Early experience using the Wallgraft in the management of distal microembolism from common iliac artery patholology.

Blue toe syndrome commonly occurs as a result of aneurysmal or atherosclerotic disease in the iliac arteries. Surgery, angioplasty, or intraarterial stent placement are the most common treatment options but the optimal management has not been defined. Here we report managing distal microembolization from iliac artery atherosclerosis associated with aneurysmal dilation with the Wallgraft Endoprosthesis, a self-expanding metallic stent covered with Dacron. Three common iliac arteries in two patients were treated using this device. A 79-year-old male presented with unilateral symptoms and an 83-year-old female with bilateral disease. Arteriography demonstrated complex plaque at the aortic bifurcation associated with aneurysmal dilation of the distal common iliac artery in both patients. This complex disease was successfully covered using the Wallgraft Endoprosthesis. Postoperatively the patients received aspirin, their toe lesions healed, and neither has had a recurrence after 16 months. Covered stents offer the theoretic advantage of completely excluding the diseased segment, preventing the escape of thrombus or plaque debris, and covering aneurysmal dilation in the artery.

Hemodialysis access assessment with intravascular ultrasound.

Reliable identification and treatment of specific hemodialysis access complications may improve access patency and result in significant cost reduction. Angiography is the gold standard for the evaluation of vascular access; however, it has significant limitations. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a relatively new technique capable of detecting subtle vascular abnormalities. To investigate the safety, feasibility, and accuracy of IVUS imaging to detect hemodialysis access complications, including stenoses, graft deterioration, and thrombus, we performed 31 IVUS imaging studies in 22 hemodialysis patients. Nineteen studies were performed in the dialysis unit, and 12 studies in the angiography suite. The IVUS catheter was inserted into the graft through the access used for hemodialysis. Findings of 21 studies (17 patients) imaged on the same day by both angiography and IVUS were compared. Grafts and vessels were successfully imaged using IVUS in 29 of 31 studies. There were no adverse effects caused by IVUS. Angiography assessed 17 of 54 vessel segments as normal versus 9 of 54 segments by IVUS (P < 0.001). Angiography detected lesions in 25 segments as opposed to 33 segments by IVUS (P < 0.001). A thrombus was detected in 32 of 54 vessel segments by IVUS, but in only 1 of 54 segments by angiography (P < 0.001). In conclusion, IVUS imaging is feasible and safe to assess hemodialysis access in the angiographic suite and dialysis unit. IVUS detected more vascular abnormalities than angiography. IVUS may be a useful independent imaging and screening modality in the assessment of dialysis access complications, which may help increase graft patency and reduce cost.