Bacterial growth and ceftriaxone activity in individual ascitic fluids in an in vitro model of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

Introduction: The environment of the infection site affects bacterial growth and antibiotic activity. When bacterial growth and antibiotic activity are studied in body fluids, samples of multiple subjects are usually pooled, averaging out potentially relevant differences in composition. The ascitic fluid (AF) environment is frequently associated with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) in cirrhotic patients. In this study, bacterial growth and ceftriaxone activity were evaluated in individual AF using an in vitro model of SBP, reflecting the environment and pharmacokinetics at the infection site. Methods: AF was obtained from nine cirrhotic patients with non-infected ascites. Growth of nine bacterial strains (three Escherichia coli, four Staphylococcus aureus, one Enterococcus faecalis, and one Klebsiella pneumoniae) in individual AF was assessed and correlated with biomarkers including potential risk factors for SBP. Ceftriaxone time-kill experiments, in which the pharmacokinetic profile observed in AF following a 1 g intravenous infusion was replicated, were performed with two E. coli and two S. aureus isolates with minimum inhibitory concentrations around the ceftriaxone resistance breakpoint. Results: Significant correlations were found between bacterial growth and AF levels of protein (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ρ = -0.35), albumin (ρ = -0.31), and complement C3c (ρ = -0.28), and serum levels of bilirubin (ρ = 0.39) and aspartate aminotransferase (ρ = 0.25). Ceftriaxone was active in AF, even against resistant isolates, generally resulting in ≥2 log reductions in bacterial count within 24 h. Conclusion: Ascites patients may be predisposed to or protected against SBP based on the antimicrobial capacity of their AF. Ceftriaxone at clinical AF concentrations is active in the AF environment.

MxA for differentiating viral and bacterial infections in adults: a prospective, exploratory study.

PURPOSE: Inappropriate antibiotic prescription in patients with viral infections contributes to the surge of antibiotic resistance. Viral infections induce the expression of the antiviral protein MxA in monocytes, which is a promising biomarker to differentiate between viral and bacterial diseases. In this prospective, exploratory study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic value of monocyte MxA expression in adults with viral, bacterial or co-infections. METHODS: We measured monocyte MxA expression using flow cytometry in a cohort of 61 adults with various viral, bacterial and co-infections including patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy. RESULTS: Monocyte MxA expression in virus-infected patients was significantly higher compared to bacterial infections (83.3 [66.8, 109.4] vs. 33.8 [29.3, 47.8] mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]; p < 0.0001) but not co-infections (53.1 [33.9, 88.9] MFI). At a threshold of 62.2 MFI, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to differentiate between viral and bacterial infections was 0.9, with a sensitivity and specificity of 92.3% and 84.6%, respectively. Immunosuppressive therapy did not affect monocyte MxA expression in virus-infected patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings corroborate the diagnostic performance of MxA in differentiating viral and bacterial infections but also point to an important caveat of MxA in viral-bacterial co-infections. This study extends previous reports and indicates that MxA is also a useful biomarker in immunocompromised patients.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics and stability of generics of cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam with their respective originator drugs: an intravenous bioequivalence study in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy and quality of generic antibacterial drug formulations are often questioned by both healthcare specialists and patients. Therefore, the present study investigated the interchangeability of generic drugs with their originators by comparing bioequivalence parameters and stability data of generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam with their respective originator drugs. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, crossover bioequivalence study, three groups of 12 healthy volunteers each received a single intravenous infusion of either 2 g of cefepime or 4.5 g of piperacillin/tazobactam and two generic formulations, or 600 mg of linezolid and one generic formulation. Plasma sampling was performed, with a 5 day washout period between study days. Stability was tested by storing reconstituted generic and originator products according to their own storage specifications and those of the comparator products. All concentrations were measured by LC-MS. RESULTS: Similar ratios of generic/originator (90% CI) Cmax were observed for Cefepime-MIP/Maxipime [93.7 (88.4-99.4)], Cefepime Sandoz/Maxipime [95.9 (89.1-103.2)], Linezolid Kabi/Zyvoxid [104.5 (91.1-119.9)], Piperacillin Kabi/Tazobac [95.9 (90.4-101.7)], Piperacillin Aurobindo/Tazobac [99.7 (84.9-104.7)], Tazobactam Kabi/Tazobac [93.4 (87.4-99.8)] and Tazobactam Aurobindo/Tazobac [97.4 (89.7-105.8)]. Accordingly, similar ratios of AUC0-t were observed for Cefepime-MIP/Maxipime [91.1 (87.6-94.8)], Cefepime Sandoz/Maxipime [97.9 (92.5-103.5)], Linezolid Kabi/Zyvoxid [99.7 (93.3-106.6)], Piperacillin Kabi/Tazobac [92.2 (88.3-96.3)], Piperacillin Aurobindo/Tazobac [99.9 (97.0-102.8)], Tazobactam Kabi/Tazobac [91.4 (86.4-96.7)] and Tazobactam Aurobindo/Tazobac [98.8 (94.3-103.6)]. Stable and similar concentrations were measured for all contiguous substances, regardless of storage conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with their respective originator drugs, generic cefepime, linezolid and piperacillin/tazobactam met the predetermined bioequivalence criteria. All formulations were stable under the storage conditions of their respective comparators.

Microdosing as a Potential Tool to Enhance Clinical Development of Novel Antibiotics: A Tissue and Plasma PK Feasibility Study with Ciprofloxacin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In microdose studies, drug pharmacokinetics is measured in humans after administration of subtherapeutic doses. While previous microdose studies focused primarily on plasma pharmacokinetics, we set out to evaluate the feasibility of microdosing for a pharmacokinetic assessment in subcutaneous tissue and epithelial lining fluid. METHODS: Healthy subjects received a single intravenous bolus injection of a microdose of [14C]ciprofloxacin (1.1 µg, 7 kBq) with (cohort A, n = 9) or without (cohort B, n = 9) a prior intravenous infusion of a therapeutic dose of unlabeled ciprofloxacin (400 mg). Microdialysis and bronchoalveolar lavage were applied for determination of subcutaneous and intrapulmonary drug concentrations. Microdose [14C]ciprofloxacin was quantified by accelerator mass spectrometry and therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin (cohort A) in plasma, subcutaneous tissue, and epithelial lining fluid was in accordance with previous data. In plasma and subcutaneous tissue, the dose-adjusted area under the concentration-time curve of microdose ciprofloxacin was similar in cohorts A and B and within an 0.8-fold to 1.1-fold range of the area under the concentration-time curve of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin. Penetration of microdose ciprofloxacin into subcutaneous tissue was similar in cohorts A and B and comparable to that of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin with subcutaneous tissue-to-plasma area under the concentration-time curve ratios of 0.44, 0.44, and 0.38, respectively. Penetration of microdose ciprofloxacin into epithelial lining fluid was highly variable and failed to predict the epithelial lining fluid penetration of therapeutic-dose ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the feasibility of microdosing for pharmacokinetic measurements in plasma and subcutaneous tissue. Microdosing combined with microdialysis is a potentially useful tool in clinical antimicrobial drug development, but its applicability for the assessment of pulmonary pharmacokinetics with bronchoalveolar lavage requires further studies. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03177720 (registered 6 June, 2017).

Microdialysis as a potential tool for comparative assessment of tissue pharmacokinetics of two different patches containing lidocaine: A crossover pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: Lidocaine 5% patches are approved for the treatment of post-herpetic neuralgia in adults. Little information is available on the penetration of lidocaine into skin and skin-related soft tissue, which are thought to be closer to the site where lidocaine exerts its pharmacological action on neuronal structures. This pilot study investigated subcutaneous and systemic pharmacokinetics of lidocaine during topical application of two different lidocaine 5% patches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized two-way, two-period crossover study assessed lidocaine concentrations in subcutaneous tissue (by microdialysis) and plasma of n = 5 healthy subjects during 12-hour-long applications of a recently developed lidocaine 5% patch (Laboratorios Gebro Pharma, SA, Barcelona, Spain) and a marketed reference patch (Versatis 5% lidocaine patch, Grünenthal, Brunn am Gebirge, Austria), respectively. RESULTS: Lidocaine was detectable in subcutaneous tissue within 60 minutes from start of patch application, and in plasma only after a marked delay. The test formulation led to increased exposure to lidocaine in both subcutaneous tissue and plasma. CONCLUSION: This study has underscored the potential of microdialysis to comparatively assess the pharmacokinetics of two different drug formulations and encourages its further use in this area.

A phase I study assessing the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering activity of immunotherapeutics targeting PCSK9.

PURPOSE: AT04A and AT06A are two AFFITOPE® peptide vaccine candidates being developed for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia by inducing proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)-specific antibodies. This study aimed to investigate safety, tolerability, antibody development, and reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) following four subcutaneous immunizations. METHODS: This phase I, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in a total of 72 healthy subjects with a mean fasting LDLc level at baseline of 117.1 mg/dL (range 77-196 mg/dL). Each cohort enrolled 24 subjects to receive three priming immunizations at weeks 0, 4, and 8 and to receive a single booster immunization at week 60 of either AT04A, AT06A, or placebo. In addition to safety (primary objective), the antigenic peptide- and PCSK9-specific antibody response and the impact on LDLc were evaluated over a period of 90 weeks. RESULTS: The most common systemic treatment-related adverse events (AEs) reported were fatigue, headache, and myalgia in 75% of subjects in the AT06A group and 58% and 46% of subjects in the placebo and AT04A groups, respectively. Injection site reactions (ISR) representing 63% of all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), were transient and mostly of mild or moderate intensity and rarely severe (3%). Both active treatments triggered a robust, long-lasting antibody response towards the antigenic peptides used for immunization that optimally cross-reacted with the target epitope on PCSK9. In the AT04A group, a reduction in serum LDLc was observed with a mean peak reduction of 11.2% and 13.3% from baseline compared to placebo at week 20 and 70 respectively, and over the whole study period, the mean LDLc reduction for the AT04A group vs. placebo was -7.2% (95% CI [-10.4 to -3.9], P < 0.0001). In this group, PCSK9 target epitope titers above 50 were associated with clinically relevant LDLc reductions with an individual maximal decrease of 39%. CONCLUSIONS: Although both AT04A and AT06 were safe and immunogenic, only AT04A demonstrated significant LDLc-lowering activity, justifying further development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT: 2015-001719-11. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02508896.

A Longitudinal Seroprevalence Study Evaluating Infection Control and Prevention Strategies at a Large Tertiary Care Center with Low COVID-19 Incidence.

Personal protective equipment and adherence to disinfection protocols are essential to prevent nosocomial severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) transmission. Here, we evaluated infection control measures in a prospective longitudinal single-center study at the Vienna General Hospital, the biggest tertiary care center in Austria, with a structurally planned low SARS-CoV-2 exposure. SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies were assessed by Abbott ARCHITECT chemiluminescent assay (CLIA) in 599 health care workers (HCWs) at the start of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in early April and two months later. Neutralization assay confirmed CLIA-positive samples. A structured questionnaire was completed at both visits assessing demographic parameters, family situation, travel history, occupational coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) exposure, and personal protective equipment handling. At the first visit, 6 of 599 participants (1%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies. The seroprevalence increased to 1.5% (8/553) at the second visit and did not differ depending on the working environment. Unprotected SARS-CoV-2 exposure (p = 0.003), positively tested family members (p = 0.04), and travel history (p = 0.09) were more frequently reported by positively tested HCWs. Odds for COVID-19 related symptoms were highest for congestion or runny nose (p = 0.002) and altered taste or smell (p < 0.001). In conclusion, prevention strategies proved feasible in reducing the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from patients and among HCWs in a low incidence hospital, not exceeding the one described in the general population.

Unexpected complete recovery of a patient with severe tick-borne encephalitis treated with favipiravir.

We report a case of tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) in a 22-year-old man, who was admitted to the Medical University of Vienna hospital with severe meningoencephalitis, unresponsive and dependent on a respirator. He had given a history of a recent tick bite, but because he had previously received a full course of vaccination against TBE, West Nile virus infection was suspected. Because the antiviral drug favipiravir has been reported to be active against WNV, therapy was initiated, and continued even after a diagnosis of TBE was confirmed, due to significant improvement of symptoms. Within days, the patient's symptoms resolved, and he was discharged after complete recovery at 15 days after onset. Although this single case does not permit any conclusion as to the role of favipiravir in the favorable outcome, it suggests that the drug should be further evaluated in laboratory animal models and in appropriate clinical settings.

Impact of different antimycotics on cytokine levels in an in vitro aspergillosis model in human whole blood.

BACKGROUND: Although fungal infections play a central role in severely ill and immunosuppressed patients, in contrast to antibiotics immunomodulatory effects of antifungals have not been sufficiently investigated. The present study sets out to compare the effect of different antimycotics on immunologic reaction towards mold in vitro. MATERIALS/METHODS: Aspergillus fumigatus ATCC204305 was used to develop a model of invasive aspergillosis in vitro in whole blood. Since autoclaved hyphal suspension demonstrated the most potent cytokine release, they were used for the further study including blood of 20 male volunteers. Impact on IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α time concentration profiles by 5 mg/mL conventional and liposomal amphotericin B, 20 mg/mL fluconazole, 5 mg/mL voriconazole, 2 mg/mL posaconazole or saline solution was investigated over 4 h of incubation at 37 °C. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, cytokine levels increased by addition of hyphal suspension over 4 h approximately: 54-fold for IL-6, 1000-fold for IL-8 and 270-fold for TNF-α. While conventional amphotericin B further increased IL-6 and to a smaller extent IL-8 levels, this was not the case for its liposomal formulation. Congruently amphotericin B increased cytokines in blood without fungus substantially. Fluconazole reduced cytokine increase for all three cytokines compared to stimulation with hyphae without antifungal agent. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate significant differences in the immunomodulatory potency of different antimycotics. While fluconazole had the highest anti-inflammatory potential, conventional amphotericin even increased cytokine release. This preliminary information might have clinical implication, since cytokine dysregulation plays a major role in the pathogenesis and outcome of fungal infections. Clinical studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Repeated determination of moxifloxacin concentrations in interstitial space fluid of muscle and subcutis in septic patients.

BACKGROUND: For an effective antimicrobial treatment, it is crucial that antibiotics reach sufficient concentrations in plasma and tissue. Currently no data exist regarding moxifloxacin plasma concentrations and exposure levels in tissue under septic conditions. OBJECTIVES: To determine the pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin in plasma and interstitial space fluid over a prolonged period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten septic patients were treated with 400 mg of moxifloxacin once a day; on days 1, 3 and 5 of treatment plasma sampling and microdialysis in the subcutis and muscle of the upper thigh were performed to determine concentrations of moxifloxacin in different compartments. This trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS, register number DRKS00012985). RESULTS: Mean unbound fraction of moxifloxacin in plasma was 85.5±3.4%. On day 1, Cmax in subcutis and muscle was 2.8±1.8 and 2.5±1.3 mg/L, respectively, AUC was 24.8±15.1 and 21.3±10.5 mg·h/L, respectively, and fAUC0-24/MIC was 100.9±62.9 and 86.5±38.3 h, respectively. Cmax for unbound moxifloxacin in plasma was 3.5±0.9 mg/L, AUC was 23.5±7.5 mg·h/L and fAUC0-24/MIC was 91.6±24.8 h. Key pharmacokinetic parameters on days 3 and 5 showed no significant differences. Clearance was higher than in healthy adults, but tissue concentrations were comparable, most likely due to a lower protein binding. CONCLUSIONS: Surprisingly, the first dose already achieved exposure comparable to steady-state conditions. The approved daily dose of 400 mg was adequate in our patient population. Thus, it seems that in septic patients a loading dose on the first day of treatment with moxifloxacin is not required.

Lack of dermal penetration of topically applied gentamicin as pharmacokinetic evidence indicating insufficient efficacy.

Background: Treatment of skin and superficial soft tissue infections with topically applied antibiotics is a controversial topic, because only few clinical studies exist and target site concentrations after topical treatment are widely unknown. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the target site concentration of topically applied gentamicin as a potential cause of therapeutic failure and to explore if microporation by laser might be used to improve penetration of gentamicin through the skin barrier. Methods: Six healthy volunteers were included in this cross-over Phase 1 study. On two study days, separated by a washout period, microdialysate and plasma sampling was performed for 6 h after administration of 500 mg of gentamicin cream on a predefined area. On one of the study days the skin was microporated before drug application using the P.L.E.A.S.E. Professional laser system. Results: In intact skin, Cmax and AUC values were 3.3 ±âŸ5.64 ng/mL and 5.4 ±âŸ10.4 ng·h/mL, respectively; thereby far under the threshold needed to treat common pathogens. With a Cmax of 474.2 ±âŸ555.3 ng/mL laser application showed a significant increase in tissue penetration and decrease in pharmacokinetic variability; however, even after microporation no therapeutically active concentrations were achieved as indicated by Cmax/epidemiological cut-off ratios of 0.237 and 0.059 for Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively. Solely after administration on microporated skin, plasma concentrations of gentamicin were quantifiable (lower limit of quantification 10 pg/mL). Conclusions: This study confirmed that after topical administration gentamicin penetration through the dermal barrier is insufficient, providing pharmacokinetic evidence that topical gentamicin in its current form might be inappropriate to treat skin infections.

Pharmacokinetics of doripenem in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF): comparison of two dosage regimens.

PURPOSE: In 2014, FDA released a warning for prescription of doripenem for ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia due to unsatisfactory clinical cure rates. The present study explores if the observed lack of efficacy might be explained by insufficient target site pharmacokinetics in intensive care patients after two different infusion schemes. METHODS: Plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage sampling was performed in 16 intubated patients with pneumonia receiving doripenem either as 1-h or as 4-h infusion. Doripenem concentrations were measured at steady state in plasma over 8 h, bronchoalvoelar lavage was performed in each patient once either after 0 h, 2 h, 4 h or 6 h. RESULTS: In plasma, mean values of Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-8 were 16.87 mg/L, 0.69 h and 52.98 mg/L×h after 1 h of infusion, and 12.94 mg/L, 3.21 h and 70.64 mg/L×h after 4 h of infusion, respectively. While the later tmax in plasma was with delay mirrored in the lung, for ELF, much lower concentrations were observed (Cmax, Tmax and AUC0-8 after 1-h infusion of 4.6 mg/L, 2 h and 15.3 mg/L×h and after 4-h infusion 6.9 mg/L, 4 h and 14.8 mg/L×h). CONCLUSION: The difference in plasma pharmacokinetics after 1-h and 4-h infusion reflects in the concentration versus time profile in the lung, but concentration at the target site was not only considerably lower but also subject to high inter-individual variability. We hypothesise that insufficient concentrations at the target site might have contributed to the previously described lack of clinical efficacy and confirmed the demand for assessment of target site pharmacokinetics in larger patient collectives.

Iontophoresis driven concentrations of topically administered diclofenac in skeletal muscle and blood of healthy subjects.

PURPOSE: The present open single-centre, descriptive and comparative pharmacokinetic study aimed to investigate the efficacy of iontophoresis to enhance transdermal delivery by measuring concentration vs. time profiles of diclofenac in local tissue and in plasma in two separate study periods. METHODS: Period 1 determined diclofenac concentrations in both calf muscles simultaneously by using microdialysis after applying diclofenac gel topically as a single dose of 5 g with or without iontophoresis in eight healthy volunteers. In period 2, the same dose was applied to another 8 volunteers to determine plasma concentrations of diclofenac either with or without iontophoresis in a cross over design. RESULTS: In period 1, tissue concentrations were found to be under the limit of detection of 0.5 ng/ml both with and without iontophoresis in all subjects. In period 2, after iontophoresis in 75% of study participants, plasma concentrations of diclofenac could be determined, but only in 25% without iontophoresis. Although area under the concentration-time-curve (AUC, 187.97 ± 315.92 vs. 22.92 ± 42.44 ng*min/ml) and maximum concentration (Cmax, 2.06 ± 3.79 vs. 0.22 ± 0.41 ng/ml) values showed a numerically clear trend for higher values with iontophoresis compared to passive diffusion, no significant difference could be found due to high inter-individual variability. In total, 18.75% of all subjects presented adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher percentage of subjects showed detectable plasma levels of diclofenac after iontophoresis, iontophoresis failed to achieve potentially more effective topical concentrations. The typical mechanism of iontophoresis like electromigration, electroosmosis and increased subcutaneous circulation could be responsible for the results of the present observation. Additional clinical studies are needed to justify the transdermal delivery of diclofenac by using iontophoresis.

Target site pharmacokinetics of linezolid after single and multiple doses in diabetic patients with soft tissue infection.

The underlying pathology of diabetic wounds, i.e. impairment of macro- and microcirculation, might also impact target site penetration of antibacterial drugs. To compare tissue concentrations of linezolid in infected and not infected tissue 10 patients suffering from type 2 diabetes with foot infection were included in the study. Tissue penetration of linezolid was assessed using in vivo microdialysis at the site of infection as well as in non-inflamed subcutaneous adipose tissue. All patients were investigated after receiving a single dose of linezolid and five patients in addition at steady state. After a single dose of linezolid significantly higher area under the concentration vs. time curve over 8 hours (AUC0-8 ) and maximum concentrations (Cmax )-values were observed in plasma (65.5 ± 21.2 mg*h/L and 16.4 ± 4.6 mg/L) as compared to inflamed (36.3 ± 22.9 mg*h/L and 6.6 ± 3.6 mg/L) and non-inflamed tissue (33.0 ± 17.7 mg*h/L and 6.7 ± 3.6 mg/L). Multiple administrations of linezolid led to disappearance of significant differences in Cmax and AUC0-8 between plasma, inflamed, and non-inflamed tissue. Approximately 2-fold increase of Cmax and AUC0-8 -values in tissue was observed at steady state as compared to the first administration. Penetration of linezolid is not impaired in diabetic foot infection but equilibrium between plasma and tissue might be delayed.