Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Nivolumab in Patients With Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression: A Multicenter, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis often induces an immunosuppressive state, which is associated with high mortality rates. Immunostimulation may be beneficial for sepsis. We investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of nivolumab, a human programmed death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of several cancers. METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label phase 1/2 study, a single 480 or 960 mg nivolumab dose was intravenously infused into Japanese patients with immunosuppressive sepsis. Doses were selected to mimic the exposure achieved with the approved dosage for cancer patients (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks [Q2W]). RESULTS: Single 480 and 960 mg nivolumab doses were intravenously infused into five and eight patients, respectively. The maximum concentration after 480 mg (132 µg/mL) was similar to the predicted concentration at the end of infusion with 3 mg/kg Q2W (117 µg/mL). The concentration on Day 28 after 960 mg (33.1 µg/mL) was within the predicted trough concentration range for 3 mg/kg Q2W (90% prediction interval 19.0-163 µg/mL). Absolute lymphocyte counts and monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR subtype expression levels appeared to increase over time. The incidences of adverse events (AEs) were 80% and 50% in the 480 mg and 960 mg groups, respectively. Drug-related AEs were observed in only one patient in the 480 mg group. No deaths related to nivolumab occurred. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of 960 mg nivolumab appeared to be well tolerated and sufficient to maintain nivolumab blood concentrations. Both 480 mg and 960 mg nivolumab seemed to improve immune system indices over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JAPIC, JapicCTI-173600.

Effects of the Intravenous Calcimimetic Etelcalcetide on Bone Turnover and Serum Fibroblast Growth Factor 23: Post Hoc Analysis of an Open-label Study.

PURPOSE: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a serious complication that increases the risk of bone disorders in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing hemodialysis. Etelcalcetide is the first injectable calcimimetic approved for treatment of SHPT, which reduces bone turnover markers and suppresses intact fibroblast growth factor 23 (iFGF-23). This study aimed to explore the associations between etelcalcetide-induced changes in circulating factors and serum iFGF-23 levels. METHODS: This study was a post hoc analysis of data from a previous multicenter, open-label study of etelcalcetide administered to 191 Japanese patients with SHPT undergoing hemodialysis for 52 weeks. Correlations were analyzed between changes from baseline in serum iFGF-23 and serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), corrected calcium, phosphate, bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b), and 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25[OH]2D) levels at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months. Akaike's Information Criterion (AIC) was calculated using serum iPTH, corrected calcium, phosphate, BAP, TRACP-5b, and 1,25(OH)2D levels as potential predictor variables at each time point. Four models with the smallest AIC at the 3-month time point were chosen as the fitted models to predict changes in iFGF-23 levels, and stepwise multivariate analysis was performed to determine the predictor variables with the greatest contribution to the change in iFGF-23 levels by calculating the partial coefficients of determination. FINDINGS: The etelcalcetide-induced reduction in iFGF-23 was positively correlated with serum levels of corrected calcium and phosphate and negatively with BAP. By calculating the AIC, corrected calcium, phosphate, iPTH, BAP, and TRACP-5b were suggested to be predictors of iFGF-23 levels. Stepwise multivariate analysis found that phosphate, corrected calcium, BAP, and TRACP-5b correlated with iFGF-23, in order from strongest to weakest. IMPLICATIONS: These results suggest that etelcalcetide effectively lowered iFGF-23 and that this reduction may occur via improvements in phosphate, corrected calcium, BAP, and TRACP-5b. Etelcalcetide is thus a promising calcimimetic for decreasing iFGF-23 and improving bone turnover in patients with CKD undergoing hemodialysis with severe SHPT, in addition to decreasing PTH itself. JapicCTI identifier: 142,665.

Long-term effects of etelcalcetide as intravenous calcimimetic therapy in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a serious major complication in hemodialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. Long-term maintenance of serum phosphate, calcium, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels in appropriate ranges in these patients is a major challenge. We investigated the efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with etelcalcetide, a novel intravenous calcimimetic, in Japanese SHPT patients on long-term hemodialysis. METHODS: This study was a multicenter open-label study. A total of 191 hemodialysis patients with serum intact PTH (iPTH) > 240 pg/mL were enrolled. Etelcalcetide was administered thrice weekly for 52 weeks, with an initial dose of 5 mg and flexibility to adjust the dose between 2.5 and 15 mg and to adjust the dosing of concomitant medications for SHPT. The efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with serum iPTH decreased to the target range (60-240 pg/mL). RESULTS: Serum iPTH levels decreased immediately after etelcalcetide was started. At the end of the study, 87.5% (95% confidence interval 81.4-92.2; 140/160 patients) of patients achieved target serum iPTH levels, with control of serum calcium and phosphate levels. Adverse events, mostly mild to moderate, were reported by 96.8% of patients and led to study discontinuation in 7.4% of patients. Nausea, vomiting, and symptomatic hypocalcemia were found in 4.7, 9.5, and 1.1%, with 0.5, 1.1, and 1.1% considered treatment-related. CONCLUSIONS: Etelcalcetide effectively maintained serum iPTH, calcium, and phosphate levels in appropriate ranges with concomitant medications for SHPT for 52 weeks in Japanese hemodialysis patients, and was safe and well tolerated. REGISTRATION NUMBER: JapicCTI-142665.

A Single- and Multiple-Dose, Multicenter Study of Etelcalcetide in Japanese Hemodialysis Patients With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism.

INTRODUCTION: The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety and tolerability profile of etelcalcetide (ONO-5163/AMG 416), a novel, i.v., long-acting calcium-sensing receptor agonist, were studied in Japanese hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisted of a single dose part and a multiple dose (3 times weekly for 4 weeks) part. Major inclusion criteria were hemodialysis for at least 90 days, serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) ≥ 300 pg/ml, and serum albumin-corrected Ca (cCa) ≥ 9.0 mg/dl. There were 3 single-dose cohorts (n = 6 each) randomized 2:1 to 5, 10, or 20 mg etelcalcetide or placebo, and 2 multiple-dose cohorts (n = 11 each) randomized 8:3 to 2.5 or 5 mg etelcalcetide or placebo. RESULTS: Etelcalcetide plasma concentration decreased rapidly after i.v. administration, generally remained stable from 24 hours postdose to the next dialysis, and then decreased by dialysis. Etelcalcetide exposure increased dose proportionally. Etelcalcetide plasma predialysis concentration reached almost steady state at week 4. A single dose of etelcalcetide dose-dependently reduced serum iPTH in 30 minutes, and the reduction reached a plateau at 1 hour that lasted until 8 hours. The percent change from baseline serum iPTH thereafter showed a trend to gradually decrease; it was still -30% or greater on day 3. Similar results were obtained at the last injection (days 27-29) of the multiple dose. The effect of the multiple dose was sustained during the interdialytic period. Etelcalcetide decreased serum cCa in a more gradual but dose-dependent and sustained manner. DISCUSSION: Etelcalcetide dose-dependently reduced serum iPTH and serum cCa. Moreover, the effect was sustained in the interdialytic period.

A 12-week dose-escalating study of etelcalcetide (ONO-5163/AMG 416), a novel intravenous calcimimetic, for secondary hyperparathyroidism in Japanese hemodialysis patients
.

AIMS: To evaluate dose-escalation of etelcalcetide (ONO-5163/AMG 416), a novel, intravenous (IV), long-acting calcium-sensing receptor agonist, for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) in Japanese hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicenter study, IV injections of etelcalcetide (3 times a week for 12 weeks) were administered, with dose escalation every 4 weeks depending on changes in serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and corrected calcium (cCa). A total of 24 patients participated in this study. RESULTS: Serum iPTH was reduced in a time- and dose-dependent manner, with reductions (in pg/mL) at 12 weeks of -226.1 ± 125.3, -362.5 ± 161.5, and -412.4 ± 130.2, respectively, for maximum doses of 5, 10, and 15 mg. At the end of the treatment, 50% of patients had serum iPTH levels within the target range (60 - 240 pg/mL). Serum cCa and phosphorus were reduced in parallel with iPTH. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 20 patients (83.3%). The most frequently observed AEs (> 10%) were either mild or moderate nasopharyngitis (29.2%), decreased serum calcium (16.7%), and vomiting (12.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Dose-escalated triweekly etelcalcetide was effective for SHPT in Japanese hemodialysis patients and was satisfactorily tolerated.
.

A phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etelcalcetide (ONO-5163/AMG 416), a novel intravenous calcimimetic, for secondary hyperparathyroidism in Japanese haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a major complication associated with chronic kidney disease. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of etelcalcetide (ONO-5163/AMG 416), a novel intravenous calcimimetic, in Japanese haemodialysis patients with SHPT. METHODS: In this phase 3, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, etelcalcetide was administered three times per week at an initial dose of 5 mg, and subsequently adjusted to doses between 2.5 and 15 mg at 4-week intervals for 12 weeks. A total of 155 SHPT patients with serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels ≥300 pg/mL were assigned to receive etelcalcetide (n = 78) or placebo (n = 77). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with decreased serum iPTH to the target range proposed by the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy (60-240 pg/mL). The major secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients with ≥30% reductions in serum iPTH from baseline. RESULTS: The proportion of patients meeting the primary endpoint was significantly higher for etelcalcetide (59.0%) versus placebo (1.3%). Similarly, the proportion of patients meeting the major secondary endpoint was significantly higher for etelcalcetide (76.9%) versus placebo (5.2%). Serum albumin-corrected calcium, phosphorus and intact fibroblast growth factor-23 levels were decreased in the etelcalcetide group. Nausea, vomiting and symptomatic hypocalcaemia were mild with etelcalcetide. Serious adverse events related to etelcalcetide were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of etelcalcetide. As the only available intravenous calcium-sensing receptor agonist, etelcalcetide is likely to provide a new treatment option for SHPT in haemodialysis patients.

A Bayesian meta-analytic approach for safety signal detection in randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Meta-analyses are frequently performed on adverse event data and are primarily used for improving statistical power to detect safety signals. However, in the evaluation of drug safety for New Drug Applications, simple pooling of adverse event data from multiple clinical trials is still commonly used. We sought to propose a new Bayesian hierarchical meta-analytic approach based on consideration of a hierarchical structure of reported individual adverse event data from multiple randomized clinical trials. METHODS: To develop our meta-analysis model, we extended an existing three-stage Bayesian hierarchical model by including an additional stage of the clinical trial level in the hierarchical model; this generated a four-stage Bayesian hierarchical model. We applied the proposed Bayesian meta-analysis models to published adverse event data from three premarketing randomized clinical trials of tadalafil and to a simulation study motivated by the case example to evaluate the characteristics of three alternative models. RESULTS: Comparison of the results from the Bayesian meta-analysis model with those from Fisher's exact test after simple pooling showed that 6 out of 10 adverse events were the same within a top 10 ranking of individual adverse events with regard to association with treatment. However, more individual adverse events were detected in the Bayesian meta-analysis model than in Fisher's exact test under the body system "Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders." Moreover, comparison of the overall trend of estimates between the Bayesian model and the standard approach (odds ratios after simple pooling methods) revealed that the posterior median odds ratios for the Bayesian model for most adverse events shrank toward values for no association. Based on the simulation results, the Bayesian meta-analysis model could balance the false detection rate and power to a better extent than Fisher's exact test. For example, when the threshold value of the posterior probability for signal detection was set to 0.8, the false detection rate was 41% and power was 88% in the Bayesian meta-analysis model, whereas the false detection rate was 56% and power was 86% in Fisher's exact test. LIMITATIONS: Adverse events under the same body system were not necessarily positively related when we used "system organ class" and "preferred term" in the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities as a hierarchical structure of adverse events. For the Bayesian meta-analysis models to be effective, the validity of the hierarchical structure of adverse events and the grouping of adverse events are critical. CONCLUSION: Our proposed meta-analysis models considered trial effects to avoid confounding by trial and borrowed strength from both within and across body systems to obtain reasonable and stable estimates of an effect measure by considering a hierarchical structure of adverse events.