Assessment of the sacroiliac joint with computed tomography motion analysis: a diagnostic study of 12 patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Pain in the sacroiliac joint may be caused by abnormal joint motion. Diagnosis is mainly based on clinical tests. The aims of this study were to examine whether low-dose computed tomography with provocation of the hip could detect sacroiliac joint motion, and to study whether provocation of the hip results in greater sacroiliac joint motion in the ipsilateral than in the contralateral sacroiliac joint. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 12 patients with sacroiliac joint pain were examined with low-dose computed tomography scans of the sacroiliac joint, one with the hips in the neutral position, and one each in provocation with the left or the right hip in a figure-of-4 position. Accuracy was tested by comparing internal rotation of the sacrum with internal rotation in the sacroiliac joint. Motion in the sacroiliac joint was assessed by comparing the position of each of the ilia with the reference, the sacrum. Data is shown as mean with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: We observed greater motion in the sacroiliac joint than internally in the sacrum, i.e., 0.57° (CI 0.43-0.71) vs. 0.20° (CI 0.11-0.28). The motion of the geometric center of the moving object for the sacroiliac joint was larger on the provoked side; mean difference 0.17 mm (CI 0.01-0.33), P = 0.04. Corresponding figures for rotation were mean difference 0.19° (CI 0.10-0.28), P < 0.001. Compared with the sacrum, the largest motion was seen at the anterior superior iliac spine; mean difference 0.38 mm (CI 0.10-0.66), P = 0.001. CONCLUSION: Provocation in the figure-of-4 position of the hip results in sacroiliac joint motion measurable with computed tomography motion analysis. Provocation of the hip induces larger motion on the ipsilateral than on the contralateral sacroiliac joint.

CT-Based Micromotion Analysis After Locking Plate Fixation of AO Type C Distal Radius Fractures.

Background: Volar locking plate fixation (VLPF) is the most common method for operative fixation of distal radius fractures (DRF). The dorsal ulnar corner (DUC) can be difficult to stabilize as the fragment is small and not exposed when using the volar approach. The purpose of this study was to study fracture fragment migration after VLPF of AO type C DRF, using a volume registration technique of paired CT scans with special focus on the DUC fragment. Materials and Methods: This pilot study included ten patients with AO type C DRF, all operated with VLPF. The primary outcome was radiographic outcome. Postoperative and 1-year scans were compared and analyzed. Fragment migration was assessed with CT-based micromotion analysis (CTMA), a software technique used for volume registration of paired CT scans. Results: All plates were stable over time. Two patients showed signs of screw movement (0.2-0.35 mm and 0.35- > 1 mm respectively). Postoperative reduction was maintained, and there was no fragment migration at the 1-year follow-up except for one case with increased dorsal tilt. The DUC fragment was found in 8/10 cases, fixated in 7/8 cases, and not dislocated in any case at the 1-year follow-up. Conclusion: The CTMA results indicate that variable-angle VLPF after AO type C DRF can yield and maintain a highly stable reduction of the fracture fragments. The DUC fragment remained stable regardless of the number of screws through the fragment. CT volume registration can be a valuable tool in the detailed assessment of fracture fragment migration following volar plate fixation of DRFs.

Computed tomography-based radiostereometric analysis in orthopedic research: practical guidelines.

Early implant migration is an indicator of the long-term survival/failure of implants. CT-based radio-stereometric analysis (CT-RSA) is a precise method for measuring and visualizing implant migration in vivo using image processing of CT scans. This makes the method widely applicable to orthopedic researcher. Since its development in the early 2000s, CT-RSA has benefited from breakthroughs in CT and computing technology. These advancements have allowed for the acquisition of images with higher resolution at a much lower radiation dose. As a result, the measurement precision of CT-RSA is now comparable to that of the current gold standard technology while still compatible with most ethical considerations regarding radiation exposure. In this review we present bests practices for the successful execution of CT-RSA research projects. These practices are based on experience from projects on the hip, knee, shoulder, lower back, cervical spine, foot, pelvis, and wrist.

Computed tomography micromotion analysis in the follow-up of patients with surgically treated pelvic fractures: a prospective clinical study.

PURPOSE: High-energy pelvic fractures are complex injuries often requiring surgical treatment. Different radiological methods exist to evaluate the reduction and healing process postoperatively but with certain limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate Computed Tomography Micromotion Analysis (CTMA) in a clinical setting for follow-up of surgically treated pelvic fracture patients. METHODS: 10 patients surgically treated for a pelvic fracture were included and prospectively followed with Computed Tomography (CT) at 0, 6, 12 and 52 weeks postoperatively. CTMA was used to measure postoperative translation and rotation of the pelvic fracture during the 52 weeks follow-up. Clinical outcomes were collected through the questionnaires EQ-5D index score and Majeed score. RESULTS: 10 patients were included with mean age (± SD, min-max) 52 (16, 31-80) years and 70% (n = 7) were males. The median (IQR, min-max) global translation from 0 to 52 weeks was 6.0 (4.6, 1.4-12.6) millimeters and median global rotation was 2.6 (2.4, 0.7-4.7) degrees. The general trend was a larger translation between 0 and 6 weeks postoperatively compared to 6-12 and 12-52 weeks. For the clinical outcomes, the general trend was that all patients started from high scores which decreased in the first postoperative follow-up and recovered to different extent during the study period. CONCLUSION: CTMA was successfully used in the follow-up of surgically treated pelvic fracture patients. Movement in the pelvic fractures after surgical fixation was largest between 0 and 6 weeks.

Inducible displacement CT increases the diagnostic accuracy of aseptic loosening in primary total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Inducible displacement CT compares 2 CTs acquired in series but with alternated rotation of the femur. This provides visual and quantitative clues as to the mechanical situation, i.e., loosening, of a total hip arthroplasty. We report the accuracy of this method as well as the experience of integrating it into a clinical workflow. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective single centre study of 72 cases of suspected aseptic loosening were the surgeon after reviewing a standard plain radiograph saw a need for more information. The displacement CT and plain radiograph were compared either to intraoperative findings or a 1-3 year follow up questionnaire for patients that did not have revision surgery. Patients reporting degradation in status since the time of the displacement CT were called for a follow up plain radiograph. Sensitivity and specificity were assessed, and user experience gathered. RESULTS: Of 72 enrolled patients 15 were lost to follow up. Of the remaining 57, 17 were judged by in-traoperative findings or follow-up to have had loose implants. For plain radiography the sensitivity and specificity were 59% (95% CI 35-82) and 85% (74-96). For displacement CT the corresponding values were 77% (56-97), and 100% (100-100) respectively. The tool was adaptable to clinical routine. CONCLUSION: Displacement CT with alternated rotations of the femur is a viable option to improve the diagnostic process for identifying aseptic loosening in a total hip arthroplasty.

CT-based micromotion analysis method can assess early implant migration and development of radiolucent lines in cemented glenoid components: a clinical feasibility study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: CT micromotion analysis (CTMA) has been considered as an alternative to radiostereometry (RSA) for assessing early implant migration of orthopedic implants. We investigated the feasibility of CTMA to assess early migration and the progression of radiolucent lines in shoulder arthroplasties over 24 months using sequential low-dose CT scans. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 7 patients were included and underwent 9 primary total shoulder arthroplasties. We made CT scans preoperatively, within 1 week postoperatively, and after 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. At each follow-up, postoperative glenoid migration and any development of radiolucent lines were assessed. Clinical outcomes were recorded at all time points except within 1 week postoperatively. RESULTS: For the glenoid component, the median translation and median rotation were 0.00-0.10 mm and -1.53° to 1.05° at 24 months. Radiolucent lines could be observed around all glenoid components. The radiolucent lines developed from the periphery to the center of the implant for 6 glenoid components during follow-up. The Constant Score improved from a mean of 30 (21-51) preoperatively to 69 (41-88) at 24 months. INTERPRETATION: CTMA can be used to identify early migration and the development of radiolucent lines over time in glenoid components. Clinical trials with a larger sample size and longer follow-up are needed to establish the relationship between migration, radiolucent lines, loosening, and clinical outcome.

Adverse Events due to Lack of Precision in Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Potential of Provocation-Based CT for Diagnosis of Implant Loosening.

Adverse events in total hip replacement (THR) may have several origins, one being lack of precision in diagnosis and/or during surgery. This study describes the pattern and frequency of avoidable injuries in THR and the potential value of a new tool for early diagnosis of implant loosening. This retrospective study was based on all (n = 1 456) settled claims regarding THR in the Swedish National Patient Insurance database from 2010 to 2017. The claims and medical records were analyzed for root causes, with special focus on adverse events where lack of precision could be the cause. In a second stage, we assessed in 10 patients (20 implants) the diagnostic precision of a new software tool based on provocation-CT. These were all patients where the implant loosening diagnosis was deemed as inconclusive after a first plain X-ray. The findings from the provocation-CT and plain X-ray were compared to the surgical findings at revision. While 3 of 20 implants were correctly diagnosed with plain X-ray, for dynamic CT, this number was 14 of 20 implants. The retrospective study showed that the most common types of injuries were infections (34%), nerve injury (29%), mechanical problems (14.5%), dislocation (6%), and miscellaneous complications (16.5%). Of the patients with mechanical complications, one-third had aseptic implant loosening. Statement of clinical significance: we estimated that almost 200 patients in our registry study had mechanical complications after THR, mainly implant loosening. A third of these could potentially have been diagnosed and treated if CT examination with a dedicated image analysis tool to assess implant loosening after THR had been available.

Precision of CT-based micromotion analysis is comparable to radiostereometry for early migration measurements in cemented acetabular cups.

Background and purpose - CT (computed tomography) based methods have lately been considered an alternative to radiostereometry (RSA) for assessing early implant migration. However, no study has directly compared the 2 methods in a clinical setting. We estimated the precision and effective radiation dose of a CT-based method and compared it with marker-based RSA in 10 patients with hip arthroplasty.Patients and methods - We included 10 patients who underwent total hip replacement with a cemented cup. CT and RSA double examinations were performed postoperatively, and precision and effective dose data were compared. The CT data was analyzed with CT micromotion analysis (CTMA) software both with and without the use of bone markers. The RSA images were analyzed with RSA software with the use of bone markers.Results - The precision of CTMA with bone markers was 0.10-0.16 mm in translation and 0.31°-0.37° in rotation. Without bone markers, the precision of CTMA was 0.10-0.16 mm in translation and 0.21°-0.31° in rotation. In comparison, the precision of RSA was 0.09-0.26 mm and 0.43°-1.69°. The mean CTMA and RSA effective dose was estimated at 0.2 mSv and 0.04 mSv, respectively.Interpretation - CTMA, with and without the use of bone markers, had a comparable precision to RSA. CT radiation doses were slightly higher than RSA doses but still at a considerably low effective dose.

There is motion between the scaphoid and the lunate during the dart-throwing motion.

Scaphoid and lunate mobility has been suggested to be minimal during the dart-throwing motion in studies based on serial computed tomography (CT) scans and cadaver studies. This study analyzes the direct motion between the scaphoid and the lunate during the dart-throwing motion in vivo. We examined nine individuals with standard CT scans of the wrist in radial extension and ulnar flexion. The paired CT scans were analyzed with a volume registration technique. The lunate was registered as fixed and the scaphoid as the mobile element. The motion of the scaphoid relative the lunate between the positions of radial extension and ulnar flexion was measured. There was considerable motion between the scaphoid and the lunate with both a distal to proximal translation and rotation during the dart-throwing motion, regardless of whether the scapholunate ligament was intact or not. These results suggest that aggressive dart-throwing exercises should not be implemented early on during rehabilitation following scapholunate repair.

Implant migration and bone mineral density measured simultaneously by low-dose CT scans: a 2-year study on 17 acetabular revisions with impaction bone grafting.

Background and purpose - Early postoperative implant migration predicts failure of joint replacements. Bone mineral density reflects bone quality and bone-graft incorporation. Implant migration and bone densitometry analysis usually require special equipment. We investigated cup migration and bone mineral density changes simultaneously with low-dose CT scans after acetabular revision hip arthroplasty using impaction bone grafting.Patients and methods - We performed a low-dose CT postoperatively, after 6 weeks, and after 2 years in 17 patients, all revised using impaction bone grafting and a graft-compressing titanium shell in the acetabulum. 6 patients had combined segmental and cavitary acetabular defects. Cup migration was analyzed using CT-based micromotion analysis (CTMA). Bone mineral density was determined in the graft and in surrounding native bone using volumetric quantitative computed tomography (QCT). The bone graft volume was calculated from 3D reconstructions.Results - At 2 years, the translations were 1.5 (95% CI 0.4-2.6) mm in proximal direction, -0.6 (CI -1.6 to 0.4) in the medial direction and 0.3 (CI 0.0-0.6) in the anterior direction. The mean volume of impacted bone graft was 40 cm³ (CI 28-52). In the graft bone mineral density increased 14% after 6 weeks and 23% after 2 years. There was 1 mechanical failure.Interpretation - Proximal migration of the acetabular component was low and comparable to previous reports. There was a rapid increase of bone mineral density in the bone graft. Low-dose CT scans make migration analysis and bone densitometry measurements possible in the same setting, offering great diagnostic potential for hip arthroplasty patients.

Low-dose CT-based implant motion analysis is a precise tool for early migration measurements of hip cups: a clinical study of 24 patients.

Background and purpose - Early implant migration is known to be a predictive factor of clinical loosening in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard used to measure early migration in patients. However, RSA requires costly, specialized imaging equipment and the image process is complex. We determined the precision of an alternative, commercially available, CT method in 3 ongoing clinical THA studies, comprising 3 different cups.Materials and methods - 24 CT double examinations of 24 hip cups were selected consecutively from 3 ongoing prospective studies: 2 primary THA (1 cemented and 1 uncemented) and 1 THA (cemented) revision study. Precision of the CT-based implant motion analysis (CTMA) system was calculated separately for each study, using both the surface anatomy of the pelvis and metal beads placed in the pelvis.Results - For the CTMA analysis using the surface anatomy of the pelvis, the precision ranged between 0.07 and 0.31 mm in translation and 0.20° and 0.39° for rotation, respectively. For the CTMA analysis using beads the precision ranged between 0.08 and 0.20 mm in translation and between 0.20° and 0.43° for rotations. The radiation dose ranged between 0.2 and 2.3 mSv.Interpretation - CTMA achieved a clinically relevant and consistent precision between the 3 different hip cups studied. The use of different hip cup types, different CT scanners, or registration method (beads or surface anatomy) had no discernible effect on precision. Therefore, CTMA without the use of bone markers could potentially be an alternative to RSA to measure early migration.

Accuracy and precision of a CT method for assessing migration in shoulder arthroplasty: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is the gold standard to measure early implant migration which is a predictive factor for implant survival. PURPOSE: To validate an alternative computed tomography (CT) technique to measure implant migration in shoulder arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cadaver proximal humerus and a scapula, which had tantalum beads incorporated within them, were prepared to accept a short-stemmed humeral component and a two-pegged glenoid component of a commercial total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) system. A five degree of freedom micrometer and goniometer equipped rig was used to translate and rotate the implant components relative to the respective bone to predetermined positions. Double CT examinations were performed for each position and CT motion analysis software (CTMA) was used to assess these movements. The accuracy and precision of the software was estimated using the rig's micrometers and goniometers as the gold standard. The technique's effective dose was also assessed. RESULTS: The accuracy was in the range of 0.07-0.23 mm in translation and 0.22-0.71° in rotation. The precision was in the range of 0.08-0.15 mm in translation and 0.23-0.54° in rotation. The mean effective dose for the CT scans was calculated to be 0.27 mSv. CONCLUSION: In this experimental setting, accuracy, precision, and effective dose of the CTMA technique were found to be comparable to that of RSA. Therefore, we believe clinical studies are warranted to determine if CTMA is a suitable alternative to traditional RSA for migration measurements in TSA.

Triquetral Motion Is Limited In Vivo After Lunocapitate Arthrodesis.

Purpose: Lunocapitate arthrodesis is a motion-preserving salvage procedure for painful wrist osteoarthritis. Because the arthrodesis is limited to the capitate and the lunate, the adaptive motion of the triquetrum is theoretically maintained. We aimed to examine whether triquetral motion is sustained in vivo after lunocapitate arthrodesis. Methods: We examined 7 patients after lunocapitate arthrodesis at least 1 year earlier, with computed tomography at 2 wrist positions: maximal radial extension and maximal ulnar flexion. Triquetral motion in vivo was analyzed using volume registration technique of the paired computed tomography scans and compared with the contralateral side. Results: The triquetrum moved in all patients, but the degree of motion was small compared with the nonsurgical wrist. A minor degree of motion of the hamate relative to the fused lunocapitate could also be demonstrated. Conclusions: Triquetral motion is limited after lunocapitate arthrodesis. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic IV.

Prosthetic liner wear in total hip replacement: a longitudinal 13-year study with computed tomography.

This case report follows a woman who had a total hip replacement in 1992 when she was 45 years old. Six serial computed tomography (CT) examinations over a period of 13 years provided information that allowed her revision surgery to be limited to liner replacement as opposed to replacement of the entire prosthesis. Additionally, they provided data that ruled out the presence of osteolysis and indeed none was found at surgery. In 2004, when the first CT was performed, the 3D distance the femoral head had penetrated into the cup was determined to be 2.6 mm. By 2017, femoral head penetration had progressed to 5.0 mm. The extracted liner showed wear at the thinnest part to be 5.5 mm, as measured with a micrometer. The use of modern CT techniques can identify problems, while still correctable without major surgery. Furthermore, the ability of CT to assess the direction of wear revealed that the liner wear changed from the cranial to dorsal direction.

Are CT Scans a Satisfactory Substitute for the Follow-Up of RSA Migration Studies of Uncemented Cups? A Comparison of RSA Double Examinations and CT Datasets of 46 Total Hip Arthroplasties.

As part of the 14-year follow-up of a prospectively randomized radiostereometry (RSA) study on uncemented cup fixation, two pairs of stereo radiographs and a CT scan of 46 hips were compared. Tantalum beads, inserted during the primary operation, were detected in the CT volume and the stereo radiographs and used to produce datasets of 3D coordinates. The limit of agreement between the combined CT and RSA datasets was calculated in the same way as the precision of the double RSA examination. The precision of RSA corresponding to the 99% confidence interval was 1.36°, 1.36°, and 0.60° for X-, Y-, and Z-rotation and 0.40, 0.17, and 0.37 mm for X-, Y-, and Z-translation. The limit of agreement between CT and RSA was 1.51°, 2.17°, and 1.05° for rotation and 0.59, 0.56, and 0.74 mm for translation. The differences between CT and RSA are close to the described normal 99% confidence interval for precision in RSA: 0.3° to 2° for rotation and 0.15 to 0.6 mm for translation. We conclude that measurements using CT and RSA are comparable and that CT can be used for migration studies for longitudinal evaluations of patients with RSA markers.

Accuracy and Precision of Three-Dimensional Low Dose CT Compared to Standard RSA in Acetabular Cups: An Experimental Study.

Background and Purpose. The gold standard for detection of implant wear and migration is currently radiostereometry (RSA). The purpose of this study is to compare a three-dimensional computed tomography technique (3D CT) to standard RSA as an alternative technique for measuring migration of acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty. Materials and Methods. With tantalum beads, we marked one cemented and one uncemented cup and mounted these on a similarly marked pelvic model. A comparison was made between 3D CT and standard RSA for measuring migration. Twelve repeated stereoradiographs and CT scans with double examinations in each position and gradual migration of the implants were made. Precision and accuracy of the 3D CT were calculated. Results. The accuracy of the 3D CT ranged between 0.07 and 0.32 mm for translations and 0.21 and 0.82° for rotation. The precision ranged between 0.01 and 0.09 mm for translations and 0.06 and 0.29° for rotations, respectively. For standard RSA, the precision ranged between 0.04 and 0.09 mm for translations and 0.08 and 0.32° for rotations, respectively. There was no significant difference in precision between 3D CT and standard RSA. The effective radiation dose of the 3D CT method, comparable to RSA, was estimated to be 0.33 mSv. Interpretation. Low dose 3D CT is a comparable method to standard RSA in an experimental setting.

A CT method for following patients with both prosthetic replacement and implanted tantalum beads: preliminary analysis with a pelvic model and in seven patients.

BACKGROUND: Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) is often used for evaluating implanted devices over time. Following patients who have had tantalum beads implanted as markers in conjunction with joint replacements is important for longitudinal evaluation of these patients and for those with similar implants. As doing traditional RSA imaging is exacting and limited to specialized centers, it is important to consider alternative techniques for this ongoing evaluation. This paper studies the use of computed tomography (CT) to evaluate over time tantalum beads which have been implanted as markers. METHODS: The project uses both a hip model implanted with tantalum beads, acquired in several orientations, at two different CT energy levels, and a cohort of seven patients. The model was evaluated twice by the same observer with a 1-week interval. All CT volumes were analyzed using a semi-automated 3D volume fusion (spatial registration) tool which provides landmark-based fusion of two volumes, registering a target volume with a reference volume using a rigid body 3D algorithm. The mean registration errors as well as the accuracy and repeatability of the method were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean registration error, maximum value of repeatability, and accuracy for the relative movement in the model were 0.16 mm, 0.02° and 0.1 mm, and 0.36° and 0.13 mm for 120 kVp and 0.21 mm, 0.04° and 0.01 mm, and 0.39° and 0.12 mm for 100 kVp. For the patients, the mean registration errors per patient ranged from 0.08 to 0.35 mm. These results are comparable to those in typical clinical RSA trials. This technique successfully evaluated two patients who would have been lost from the cohort if only RSA were used. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique can be used to evaluate patients with tantalum beads over time without the need for stereoradiographs. Further, the effective dose associated with CT is decreasing.

A New CT Method for Assessing 3D Movements in Lumbar Facet Joints and Vertebrae in Patients before and after TDR.

This study describes a 3D-CT method for analyzing facet joint motion and vertebral rotation in the lumbar spine after TDR. Ten patients were examined before and then three years after surgery, each time with two CT scans: provoked flexion and provoked extension. After 3D registration, the facet joint 3D translation and segmental vertebral 3D rotation were analyzed at the operated level (L5-S1) and adjacent level (L4-L5). Pain was evaluated using VAS. The median (±SD) 3D movement in the operated level for the left facet joint was 3.2 mm (±1.9 mm) before and 3.5 mm (±1.7 mm) after surgery and for the right facet joint was 3.0 mm (±1.0 mm) before and 3.6 mm (±1.4 mm) after surgery. The median vertebral rotation in the sagittal plane at the operated level was 5.4° (±2.3°) before surgery and 6.8° (±1.7°) after surgery and in the adjacent level was 7.7° (±4.0°) before and 9.2° (±2.7°) after surgery. The median VAS was reduced from 6 (range 5-8) to 3 (range 2-8) in extension and from 4 (range 2-6) to 2 (range 1-3) in flexion.

Evaluation of mobility and stability in the Discover artificial disc: an in vivo motion study using high-accuracy 3D CT data.

OBJECT: Artificial disc replacement (ADR) devices are unlike implants used in cervical fusion in that they are continuously exposed to stress not only within the implant site but also at their site of attachment to the adjacent vertebra. An imaging technique with higher accuracy than plain radiography and with the possibility of 3D visualization would provide more detailed information about the motion quality and stability of the implant in relation to the vertebrae. Such high-accuracy studies have previously been conducted with radiostereometric analysis (RSA), which requires implantation of tantalum markers in the adjacent vertebrae. The aim of this study was to evaluate in vivo motion and stability of implanted artificial discs. A noninvasive analysis was performed with CT, with an accuracy higher than that of plain radiographs and almost as high as RSA in cervical spine. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with ADR were included from a larger cohort of a randomized controlled trial comparing treatment of cervical radiculopathy with ADR or anterior cervical decompression and fusion. Surgical levels included C4-7; 18 patients had 1-level surgery and 10 patients had 2-level surgery. Follow-up time ranged from 19 to 50 months, with an average of 40 months. Two CT volumes of the cervical spine, 1 in flexion and 1 in extension, were obtained in each patient and then spatially registered using a customized imaging tool, previously used and validated for the cervical spine. Motion between the components in the artificial disc, as well as motion between the components and adjacent vertebrae, were calculated in 3 planes. Intraclass correlation (ICC) between independent observers and repeatability of the method were also calculated. RESULTS: Intrinsic motion, expressed as degrees in rotation and millimeters in translation, was detectable in a majority of the ADRs. In the sagittal plane, in which the flexion/extension was performed, sagittal rotation ranged between 0.2° and 15.8° and translation between 0.0 and 5.5 mm. Eight percent of the ADRs were classified as unstable, as motion between at least 1 of the components and the adjacent vertebra was detected. Five percent were classified as ankylotic, with no detectable motion, and another 8% showed very limited motion due to heterotopic ossification. Repeatability for the motion in the sagittal plane was calculated to be 1.30° for rotation and 1.29 mm for translation (95% confidence level), ICC 0.99 and 0.84, respectively. All 3 patients with unstable devices had undergone 1-level ADRs at C5-6. They all underwent revision surgery due to increased neck pain, and instability was established during the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the artificial discs in this study showed intrinsic mobility several years after implantation and were also shown to be properly attached. Implant instability was detected in 8% of patients and, as all of these patients underwent revision surgery due to increasing neck pain, this might be a more serious problem than heterotopic bone formation.