RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonologists and cardiologists view chest radiographs differently. Lung cancer may therefore go undetected in patients referred to cardiovascular departments. We aimed to determine the clinical benefit of the additional interpretation of chest radiographs by pulmonologists in study involving cardiovascular outpatients. METHODS: A retrospective review of chest radiographs of outpatients attending a Japanese cardiovascular hospital between April 2000 and March 2010 was conducted. Lung cancer patients were categorized into 3 groups: group C, patients in whom tumors were detected by a cardiologist at the first visit; group P, patients in whom tumors were detected by the additional interpretation of a chest radiographs by a pulmonologist after a lesion was missed by a cardiologist; and group H, patients from an earlier period in which chest radiographs were only examined by a cardiologist. RESULTS: Cardiologists detected 9 cases of lung cancer in groups C and H from 2,430 and 2,288 radiographs, respectively. Pulmonologists detected 10 cases of lung cancer (group P) and 3 other malignancies that were previously undetected, giving a miss rate of 52.6% for the cardiologists. Tumor diameters were significantly smaller in group P than in group C or H. Furthermore, a significantly higher number of the tumors in group P were of an early stage and resectable, with more superposing structures than in groups C or H. CONCLUSION: The additional pulmonologist-based interpretations significantly increased the detection rate of operable tumors that mostly corresponded to the early T1 stage; this serves offers a potential clinical benefit in reducing the period of time from patient presentation to the diagnosis of lung cancer.