How to address the posterior malleolus in ankle fractures? A decision-making model based on the computerised tomography findings.

INTRODUCTION: The posterior malleolus (PM) is affected in around the 40% of ankle fractures. Anatomical reduction of the articular surface and fibular notch are essential for ankle stability and functional outcomes. These facts justify the increasing interest in the surgical treatment of PM in ankle fractures. Within this context, pre-operative computed tomography (CT) images and posterior approaches to the ankle play a crucial role. The aim of this paper is to make an accurate description of the literature and describe, according to authors' experience, the best surgical approach to the PM based on the CT findings while assessing their advantages and disadvantages. METHODS: The fracture pattern of PM is classified according to Haraguchi or Bartonícek classification, both based on pre-operative CT scan images. The posterolateral (PLA) and posteromedial (PMA) approaches to the ankle and their corresponding modifications are described. We propose a decision-making algorithm for posterior malleolus fractures to facilitate treatment selection. RESULTS: Posterolateral approach should be the election for Haraguchi I or III and Bartonícek 1, 2, or 4 fractures. Percutaneous PLA might be adequate in Haraguchi I and Bartonícek 1 to improve syndesmotic stability. In PL approaches, the fibula fracture may be addressed and fixed with a posterolateral plate or through a subcutaneous window that allows lateral reduction and fixation. Posteromedial approach should be the election for Haraguchi II and Bartonícek 3 fractures. A modified PMA might be the election to reduce and fix any fragment dependent on the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL). The modified PMA is performed in a supine position and allows us to check the articular reduction under direct vision. Both PMA are associated with a lateral fibular approach. CONCLUSION: To address the posterior malleolus when treating ankle fractures, surgeons should choose the most adequate approach based on the fracture pattern and their own experience. Anatomical reduction and stable fixation are critical to improve outcomes.

Analysis of complications after a floating elbow injury.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to analyse complications after a floating elbow injury, attempting to establish which of them act as a poor prognosis factor regarding clinical and functional results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three patients who suffered a floating elbow injury, treated at our institution from 2004 to 2013, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into four groups depending on the type of injury. An analysis of demographic data, associated injuries, treatment options and complications was carried out. Clinical evaluation was made by a conventional goniometer, testing flexo-extension and prono-supination ranges. For functional evaluation, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score was employed. Association between radioulnar synostosis, articular surface disruption, nerve injury and clinical and functional results was analysed. RESULTS: Patients with radioulnar synostosis had worse results in functional evaluation than patients without it (56.6 vs. 75); this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.05). Regarding intra-articular extension, we found statistical association with worse results in functional evaluation (p = 0.018); however, nerve palsy does not seem to influence functional results. CONCLUSIONS: Radioulnar synostosis and intra-articular extension of the injury are poor prognosis factor in floating elbow.