOA were moderately correlated with high TMPG post-MitraClip, in which MAA and MVOA had the highest degree of correlation after 1-clip (r = -0.46 both), whereas MAA and ML had the strongest degree of correlation after 2-clip (r = -0.39 both) and at discharge (r = -0.38 both). From the receiver-operating-characteristic curve analyses, no significant differences in the area under the curve were observed among these MDCT parameters for low TMPG after MitraClip implantation, except for those between MAA and AP diameter at discharge (p=0.026). For optimal cutoff values, MAA ≥1100 and ≥1300 mm2 had positive predictive values of 89% and 91%, while both MAA ≥750 and ≥900 mm2 had negative predictive values of 100%, for mean TMPG <5 mmHg after 1-and 2-clip implantation, respectively. In conclusion, in patients undergoing the MitraClip procedure, preprocedural MDCT parameters are useful to predict postprocedural mitral stenosis.

Effect of Sex on Mortality and Left Ventricular Remodeling After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: The effect of sex on mortality is controversial; furthermore, sex differences in left ventricular (LV) remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain unknown.Methods and Results:This study included 2,588 patients (1,793 [69.3%] female) enrolled in the Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention (OCEAN)-TAVI Japanese multicenter registry between October 2013 and May 2017. We retrospectively analyzed the effect of sex on mortality, and evaluated changes in the LV mass index (LVMI) after TAVI. Female sex was significantly associated with lower all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (log-rank P<0.001 for both). Multivariate analysis showed that female sex was independently associated with lower cumulative long-term mortality (hazard ratio 0.615; 95% confidence interval 0.512-0.738; P<0.001). Regression in the LVMI was observed in both sexes, and there was no significant difference in the percentage LVMI regression from baseline to 1 year after TAVI between women and men. Women had a survival advantage compared with men among patients with LVMI regression at 1 year, but not among patients with no LVMI regression. CONCLUSIONS: We found that female sex is associated with better survival outcomes after TAVI in a large Japanese registry. Although LVMI regression was observed in women and men after TAVI, post-procedural LV mass regression may be related to the sex differences in mortality.

Comparison between cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients on hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Difficulties are often encountered while controlling atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Previous data revealed that cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) was not inferior to radiofrequency ablation (RFA); however, HD patients were excluded in this prior trial. Thus, the efficacy of CBA for HD patients is still unknown. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed HD patients who underwent catheter ablation (CA) for AF from August 2011 to June 2019. Patients who received CBA (CBA group) and those who received RFA (RFA group) were compared. The primary endpoint was defined as freedom from a composite outcome (a documented recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia or a prescription of antiarrhythmic drugs) at one year after CA. RESULTS: The RFA and CBA groups were composed of 21 and 23 patients, respectively. Freedom from a composite outcome was 58.4% in the RFA group and 68.2% in the CBA group (Log-rank: p = 0.571). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that patients on HD with AF who were treated with CBA tended to have better outcomes than patients treated with RFA. Therefore, CBA could be a suitable ablation method for HD patients.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure.

Optimal timing and outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients presenting with acute heart failure (AHF) remain unclear. In this consecutive cohort of 1,547 patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI, the AHF status at admission was collected, and patients were classified into AHF and elective TAVI groups. In the AHF group, early TAVI was defined as TAVI performed ≤60 hours after emergency room arrival. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30-day and 2-year after TAVI. There were 139 (9%) patients who underwent TAVI while hospitalized with AHF. At baseline, this group had higher rates of chronic kidney disease, higher Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and lower left ventricular ejection fraction. After adjusting for baseline differences, the AHF group had significantly higher all-cause mortality at 30-day and 2-year than the elective TAVI group (8% vs 2%; p = 0.002, and 33% vs 18%; p = 0.002, respectively). In the AHF group, 43 (31%) patients underwent early treatment with TAVI. No significant difference in all-cause mortality at 30-day was observed between early and non-early TAVI groups (5% vs 10%; p = 0.617). All-cause mortality at 2-year was lower in the early TAVI groups (16% vs 40%, log-rank p = 0.022); however, after multivariable adjustment, the difference was barely statistically significant (p = 0.053). In conclusion, TAVI in patients with AHF was associated with worse short and long-term outcomes. In AHF setting, early TAVI did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality at 30-day; however, it showed a strong trend for lower all-cause mortality at 2-year.