RESUMEN
The management of urinary tract infection (UTI) in infants and children has changed significantly over the past few decades based on scientific evidence that questioned the efficacy of strategies used to prevent kidney injury and subsequent progression to chronic kidney disease, which is very unlikely in most paediatric cases. However, there is still substantial heterogeneity in its management and uncertainty regarding the diagnosis, indication of imaging tests, treatment or follow-up in these patients. The Spanish clinical practice guideline has been updated through the review of the literature published since 2009 and a rigorous evaluation of current clinical practice aspects, taking into account the evidence on the benefits of each intervention in addition to its risks and drawbacks to attempt to provide more precise recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Urinarias , Humanos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/terapia , Lactante , Niño , España , Estudios de Seguimiento , PreescolarRESUMEN
Background: Programs that aim to improve the detection hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) should establish which neonates suffering from perinatal asphyxia need to be monitored within the first 6â h of life. Method: An observational prospective cohort study of infants with gestational age ≥35 weeks, and above 1,800g, were included according to their arterial cord pH value (ApH): ≤7.00 vs. 7.01-7.10. Data was collected including obstetrical history, as well as neonatal comorbidities, including the presence of HIE, that happened within 6â h of life. A standardized neurological exam was performed at discharge. Results: There were 9,537 births; 176 infants with ApH 7.01-7.10 and 117 infants with ApH ≤7.00. All 9 cases with moderate-to-severe HIE occurred among infants with ApH ≤7.00. The incidence of global and moderate-severe HIE was 3/1,000 and 1/1,000 births, respectively. Outcome at discharge (abnormal exam or death) showed an OR 12.03 (95% CI 1.53, 94.96) in infants with ApH ≤7.00 compared to ApH 7.01-7.10 cohort. Ventilation support was 5.1 times (95% CI 2.87, 9.03) more likely to be needed by those with cord ApH ≤7.00 compared to those with ApH 7.01-7.10, as well as hypoglycemia (37% vs. 25%; p = 0.026). In 55%, hypoglycemia occurred despite oral and/or intravenous glucose administration had been already initiated. Conclusions: Cord pH 7.00 might be a safe pH cut-off point when developing protocols to monitor infants born with acidemia in order to identify infants with moderate or severe HIE early on. There is non-negligible comorbidity in the ApH ≤7.00 cohort, but also in the 7.01-7.10 cohort.
RESUMEN
Conclusiones de los autores del estudio: la vacuna de proteína F prefusión contra el virus respiratorio sincitial, administrada a embarazadas en el último trimestre de embarazo, previene de infecciones respiratorias graves por dicho virus en sus lactantes, sin efectos adversos de importancia. Comentario de los revisores: la vacuna parece eficaz y segura, aunque las estimaciones de eficacia son imprecisas. Constituye una opción preventiva alternativa a la administración de nirsevimab en el recién nacido, con expectativas de impacto equiparables. (AU)
Authors´ conclusions: prefusion F protein vaccine against respiratory syncytial virus administered to pregnant women in the last trimester of pregnancy prevents this virus severe respiratory infections in their infants, without important adverse effects. Reviewers´ commentary: the vaccine appears effective and safe, although its efficacy estimates are imprecise. It constitutes an alternative preventive option to the administration of nirsevimab in the newborn, with comparable impact expectations. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Bronquiolitis/prevención & control , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The availability in the literature of data related to perinatal variables in the Spanish population is very scarce. The aim of this study was to know the evolution of perinatal health indicators according to the risk groups of prematurity and birth weight, the proportion of multiple births, caesarean section and stillbirths. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of births in eleven hospitals in Castilla y León (January 2015 to June 2020). There were 70,024 newborns from 68,769 deliveries. Jointpoint regression analysis was used to identify changes in trend over the years, and binomial logistic regression was used to adjust for the potential interaction of hospital type, sex, type of delivery and multiple births on the frequencies of prematurity and death. RESULTS: There was a 19.9% decrease in deliveries and a 42% decrease in multiple births, with no change in preterm (7.7%) and stillbirths (0.44%). The percentage of caesarean sections was 21.5% with a slight downward trend over time. Death (stillbirth) was associated with preterm multiple birth; especially with the male-male combination (p<0.05). Late preterm and early term newborns showed higher risk of death compared to term newborns: OR 7.7 (95%CI 5.6-10.7) and 2.4 (95%CI 1.6-3.6), respectively; as well as the low birth weight group (OR 17.6; 95%CI 13.9-22.2) and small for gestational age (OR 3.4; 95%CI 1.9-5.8), compared to those of adequate weight. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the development of the COVID-19 pandemic there is a decline in births, including multiple births, with no change in stillbirths or prematurity. Late preterm and early term newborns are at increased risk of intrauterine death.
OBJETIVO: La disponibilidad en la literatura de datos relacionados con variables perinatales en la población española son muy escasos. El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer la evolución de los indicadores de salud perinatal atendiendo a los grupos de riesgo de prematuridad y de peso al nacimiento, la proporción de parto múltiple, de cesárea y de mortinatos. METODOS: Se realizó un estudio transversal poblacional de los partos en once hospitales de Castilla y León (enero de 2015 a junio de 2020). Hubo 70.024 recién nacidos (RN) procedentes de 68.769 partos. Se utilizó el análisis de regresión Jointpoint para identificar cambios en la tendencia a lo largo de los años, y la regresión logística binomial para ajustar la potencial interacción del tipo de hospital, el sexo, el tipo de parto y el parto múltiple en las frecuencias de prematuridad y de fallecimiento. RESULTADOS: Hubo un descenso de partos del 19,9% y de los múltiples del 42%, sin cambios en los RN prematuros (7,7%) ni en los mortinatos (0,44%). El porcentaje de cesáreas fue del 21,5% con una ligera tendencia temporal descendente. El fallecimiento (mortinato) se asoció al parto múltiple pretérmino; especialmente a la combinación varón-varón (p<0,05). Los RN pretérminos tardíos y términos precoces mostraron mayor riesgo de fallecer frente a los RN a término: OR 7,7 (IC95% 5,6-10,7) y 2,4 (IC95% 1,6-3,6), respectivamente; así como el grupo de bajo peso (OR 17,6; IC95% 13,9-22,2) y el pequeño para la edad gestacional (OR 3,4; IC95% 1,9-5,8), frente a los de peso adecuado. CONCLUSIONES: Previo al desarrollo de la pandemia por COVID-19 existe un descenso de la natalidad, incluidos los partos múltiples, sin cambios en los mortinatos ni en la prematuridad. Los RN pretérminos tardío y términos precoces tienen mayor riesgo de fallecer intraútero.
Asunto(s)
Cesárea , Mortinato , Humanos , Masculino , Embarazo , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Mortinato/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , España/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Fundamentos: La disponibilidad en la literatura de datos relacionados con variables perinatales en la población española son muy escasos. El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer la evolución de los indicadores de salud perinatal atendiendo a los grupos de riesgo de prematuridad y de peso al nacimiento, la proporción de parto múltiple, de cesárea y de mortinatos. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal poblacional de los partos en once hospitales de Castilla y León (enero de 2015 a junio de 2020). Hubo 70.024 recién nacidos (RN) procedentes de 68.769 partos. Se utilizó el análisis de regresiónJointpoint para identificar cambios en la tendencia a lo largo de los años, y la regresión logística binomial para ajustar la potencial interacción del tipo de hospital, el sexo, el tipo de parto y el parto múltiple en las frecuencias de prematuridad y de fallecimiento. Resultados: Hubo un descenso de partos del 19,9% y de los múltiples del 42%, sin cambios en los RN prematuros (7,7%) ni en los mortinatos (0,44%). El porcentaje de cesáreas fue del 21,5% con una ligera tendencia temporal descendente. El fallecimiento (mortinato) se asoció al parto múltiple pretérmino; especialmente a la combinación varón-varón (p<0,05). Los RN pretérminos tardíos y términos precoces mostraron mayor riesgo de fallecer frente a los RN a término: OR 7,7 (IC95% 5,6-10,7) y 2,4 (IC95% 1,6-3,6), respectivamente; así como el grupo de bajo peso (OR 17,6; IC95% 13,9-22,2) y el pequeño para la edad gestacional (OR 3,4; IC95% 1,9-5,8), frente a los de peso adecuado. Conclusiones: Previo al desarrollo de la pandemia por COVID-19 existe un descenso de la natalidad, incluidos los partos múltiples, sin cambios en los mortinatos ni en la prematuridad. Los RN pretérminos tardío y términos precoces tienen mayor riesgo de fallecer intraútero.(AU)
Backgorund: The availability in the literature of data related to perinatal variables in the Spanish population is very scarce. The aim of this study was to know the evolution of perinatal health indicators according to the risk groups of prematurity and birth weight, the proportion of multiple births, caesarean section and stillbirths. Methods: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of births in eleven hospitals in Castilla y León (January 2015 to June 2020). There were 70,024 newborns from 68,769 deliveries. Jointpoint regression analysis was used to identify changes in trend over the years, and binomial logistic regression was used to adjust for the potential interaction of hospital type, sex, type of delivery and multiple births on the frequencies of prematurity and death. Results: There was a 19.9% decrease in deliveries and a 42% decrease in multiple births, with no change in preterm (7.7%) and stillbirths (0.44%). The percentage of caesarean sections was 21.5% with a slight downward trend over time. Death (stillbirth) was associated with preterm multiple birth; especially with the male-male combination (p<0.05). Late preterm and early term newborns showed higher risk of death compared to term newborns: OR 7.7 (95%CI 5.6-10.7) and 2.4 (95%CI 1.6-3.6), respectively; as well as the low birth weight group (OR 17.6; 95%CI 13.9-22.2) and small for gestational age (OR 3.4; 95%CI 1.9-5.8), compared to those of adequate weight. Conclusions: Prior to the development of the COVID-19 pandemic there is a decline in births, including multiple births, with no change in stillbirths or prematurity. Late preterm and early term newborns are at increased risk of intrauterine death.(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Indicadores de Salud , Parto , Epidemiología , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Mortinato/epidemiología , Mortalidad Fetal , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , EspañaRESUMEN
Analizamos la evidencia publicada sobre la eficacia y seguridad de nirsevimab, un anticuerpo monoclonal, empleado para prevenir las infecciones de vías respiratorias bajas (IVRB) por virus respiratorio sincitial (VRS) en el lactante a término. Encontramos un ensayo clínico aleatorizado controlado con placebo doble ciego que incluyó 3012 lactantes, nacidos a término o pretérmino tardío, menores de un año con un seguimiento de al menos 150 días. La calidad de la evidencia se clasificó como baja para IVRB muy grave y moderada para IVRB que precisara asistencia o ingreso. La evidencia se sustenta sobre un escaso número de eventos (para ingresos hospitalarios sólo 29 casos, para IVRB con atención médica 78), por lo que cualquier estimación debe considerarse imprecisa. La eficacia, estimada como reducción relativa del riesgo (RRR) fue del 76,4% (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC 95]: 62,3 a 85,2) para IVRB por VRS y del 76,8% (IC 95: 49,4 a 89,4%) para ingreso. No se encontraron diferencias en cuanto a seguridad. Existen dudas sobre la importancia clínica, por los criterios de gravedad empleados, y sobre su impacto, con un número necesario a tratar para evitar una IVRB con ingreso de 63 y que requiera asistencia médica de 24. Por la información disponible parece una intervención segura, de la que no esperamos efectos adversos comunes, pero no podemos descartar efectos de baja frecuencia. Asimismo, esperamos contar pronto con estimaciones más precisas de eficacia y seguridad (AU)
We reviewed the published evidence on the efficacy and safety of nirsevimab, a monoclonal antibody, used to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) associated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in term infants. We have found a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial that included 3012 infants, born at term or late preterm, less than one year of age with a follow-up of at least 150 days. The quality of the evidence was classified as low for very severe LRTI and moderate for LRTI requiring medical care or admission. The evidence is based on a small number of events (only 29 cases for hospital admissions, 78 for IVRB with medical care), so any estimate must be considered imprecise. Efficacy, estimated as relative risk reduction (RRR) was 76.4% (95% confidence interval [95 CI]: 62.3 to 85.2) for RSV associated LRTI that required medical care and 76.8% (CI 95: 49.4 to 89.4%) for hospital admission. No differences were found in terms of safety. There are doubts about the clinical importance, due to the severity criteria used, and about its impact, with a number needed to treat of 63 to avoid a LRTI with hospital admission and of 24 to avoid LRTI requiring medical care. Based on the available information, it seems a safe intervention, from which we do not expect common adverse effects, but we cannot rule out low-frequency effects. We also expect to have more precise estimates of efficacy and safety soon. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Lactante , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Bronquiolitis Viral/prevención & controlRESUMEN
The worldwide prevalence of asymptomatic coeliac disease (CD) is increasing, which is in part due to the routine screening of children with risk factors. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with CD are at risk of long-term complications. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics of asymptomatic and symptomatic children at the time of CD diagnosis. A case-control study was conducted using data from a cohort of 4838 CD patients recruited from 73 centers across Spain between 2011 and 2017. A total of 468 asymptomatic patients (cases) were selected and matched by age and sex with 468 symptomatic patients (controls). Clinical data, including any reported symptoms, as well as serologic, genetic, and histopathologic data were collected. No significant differences were found between the two groups in most clinical variables, nor in the degree of intestinal lesion. However, the asymptomatic patients were taller (height z-score -0.12 (1.06) vs. -0.45 (1.19), p < 0.001) and were less likely to have anti transglutaminase IgA antibodies ≥ 10 times the upper normal limit (66.2% vs. 758.4%, p = 0.002). Among the 37.1% of asymptomatic patients who were not screened for CD due to the absence of risk factors, only 34% were truly asymptomatic, while the remaining 66% reported non-specific CD-related symptoms. Therefore, expanding CD screening to any child who undergoes a blood test could reduce the burden of care for some children, as many of those considered asymptomatic reported non-specific CD-related symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Celíaca , Niño , Humanos , Enfermedad Celíaca/diagnóstico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Transglutaminasas , Tamizaje Masivo , Inmunoglobulina A , AutoanticuerposRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We present a systematic review on the effectiveness of noninvasive respiratory support techniques in bronchiolitis. DATA SOURCES: Systematic review with pairwise meta-analyses of all studies and network meta-analyses of the clinical trials. STUDY SELECTION: Patients below 24 months old with bronchiolitis who require noninvasive respiratory support were included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCT, and cohort studies in which high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) was compared with conventional low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) and/or noninvasive ventilation (NIV). DATA EXTRACTION: Emergency wards and hospitalized patients with bronchiolitis. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 3,367 patients were analyzed in 14 RCTs and 8,385 patients in 14 non-RCTs studies. Only in nonexperimental studies, HFNC is associated with a lower risk of invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) than NIV (odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.42-0.58), with no differences in experimental studies. There were no differences between HFNC and NIV in other outcomes. HFNC is more effective than LFOT in reducing oxygen days and treatment failure. In the network meta-analyses of clinical trials, NIV was the most effective intervention to avoid invasive MV (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 57.03%) and to reduce days under oxygen therapy (SUCRA, 79.42%), although crossover effect estimates between interventions showed no significant differences. The included studies show methodological heterogeneity, but it is only statistically significant for the reduction of days of oxygen therapy and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental evidence does not suggest that high-flow oxygen therapy has advantages over LFOT as initial treatment nor over NIV as a rescue treatment.
Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis , Ventilación no Invasiva , Humanos , Bronquiolitis/terapia , Cánula , Metaanálisis en Red , Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Oxígeno , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , LactanteRESUMEN
Objetivos: La prevalencia de niños con dificultades en la alimentación (NDA) o malos comedores es alta en nuestro medio, si consideramos la opinión de los padres. Aunque en la mayoría no observamos enfermedad orgánica o repercusión nutricional, es frecuente que este problema repercuta en la dinámica familiar. Nos proponemos estimar su impacto en el estrés, la calidad de vida y el estado de salud psicológica familiar.Métodos: Estudio de casos (NDA) y controles (controles sanos y controles con trastornos digestivos o controles enfermos). Se evaluó el estrés parental y el riesgo de afectación psicológica en estas familias, mediante escalas validadas (Parent Stress Index Short Form y General Health Questionnaire de Goldberg) y una encuesta de opinión a los padres. Resultados: Se recogieron un total de 238 encuestas: 102 correspondientes a controles sanos, 88 con trastornos digestivos y 48 de NDA. El 45,8% de los padres de NDA se consideraban desatendidos por su pediatra y el 47,9% no estaban de acuerdo con sus recomendaciones. El 54,2% de ellos encuentra limitaciones en su vida social, el 25% problemas de pareja, el 47,9% se sienten juzgados por los demás (12,5% por sus propias parejas) sobre cómo manejan la alimentación de su hijo y un 37,5% habían solicitado o considerado ayuda psicológica. Todos estos problemas fueron significativamente más frecuentes que en los controles. Padres y madres de los NDA presentaron con mayor frecuencia riesgo de ansiedad/depresión según el General Health Questionnaire de Goldberg: un 54,2% según valores de referencia (odds ratios ajustadas frente a controles sanos 4,18; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 1,96 a 8,87; frente a controles enfermos odds ratio 6,25; IC95% 2,79 a 13,98) y un 33,3% según los valores de nuestros controles sanos. Asimismo, presentaron mayores puntuaciones de estrés (Parent Stress Index Short Form) que los controles sanos (diferencia de medias ajustada 21; IC95% 12,19 a 29,81) y controles enfermos (AU)
Objectives: The prevalence of feeding disorders (FDs) and picky eating in children is high in our region, based on the parents perceptions. Although organic disease or a nutritional impact is rarely observed in these children, the problem frequently has an effect on family dynamics. We aimed to estimate the impact of these disorders on the stress level, quality of life and psychological health of families. Methods: Study of cases (FDs) and controls (healthy controls and controls with digestive disorders or sick controls). We assessed parental stress and the risk of psychological distress in these families using validated scales (Parent Stress Index Short Form and Goldberg's General Health Questionnaire) and a parental opinion survey. Results: We collected a total of 238 surveys, 102 corresponding to healthy controls, 88 to controls with digestive disorders and 48 to children with FDs. We found that 45.8% of parents in the FD group felt neglected by their paediatricians and 47.9% did not agree with the paediatrician's recommendations. In addition, 54.2% reported limitations to their social life, 25% problems in their relationship, 47.9% feeling judged by others (12.5% by their own partner) for how they managed mealtimes, and 37.5% having sought or considered seeking psychological support. All these problems were significantly more frequent compared to controls. Based on the Goldberg's General Health Questionnaire, the risk of anxiety and depression was more frequent in parents in the FD group: 54.2% compared to the reference (adjusted odds ratio compared to controls, 4.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96-8.87; odds ratio compared to sick controls, 6.25; 95% CI, 2.79-13.98) and 33.3% compared to the healthy control group. They also had higher stress scores (Parent Stress Index Short Form) compared to the healthy control group (adjusted mean difference, 21; 95% CI, 12.19-29.81) and the sick control group (adjusted mean difference, 20; 95% CI, 9.81-30.19).
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Conducta Alimentaria/psicología , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos , Relaciones Madre-Hijo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estado de Salud , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of feeding disorders (FDs) and picky eating in children is high in our region, based on the parents' perceptions. Although organic disease or a nutritional impact is rarely observed in these children, the problem frequently has an effect on family dynamics. We aimed to estimate the impact of these disorders on the stress level, quality of life and psychological health of families. METHODS: Study of cases (FDs) and controls (healthy controls and controls with digestive disorders or other illness). We assessed parental stress and the risk of psychological distress in these families using validated scales (Parent Stress Index Short Form [PSI-SF] and Goldberg's General Health Questionnaire [GHQ-28]) and a parental opinion survey. RESULTS: We collected a total of 238 surveys, 102 corresponding to healthy controls, 88 to controls with digestive disorders and 48 to children with FDs. We found that 45.8% of parents in the FD group felt neglected by their paediatricians and 47.9% did not agree with the paediatrician's recommendations. In addition, 54.2% reported limitations to their social life, 25% problems in their relationship, 47.9% feeling judged by others (12.5% by their own partner) for how they managed mealtimes, and 37.5% having sought or considered seeking psychological support. All these problems were significantly more frequent compared to controls. Based on the GHQ-28, the risk of anxiety and depression was more frequent in parents in the FD group: 54.2% compared to the reference (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] compared to controls, 4.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.96-8.87; OR compared to sick controls, 6.25; 95% CI, 2.79-13.98) and 33.3% compared to the healthy control group. They also had higher stress scores (PSI-SF) compared to the healthy control group (adjusted mean difference [AMD], 21; 95% CI, 12.19-29.81) and the sick control group (AMD, 20; 95% CI, 9.81-30.19). CONCLUSIONS: Parents of children with FDs have a high level of stress and risk of anxiety and depression, with repercussions at the social, family, couple and work levels. The relationship with the paediatrician may also be affected.
Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Cambio Social , Niño , Humanos , Padres/psicología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The main objective of this study was to analyze the degree of knowledge and compliance of Spanish pediatricians with the "do not do" recommendations of the Spanish Association of Pediatrics. A nationwide cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out using a 25-item questionnaire among Spanish pediatricians. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were performed. A total of 1137 pediatricians participated in the study. Most of them were women (75.1%), older than 55 (28.3%), worked in specialized care (56.9%), with public financing (91.2%), and had been working for more than 20 years (44.9%). The median of inappropriate answers per question was 9.1%. The bivariate and multivariate analyses showed that the factors that influenced higher adequacy to the "do not do" recommendations were younger than 45 years, working in specialized care, and working in the public health system. CONCLUSION: This research is the first nationwide study in Spain to analyze the adequacy of "do not do" pediatric clinical recommendations. The study showed a high level of compliance by Spanish pediatricians with these recommendations. However, there is a lack of knowledge in less frequent infectious pathologies such as HIV or fungal infections, in not prolonging antibiotic treatment unnecessarily and directing it appropriately according to the antibiogram results. These aspects may be improved by designing measures to enhance pediatricians' knowledge in these specific aspects. Some demographical factors are related to higher adequacy. Performing this research in other countries may allow assessing the current clinical practice of pediatricians. WHAT IS KNOWN: ⢠Low-value care is defined as care that delivers little or no benefit, may cause patients harm, or outcomes marginal benefits at a disproportionately increased cost. ⢠Few nationwide studies have assessed adherence to "do not do" guidelines, especially in pediatric settings. WHAT IS NEW: ⢠Albeit there is a high level of compliance by Spanish pediatricians with the «do not do¼ recommendations, there is a lack of knowledge in different aspects that may be improved. ⢠Some demographical factors are related to higher adequacy. Performing this research in other countries may allow assessing the current clinical practice of pediatricians.
Asunto(s)
Atención de Bajo Valor , Pediatras , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that greater comfort is achieved using a nebuliser integrated into a high-flow nasal cannula (nebulisation system integrated in high-flow nasal cannula (NHF)) than using a jet nebuliser (JN), and to explore differences in analgesia requirement and the possibility of feeding during nebulisation. DESIGN: Randomised cross-over trial. SETTING: Paediatric intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Children aged <24 months diagnosed with bronchiolitis between November 2016 and May 2017. INTERVENTIONS: Nebulisations using NHF and JN. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: COMFORT-Behaviour Scale (CBS) and Numerical Rating Comfort Scale (NRSc) were used to measure comfort, and Numerical Rating Satisfaction Scale (NRSs) was used to assess satisfaction before, during and after nebulisation. Other variables included feeding, analgesia, need for being held and respiratory and heart rates. RESULTS: Thirty-three children with 233 nebulisations were included in the study. The median age was 3.0 (IQR 2-9) months. Comfort and satisfaction were greater with NHF than with JN. The median staff-recorded CBS, NRSc and NRSs scores for NHF versus JN were 13 (IQR 9-15) vs 17 (IQR 13-23), 8 (IQR 7-0) vs 7 (IQR 4-8), and 4 (IQR 3-4) vs 2 (IQR 2-3), respectively; and caregiver-recorded scores were 12 (IQR 10-15) vs 19 (IQR 13-24), 9 (IQR 7-10) vs 4 (IQR 1-6), and 4 (IQR 3-4) vs 2 (IQR 1-3), respectively (p<0.001). Children who received NHF had lower cardiac and respiratory rates, needed to be held less often during therapy and required less analgesia (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Nebulisation through NHF appears to be a better alternative to JN in terms of comfort and satisfaction as well as making feeding possible during nebulisation.
Asunto(s)
Bronquiolitis , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Estudios Cruzados , Comodidad del Paciente , Bronquiolitis/terapia , CánulaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to assess the association between serological markers and changes of the intestinal mucosa in children with celiac disease (CD). METHODS: Clinical data from CD patients under 15 years old were collected from the participating centers in an on-line multicenter nationwide observational Spanish registry called REPAC-2 (2011-2017). Correlation between anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies (t-TGA) levels and other variables, including mucosal damage and clinical findings (symptoms, age, and gender), was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 2955 of 4838 patients had t-TGA and a small bowel biopsy (SBB) performed for CD diagnosis. A total of 1931 (66.2%) patients with normal IgA values had a Marsh 3b-c lesion and 1892 (64.9%) had t-TGA Immunoglobulin A (IgA) ≥ 10 times upper limit of normal (ULN). There is a statistically significant association between t-TGA IgA levels and the degree of mucosal damage ( P < 0.001), the higher the t-TGA IgA levels the more severe the mucosal damage. Those patients who reported symptoms had more severe mucosal damage ( P = 0.001). On the contrary, there was a negative association between age and changes of the intestinal mucosa ( P < 0.001). No association was found with gender. Regarding the IgA-deficient patients, 47.4% (18 cases) had t-TGA Immunoglobulin A (IgA) ≥ 10 times ULN and a Marsh 3b-c lesion was observed in 68.4% (26 patients). No statistical relation was found between t-TGA IgG levels and the changes of the intestinal mucosa, neither a relation with age, gender, or symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: There is a positive correlation between t-TGA IgA levels and the severity of changes of the intestinal mucosa. Such correlation was not found in IgA-deficient patients who had positive t-TGA IgG serology. The results in this group of patients support the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition recommendations about the need of performing a SBB in IgA-deficient individuals despite high t-TGA IgG levels.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Celíaca , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Autoanticuerpos , Biopsia , Enfermedad Celíaca/diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina A , Inmunoglobulina G , TransglutaminasasRESUMEN
Presentamos el resumen de las principales modificaciones surgidas en la guía de práctica clínica «COVID-19 en Pediatría» entre su versión inicial publicada en el año 2021 y la publicada en el año 2022. El documento se ha elaborado siguiendo los pasos estructurados de la medicina basada en la evidencia e incorporando el sistema GRADE para realizar síntesis de la evidencia, con valoración de su calidad y, cuando se consideró apropiado, emitir recomendaciones jerarquizadas (en función de la calidad de la evidencia, los valores y preferencias, el balance entre beneficios, riesgos y costes, la equidad y la factibilidad). En esta actualización se incluyen también los cambios recomendados por los revisores externos. Se sintetizan las principales modificaciones en los siguientes apartados: epidemiología, clínica, diagnóstico, prevención, tratamiento y vacunas. En el conjunto del conocimiento alcanzado a lo largo del primer año de pandemia, las publicaciones durante el segundo año añaden nuevos datos, sin que en muchas de las áreas se produzcan modificaciones sustanciales. Los principales cambios acaecen en el campo de investigación de las vacunas. Esta actualización finaliza en diciembre de 2021, coincidiendo con el aumento de la infección por ómicron, por lo que será necesario una futura actualización del documento.(AU)
We present a summary of the main modifications to the «COVID-19 in Paediatrics» clinical practice guideline made from its initial version, published in 2021, and the version published in 2022. The document was developed following the structured steps of evidence-based medicine and applying the GRADE system to synthesize the evidence, assess its quality and, when appropriate, issue graded recommendations (based on the quality of the evidence, values and preferences, the balance between benefits, risks and costs, equity and feasibility). This update also includes the modifications proposed by external reviewers.We summarised the main modifications in the following sections: epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, prevention, treatment and vaccines. In relation to the body of knowledge achieved in the first year of the pandemic, the literature published in the second year contributed additional data, but without substantial modifications in many of the areas. The main changes took place in the field of vaccine research. This update was completed in December 2021, coinciding with the emergence of infections by the omicron variant, so the document will need to be updated in the future. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Pandemias , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Coronavirus Relacionado al Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Severo , Pediatría , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Vacunación MasivaRESUMEN
We present a summary of the main modifications to the «COVID-19 in Paediatrics¼ clinical practice guideline made from its initial version, published in 2021, and the version published in 2022. The document was developed following the structured steps of evidence-based medicine and applying the GRADE system to synthesize the evidence, assess its quality and, when appropriate, issue graded recommendations (based on the quality of the evidence, values and preferences, the balance between benefits, risks and costs, equity and feasibility). This update also includes the modifications proposed by external reviewers.We summarised the main modifications in the following sections: epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, prevention, treatment and vaccines. In relation to the body of knowledge achieved in the first year of the pandemic, the literature published in the second year contributed additional data, but without substantial modifications in many of the areas. The main changes took place in the field of vaccine research. This update was completed in December 2021, coinciding with the emergence of infections by the omicron variant, so the document will need to be updated in the future.
RESUMEN
We present a summary of the main modifications to the "COVID-19 in Paediatrics" clinical practice guideline made from its initial version, published in 2021, and the version published in 2022. The document was developed following the structured steps of evidence-based medicine and applying the GRADE system to synthesize the evidence, assess its quality and, when appropriate, issue graded recommendations (based on the quality of the evidence, values and preferences, the balance between benefits, risks and costs, equity and feasibility). This update also includes the modifications proposed by external reviewers. We summarised the main modifications in the following sections: epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, prevention, treatment and vaccines. In relation to the body of knowledge achieved in the first year of the pandemic, the literature published in the second year contributed additional data, but without substantial modifications in many the areas. The main changes took place in the field of vaccine research. This update was completed in December 2021, coinciding with the emergence of infections by the omicron variant, so the document will need to be updated in the future.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pediatría , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Humanos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Introducción: Evaluar el impacto de la incorporación de la oxigenoterapia de alto flujo (OAF) en pacientes ingresados con bronquiolitis aguda en un hospital sin unidad de cuidados intensivos pediátricos (UCIP). Material y métodos: Estudio de cohortes con control histórico de bronquiolitis ingresadas en un hospital de segundo nivel, antes (2009-2012) y después (2015-2020) de la introducción de OAF. La medida principal de efecto fue necesidad de traslado a UCIP. Resultados: Se incluyeron 301 pacientes. En el 64,7% se identificó virus respiratorio sincitial y en el 0,3%, virus de la gripe. No se observaron diferencias en la edad ni en la comorbilidad entre períodos. La media de la estancia en planta fue de 3,67días (desviación estándar [DE]: 2,10) en la primera etapa y de 4,00 días (DE: 2,35) en la segunda etapa. Fueron trasladados a UCIP tres pacientes en el período 2009-2012 (2,6%) y 13 pacientes (9,4%) en el período 2015-2020, lo que supuso un importante aumento de riesgo (riesgo relativo 3,58; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 1,04 a 12,27), aunque no significativo en los análisis ajustados (odds ratio: 3,48; IC95%: 0,95 a 12,72).También se observó un aumento significativo de reingresos (del 5,3 al 13,7%) y un acortamiento del tiempo hasta el traslado. Conclusiones: La incorporación de la OAF en planta no se asoció a menor riesgo de traslado a UCIP ni a menor duración de la oxigenoterapia. En ausencia de evidencia que apoye la eficacia y eficiencia de la OAF y establezca sus indicaciones, debemos revaluar su uso. (AU)
Introduction: To estimate the impact of the incorporation of high-flow nasal cannule (HFNC) in patients admitted with acute bronchiolitis in a hospital without pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Material and methods: Cohort study with historical control of bronchiolitis in a second-level hospital, before (2009-2012) and after (2015-2020) the implementation of HFNC. The main outcome was the need for admission to the PICU. Results: 301 patients were included. Respiratory syncytial viruses were identified in 64.7% of them and influenza viruses in 0.3%. No differences in age nor comorbility between periods were observed. The average stay was 3.67days (standard deviation [SE]: 2.10) in the first period and 4.00 days (SE: 2.35) in the second. Three patients were transferred to PICU (2.6%) before the availability of HFNC and 13 patients (9.4%) after, which supposed an important increase of the risk (relative risk 3.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 12.27), although not significant in adjusted analyses (odds ratio 3.48; 95%CI: 0.95 to 12.72). A significant increase in readmission risk was also observed (from 5.3% to 13.7%) and a shortening of the time to transfer. Conclusions: The incorporation of HFNC was not associated with a lower risk of transfer to PICU nor a shorter length of oxygen therapy. In the absence of evidence, that supports the effectiveness and efficiency of the HFNC and establishes its indications, we must reassess its use.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Lactante , Ciencias de la Salud , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno , Bronquiolitis , Estudios de Cohortes , Bronquiolitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Bronquiolitis/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: To estimate the impact of the incorporation of high-flow nasal cannule (HFNC) in patients admitted with acute bronchiolitis in a hospital without pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cohort study with historical control of bronchiolitis in a second-level hospital, before (2009-2012) and after (2015-2020) the implementation of HFNC. The main outcome was the need for admission to the PICU. RESULTS: 301 patients were included. Respiratory syncytial viruses were identified in 64.7% of them and influenza viruses in 0.3%. No differences in age nor comorbility between periods were observed. The average stay was 3.67 days (standard deviation [SE] 2.10) in the first period and 4.00 days (SE 2.35) in the second. Three patients were transferred to UCIP (2.6%) before the availability of HFCN and 13 patients (9.4%) after, which supposed an important increase of the risk (relative risk 3.58; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 1.04-12.27), although not significant in adjusted analyses (Odds ratio 3.48; IC95% 0.95-12.72). A significant increase in readmission risk was also observed (from 5.3%-13.7%) and a shortening of the time to transfer. CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of HFNC was not associated with a lower risk of transfer to PICU nor a shorter length of oxygen therapy. In the absence of evidence, that supports the effectiveness and efficiency of the HFNC and establishes its indications, we must reassess its use.