Evaluation of Detection and Efficacy of Decontamination of Respiratory Pathogens Including SARS-CoV-2 on Basic Military Trainee Gas Masks.

INTRODUCTION: Basic military trainee (BMT) gas mask training poses a potential mechanism of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. After training, gas masks are decontaminated. Insufficient decontamination can lead to viral transmission in the next training class. To our knowledge, the decontamination process has not been validated for efficacy in removing respiratory pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Inactivated strains of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A and B, and Bordetella pertussis were separately inoculated onto gas masks in the emitter area (n = 5). Pathogen detection in swabs collected from gas masks was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using the BioFire® RP2.1 panel and Biomeme Franklin system. For decontamination efficacy experiments, pathogens were inoculated onto gas masks, and contaminated areas were swabbed before and after decontamination, with detection using both PCR platforms. Lastly, 65 gas masks were swabbed after gas mask training, and again after the trainees and guardians decontaminated the masks, to identify the presence of any respiratory pathogen exhaled onto the gas masks. RESULTS: All four pathogens were detected by both PCR platforms. The BioFire® FilmArray® was more sensitive than the Biomeme platform. Decontamination resulted in undetectable levels of all three viruses. B. pertussis was detected on one mask after decontamination. Experiments with live B. pertussis validated that decontamination eliminated all viable bacteria from gas masks. For BMT sampling, all masks were negative for SARS-CoV-2. One mask tested positive for coronavirus 229E. Once decontaminated, all masks tested negative. CONCLUSIONS: BMT gas masks can be monitored for the presence of respiratory pathogens using RT-PCR. The decontamination process removed all viable respiratory pathogens tested from the gas masks. This study demonstrates that RT-PCR can be used to conduct pathogen surveillance on BMT gas masks after training and that the current decontamination process is effective to eliminate respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV-2.

Comparison of next generation diagnostic systems (NGDS) for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

INTRODUCTION: The World Health Organization (WHO) declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) a pandemic in March 2020. Initially, supply chain disruptions and increased demand for testing led to shortages of critical laboratory reagents and inadequate testing capacity. Thus, alternative means of biosample collection and testing were essential to overcome these obstacles and reduce viral transmission. This study aimed to 1) compare the sensitivity and specificity of Cepheid GeneXpert® IV and BioFire® FilmArray® 2.0 next generation detection systems to detect SARS-CoV-2, 2) evaluate the performance of both platforms using different biospecimen types, and 3) assess saline as an alternative to viral transport media (VTM) for sample collection. METHODS: A total of 1,080 specimens consisting of nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs in VTM, NP swabs in saline, nasal swabs, oropharyngeal (OP) swabs, and saliva were collected from 216 enrollees. Limit of detection (LoD) assays, NP VTM and NP saline concordance, and saliva testing were performed on the BioFire® FilmArray® 2.0 Respiratory Panel 2.1 and Cepheid GeneXpert® Xpress SARS-CoV-2/Flu/RSV assays. RESULTS: LoD and comparative testing demonstrated increased sensitivity with the Cepheid compared with the BioFire® in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in NP VTM and saline, nasal, and OP swabs. Conversely, saliva testing on the Cepheid showed statistically significant lower sensitivity compared to the BioFire® . Finally, NP swabs in saline showed no significant difference compared with NP swabs in VTM on both platforms. CONCLUSION: The Cepheid and BioFire® NGDS are viable options to address a variety of public health needs providing rapid and reliable, point-of-care testing using a variety of clinical matrices.

Evaluating sensitivity and specificity of the Biomeme Franklin™ three9 real-time PCR device and SARS-CoV-2 go-strips assay using clinical samples.

We evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the Biomeme Franklin™ three9 Real-Time PCR Thermocycler and Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 Go-Strips in the detection of SARS-CoV-2. The Biomeme Franklin™ three9 platform is a portable, battery-operated system that could be used in remote settings. We assessed performance of the Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 detection system at a wide range of viral concentrations, examined cross-reactivity of the SARS-CoV-2 Go-Strips against several near-neighbor respiratory pathogens, and evaluated agreement against the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 in four clinical sample types. Our data indicate the Biomeme Go-Strips can reliably detect SARS-CoV-2 at a concentration of 4.2 × 103 copies/mL. No cross reactivity of the Go-Strips targets was detected against any of the tested near-neighbor respiratory pathogens. Cohen's kappa statistics ranged from 0.68 to 0.92 between results from the Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 Go-Strips and the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 in all the different sample types. Compared to the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1, the Biomeme SARS-CoV-2 Go-Strips demonstrated statistically significantly lower sensitivity in 3 out of 5 sample types. Overall, our study demonstrates the Biomeme Franklin™ three9 used with the SARS-CoV-2 Go-Strips is an effective system for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 that could potentially be used in a remote or austere environment.

Polymorphism of RANTES chemokine gene promoter is not associated with long-term nonprogressive HIV-1 infection of more than 16 years.

To examine whether polymorphisms of the RANTES chemokine gene promoter are associated with long-term nonprogressive HIV-1 infection in white Spanish subjects, we performed a cross-sectional genetic association case-control study. Two-hundred sixty-seven white Spaniards were studied: 58 were HIV-1-infected long-term nonprogressors (LTNPs) of more than 16 years, 109 were HIV-1-infected usual progressors (UPs), and 100 were control subjects. Three RANTES single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) at positions -28C>G, -109T>C, and -403G>A were assessed. The prevalence of the CCR5Delta 32 allele was also examined. Genotyping was performed using polymerase chain reaction and automatic sequencing analysis methods. Genotype and allele frequencies between the 3 groups were compared by the chi2 test and the Fisher exact test. The distribution of allelic variants of RANTES in controls, UPs, and LTNPs, respectively, was 3%, 2%, and 5% for -28G; 4%, 2%, and 2% for -109C; and 18%, 18%, and 18% for -403A (P = not significant). The differences were still nonsignificant when we exclusively analyzed individuals not carrying the CCR5Delta32 allele. We conclude that LTNP of more than 16 years is not associated with SNPs in the RANTES gene promoter in white Spanish HIV-1-infected subjects.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV-infected patients with interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin.

One hundred six HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were randomized to receive ribavirin (RBV) 400 mg bid plus interferon alpha-2b (IFN-alpha) at two different doses, 3 mU tiw (control arm) or 5 mU daily for the first 6 weeks, followed by 3 mU tiw until completing 6 months of therapy (induction arm). All patients had CD4 counts above 350 cells/microl and 89% were taking antiretroviral therapy. Adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 12.3% of patients, a rate quite similar to that seen in HCV-monoinfected patients. Negative serum HCV-RNA values (< 60 IU/ml) were recorded in 24.7% and 35.5% of patients at 3 and 6 months of therapy. However, in the intent-to-treat analysis, sustained response was reached by only 16% of patients (22.4% in the on-treatment analysis). No differences between treatment arms were noticed. Patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3 had a 7-fold higher response rate than those with HCV genotypes 1 or 4. Therefore, early, end-of-treatment, and sustained response rates are lower in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients treated with RBV/IFN-alpha combination therapy. Since HCV-related liver disease is currently one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality among HIV-infected patients, new treatment options are urgently needed for coinfected individuals.