Bacteriophage-encoded 24B_1 molecule resembles herpesviral microRNAs and plays a crucial role in the development of both the virus and its host.

The 24B_1 small non-coding RNA molecule has been identified in Escherichia coli after induction of Shiga toxin-converting bacteriophage Φ24B. In this work, we focused on its direct role during phage and bacterial host development. We observed that in many aspects, this phage sRNA resembles herpesviral microRNAs. Similar to microRNAs, the mature 24B_1 is a short molecule, consisting of just 20 nucleotides. It is generated by cleaving the 80-nt long precursor transcript, and likely it undergoes a multi-step maturation process in which the Hfq protein plays an important role, as confirmed by demonstration of its binding to the 24B_1 precursor, but not to the 24B_1 mature form. Moreover, 24B_1 plays a significant role in maintaining the prophage state and reprogramming the host's energy metabolism. We proved that overproduction of this molecule causes the opposite physiological effects to the mutant devoid of the 24B_1 gene, and thus, favors the lysogenic pathway. Furthermore, the 24B_1 overrepresentation significantly increases the efficiency of expression of phage genes coding for proteins CI, CII, and CIII which are engaged in the maintenance of the prophage. It seems that through binding to mRNA of the sdhB gene, coding for the succinate dehydrogenase subunit, the 24B_1 alters the central carbon metabolism and causes a drop in the ATP intracellular level. Interestingly, a similar effect, called the Warburg switch, is caused by herpesviral microRNAs and it is observed in cancer cells. The advantage of the Warburg effect is still unclear, however, it was proposed that the metabolism of cancer cells, and all rapidly dividing cells, is adopted to convert nutrients such as glucose and glutamine faster and more efficiently into biomass. The availability of essential building blocks, such as nucleotides, amino acids, and lipids, is crucial for effective cell proliferation which in turn is essential for the prophage and its host to stay in the lysogenic state.

Biochemical and genetic dissection of the RNA-binding surface of the FinO domain of Escherichia coli ProQ.

RNA-binding proteins play important roles in bacterial gene regulation through interactions with both coding and noncoding RNAs. ProQ is a FinO-domain protein that binds a large set of RNAs in Escherichia coli, though the details of how ProQ binds these RNAs remain unclear. In this study, we used a combination of in vivo and in vitro binding assays to confirm key structural features of E. coli ProQ's FinO domain and explore its mechanism of RNA interactions. Using a bacterial three-hybrid assay, we performed forward genetic screens to confirm the importance of the concave face of ProQ in RNA binding. Using gel shift assays, we directly probed the contributions of ten amino acids on ProQ binding to seven RNA targets. Certain residues (R58, Y70, and R80) were found to be essential for binding of all seven RNAs, while substitutions of other residues (K54 and R62) caused more moderate binding defects. Interestingly, substitutions of two amino acids (K35, R69), which are evolutionarily variable but adjacent to conserved residues, showed varied effects on the binding of different RNAs; these may arise from the differing sequence context around each RNA's terminator hairpin. Together, this work confirms many of the essential RNA-binding residues in ProQ initially identified in vivo and supports a model in which residues on the conserved concave face of the FinO domain such as R58, Y70, and R80 form the main RNA-binding site of E. coli ProQ, while additional contacts contribute to the binding of certain RNAs.

Biochemical and genetic dissection of the RNA-binding surface of the FinO domain of Escherichia coli ProQ.

RNA-binding proteins play important roles in bacterial gene regulation through interactions with both coding and non-coding RNAs. ProQ is a FinO-domain protein that binds a large set of RNAs in Escherichia coli , though the details of how ProQ binds these RNAs remain unclear. In this study, we used a combination of in vivo and in vitro binding assays to confirm key structural features of E. coli ProQ's FinO domain and explore its mechanism of RNA interactions. Using a bacterial three-hybrid assay, we performed forward genetic screens to confirm the importance of the concave face of ProQ in RNA binding. Using gel shift assays, we directly probed the contributions of ten amino acids on ProQ binding to seven RNA targets. Certain residues (R58, Y70, and R80) were found to be essential for binding of all seven RNAs, while substitutions of other residues (K54 and R62) caused more moderate binding defects. Interestingly, substitutions of two amino acids (K35, R69), which are evolutionarily variable but adjacent to conserved residues, showed varied effects on the binding of different RNAs; these may arise from the differing sequence context around each RNA's terminator hairpin. Together, this work confirms many of the essential RNA-binding residues in ProQ initially identified in vivo and supports a model in which residues on the conserved concave face of the FinO domain such as R58, Y70 and R80 form the main RNA-binding site of E. coli ProQ, while additional contacts contribute to the binding of certain RNAs.

KH domain proteins: Another family of bacterial RNA matchmakers?

In many bacteria, the stabilities and functions of small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) that act by base pairing with target RNAs most often are dependent on Hfq or ProQ/FinO-domain proteins, two classes of RNA chaperone proteins. However, while all bacteria appear to have sRNAs, many have neither Hfq nor ProQ/FinO-domain proteins raising the question of whether another factor might act as an sRNA chaperone in these organisms. Several recent studies have reported that KH domain proteins, such as KhpA and KhpB, bind sRNAs. Here we describe what is known about the distribution, structures, RNA-binding properties, and physiologic roles of KhpA and KhpB and discuss evidence for and against these proteins serving as sRNAs chaperones.

Bacterial Chaperone Protein Hfq Facilitates the Annealing of Sponge RNAs to Small Regulatory RNAs.

Bacterial small RNAs (sRNAs) in association with the chaperone protein Hfq regulate the expression of many target mRNAs. Since sRNAs' action is crucial to engendering a response to changing environmental conditions, their activity needs to be regulated. One such mechanism occurs at the post-transcriptional level and involves sponge RNAs, which sequester sRNAs affecting their regulatory output. Both types of RNAs were identified on Hfq, but it is not known how Hfq interacts with RNA sponges and stimulates their base-pairing with sRNAs. Here, we used biochemical methods to demonstrate that sponge RNAs resemble sRNAs by their structure and their modes of Hfq binding. Hfq facilitates the annealing of AgvB and 3'ETSleuZ sponge RNAs to targeted sRNAs: GcvB and RybB, respectively, and each surface of the protein plays a particular role in the process. Moreover, we found that the efficiency of sponge RNA interactions with sRNAs can be improved; therefore, we propose that natural RNA sponges might not sequester sRNAs optimally.

Determinants of RNA recognition by the FinO domain of the Escherichia coli ProQ protein.

The regulation of gene expression by small RNAs in Escherichia coli depends on RNA binding proteins Hfq and ProQ, which bind mostly distinct RNA pools. To understand how ProQ discriminates between RNA substrates, we compared its binding to six different RNA molecules. Full-length ProQ bound all six RNAs similarly, while the isolated N-terminal FinO domain (NTD) of ProQ specifically recognized RNAs with Rho-independent terminators. Analysis of malM 3'-UTR mutants showed that tight RNA binding by the ProQ NTD required a terminator hairpin of at least 2 bp preceding an 3' oligoU tail of at least four uridine residues. Substitution of an A-rich sequence on the 5' side of the terminator to uridines strengthened the binding of several ProQ-specific RNAs to the Hfq protein, but not to the ProQ NTD. Substitution of the motif in the malM-3' and cspE-3' RNAs also conferred the ability to bind Hfq in E. coli cells, as measured using a three-hybrid assay. In summary, these data suggest that the ProQ NTD specifically recognizes 3' intrinsic terminators of RNA substrates, and that the discrimination between RNA ligands by E. coli ProQ and Hfq depends both on positive determinants for binding to ProQ and negative determinants against binding to Hfq.

The binding of Class II sRNA MgrR to two different sites on matchmaker protein Hfq enables efficient competition for Hfq and annealing to regulated mRNAs.

MgrR is an Hfq-dependent sRNA, whose transcription is controlled by the level of Mg2+ ions in Escherichia coli MgrR belongs to Class II sRNAs because its stability in the cell is affected by mutations in Hfq differently than canonical, Class I sRNAs. Here, we examined the effect of mutations in RNA binding sites of Hfq on the kinetics of the annealing of MgrR to two different target mRNAs, eptB and ygdQ, by global data fitting of the reaction kinetics monitored by gel electrophoresis of intermediates and products. The data showed that the mutation on the rim of the Hfq ring trapped MgrR on Hfq preventing the annealing of MgrR to either mRNA. The mutation in the distal face slowed the ternary complex formation and affected the release of MgrR-mRNA complexes from Hfq, while the mutation in the proximal face weakened the MgrR binding to Hfq and in this way affected the annealing. Moreover, competition assays established that MgrR bound to both faces of Hfq and competed against other sRNAs. Further studies showed that uridine-rich sequences located in less structurally stable regions served as Hfq binding sites in each mRNA. Overall, the data show that the binding of MgrR sRNA to both faces of the Hfq ring enables it to efficiently anneal to target mRNAs. It also confers on MgrR a competitive advantage over other sRNAs, which could contribute to efficient cellular response to changes in magnesium homeostasis.

ProQ/FinO-domain proteins: another ubiquitous family of RNA matchmakers?

Small RNAs (sRNAs), particularly those that act by limited base pairing with mRNAs, are part of most regulatory networks in bacteria. In many cases, the base-pairing interaction is facilitated by the RNA chaperone Hfq. However, not all bacteria encode Hfq and some base-pairing sRNAs do not require Hfq raising the possibility of other RNA chaperones. Candidates are proteins with homology to FinO, a factor that promotes base pairing between the FinP antisense sRNA and the traJ mRNA to control F plasmid transfer. Recent papers have shown that the Salmonella enterica FinO-domain protein ProQ binds a large suite of sRNAs, including the RaiZ sRNA, which represses translation of the hupA mRNA, and the Legionella pneumophila protein RocC binds the RocR sRNA, which blocks expression of competence genes. Here we discuss what is known about FinO-domain structures, including the recently solved Escherichia coli ProQ structure, as well as the RNA binding properties of this family of proteins and evidence they act as chaperones. We compare these properties with those of Hfq. We further summarize what is known about the physiological roles of FinO-domain proteins and enumerate outstanding questions whose answers will establish whether they constitute a second major class of RNA chaperones.

Analysis of ribosomal inter-subunit sites as targets for complementary oligonucleotides.

The bacterial ribosome has many functional ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sites. We have computationally analyzed the rRNA regions involved in the interactions between the 30S and 50S subunits. Various properties of rRNA such as solvent accessibility, opening energy, hydrogen bonding pattern, van der Waals energy, thermodynamic stability were determined. Based on these properties we selected rRNA targets for hybridization with complementary 2'-O-methyl oligoribonucleotides (2'-OMe RNAs). Further, the inhibition efficiencies of the designed ribosome-interfering 2'-OMe RNAs were tested using a ß-galactosidase assay in a translation system based on the E. coli extract. Several of the oligonucleotides displayed IC50 values below 1 µM, which were in a similar range as those determined for known ribosome inhibitors, tetracycline and pactamycin. The calculated opening and van der Waals stacking energies of the rRNA targets correlated best with the inhibitory efficiencies of 2'-OMe RNAs. Moreover, the binding affinities of several oligonucleotides to both 70S ribosomes and isolated 30S and 50S subunits were measured using a double-filter retention assay. Further, we applied heat-shock chemical transformation to introduce 2'-OMe RNAs to E. coli cells and verify inhibition of bacterial growth. We observed high correlation between IC50 in the cell-free extract and bacterial growth inhibition. Overall, the results suggest that the computational analysis of potential rRNA targets within the conformationally dynamic regions of inter-subunit bridges can help design efficient antisense oligomers to probe the ribosome function.

The structure of fadL mRNA and its interactions with RybB sRNA.

Small bacterial RNAs (sRNAs) regulate translation by pairing with complementary sequences in their target mRNAs, in a process which is often dependent on the Hfq protein. Here, the secondary structure of a 95-nt long fragment of Salmonella fadL mRNA containing RybB sRNA binding site in the coding region was analyzed. The data indicated local rearrangements in this mRNA structure after the annealing of RybB. The filter retention data had shown that Hfq bound both RybB and the fadL mRNA fragment with tight affinities. Moreover, Hfq increased the rate of RybB annealing to fadL mRNA. These data indicate that Hfq directly participates in RybB interactions with the fadL mRNA.

Contributions of the Hfq protein to translation regulation by small noncoding RNAs binding to the mRNA coding sequence.

The bacterial Sm-like protein Hfq affects the regulation of translation by small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs). In this way, Hfq participates in the cell adaptation to environmental stress, regulation of cellular metabolism, and bacterial virulence. The majority of known sRNAs bind complementary sequences in the 5'-untranslated mRNA regions. However, recent studies have shown that sRNAs can also target the mRNA coding sequence, even far downstream of the AUG start codon. In this review, we discuss how Hfq contributes to the translation regulation by those sRNAs which bind to the mRNA coding sequence.

Hfq assists small RNAs in binding to the coding sequence of ompD mRNA and in rearranging its structure.

The bacterial protein Hfq participates in the regulation of translation by small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs). Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the role of Hfq in the regulation by sRNAs binding to the 5'-untranslated mRNA regions. However, it remains unknown how Hfq affects those sRNAs that target the coding sequence. Here, the contribution of Hfq to the annealing of three sRNAs, RybB, SdsR, and MicC, to the coding sequence of Salmonella ompD mRNA was investigated. Hfq bound to ompD mRNA with tight, subnanomolar affinity. Moreover, Hfq strongly accelerated the rates of annealing of RybB and MicC sRNAs to this mRNA, and it also had a small effect on the annealing of SdsR. The experiments using truncated RNAs revealed that the contributions of Hfq to the annealing of each sRNA were individually adjusted depending on the structures of interacting RNAs. In agreement with that, the mRNA structure probing revealed different structural contexts of each sRNA binding site. Additionally, the annealing of RybB and MicC sRNAs induced specific conformational changes in ompD mRNA consistent with local unfolding of mRNA secondary structure. Finally, the mutation analysis showed that the long AU-rich sequence in the 5'-untranslated mRNA region served as an Hfq binding site essential for the annealing of sRNAs to the coding sequence. Overall, the data showed that the functional specificity of Hfq in the annealing of each sRNA to the ompD mRNA coding sequence was determined by the sequence and structure of the interacting RNAs.

Structure of bacterial regulatory RNAs determines their performance in competition for the chaperone protein Hfq.

Bacterial regulatory RNAs require the chaperone protein Hfq to enable their pairing to mRNAs. Recent data showed that there is a hierarchy among sRNAs in the competition for access to Hfq, which could be important for the tuning of sRNA-dependent translation regulation. Here, seven structurally different sRNAs were compared using filter-based competition assays. Moreover, chimeric sRNA constructs were designed to identify structure elements important for competition performance. The data showed that besides the 3'-terminal oligouridine sequences also the 5'-terminal structure elements of sRNAs were essential for their competition performance. When the binding of sRNAs to Hfq mutants was compared, the data showed the important role of the proximal and rim sites of Hfq for the binding of six out of seven sRNAs. However, ChiX sRNA, which was the most efficient competitor, bound Hfq in a unique way using the opposite-distal and proximal-faces of this ring-shaped protein. The data indicated that the simultaneous binding to the opposite faces of Hfq was enabled by separate adenosine-rich and uridine-rich sequences in the long, single-stranded region of ChiX. Overall, the results suggest that the individual structural composition of sRNAs serves to tune their performance to different levels resulting in a hierarchy of sRNAs in the competition for access to the Hfq protein.

Despite similar binding to the Hfq protein regulatory RNAs widely differ in their competition performance.

The binding of nine noncoding regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) to the E. coli Hfq protein was compared using a high-throughput double filter retention assay. Despite the fact that these sRNAs have different lengths, sequences and secondary structures their Hfq binding affinities were surprisingly uniform. The analysis of sRNAs binding to Hfq mutants showed that the proximal face of Hfq, known as the binding site for DsrA RNA, is a universal sRNA binding site. Moreover, all sRNAs bound Hfq with similar association rates limited only by the rate of diffusion, while the rates of dissociation, measured in the dilution experiments, were uniformly slow. Despite that, the data showed that there was a hierarchy of sRNAs in regard to their performance in competition for access to Hfq and in their ability to facilitate the dissociation of other sRNAs from Hfq. The sRNAs also differed in their salt dependence of binding to this protein. Overall, the results suggest that despite the uniform binding of different sRNAs to the same site on Hfq their exchange on this protein is dependent on the identities of the competing sRNAs.

A sequence element that tunes Escherichia coli tRNA(Ala)(GGC) to ensure accurate decoding.

Mutating the rare A32-U38 nucleotide pair at the top of the anticodon loop of Escherichia coli tRNA(Ala)(GGC) to a more common U32-A38 pair results in a tRNA that performs almost normally on cognate codons but is unusually efficient in reading near-cognate codons. Pre-steady state kinetic measurements on E. coli ribosomes show that, unlike the wild-type tRNA(Ala)(GGC), the misreading mutant tRNA(Ala)(GGC) shows rapid GTP hydrolysis and no detectable proofreading on near-cognate codons. Similarly, tRNA(Ala)(GGC) mutated to contain C32-G38, a pair that is found in some bacterial tRNA(Ala)(GGC) sequences, was able to decode only the cognate codons, whereas tRNA(Ala)(GGC) containing a more common C32-A38 pair was able to decode all cognate and near-cognate codons tested. We propose that many of the phylogenetically conserved sequence elements present in each tRNA have evolved to suppress translation of near-cognate codons.

Specificity of the ribosomal A site for aminoacyl-tRNAs.

Although some experiments suggest that the ribosome displays specificity for the identity of the esterified amino acid of its aminoacyl-tRNA substrate, a study measuring dissociation rates of several misacylated tRNAs containing the GAC anticodon from the A site showed little indication for such specificity. In this article, an expanded set of misacylated tRNAs and two 2'-deoxynucleotide-substituted mRNAs are used to demonstrate the presence of a lower threshold in k(off) values for aa-tRNA binding to the A site. When a tRNA binds sufficiently well to reach this threshold, additional stabilizing effects due to the esterified amino acid or changes in tRNA sequence are not observed. However, specificity for different amino acid side chains and the tRNA body is observed when tRNA binding is sufficiently weaker than this threshold. We propose that uniform aa-tRNA binding to the A site may be a consequence of a conformational change in the ribosome, induced by the presence of the appropriate combination of contributions from the anticodon, amino acid and tRNA body.

tRNA residues that have coevolved with their anticodon to ensure uniform and accurate codon recognition.

The structure, phylogeny and in vivo function of the base pair formed between nucleotides 32 and 38 of the tRNA anticodon loop are reviewed. The A32-U38 pair, which is highly conserved in tRNA2(Ala) and sometimes observed in tRNA2(Pro), was recently found to decrease the affinity of tRNAs to the ribosomal A site relative to other 32-38 combinations. This suggests that the role of 32-38 pair is to tune the tRNA affinity in the A site to a uniform value. New experiments presented here show that the U32C mutation in tRNA1(Gly) increases its affinity to the cognate codon and to codons with third position mismatches in the A site. This suggests that one reason for uniform tRNA binding to evolve was to avoid incorrect codon recognition.

Quantitative analysis of deoxynucleotide substitutions in the codon-anticodon helix.

The role of 2' hydroxyl groups in the codon-anticodon helix was evaluated by introducing single deoxynucleotides into each of the six positions in the helix and measuring the affinity of tRNA to either the A site or the P site of Escherichia coli 70S ribosomes. In perfect agreement with the X-ray structure of the Thermus thermophilus 30S subunit, A site binding was weaker in five of the six positions but P site binding was unaffected. Since the addition of paromomycin restores A site binding, it appears that the deoxynucleotide substituted complexes are impaired in their ability to promote the ribosomal conformational change that accompanies tRNA binding.

Idiosyncratic tuning of tRNAs to achieve uniform ribosome binding.

The binding of seven tRNA anticodons to their complementary codons on Escherichia coli ribosomes was substantially impaired, as compared with the binding of their natural tRNAs, when they were transplanted into tRNA(2)(Ala). An analysis of chimeras composed of tRNA(2)(Ala) and various amounts of either tRNA(3)(Gly) or tRNA(2)(Arg) indicates that the presence of the parental 32-38 nucleotide pair is sufficient to restore ribosome binding of the transplanted anticodons. Furthermore, mutagenesis of tRNA(2)(Ala) showed that its highly conserved A32-U38 pair serves to weaken ribosome affinity. We propose that this negative binding determinant is used to offset the very tight codon-anticodon interaction of tRNA(2)(Ala). This suggests that each tRNA sequence has coevolved with its anticodon to tune ribosome affinity to a value that is the same for all tRNAs.

The apical loop of the HIV-1 TAR RNA hairpin is stabilized by a cross-loop base pair.

The TAR hairpin of the HIV-1 RNA genome is indispensable for trans-activation of the viral promoter and virus replication. The TAR structure has been studied extensively, but most attention has been directed at the three-nucleotide bulge that constitutes the binding site of the viral Tat protein. In contrast, the conformational properties of the apical loop have remained elusive. We performed biochemical studies and molecular dynamics simulations, which indicate that the TAR loop is structured and stabilized by a cross-loop base pair between residues C30 and G34. Mutational disruption of the cross-loop base pair results in reduced Tat response of the LTR promoter, which can be rescued by compensatory mutations that restore the base pair. Thus, Tat-mediated transcriptional activation depends on the structure of the TAR apical loop. The C30-G34 cross-loop base pair classes TAR in a growing family of hairpins with a structured loop that was recently identified in ribosomal RNA, tRNA, and several viral and cellular mRNAs.