RESUMEN
Inovações técnicas e tecnológicas têm liderado a expansão das indicações de uso das abordagens endoscópicas endonasais para a extirpação de lesões malignas do trato nasossinusal e base do crânio. OBJETIVO: Analisar criticamente a literatura disponível sobre o uso de abordagens endoscópicas endonasais incluindo indicações, limitações, técnicas cirúrgicas, desfecho oncológico e qualidade de vida. MÉTODO: Várias técnicas endoscópicas endonasais foram analisadas segundo a origem e extensão local das lesões malignas nasossinusais e da base do crânio, incluindo a porção anterior da base do crânio, nasofaringe, clívus e fossa infratemporal. A literatura disponível foi também avaliada em função dos desfechos. CONCLUSÃO: As abordagens endoscópicas endonasais são parte integrante do arsenal terapêutico desenvolvido para abordar neoplasias malignas do trato nasossinusais e da base do crânio. Em casos adequadamente selecionados, esta abordagem produz resultados oncológicos semelhantes com menor morbidade do que as abordagens abertas tradicionais. Não obstante, abordagens minimamente invasivas devem ser consideradas como complemento às abordagens abertas estabelecidas, ainda necessárias na maioria dos tumores mais avançados. .
Technical and technological innovations have spearheaded the expansion of the indications for the use of endoscopic endonasal approaches to extirpate malignancies of the sinonasal tract and adjacent skull base. OBJECTIVE: Critical review of the available literature regarding the use of endoscopic endonasal approaches including indications, limitations, surgical techniques, oncologic outcome, and quality of life. METHOD: Various endoscopic endonasal techniques are reviewed according to the origin and local extension of sinonasal and skull base malignancies including anterior cranial base, nasopharynx, clivus, and infratemporal fossa. In addition, the available literature is reviewed to assess outcomes. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic endonasal approaches are an integral part of the armamentarium for the treatment of the sinonasal tract malignancies and skull base. In properly selected cases, it affords similar oncologic outcomes with lower morbidity than traditional open approaches. Nonetheless, these minimal access approaches should be considered a complement to well-established open approaches, which are still necessary in most advanced tumors. .
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Endoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias de los Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/cirugíaRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: Technical and technological innovations have spearheaded the expansion of the indications for the use of endoscopic endonasal approaches to extirpate malignancies of the sinonasal tract and adjacent skull base. OBJECTIVE: Critical review of the available literature regarding the use of endoscopic endonasal approaches including indications, limitations, surgical techniques, oncologic outcome, and quality of life. METHOD: Various endoscopic endonasal techniques are reviewed according to the origin and local extension of sinonasal and skull base malignancies including anterior cranial base, nasopharynx, clivus, and infratemporal fossa. In addition, the available literature is reviewed to assess outcomes. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic endonasal approaches are an integral part of the armamentarium for the treatment of the sinonasal tract malignancies and skull base. In properly selected cases, it affords similar oncologic outcomes with lower morbidity than traditional open approaches. Nonetheless, these minimal access approaches should be considered a complement to well-established open approaches, which are still necessary in most advanced tumors.