Racial Inequities in Drug Tests Ordered by Clinicians for Pregnant People Who Disclose Prenatal Substance Use.

OBJECTIVE: To measure racial inequities in drug testing among pregnant people during the first prenatal visit based on their drug use disclosure pattern. METHODS: We used data from a cohort study of patient-clinician communication patterns regarding substance use in first prenatal visits from February 2011 to August 2014. We assessed racial differences (Black-White) in the receipt of urine toxicology testing, stratifying on patients' drug use disclosure to the clinician. RESULTS: Among 341 study participants (205 Black [60.1%] and 136 White [39.9%] participants), 70 participants (33 Black [47.1%] and 37 White [52.9%] participants) disclosed drug use, and 271 participants (172 Black [63.5%] and 99 White [36.5%] participants) did not disclose drug use during their first obstetric visit. Of 70 participants who disclosed drug use, 50 (28 Black [56.0%] and 22 White [44.0%] White) had urine drug testing conducted. Black pregnant patients who disclosed drug use were more likely to be tested for drugs than their White counterparts in the adjusted regression analysis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.9, 95% CI 1.3-58.6). Among the 271 participants who did not disclose drug use, 38 (18 Black [47.4%] and 20 White [52.6%] participants) had urine drug testing conducted. For those who did not disclose drug use, the adjusted model showed no statistically significant differences in urine drug testing by patients' race (aOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.6). CONCLUSION: When pregnant people disclosed drug use, clinicians were more likely to order urine drug testing for Black pregnant people compared with their White counterparts, suggesting clinician racial bias. Current practice patterns and protocols such as urine drug testing in pregnancy care deserve review to identify and mitigate areas of potential clinician discrimination.

The Medial Gastrocnemius Recession, an Alternative Surgical Treatment for Isolated Gastrocnemius Contracture: A Cadaver Study With Discussion Emphasizing Variable Conjoint Tendon Anatomy.

BACKGROUND: Gastrocnemius recession is a popular procedure utilized to treat chronic conditions related to isolated gastrocnemius contracture (IGC). Recent anatomical research detailing variable gastrocsoleus tendon morphology has raised important questions regarding the safety of some traditional recession procedures. Alternative gastrocnemius recession strategies may produce comparable dorsiflexion improvement results while avoiding the surgical risk related to conjoint tendon anatomical variability. METHODS: Ten matched cadaver pairs were randomized to receive either a medial gastrocnemius recession (MGR) procedure or a gastrocnemius intramuscular recession "Baumann" procedure. Postoperative dorsiflexion improvement was measured and then compared between groups. Detailed postoperative surgical dissections were performed to assess structures at risk, conjoint tendon morphology, and anatomical symmetry. RESULTS: Medial gastrocnemius recession and Baumann procedures were equally effective at producing significant increases in passive ankle dorsiflexion. No sural nerve injuries were observed. Thirty-five percent of specimens showed direct muscular fusion of at least a portion of the distal gastrocnemius muscular tissue to the adjacent soleus. CONCLUSION: The MGR procedure produced comparable dorsiflexion improvement results to the Baumann procedure in our cadaver model. Surgeons must account for certain conjoint tendon anatomical variants when surgically treating IGC as traditional recession methods risk tendo-Achilles overlengthening. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level V: Cadaver Study.

Community-engaged Processes for Restarting Federally Funded Research in a Community-based Organization during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Birmingham AIDS Outreach (BAO) is one of three study sites partnering with the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health (Pitt Public Health) for a National Institutes of Health-funded randomized controlled trial on a financial management intervention for people with HIV who are experiencing homelessness or housing instability. After the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in March 2020, the study team used a community-engaged approach to adapt research protocols at this site. We sought to describe a community-engaged approach to restarting National Institutes of Health-funded research during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Partners at Pitt Public Health and BAO developed a set of agency-wide COVID-19 policies and procedures for BAO organized around Rhodes' critical elements of community engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The challenges presented by COVID-19 in the research sector have provided an opportunity to reevaluate study activities and increase the extent to which research is conducted in a community-centered manner.

Investing in the Next Generation of Maternal and Child Health Leaders: The APHA Maternal and Child Health Section Student Fellows Program.

PURPOSE: Practical experience in maternal and child health (MCH) settings is critical for professional development and learning. In 2002, the Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Section of the American Public Health Association (APHA) formalized its inclusion of students in section activities through the establishment of the Student Fellows Program. The Program provides graduate-level students opportunities to learn about MCH and APHA, build professional networks, and develop leadership skills. DESCRIPTION: Since its inception, 18 cohorts of Fellows have benefited. This paper presents findings describing the Program from both written records about Fellow projects and activities recorded in past MCH Section communications as well as an online survey that was distributed to former and current Fellows to assess their perceptions and the benefits of the Student Fellows Program. ASSESSMENT: Eighteen cohorts of Fellows have engaged with Section committees and working groups in diverse ways, including MCH-related research, policy, advocacy, and education. An online survey distributed to 151 participants was answered by 79 to document their perceptions of the Student Fellows Program. Of them, 56 (71%) indicated that the Program was important for their career development, 44 (55%) reported being current members of the APHA MCH Section, and 21 (27%) reported serving in a leadership position in the Section. The Fellows highlighted that networking, mentorship and leadership development were key benefits of the Student Fellows Program. CONCLUSION: After several years of involving students in its programs, the APHA MCH Section established the Student Fellows Program in 2002. The Fellows Program has been important for developing the next generation of MCH leaders. The findings suggest that this Program supports long-term interest and commitment to the field of MCH and contributed to the formation of leadership skills and behaviors of Fellows.

Barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for childhood immunisation in Nigeria: perspectives from caregivers, community leaders, and healthcare workers.

Introduction: vaccination is one of the most successful and cost-effective public health interventions, significantly reducing childhood morbidity and mortality. In 2019, Nigeria had almost 2.5 million unvaccinated children. This study highlights barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for childhood immunisation uptake from various stakeholder perspectives. Methods: the study team conducted ten focus groups with mothers/caregivers and community leaders and nine semi-structured interviews with healthcare workers who provide routine immunisation services in Lagos State primary healthcare facilities. We performed a descriptive thematic analysis of the focus groups and semi-structured interviews. Results: study participants included 44 mothers/caregivers and 24 community leaders, and 19 primary healthcare workers in the State. Study participants reported barriers, facilitators, and recommendations for childhood immunisation uptake. Barriers include poor geographical and financial constraints to access healthcare services, inconducive health facility attributes, negative attitudes of health facility staff, vaccination misperceptions, and adverse events following immunisation. Facilitators include free immunisation service policy, optimal vaccine and device supply chain system, adequate knowledge of immunisation benefits and efficacy, vaccination outreaches, and provision of incentives to caregivers. Participants also made recommendations for implementation, including more awareness creation, use of community resources, employing more healthcare workers, frequent and optimal immunisation services and planning, and instituting a reminder system and defaulter tracking. Conclusion: our results can inform the development of interventions to improve childhood immunisation uptake. In addition, study findings can be employed to improve adult immunisation acceptance and uptake and other services provided within the primary healthcare setting.

The Socioecological Model as a framework for exploring factors influencing childhood immunization uptake in Lagos state, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: Nigeria is one of the ten countries globally that account for 62% of under- and unvaccinated children worldwide. Despite several governmental and non-governmental agencies' interventions, Nigeria has yet to achieve significant gains in childhood immunization coverage. This study identifies intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy-level factors that influence childhood immunization uptake from various stakeholders' perspectives using the Socioecological Model (SEM). METHODS: Using the Socioecological Model as a guiding framework, we conducted ten focus group sessions with mothers/caregivers and community leaders residing in Lagos state and nine semi-structured interviews with healthcare workers who provide routine immunization services in Lagos state primary healthcare facilities. We performed a qualitative analysis of focus groups and semi-structured interviews using deductive coding methods. RESULTS: The study sample included 44 mothers/caregivers and 24 community leaders residing in Lagos State, Nigeria, and 19 healthcare workers (routine immunization focal persons) working in the primary healthcare setting in Lagos state. Study participants discussed factors at each level of the SEM that influence childhood immunization uptake, including intrapersonal (caregivers' immunization knowledge, caregivers' welfare and love of child/ren), interpersonal (role of individual relationships and social networks), organizational (geographical and financial access to health facilities, health facilities attributes, staff coverage, and healthcare worker attributes), community (community outreaches and community resources), and policy-level (free immunization services and provision of child immunization cards). Several factors were intertwined, such as healthcare workers' education of caregivers on immunization and caregivers' knowledge of vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: The reciprocity of the findings across the Socioecological Model levels emphasizes the importance of developing multi-pronged interventions that operate at multiple levels of the SEM. Our results can inform the design of culturally appropriate and effective interventions to address Nigeria's suboptimal immunization coverage.

Naming Silence and Inadequate Obstetric Care as Obstetric Violence is a Necessary Step for Change.

This response article addresses the questions raised in "How Gentle Must Violence Against Women be in Order to not be Violent? Rethinking the Word 'Violence; in Obstetric Settings" and concludes that naming violence is critical for describing people's experiences of such violence and for addressing the structures and contexts that create and fuel such violence, not for judgment but for accountability and change. Impact, outcome, and, at times, processes-rather than intention-should underpin applications of the term violence; naming violence does not disempower women, but rather naming structural, systemic, and institutional violence demands acknowledgment, accountability, and responsibility for its effects on both patients and clinicians; and, finally, while the unintended consequences of using such a term may present challenges, they do not outweigh the importance of naming structural violence in health-related systems to identify practices and processes that discriminate, disempower, harm, and oppress.

More Than a Means to an End: Alignment of Social Service Organizations' Missions with Representative Payee Program Goals.

Although nearly 5 million Social Security Income and Social Security Disability Insurance beneficiaries receive entitlements through representative payee programs and approximately 5% of these receive representative payee services from social service agencies, few studies have assessed ways that these services align with their organizations' missions. We conducted nine qualitative interviews with 15 staff members of organizations in Pennsylvania that provide representative payee services in addition to other social or supportive services, with some interviews conducted with multiple representatives within an organization. The purpose of the interviews was to explore the goals of representative payee services for these organizations, whether these providers incorporated representative payee services into their organizational missions, and the extent to which organizations incorporate client-centered approaches in their representative payee services. We identified three main goals of the representative payee programs, which were in alignment with the organizations' missions: financial and housing stability, financial literacy, and improving health outcomes. In addition, participants discussed challenges related to representative payee services that were encountered within their organizations and with clients. Findings indicate that organizations view representative payee services as not just financial management but also a means to improve clients' knowledge and skills and assist them with achieving their goals. Client-centered practices were emphasized as a means of reducing paternalism and to support clients' goals. Given that participants discussed the importance of incorporating client-centeredness into the provision of representative payee services and there are currently no published guidelines or best practices on how this can be achieved, we suggest that guidance on how to effectively provide client-centered representative payee services to improve client outcomes is essential.

"Support People the Way in Which They Want to Be Supported": Best Practices for Incorporating Client-Centeredness in Representative Payee Programs.

Nearly 1 million Social Security beneficiaries have representative payees to manage their funds. Although coercion and paternalism are historically associated with payee services, a recent study showed high satisfaction in a payee program incorporating client-centered practices. Separately we reported ways organizations align payee services with their missions to empower clients and improve outcomes. Here we share results from nine provider qualitative interviews describing client-centered best practices and exploring beliefs regarding their value. We identified four best practices: Shared Decision-Making on Bills and Spending, Non-Paternalistic Substance Use Policies, Client Advocacy, and Additional Service Policies, (changing fee structures, termination policies, incorporating opting in or out, and "graduation"). Results indicate prioritizing clients' goals and agency may improve the quality of life of beneficiaries and reduce the paternalism and coercion historically associated with payee. Creating a client-centered payee toolkit and a payee collaborative may empower organizations to refine their services and provide opportunities for shared learning and support.

Protocol of a randomized controlled trial to test the effects of client-centered Representative Payee Services on antiretroviral therapy adherence among marginalized people living with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Client-Centered Representative Payee (CCRP) is an intervention modifying implementation of a current policy of the US Social Security Administration, which appoints organizations to serve as financial payees on behalf of vulnerable individuals receiving Social Security benefits. By ensuring beneficiaries' bills are paid while supporting their self-determination, this structural intervention may mitigate the effects of economic disadvantage to improve housing and financial stability, enabling self-efficacy for health outcomes and improved antiretroviral therapy adherence. This randomized controlled trial will test the impact of CCRP on marginalized people living with HIV (PLWH). We hypothesize that helping participants to pay their rent and other bills on time will improve housing stability and decrease financial stress. METHODS: PLWH (n = 160) receiving services at community-based organizations will be randomly assigned to the CCRP intervention or the standard of care for 12 months. Fifty additional participants will be enrolled into a non-randomized ("choice") study allowing participant selection of the CCRP intervention or control. The primary outcome is HIV medication adherence, assessed via the CASE adherence index, viral load, and CD4 counts. Self-assessment data for ART adherence, housing instability, self-efficacy for health behaviors, financial stress, and retention in care will be collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Viral load, CD4, and appointment adherence data will be collected at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months from medical records. Outcomes will be compared by treatment group in the randomized trial, in the non-randomized cohort, and in the combined cohort. Qualitative data will be collected from study participants, eligible non-participants, and providers to explore underlying mechanisms of adherence, subjective responses to the intervention, and implementation barriers and facilitators. DISCUSSION: The aim of this study is to determine if CCRP improves health outcomes for vulnerable PLWH. Study outcomes may provide information about supports needed to help economically fragile PLWH improve health outcomes and ultimately improve HIV health disparities. In addition, findings may help to refine service delivery including the provision of representative payee to this often-marginalized population. This protocol was prospectively registered on May 22, 2018 with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03561103) .