Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 82(1): 47-55, 2024 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38164998

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Scientific evidence of nonsurgical site-related complications in mandibular fracture patients is limited. PURPOSE: The purpose was to measure the frequency of nonsurgical site complications in patients with mandible fractures, describe the types of complications, and identify the risk factors associated with these complications. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Helsinki University hospital between 2018 and 2021. Patients undergoing surgery with open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fracture(s) were evaluated. Patients under 16 years of age were excluded. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: Primary predictor variable was age. Patient-related predictor variables were sex, long-term disease(s), smoking, and alcohol and/or drug abuse. Injury and fracture-related variables were injury mechanism, type and site of facture, combined craniofacial fracture(s), and associated injury(s). MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE(S): The primary outcome variable was nonsurgical site-related postoperative complication. The secondary outcome variable was type of complication. COVARIATES: Not applicable. ANALYSES: The main outcome variable was cross tabulated for pairwise comparisons with predictor variables. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for statistically significant (P < .05) variables. RESULTS: The data included 314 patients (age range: 16 to 89 years; mean age: 38 years old; median age: 33 years old); most (78.3%) were men. Nonsurgical site-related postoperative complications occurred in 6.7% of patients. The most common complication type was pulmonary complication (36.0%), followed by urinary complication (20.0%) and general infection (16.0%). Nonsurgical site-related postoperative complications were most likely to occur in patients who were elderly (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.55; 95% CI 1.92 to 16.21; P = .002), had combined craniofacial fractures (aOR 2.92; 95% CI 1.06 to 8.03; P = .038), and abused alcohol or drugs (aOR 4.51; 95% CI 1.70 to 11.96; P = .003). Pulmonary complications occurred more often in elderly patients, whereas urinary complications were more common in younger patients. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The types of nonsurgical site complications in mandibular fracture patients increase and vary according to the patient's age. Awareness of possible complications related to different age groups helps anticipate and identify these in clinical work, and to consider the overall treatment of the patient beyond the fracture.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Mandibulares , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Adulto , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Fracturas Mandibulares/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos
2.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 28(2): 839-847, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38286958

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To clarify reasons for infections, surgical techniques, and occurrence of postoperative surgical site complications in infected mandibular fractures. METHODS: Patients with clinically infected mandibular fracture of the dentate part without preceding surgery were studied retrospectively. Clinical infection was defined to occur if pus, abscess, or a fistula in the fracture area was present. Patient-, fracture-, and surgery-related variables were evaluated, and predictors for postoperative complications were analysed. RESULTS: Of 908 patients with surgically treated fracture in the dentate part of the mandible, 41 had infected fracture at the time of surgery (4.5%). Of these patients, 46.3% were alcohol or drug abusers. Median delay from injury to surgery was 9 days. Patient-related factors were the most common cause for delayed surgery (n = 30, 73.2%), followed by missed diagnosis by a health care professional (n = 8, 19.5%). Twenty-two fractures were treated via extraoral approach (53.7%) and the remaining 19 intraorally (46.3%). Postoperative surgical site complications were found in 13 patients (31.7%), with recurrent surgical site infections predominating. Notable differences between total complication rates between intraoral and extraoral approaches were not detected. Secondary osteosynthesis for non-union was conducted for one patient treated intraorally. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative surgical site complications are common after treatment of infected mandibular fractures, and these occur despite the chosen surgical approach. Infected mandibular fractures heal mainly without bone grafting, and non-union is a rare complication. Due to the high complication rate, careful perioperative and postoperative care is required for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Mandibulares , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica , Humanos , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Adulto , Masculino , Femenino , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adolescente , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Fijación Interna de Fracturas , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Diagnóstico Tardío
3.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 81(7): 555-561, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37171859

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the occurrence and causes of non-infection-related surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) in intraorally treated mandibular fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with one or two fractures of the dentate part of the mandible treated surgically via an intraoral approach were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome variable was SWD. Associations between patient-, fracture- and surgery-related variables and SWD were evaluated. RESULTS: Altogether 232 patients with 270 mandibular angle, body, symphysis and/or parasymphysis fractures were included in the analysis. In all, 22 SWDs were detected. These occurred in 9.5% of patients and in 8.1% of fractures. Surgery performed at night-time showed a significantly higher SWD rate than daytime surgeries (p = .012). Additionally, a significantly greater SWD rate was found among smokers (p = .041). Other studied variables remained statistically non-significant for SWD. In a multivariate analysis, night-time was the only significant independent variable with an odds ratio of 3.297 (95% CI 1.238 - 8.780, p = .017) for SWD. CONCLUSION: The approach or closure technique used and the fracture type had only a minor effect on non-infection-related SWD in patients with mandibular fractures. To avoid SWDs, mandibular fracture surgeries should be conducted during the daytime with adequate support from an experienced surgeon.

4.
Acta Odontol Scand ; 80(7): 494-500, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35130467

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the occurrence of surgical site infections and predisposing factors for these in simple mandibular fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with fractures of the dentate part of the mandible included patients with intraorally treated simple fractures of the mandibular body, symphysis, and parasymphysis. The primary outcome variable was postoperative surgical site infection. Use of antibiotics, injury mechanism, fracture and surgery-related explanatory variables, patient-related variables and level of oral hygiene according to the modified Total Dental Index were evaluated. RESULTS: Of 254 patients with mandibular fractures, 107 were included in the final analysis. The infection group consisted of 18 patients (16.8%). Despite the high infection occurrence, significant differences were not found between antibiotic use or other studied variables and infection occurrence. Infections occurred mainly in patients without any specific explanatory factor for infection. CONCLUSION: The notably high occurrence of surgical site infections despite antibiotic use after simple mandibular fracture surgery highlights the importance of perioperative tissue handling and local oral circumstances. It is also necessary to consider whether we generally accept the high risk of infection associated with the intraorally treated simple mandibular fractures.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Mandibulares , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Mandíbula/cirugía , Fracturas Mandibulares/epidemiología , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control
5.
Stomatologija ; 24(2): 35-42, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37140236

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To clarify antibiotic use by oral and maxillofacial surgeons in mandibular fracture patients and evaluate practices based on scientific evidence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We assessed antibiotic use in simple symphysis and angle mandibular fractures among oral and maxillofacial surgeons in the Nordic countries through an e-survey. In addition, we performed a literature review of antibiotic administration in mandibular fracture surgery. RESULTS: A total of 41 oral and maxillofacial surgeons who treat mandibular fractures responded to the questionnaire. Timing and duration of antibiotic use varied. The duration of postoperative antibiotic treatment ranged from 1 to 7 days (mean 5.6 days). Respondents' practices were not in concordance with scientific evidence. According to previous studies, restricting antibiotic exposure to a maximum of 24 hours postoperatively was not related to a higher risk of surgical site infections. No articles described a benefit of prolonged postoperative antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic use in connection with mandibular fracture treatment varied in the Nordic countries and antibiotic practices are not in concordance with the current literature. Restricting antibiotic exposure to a maximum of 24 hours postoperatively should be considered. Clear guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis as part of the surgical management of mandibular fractures are required.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Fracturas Mandibulares , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Fracturas Mandibulares/tratamiento farmacológico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
J Craniofac Surg ; 32(8): 2611-2614, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34727465

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: The authors' aim was to evaluate the effect of perioperative systemic dexamethasone (DXM) administration on postoperative pain, edema, and trismus in mandibular fracture patients. The authors conducted a prospective randomized study of 45 patients with one or 2 noncomminuted fractures of the dentate part of the mandible. All patients underwent surgery for intraoral miniplate fixation. Patients in the study group were given a total of 30 mg DXM, while patients in the control group received neither DXM nor placebo. Only paracetamol and opioids were served as analgesics. Pain severity was assessed using the visual analog scale. The effect in facial swelling was measured in centimeters and analyzed as percentage change. Trismus was evaluated as the difference in maximal mouth opening by measuring interincisal distance in millimeters. The Mann-Whitney U test was applied to determine the statistical significance of differences between the groups. Thirty-four patients were included in the statistical analysis. The visual analog scale score was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group at 18 hours postoperatively (P = 0.033). Significant differences in edema or trismus were not found postoperatively between the DXM and control groups. In conclusion, perioperative DXM decreases postoperative pain in mandibular fracture patients when nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are not used, but it does not seem to be effective in reducing edema or trismus.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Mandibulares , Diente Impactado , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Edema/etiología , Edema/prevención & control , Humanos , Fracturas Mandibulares/cirugía , Tercer Molar , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Extracción Dental , Trismo/etiología , Trismo/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA