Proliferative and anti-apoptotic indices of unicystic ameloblastoma, odontogenic keratocyst, dentigerous cyst and radicular cyst.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the proliferative capacity and antiapoptotic capacity of unicystic ameloblastoma (UA), odontogenic keratocyst (OKC), dentigerous cyst (DC) and radicular cyst (RC) by assessing the Ki-67 labeling index (LI) and Bcl-2 LI, respectively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of twenty-three histopathologically diagnosed UAs, 6 OKCs, 8 DCs and 10 RCs were selected from the archival specimens. Five micrometer thick sections of tissue blocks of the lesions were processed for immunohistochemical staining with Ki-67 and Bcl-2. The Ki-67 LI and Bcl-2 LI were determined for the cases with a positive reaction. RESULTS: Ki-67 expression was seen in 6 (26.1%) cases of UA, 4 (66.7%) OKC, 1 (12.5%) DC and 1 (10.0%) RC. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean Ki-67 LI of UA and OKC (P = 0.024). Bcl-2 expression was seen in 16 (69.6%) UA, 5 (83.3%) OKC, 5 (62.5%) DC and 5 (50.0%) RC. The mean Bcl-2 LI of UA was significantly higher than that of DC (P = 0.048). Furthermore, cases of OKC had significantly higher mean Bcl-2 LI compared to DC (P = 0.026) and RC (P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the Ki-67 LI may help in differentiating OKC from UA. The Bcl-2 LI may be useful in differentiating UA from DCs, and differentiating OKC from DC and RC.

A study on the clinical indicators in the diagnosis of orofacial nonodontogenic tumors.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the clinical features which are helpful as significant indicators in the diagnosis of malignant and nonmalignant nonodontogenic orofacial tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study performed on patients with swellings in the oral and maxillofacial region clinically suspicious of being tumors of nonodontogenic origin in a Nigerian Tertiary Health Institution. The statistical variables that were analyzed included patients' resume, clinical and radiological features as well as the histopathological diagnosis of the lesions. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05. Inferential analysis was done using Student's t-test, Chi-square, binary logistic regression, and adjusted odds ratio as appropriate. RESULTS: There were forty patients histopathologically diagnosed as nonodontogenic tumors of the orofacial region. Twenty-five (62.5%) were females and 15 (37.5%) were males with mean age of 36 ± 21.9 years. Histopathological features showed three different categories of the lesions: Reactive and benign (nonmalignant) and the malignant lesions. Lymphadenopathy (P = 0.035) and nonmobility of the swellings (P = 0.029) were significant clinical indicators that were strongly associated with histological diagnosis of the malignant nonodontogenic tumors. CONCLUSION: This study showed that the nonodontogenic tumors occurred mostly in younger patients with a female preponderance. The mandible and the preauricular region were the most common sites. Lymphadenopathy and nonmobility of the swellings were strong clinical indicators for the diagnosis of the malignant nonodontogenic tumors.

A clinicopathologic correlation in the diagnosis of periradicular lesions of extracted teeth.

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the contributory percentage of histopathologic diagnoses of routine biopsies and to ascertain the possible indicators for histopathologic examination to confirm the clinical diagnosis of periradicular lesions of extracted teeth. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective study carried out over a period of 8 months on patients who had single tooth extraction and routine histopathologic examination of recoverable periradicular tissues from extracted teeth. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients participated in this study. There was a male/female incidence ratio of 3:2 and most of the patients with histopathologically diagnosed lesions were within the first, second, and third decades of life (n = 49, 36.0%). Seventy-five (55.2%) cases had histopathologically diagnosed periradicular lesions, which were mostly periapical abscess (n = 30, 22.8%) and inflammatory (periapical) granuloma (n = 23, 16.9%). Some clinical and radiologic features were associated significantly with histopathologic diagnosis of some periradicular lesions (P < .05). There also was a significant correlation of clinical diagnosis with histopathologic diagnosis of inflammatory (periapical) granuloma, periapical abscess, chronic osteomyelitis, and Burkitt's lymphoma (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a higher contributory percentage of histopathologic diagnoses after routine biopsies, compared to previous reports from selected biopsies of periradicular lesions. We identified clinical indicators for predicting possible histopathologic diagnosis of some periradicular lesions, in particular, those that predict possible histologic diagnosis of neoplastic periradicular lesions.