The influence of Gleason score ≤ 6 histology on the outcome of high-risk localized prostate cancer after modern radiotherapy.

We aimed to retrospectively review outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and a Gleason score ≤ 6 following modern radiotherapy. We analyzed the outcomes of 1374 patients who had undergone modern radiotherapy, comprising a high-risk low grade [HRLG] group (Gleason score ≤ 6; n = 94) and a high-risk high grade [HRHG] group (Gleason score ≥ 7, n = 1125). We included 955 patients who received brachytherapy with or without external beam radio-therapy (EBRT) and 264 who received modern EBRT (intensity-modulated radiotherapy [IMRT] or stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT]). At a median follow-up of 60 (2-177) months, actuarial 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rates were 97.8 and 91.8% (p = 0.017), respectively. The frequency of clinical failure in the HRLG group was less than that in the HRHG group (0% vs 5.4%, p = 0.012). The HRLG group had a better 5-year distant metastasis-free survival than the HRHG group (100% vs 96.0%, p = 0.035). As the HRLG group exhibited no clinical failure and better outcomes than the HRHG group, the HRLG group might potentially be classified as a lower-risk group.

Novel image-guided marker aimed at organ-preserving therapies for prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We developed fiducial imaging-guidance markers for the prostate with less imaging artifacts than currently commercially available markers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the imaging artifacts and potential usefulness and safety of these novel fiducial imaging markers in preclinical experiments. METHODS: We selected specific metal materials and a shape that can minimize artifacts in line with a license we obtained for a metal with a gold-platinum (Au-Pt) alloy composition that maximized artifact-free MRI images. Both phantom and canine prostate tests were conducted in order to evaluate the imaging artifacts for three imaging modalities, MRI, CT and ultrasound, and the risk of migration of the markers from the site of insertion to elsewhere, as well as crushing. RESULTS: The newly developed Au-Pt material had less imaging artifacts in the MRI, CT and ultrasound imaging modalities in comparison with current commercially available fiducial markers made from gold materials only. The Au-Pt markers had sufficient strength and durability and were considered to be potentially clinically useful and safe markers. CONCLUSION: The developed Au-Pt markers could be potential tools for accurate lesion-targeted, organ-preserving therapies such as lesion-targeted focal therapy and active surveillance in addition to conventional radiation therapies.

Apalutamide versus bicalutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer.

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of apalutamide and bicalutamide in combination with androgen deprivation therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). We retrospectively collected the data of about 330 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer at our hospital and affiliated hospitals between December 2013 and August 2023. Sixty-one patients were administered apalutamide (240 mg/day) with androgen deprivation therapy (group A), and 269 patients were administered bicalutamide (80 mg/day) with androgen deprivation therapy (group B). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for clinical background factors between the two groups. PSA progression-free survival and overall survival were significantly longer in group A than in group B among the matched patients. Apalutamide therapy was a significant independent factor for OS in matched patients. The second progression-free survival of group A was significantly longer than that of group B in matched patients. Patients treated with apalutamide achieved ≥ 90% PSA decline from baseline faster and in larger numbers than those with bicalutamide. Apalutamide combined with ADT may be superior to bicalutamide alone in terms of OS and PSA-PFS in patients with mHSPC.

A big data-based prediction model for prostate cancer incidence in Japanese men.

To define a normal range for PSA values (ng/mL) by age and create a prediction model for prostate cancer incidence. We conducted a retrospective analysis using 263,073 observations of PSA values in Japanese men aged 18-98 years (2007-2017), including healthy men and those diagnosed with prostate cancer. Percentiles for 262,639 PSA observations in healthy men aged 18-70 years were calculated and plotted to elucidate the normal fluctuation range for PSA values by age. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to develop a predictive model for prostate cancer incidence. PSA levels and PSA velocity increased with age in healthy men. However, there was no difference in PSA velocity with age in men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Logistic regression analysis showed an increased risk of prostate cancer for PSA slopes ranging from 0.5 to 3.5 ng/mL/year. This study provides age-specific normal fluctuation ranges for PSA levels in men aged 18-75 years and presents a novel and personalized prediction model for prostate cancer incidence. We found that PSA slope values of > 3.5 ng/mL/year may indicate a rapid increase in PSA levels caused by pathological condition such as inflammation but are unlikely to indicate cancer risk.

Predictive factors for the efficacy of abiraterone acetate therapy in high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients.

PURPOSE: There is a discrepancy in the efficacy of abiraterone acetate for overall survival (OS) in patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). This study aimed to identify predictive factors for the efficacy of abiraterone acetate for OS in high-risk mHSPC patients by analyzing them over a longer observation period. METHODS: Five hundred high-risk mHSPC patients were retrospectively identified at our hospital and affiliated hospitals in the Kindai Oncology Study Group and Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Oncology Study Group between December 2013 and March 2022. Two hundred patients were treated with abiraterone acetate (1000 mg/day) plus prednisolone (5 mg/day) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). A total of 300 patients were treated with bicalutamide (80 mg/day) in combination with ADT. RESULTS: OS was not significantly different between the two treatments in the overall cohort (p = 0.1643). In the subgroup without Gleason pattern 5 at the primary lesion, OS was significantly better in patients treated with abiraterone acetate than in those treated with bicalutamide (p = 0.0192). In the subgroup with Gleason pattern 5 at the primary lesion, no significant difference was found between the two treatments (p = 0.1799). Univariate and multivariate analyses in the subgroup without Gleason pattern 5 at the primary lesion suggested that abiraterone therapy may be an important and independent predictor of OS in high-risk mHSPC patients. CONCLUSION: The presence of Gleason pattern 5 at the primary lesion may be a predictor for high-risk mHSPC patients who could benefit from abiraterone acetate treatment.

Role of Brachytherapy Boost in Clinically Localized Intermediate and High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Lack of Benefit in Patients with Very High-Risk Factors T3b-4 and/or Gleason 9-10.

This study examined the role of brachytherapy boost (BT-boost) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer, especially in patients with very high-risk factors (VHR: T3b-4 or Gleason score 9-10) as patients with double very high-risk factors (VHR-2: T3b-4 and Gleason score 9-10) previously showed worst prognosis in localized prostate cancer. We retrospectively reviewed multi-institutional data of 1961 patients that were administered radiotherapy (1091 BT-boost and 872 EBRT: 593 conventional-dose RT (Conv RT: equivalent to doses of 2 Gy per fraction = EQD2 ≤ 72 Gy) and 216 dose-escalating RT (DeRT = EQD2 ≥ 74 Gy). We found that BT-boost improved PSA control and provided an equivalent overall survival rate in the intermediate- and high-risk groups, except for patients within the VHR factor group. In the VHR-1 group (single VHR), BT-boost showed a superior biochemical control rate to the Conv RT group but not to the DeRT group. In the VHR-2 group, BT-boost did not improve outcomes of either Conv RT or DeRT groups. In conclusion, BT-boost showed no benefit to modern DeRT in the patients with VHR; therefore, they are not good candidates for BT-boost to improve outcome and may be amenable to clinical trials using multimodal intensified systemic treatments.

Impact of prostate-specific antigen screening on tumor size in patients with prostate cancer in a super-aging district in Kyoto, Japan.

BACKGROUND: Population-based prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening is effective for reducing prostate cancer (PCa)-related mortality rates. In this study, we assessed biopsy-proven maximum cancer core length (MCCL) and maximum cancer diameter on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; MCDM) in prostate biopsy and multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) by PCa detection. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 214 male PCa patients and 187 PCa patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS) category 3-5 lesions in pre-biopsy mp-MRI and targeted biopsy characteristics. The mean biopsy-proven MCCL and MCDM were compared among three PSA screening groups, namely the population-based PSA screening (PBS), opportunistic PSA screening (OPS), and symptomatic outpatient PSA examination (SOP) groups. RESULTS: The median age and PSA value of the 214 participants were 75 years and 7.9 ng/mL, respectively. In the PBS, OPS, and SOP groups, the median ages were 73, 76, and 76 years, respectively (p = 0.046); PSA values were 7.2, 9.5, and 11.5 ng/mL, respectively (p < 0.001); and biopsy-proven MCCL and MCDM were significantly increased to 7, 10, and 14 mm (p < 0.001) and to 11, 15, and 17 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. In the 187 PCa patients with PI-RADS category 3-5 lesions on mp-MRI, MCDM were 11, 14, and 17 mm (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The biopsy-proven MCCL and MCDM were significantly smaller in the PBS and OPS groups than in the SOP group, which suggests that PSA screening detected PCa earlier than in symptomatic patients. PSA screening with MRI could objectively lead to earlier diagnosis based on tumor size.

Challenge and Outcome for the Prostate Squamous Cell Carcinoma Which Developed 8 Years after Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Approached by a Combined Multimodal Treatment with High-Dose-Rate Interstitial Brachytherapy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, and Chemotherapy.

Prostate squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC) rarely develops as a secondary cancer after treatment with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT). There is no established effective treatment for the disease condition. Herein, we present a 78-year-old man who developed pSCC 8 years after LDR-BT. He was subsequently selected to receive a combined multimodal treatment with high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT), external beam radiation therapy, and chemotherapy for his pSCC. Eleven months later, he displayed no biochemical failure nor clinical radiographic recurrence. However, MRI detected a newly developed prostatic-rectal fistula (grade 4), and a colostomy was performed to relieve pain and inflammation. To our knowledge, this is the first report to perform a combined multimodal treatment with HDR-ISBT for pSCC suspected as a secondary cancer due to LDR-BT.

Novel Prognostic Index of High-Risk Prostate Cancer Using Simple Summation of Very High-Risk Factors.

This study aimed to examine the role of very high-risk (VHR) factors (T3b-4 and Gleason score 9-10) for prognosis of clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer. We reviewed multi-institutional retrospective data of 1413 patients treated with radiotherapy (558 patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and 855 patients treated with brachytherapy (BT) ± EBRT. We introduced an index by simple summation of the number of VHR factors-VHR-0, VHR-1, and VHR-2. With median follow-up of 69.6 months, the 5-year biochemical disease free survival rate (bDFS), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMSF) rates were 59.4%, 7.65%, and 83.2% for the VHR-2 group, respectively; 86.7%, 1.50%, and 95.4% for the VHR-1 group, respectively; and 93.1%, 0.12%, and 98.2% for the VHR-0 group, respectively. The VHR-2 group had significantly worse bDFS, PCSM, and DMSF than the VHR-0 (hazard ratios: 4.55, 9.607, and 7.904, respectively) and VHR-1 (hazard ratios: 1.723, 2.391, and 1.491, respectively) groups. The VHR-2 group could be identified as a super high-risk group compared with other groups, and could be a good candidate for clinical trials using multimodal intensified treatments. Simple summation of the number of VHR factors is an easy and useful predictive index for bDFS, PCSM, and DMSF.

Abiraterone acetate versus bicalutamide in combination with gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist therapy for high risk metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer.

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of abiraterone acetate with that of bicalutamide in combination with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist treatment for patients with high-risk metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). A total of 149 patients with mHSPC who underwent treatment at our hospital and affiliated hospitals between December 2013 and July 2020 were retrospectively identified. Fifty patients were administered abiraterone acetate (1000 mg/day) plus prednisolone (5 mg/day) with a GnRH antagonist (degarelix) (group A), and 99 patients were administered bicalutamide (80 mg/day) with a GnRH antagonist (group B). The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PSA-PFS) was significantly longer in group A than in group B. Abiraterone acetate therapy and Gleason score were significant independent factors of PSA-PFS. Using propensity score matching, 56 matched patients were obtained. The PSA-PFS (p < 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p = 0.0071) of patients with high-risk mHSPC were significantly longer in group A of matched patients. Abiraterone acetate therapy and Gleason score were significant independent factors for PSA-PFS in matched patients. The PSA-PFS and OS of patients treated with abiraterone acetate in combination with a GnRH antagonist were significantly better than those treated with bicalutamide.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy with external beam radiotherapy versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy with or without external beam radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

To compare the outcomes of localized prostate cancer treatment with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT), we examined 924 patients treated with HDR-BT + external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and 500 patients treated with LDR-BT ± EBRT using multi-institutional retrospective data. The HDR-BT treated advanced disease with more hormonal therapy than LDR-BT. To reduce background selection bias, we performed inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis using propensity scores and excluded patients with T3b-4 disease/ initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels > 50 ng/ml. The actuarial 5-year biochemical control rates (5y-bNED) were 96.3% and 95.7% in the HDR-BT and LDR-BT groups, respectively. The corresponding values were 100% and 96.5% in the low-risk group; 97.4% and 97.1% in the intermediate-risk group (97.2% and 97% in the higher titer group and 97.5% and 94.6% in the lower titer group, respectively); and 95.7% and 94.9% in the selected high-risk group, respectively. IPTW correction indicated no significant difference among the groups. The 5y-bNED in the HDR-BT + EBRT, LDR-BT + EBRT, and LDR-BT alone groups were 96.3%, 95.5%, and 97%, respectively (P = 0.3011). The corresponding values were 97.4%, 94.7%, and 96.6% (P = 0.1004) in the intermediate-risk group (97.5%, 100%, and 94.5% in the lower titer group [P = 0.122] and 97.2%, 96.2%, and 100% [P = 0.664] in the higher titer group, respectively) and 95.7%, 95.5%, and 100% (P = 0.859) in the high-risk group, respectively. The HDR-BT group showed a lower incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 genitourinary toxicities; the incidence of other early and late grade ≥ 2 toxicities were similar between the HDR-BT and LDR-BT groups. Acute genitourinary toxicity predicted the occurrence of late genitourinary toxicity. EBRT increased the risk of grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal toxicity. HDR-BT + EBRT is a good alternative to LDR-BT ± EBRT for low-, intermediate-, and selected high-risk patients.

Radiotherapy for elder patients aged ≥80 with clinically localized prostate cancer - Brachytherapy enhanced late GU toxicity especially in elderly.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Elongation of life expectancy had led to marked increase in number of elderly patients with localized prostate cancer. However, the standard treatment for such patients is not well determined because of a high prevalence of comorbidities and slow growth of prostate cancer. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of radiotherapy for elderly patients aged ≥80 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared 96 patients aged ≥80 years and 2333 younger patients (aged 60-79 years) using multi-institutional data included cT1-T4N0M0 prostate cancer treated with 902 external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and 1527 brachytherapy (BT). RESULTS: The 5-year biochemical failure-free survival rate was similar between elderly ≥80 years and younger control (91.3% vs. 85.9%, p = 0.6171) (100%, 92.9%, 82.4% and 96.3%, 93.7%, 89% for low, intermediate and high risk group), and for the prostate cancer-specific survival rate (100% and 99.3%, p = 0.6171). The accumulated incidence of late gastrointestinal (GI) at 5 years was also similar between elderly and younger patients (3.5% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.6857). Brachytherapy improved biochemical control rate and reduced GI toxicity compared with EBRT, however, enhanced late genitourinary (GU) toxicity, especially in elderly patients. Elderly received brachytherapy showed highest rate of late GU toxicity grade ≥2 of 22.1% than the younger counterparts of 12.7% at 5 years, whereas younger patients treated with EBRT had 2.4% and elderly EBRT had 2.7% (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients aged ≥80 years showed equivalent biochemical control, prostate cancer-related survival, and gastrointestinal toxicity profiles to younger patients. Meticulous care should be required for brachytherapy enhanced late GU toxicity, especially in elderly patients aged ≥80 years.

Small bowel perforation caused by applicator implantation in high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for recurrent pelvic tumor: a case report.

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) is widely used for the treatment of pelvic tumors. However, there are a few reports on complications of applicator implantation in HDR-ISBT. We describe a case of small bowel perforation caused by applicator implantation in an 82-year-old male patient with recurrence tumor in the pelvis treated with HDR-ISBT. Eventually, the patient underwent laparotomy and partial intestinal resection. We recognized the site where the applicator was inserted into a part of the tumor on the mucosal surface. Pathological examination confirmed that the tumor had infiltrated the small intestine directly and that the infiltrated part had reached the submucosa. This is the first published report about small bowel perforation caused by applicator implantation. In cases where intestinal infiltration of the tumor is suspected, HDR-ISBT should be performed with maximum caution.

Intratumoral and s.c. injection of inactivated hemagglutinating virus of Japan envelope (GEN0101) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Inactivated hemagglutinating virus of Japan envelope (HVJ-E) has an antitumor effect and tumor immunity. We undertook an open-label, phase I, dose-escalation study in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) to determine the safety and efficacy of intratumoral and s.c. injection of HVJ-E (GEN0101). Patients with CRPC, who were resistant to or unable to receive standard of care, were included. GEN0101 was injected directly into the prostate and s.c. in two 28-day treatment cycles. The primary end-points were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of GEN0101 and determine its recommended dose. The secondary end-points were to analyze the antitumor effect and tumor immunity. Three patients received 30 000 mNAU GEN0101 and 6 received 60 000 mNAU. There was no dose-limiting toxicity, and the recommended dose of GEN0101 was defined as 60 000 mNAU. Radiographically, 1 patient had stable disease and 2 had progressive disease in the low-dose group, whereas 5 patients had stable disease and 1 had progressive disease in the high-dose group. Three patients in the high-dose group showed reduction in lymph node metastasis. Prostate-specific antigen increase rates in the high-dose group were suppressed more than those in the low-dose group. Natural killer cell activity was enhanced in 2 patients of the low-dose group and in 5 patients in the high-dose group. In conclusion, intratumoral and s.c. injections of GEN0101 were well-tolerated and feasible to use. The study is registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (no. UMIN000017092).

Less nephrotoxicity of paclitaxel and ifosfamide plus nedaplatin for refractory or relapsed germ cell tumors in patients with impaired renal function.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of the combined regimen of paclitaxel and ifosfamide plus nedaplatin for patients with refractory or relapsed germ cell tumors and impaired renal function. METHODS: Of a total of 68 patients who received paclitaxel, ifosfamide and nedaplatin chemotherapy for germ cell tumors, those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 before paclitaxel, ifosfamide and nedaplatin treatment were defined as having renal dysfunction. The combination chemotherapy regimen included paclitaxel (210 mg/m2 on day 1) and ifosfamide (1.2 g/m2 on days 2-6) with nedaplatin (100 mg/m2 on day 2) on a 3-week cycle. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients had renal dysfunction with a median estimated glomerular filtration rate of 49.97 mg/mL/1.73 m2 (range 31.7-57.5 mg/mL/1.73 m2 ). Paclitaxel, ifosfamide and nedaplatin chemotherapy was given as second-line therapy in four patients, third-line in four and fourth-line or later in two. Patients with impaired renal function received pretreatment of a median of 5.5 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy (range 3-11 cycles) with a median cisplatin dose of 550 mg/m2 . The patients were given two to six cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide and nedaplatin chemotherapy with no dose reduction, with an overall response rate of 60%. Chemotherapy-induced kidney dysfunction was not observed in any patient with decreased renal function. Furthermore, there was no difference in the frequency of adverse events between patients with renal dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and those with normal renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel, ifosfamide and nedaplatin chemotherapy can be considered a safe and effective regimen that results in less nephrotoxicity in germ cell tumor patients with renal dysfunction.

Focal salvage low-dose-rate brachytherapy for recurrent prostate cancer based on magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy technique.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of permanent salvage brachytherapy in prostate cancer patients suffering recurrence after three-dimensional conformal external beam radiotherapy. METHODS: The ultra-focal (target lesion alone), hemi-lobe (within a hemi-lobe) or focused whole-gland (focusing on the lesion, but extending into the whole gland) pattern was selected based on the Gleason score for the targeted biopsy, the numbers of positive cores in the targeted and systematic biopsies, and the locations of the positive cores. Novel dosimetry criteria derived from three-dimensional cancer mapping, which was based on targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsies, were used in these cases. RESULTS: Permanent salvage brachytherapy was carried out in 13 patients who suffered prostate-specific antigen failure (prostate-specific antigen 2.1-6.8 ng/mL; age range 57-75 years; Gleason score ≤7 [n = 10], Gleason score ≥8 [n = 2] and Gleason score not available [n = 1]) since 2012. The targeted biopsy showed a single focus in three patients. The ultra-focal, hemi-lobe and focused whole-gland patterns were chosen in three, five and five patients, respectively. During the follow-up period (median duration 48 months), prostate-specific antigen failure occurred in zero of three, one of five and three of five of the patients treated with the ultra-focal, hemi-lobe and focused whole-gland patterns, respectively. The 4-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 74%. No grade 3-4 adverse intestinal or urological events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted fusion biopsy-based three-dimensional cancer mapping should be used for permanent salvage brachytherapy treatment planning to reduce the incidence of treatment-related adverse events while maintaining good oncological outcomes.