Effect of synthetic CT on dose-derived toxicity predictors for MR-only prostate radiotherapy.

Objectives: Toxicity-driven adaptive radiotherapy (RT) is enhanced by the superior soft tissue contrast of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging compared with conventional computed tomography (CT). However, in an MR-only RT pathway synthetic CTs (sCT) are required for dose calculation. This study evaluates 3 sCT approaches for accurate rectal toxicity prediction in prostate RT. Methods: Thirty-six patients had MR (T2-weighted acquisition optimized for anatomical delineation, and T1-Dixon) with same day standard-of-care planning CT for prostate RT. Multiple sCT were created per patient using bulk density (BD), tissue stratification (TS, from T1-Dixon) and deep-learning (DL) artificial intelligence (AI) (from T2-weighted) approaches for dose distribution calculation and creation of rectal dose volume histograms (DVH) and dose surface maps (DSM) to assess grade-2 (G2) rectal bleeding risk. Results: Maximum absolute errors using sCT for DVH-based G2 rectal bleeding risk (risk range 1.6% to 6.1%) were 0.6% (BD), 0.3% (TS) and 0.1% (DL). DSM-derived risk prediction errors followed a similar pattern. DL sCT has voxel-wise density generated from T2-weighted MR and improved accuracy for both risk-prediction methods. Conclusions: DL improves dosimetric and predicted risk calculation accuracy. Both TS and DL methods are clinically suitable for sCT generation in toxicity-guided RT, however, DL offers increased accuracy and offers efficiencies by removing the need for T1-Dixon MR. Advances in knowledge: This study demonstrates novel insights regarding the effect of sCT on predictive toxicity metrics, demonstrating clear accuracy improvement with increased sCT resolution. Accuracy of toxicity calculation in MR-only RT should be assessed for all treatment sites where dose to critical structures will guide adaptive-RT strategies. Clinical trial registration number: Patient data were taken from an ethically approved (UK Health Research Authority) clinical trial run at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust. Study Name: MR-simulation in Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03238170.

Choosing the right artificial intelligence solutions for your radiology department: key factors to consider.

The rapid evolution of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in deep learning, has significantly impacted radiology, introducing an array of AI solutions for interpretative tasks. This paper provides radiology departments with a practical guide for selecting and integrating AI solutions, focusing on interpretative tasks that require the active involvement of radiologists. Our approach is not to list available applications or review scientific evidence, as this information is readily available in previous studies; instead, we concentrate on the essential factors radiology departments must consider when choosing AI solutions. These factors include clinical relevance, performance and validation, implementation and integration, clinical usability, costs and return on investment, and regulations, security, and privacy. We illustrate each factor with hypothetical scenarios to provide a clearer understanding and practical relevance. Through our experience and literature review, we provide insights and a practical roadmap for radiologists to navigate the complex landscape of AI in radiology. We aim to assist in making informed decisions that enhance diagnostic precision, improve patient outcomes, and streamline workflows, thus contributing to the advancement of radiological practices and patient care.

3D printing of an artificial intelligence-generated patient-specific coronary artery segmentation in a support bath.

Accurate segmentation of coronary artery tree and personalized 3D printing from medical images is essential for CAD diagnosis and treatment. The current literature on 3D printing relies solely on generic models created with different software or 3D coronary artery models manually segmented from medical images. Moreover, there are not many studies examining the bioprintability of a 3D model generated by artificial intelligence (AI) segmentation for complex and branched structures. In this study, deep learning algorithms with transfer learning have been employed for accurate segmentation of the coronary artery tree from medical images to generate printable segmentations. We propose a combination of deep learning and 3D printing, which accurately segments and prints complex vascular patterns in coronary arteries. Then, we performed the 3D printing of the AI-generated coronary artery segmentation for the fabrication of bifurcated hollow vascular structure. Our results indicate improved performance of segmentation with the aid of transfer learning with a Dice overlap score of 0.86 on a test set of 10 coronary tomography angiography images. Then, bifurcated regions from 3D models were printed into the Pluronic F-127 support bath using alginate + glucomannan hydrogel. We successfully fabricated the bifurcated coronary artery structures with high length and wall thickness accuracy, however, the outer diameters of the vessels and length of the bifurcation point differ from the 3D models. The extrusion of unnecessary material, primarily observed when the nozzle moves from left to the right vessel during 3D printing, can be mitigated by adjusting the nozzle speed. Moreover, the shape accuracy can also be improved by designing a multi-axis printhead that can change the printing angle in three dimensions. Thus, this study demonstrates the potential of the use of AI-segmented 3D models in the 3D printing of coronary artery structures and, when further improved, can be used for the fabrication of patient-specific vascular implants.

Quantitative evaluation of Saliency-Based Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) methods in Deep Learning-Based mammogram analysis.

BACKGROUND: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is prominent in the diagnostics of opaque deep learning (DL) models, especially in medical imaging. Saliency methods are commonly used, yet there's a lack of quantitative evidence regarding their performance. OBJECTIVES: To quantitatively evaluate the performance of widely utilized saliency XAI methods in the task of breast cancer detection on mammograms. METHODS: Three radiologists drew ground-truth boxes on a balanced mammogram dataset of women (n = 1496 cancer-positive and negative scans) from three centers. A modified, pre-trained DL model was employed for breast cancer detection, using MLO and CC images. Saliency XAI methods, including Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM), Grad-CAM++, and Eigen-CAM, were evaluated. We utilized the Pointing Game to assess these methods, determining if the maximum value of a saliency map aligned with the bounding boxes, representing the ratio of correctly identified lesions among all cancer patients, with a value ranging from 0 to 1. RESULTS: The development sample included 2,244 women (75%), with the remaining 748 women (25%) in the testing set for unbiased XAI evaluation. The model's recall, precision, accuracy, and F1-Score in identifying cancer in the testing set were 69%, 88%, 80%, and 0.77, respectively. The Pointing Game Scores for Grad-CAM, Grad-CAM++, and Eigen-CAM were 0.41, 0.30, and 0.35 in women with cancer and marginally increased to 0.41, 0.31, and 0.36 when considering only true-positive samples. CONCLUSIONS: While saliency-based methods provide some degree of explainability, they frequently fall short in delineating how DL models arrive at decisions in a considerable number of instances.