Elimination diet in food allergy: friend or foe?

OBJECTIVES: To review and discuss the role of an elimination diet in food-allergic children, emphasizing nutritional aspects for a better practical approach. SOURCES: Non-systematic review of the literature. FINDINGS: Under an elimination diet, food-allergic patients may suffer from growth impairment or obesity and compromised quality of life. Disease phenotype, age, type, number of foods excluded, comorbidities, eating difficulties, economic status, and food availability must be considered for an appropriate diet prescription. Diet quality encompasses diversity and degree of food processing, which may alter immune regulation. CONCLUSIONS: A friendly food elimination diet prescription depends on a multidisciplinary approach beyond macro and micronutrients.

EAACI guidelines on the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy.

This European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology guideline provides recommendations for diagnosing IgE-mediated food allergy and was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Food allergy diagnosis starts with an allergy-focused clinical history followed by tests to determine IgE sensitization, such as serum allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) and skin prick test (SPT), and the basophil activation test (BAT), if available. Evidence for IgE sensitization should be sought for any suspected foods. The diagnosis of allergy to some foods, such as peanut and cashew nut, is well supported by SPT and serum sIgE, whereas there are less data and the performance of these tests is poorer for other foods, such as wheat and soya. The measurement of sIgE to allergen components such as Ara h 2 from peanut, Cor a 14 from hazelnut and Ana o 3 from cashew can be useful to further support the diagnosis, especially in pollen-sensitized individuals. BAT to peanut and sesame can be used additionally. The reference standard for food allergy diagnosis is the oral food challenge (OFC). OFC should be performed in equivocal cases. For practical reasons, open challenges are suitable in most cases. Reassessment of food allergic children with allergy tests and/or OFCs periodically over time will enable reintroduction of food into the diet in the case of spontaneous acquisition of oral tolerance.

Teste de provocação oral com alimentos: o panorama brasileiro / Oral food challenge: a Brazilian panorama

Introdução: O teste de provocação oral (TPO) com alimentos é o padrão ouro para avaliação diagnóstica e de aquisição de tolerância em pacientes com alergia alimentar (AA). Exige, no entanto, equipe especializada e local apropriado para execução, uma vez que reações alérgicas, incluindo anafilaxia, podem acontecer. Foi recém-incorporado como procedimento reconhecido pelo Sistema Único de Saúde e pela Agência Nacional de Saúde, mas apenas no contexto da alergia ao leite de vaca para pacientes com até 24 meses de vida. Pouco se sabe sobre sua disponibilidade/execução no território brasileiro. Objetivos: Explorar o perfil de realização de TPO com alimentos em âmbito nacional, bem como as limitações para a sua não realização. Métodos: Inquérito virtual foi disponibilizado por e-mail aos 2.500 sócios cadastrados na Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia questionando sobre a prática de TPO, formação do profissional, limitações para sua não realização e possíveis soluções para sua execução. Resultados: Foram obtidas 290 respostas (11,6% dos associados), sendo a maioria deles proveniente da Região Sudeste (56,1%). Realizam TPO 54,5% (158/290) dos associados, 62% destes mais de 5 TPOs/mês, principalmente para leite e ovo. A execução de TPO na atualidade, majoritariamente na rede privada, esteve associada à prática do procedimento durante a especialização. Falta de recurso e ambiente apropriados são as maiores limitações para a não realização do TPO. Conclusões: Apesar do viés de seleção inerente à metodologia empregada do estudo, este inquérito pioneiro em território nacional tem importância por esclarecer e discutir a realização do TPO no âmbito do Brasil. Certamente este procedimento ainda é insuficientemente realizado no Brasil.

Background: Oral food challenge (OFC), the gold standard for diagnosing food allergy and determining tolerance levels, requires specialized staff and appropriate conditions since anaphylaxis may occur. In 2022, OFC was officially recognized in Brazilian public and private health systems, although only for milk allergy in children up to 24 months of age. Little is known about OFC practices in Brazil. Objectives: To explore OFC practices, barriers, and solutions among Brazilian allergists and immunologists. Methods: A survey was e-mailed to 2500 associates of the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology regarding OFC practices, training experiences, barriers to this procedure, and workable solutions. Results: A total of 290 associates responded (11.6%), more than a half of whom (56.15) practiced in the southeast region: 158 (54.5%) reported performing OFC, of whom 62% performed > 5 procedures each month, mostly for cow milk and hen egg. OFCs were mostly performed in private practice and were associated with specialized training. Lack of an appropriate setting was seen as the main barrier to performing the procedure. Conclusions: Although this study's methodology involves intrinsic biases, this is the first exploration of OFC practice in Brazil. OFCs are still underperformed nationwide.

Varying Approaches to Management of IgE-Mediated Food Allergy in Children Around the World.

Food allergy is a chronic disease that affects individuals of all ages and is a significant public health problem globally. This narrative overview examines clinical management strategies for IgE-mediated food allergy in children around the world to understand variations in practice. Information was drawn from clinical practice guidelines, recent research, the websites of professional and governmental bodies with expertise in food allergy, and clinical experts from a broad cross-section of geographical regions. The structure and delivery of clinical services, allergen avoidance and food labeling, and resources to support the management of allergic reactions in the community are discussed in detail. The adoption of emerging food immunotherapies is also explored. Wide variations in clinical management of food allergy were apparent across the different countries. Common themes were continuing issues with access to specialist care and recognition of the need to balance risk reduction with dietary and social restrictions to avoid unnecessary detrimental impacts on the quality of life of food allergy sufferers. Findings highlight the need for standardized presentation of practice and priorities, and may assist clinicians and researchers when engaging with government and funding agencies to address gaps.

Nutritional management of immediate hypersensitivity to legumes in vegetarians.

Vegetarianism is becoming a common practice among people. Products of vegetable origin are also on the rise, such as vegetable "milk" and legume-based snacks, which may lead to legume sensitivity and allergies in vegetarian diet followers. Furthermore, products derived from legumes, such as lupin flour or fenugreek powder, are often used as food additives. They function as hidden allergens, not always evident on the precautionary labeling, favoring allergic reactions. As dietary allergen restriction is the fundamental pillar in managing patients with food allergies, this review aims to reflect on practical aspects-diagnosis and nutritional management-in managing legume allergies in vegetarians, aiming to reduce the negative nutritional impact of an even more restrictive diet.

Nutritional management of immediate hypersensitivity to legumes in vegetarians

Vegetarianism is becoming a common practice among people. Products of vegetable origin are also on the rise, such as vegetable “milk” and legume-based snacks, which may lead to legume sensitivity and allergies in vegetarian diet followers. Furthermore, products derived from legumes, such as lupin flour or fenugreek powder, are often used as food additives. They function as hidden allergens, not always evident on the precautionary labeling, favoring allergic reactions. As dietary allergen restriction is the fundamental pillar in managing patients with food allergies, this review aims to reflect on practical aspects—diagnosis and nutritional management—in managing legume allergies in vegetarians, aiming to reduce the negative nutritional impact of an even more restrictive diet (AU)

Introdução dos alimentos no primeiro ano de vida e prevenção da alergia alimentar: quais as evidências? / Introduction of food in the first year of life and food allergy prevention: what is the evidence?

Objetivo: A incidência das doenças alérgicas cresceu nas últimas décadas. Na tentativa de conter o aumento da alergia alimentar (AA) ao longo dos anos, estratégias de prevenção vêm sendo implementadas. Para promover um melhor entendimento dos dilemas que permeiam a introdução alimentar no primeiro ano de vida, esse artigo trata de uma revisão bibliográfica narrativa sobre a introdução dos alimentos complementares no primeiro ano de vida e possíveis associações com a prevenção primária da alergia alimentar. Fonte dos dados: Publicações relevantes foram pesquisadas nas bases de dados Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, Guidelines International Network, National Guidelines Clearinghouse e revisadas recomendações do guia e do consenso nacional de alergia alimentar. Resultados: Estudos observacionais diversos e ensaios clínicos randomizados estão disponíveis, bem como recomendações publicadas por organizações científicas; no entanto, de qualidade variável. Foram consideradas as recomendações de diretrizes de prática clínica classificadas como de alta qualidade e publicações recentes ainda não categorizadas de forma sistemática em sua qualidade, mas internacionalmente reconhecidas como relevantes para a atenção primária. Conclusão: Até o momento, não há evidências consistentes de que a introdução precoce, antes dos 6 meses, dos alimentos alergênicos, contribua para a prevenção de alergia a alimentos na população geral.

Objective: The incidence of allergic diseases has increased in recent decades. In an attempt to contain the increase in food allergy (AA) over the years, prevention strategies have been implemented. To promote a better understanding of the dilemmas that permeate the introduction of food in the first year of life, this article deals with a narrative literature review on the introduction of complementary foods in the first year of life and possible associations with the primary prevention of food allergy. Data source: Relevant publications were searched in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, PubMed, Guidelines International Network, National Guidelines Clearinghouse, and revised recommendations from the national food allergy guide and consensus. Results: Several observational studies and randomized controlled trials are available, as well as recommendations. published by scientific organizations; however, of variable quality. Recommendations from clinical practice guidelines classified as high quality and recent publications not yet systematically categorized in their quality, but internationally recognized as relevant to primary care, were considered. Conclusion: To date, there is no consistent evidence that the early introduction, before 6 months, of allergenic foods contributes to the prevention of food allergy in the general population.

O teste de contato (patch test) na avaliação de sensibilização por alimentos em pacientes com dermatite atópica ­ estudo piloto / Patch testing in the evaluation of food sensitization in patients with atopic dermatitis ­ a pilot study

Objetivos: Investigar o papel do patch test na avaliação da sensibilização por alimentos e no diagnóstico de alergia alimentar em pacientes com dermatite atópica (DA) e comparar duas distintas apresentações do teste. Métodos: Esse estudo prospectivo envolveu 20 crianças (mediana de idade de 8,4 anos) com dermatite atópica moderada ou grave que foram submetidas ao teste cutâneo de hipersensibilidade tardia (patch test ) com alimentos frescos e extratos comerciais, seguidos de teste de provocação oral (TPO) nos casos de resultado positivo, no intuito de avaliar a correlação clínica. Resultados: Entre os 20 pacientes avaliados, somente 4 (20%) apresentaram resultados positivos para o patch test, com maior positividade para os extratos comerciais (3/4), em comparação aos alimentos in natura. Não se observou concordância dos resultados obtidos entre as duas apresentações comparadas. Do total de 7 TPO realizados, 4 foram positivos (soja e milho para um paciente e amendoim para outros dois), com piora das lesões da DA (valor preditivo positivo de 57%). Apenas uma criança apresentou efeito adverso mais significativo. Conclusões: Embora tenha sido encontrada baixa sensibilização aos alérgenos alimentares na população estudada e discordância entre os resultados dos patch tests com alimentos frescos e extratos comerciais, o teste mostrou-se seguro. Para uma melhor análise estatística, recomenda-se estudo em população maior.

Objective: To evaluate the use of patch testing in determining food sensitization and allergy in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and compare two distinct assays. Method: Twenty children (median age, 8.4 years) with moderate-to-severe AD were prospectively evaluated by atopy patch test with commercial extracts and fresh food allergens. Positive results were further investigated by oral food challenge (OFC). Results: Only 4/20 patients (20%) had positive patch results, mostly to commercial extracts (3/4) compared to fresh food. There was no agreement between the results of the two presentations tested. Four of seven OFCs were positive (one patient to soy and corn, two others to peanut), with worsening AD eczema (positive predictive value of 57%). One child had a more significant side effect. Conclusion: In spite of poor sensitization rates in the study population and no observed correlation between the two presentations tested, atopy patch testing was safe. Studies with a broader population are needed for better conclusions.

Consenso Brasileiro sobre Alergia Alimentar: 2018 - Parte 1 - Etiopatogenia, clínica e diagnóstico. Documento conjunto elaborado pela Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria e Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia / Brazilian Consensus on Food Allergy: 2018 - Part 1 - Etiopathogenesis, clinical features, and diagnosis. Joint position paper of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics and the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology

A alergia alimentar é definida como uma doença consequente a uma resposta imunológica anômala, que ocorre após a ingestão e/ou contato com determinado(s) alimento(s). Atualmente é considerada um problema de saúde pública, pois a sua prevalência tem aumentado no mundo todo. É um capítulo à parte entre as reações adversas a alimentos, e de acordo com os mecanismos fisiopatológicos envolvidos, essas reações podem ser imunológicas ou não-imunológicas. Em geral, a alergia alimentar inicia precocemente na vida com manifestações clínicas variadas na dependência do mecanismo imunológico envolvido. A anafilaxia é a forma mais grave de alergia alimentar mediada por IgE. Conhecimentos recentes permitiram a melhor caracterização da Síndrome da enterocolite induzida por proteína alimentar (FPIES), assim como da esofagite eosinofílica. Vários fatores de risco, assim como novos alérgenos alimentares, têm sido identificados nos últimos anos. Tomando-se como ponto de partida o "Consenso Brasileiro sobre Alergia Alimentar: 2007" foi realizada revisão e atualização dos conceitos apresentados por grupo de alergologistas, gastroenterologistas, nutrólogos e pediatras especializados no tratamento de pacientes com alergia alimentar. Novos conceitos foram apresentados sobretudo pela melhor caracterização. O objetivo desta revisão foi elaborar um documento prático capaz de auxiliar na compreensão dos mecanismos envolvidos na alergia alimentar, assim como dos possíveis fatores de risco associados à sua apresentação, bem como sobre a sua apresentação clínica.

Food allergy is defined as a disease resulting from an anomalous immune response that occurs after ingestion of and/or contact with certain foods. It is currently considered a public health problem because of its increased prevalence worldwide. Food allergy is a major entity among adverse reactions to foods; depending on the pathophysiological mechanisms involved, these reactions may be immunological or non-immunological. In general, food allergy starts early in life with varied clinical manifestations depending on the immune mechanism involved. Anaphylaxis is the most severe form of IgE-mediated food allergy. Recent knowledge has allowed to better characterize food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES), as well as eosinophilic esophagitis. Several risk factors as well as new food allergens have been identified in recent years. Taking the 2007 Brazilian Consensus on Food Allergy as a starting point, the concepts presented were reviewed and updated by a group of allergologists, gastroenterologists, nutrologists and pediatricians specialized in the treatment of patients with food allergy. The objective of this review was to develop a hands-on document capable of helping improve the understanding of the mechanisms involved in food allergy, possible associated risk factors, as well as clinical presentation.

Consenso Brasileiro sobre Alergia Alimentar: 2018 - Parte 2 - Diagnóstico, tratamento e prevenção. Documento conjunto elaborado pela Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria e Associação Brasileira de Alergia e Imunologia / Brazilian Consensus on Food Allergy: 2018 - Part 2 - Diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Joint position paper of the Brazilian Society of Pediatrics and the Brazilian Association of Allergy and Immunology

Na última década o conhecimento sobre a etiopatogenia da alergia alimentar (AA) avançou muito. A identificação de novas formas clínicas de apresentação, aliada à aquisição de novos métodos laboratoriais, possibilitaram a realização do diagnóstico etiológico de modo mais preciso, sobretudo quanto à reatividade cruzada entre alimentos e mesmo na identificação de marcadores indicativos de formas clínicas transitórias, persistentes e quadros mais graves. A padronização dos testes de provocação oral permitiu a sua realização de forma mais segura e possibilitou a sua inclusão entre as ferramentas disponíveis para uso na confirmação etiológica da AA. Apesar disso, a exclusão do alimento responsável pelas manifestações clínicas continua sendo a principal conduta terapêutica a ser empregada. Entre os pacientes alérgicos às proteínas do leite de vaca, a disponibilidade de fórmulas especiais, por exemplo parcialmente hidrolisadas, extensamente hidrolisadas à base da proteína do leite de vaca e fórmulas de aminoácidos, tem facilitado o tratamento substitutivo do leite de vaca para esses pacientes. A abordagem atual da anafilaxia é revisada, uma vez que os alimentos são os principais agentes etiológicos em crianças. Avanços na conduta de algumas manifestações gastrintestinais também são abordados. Na atualidade, a imunoterapia oral tem sido cada vez mais utilizada. A aquisição de novos agentes, os imunobiológicos, também são apresentados à luz das evidências científicas e clínicas atuais. Considerações sobre história natural da AA, assim como sobre formas de prevenção da AA também são abordadas. Em conclusão, o Consenso Brasileiro sobre Alergia Alimentar de 2018 objetivou rever os métodos diagnósticos e esquemas de tratamento disponíveis e empregados no acompanhamento de pacientes com AA, visando a melhor abordagem terapêutica desses pacientes.

Over the last decade, knowledge about the etiopathogenesis of food allergy (FA) has advanced a great deal. The identification of new clinical presentations, associated with the acquisition of new laboratory methods, have made the diagnostic process more accurate, especially with regard to cross-reactivity between foods and the identification of biomarkers suggestive of transitory, persistent clinical forms and/or more severe manifestations. The standardization of oral provocation tests has made their performance safer and has allowed their inclusion among the tools available for use in the etiological confirmation of FA. Despite this, exclusion of the food involved in the clinical manifestations remains as the main therapeutic strategy. Among patients allergic to cow's milk proteins, the availability of special formulas, e.g., partially hydrolyzed and extensively hydrolyzed cow's milk protein-based formulas, in addition to amino acid formulas, has facilitated the introduction of substitute formulas for these patients. The current approach to anaphylaxis is reviewed, since food is the major etiological agent in children. Advances in the management of some gastrointestinal manifestations are also addressed. Currently, oral immunotherapy has been increasingly used. The acquisition of new agents, namely, immunobiological agents, is also described in light of current scientific and clinical evidence. Considerations on the natural history of FA, as well as on ways how to prevent FA, are addressed. In conclusion, the 2018 Brazilian Consensus on Food Allergy aimed to review the diagnostic methods and treatment schemes available and used in the follow-up of patients with FA, with a view to adopting the best possible therapeutic approach to these patients.

Alergia ao amendoim: revisão / Penaut allergy: review

Objetivo: Revisar a literatura para um melhor manejo do paciente com alergia a amendoim. Fonte de dados: Artigos originais indexados no banco de dados do MEDLINE no período de janeiro de 1990 a dezembro de 2011 nos idiomas português e inglês, além de sites específicos na Internet. Palavras-chave: alergia, atopia, amendoim, Arachis hypogaea. Síntese dos dados: O amendoim é um dos principais alimentos relacionados a manifestações alérgicas. Com início geralmente na infância, a alergia ao amendoim comumente associa-se a outras manifestações atópicas e à anafilaxia. O padrão ouro para diagnóstico permanece o teste de provocação oral, embora outros parâmetros imunológicos se mostrem promissores, como o diagnóstico resolvido por componentes (CRD-Component resolved diagnosis). Por determinar importante prejuízo na qualidade de vida destes pacientes e ser sua duração prolongada, na maioria dos casos, tem sido objeto de estudos de novas opções terapêuticas.Conclusões: Embora certamente o amendoim não se encontre entre os principais alimentos causadores de manifestações alérgicas observadas na prática clínica em nosso país, casos existem e é preciso saber o melhor manejo destes pacientes.

Objective: Review of the literature for a better handling of the patient with peanut allergy. Sources: English and Portuguese written original articles indexed on the MEDLINE databases from the period of January 1990 to December 2011 and also specific sites on the Internet. Key words: allergy, atopy, peanut, Arachis hypogaea. Data synthesis: Peanut is one of the main food allergy related sources. Beginning normally in childhood, peanut allergy is often associated with other atopic diseases and anaphylaxis. Oral food challenge remains the gold standard method for diagnosis although other immunological parameters, like component resolved diagnosis, seem promising. Accounting for an important impairment of the quality of life and long lasting symptoms, it is the objective of studies on new therapeutic options. Conclusions: Although certainly peanut is not one of the main food allergens in Brazil, there are cases and it is necessary knowing how to handle those.

Oral peanut immunotherapy in children with peanut anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: The only treatment option for peanut allergy is strict avoidance. OBJECTIVE: To investigate efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy (OIT) in peanut allergy. METHODS: Twenty-three children (age, 3.2-14.3 years) with IgE-mediated peanut allergy confirmed by positive double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) received OIT following a rush protocol with roasted peanut for 7 days. If a protective dose of at least 0.5 g peanut was not achieved, patients continued with a long-term buildup protocol using biweekly dose increases up to at least 0.5 g peanut. A maintenance phase for 8 weeks was followed by 2 weeks of peanut avoidance and a final DBPCFC. Immunologic parameters were determined. RESULTS: After OIT using the rush protocol, patients tolerated a median dose of only 0.15 g peanut. Twenty-two of 23 patients continued with the long-term protocol. After a median of 7 months, 14 patients reached the protective dose. At the final DBPCFC, patients tolerated a median of 1 g (range, 0.25-4 g) in comparison with 0.19 g peanut at the DBPCFC before OIT (range, 0.02-1 g). In 2.6% of 6137 total daily doses, mild to moderate side effects were observed; in 1.3%, symptoms of pulmonary obstruction were detected. OIT was discontinued in 4 of 22 patients because of adverse events. There was a significant increase in peanut-specific serum IgG(4) and a decrease in peanut-specific IL-5, IL-4, and IL-2 production by PBMCs after OIT. CONCLUSION: Long-term OIT appears to be safe and of some benefit in many patients with peanut allergy. With an increase in threshold levels and a reduction of peanut-specific T(H)2 cytokine production, the induction of tolerance may be feasible in some patients.

Síndrome de alergia oral / Oral allergy syndrome

A síndrome de alergia oral (SAO) é uma condição caracterizada por sintomas alérgicos mediados por IgE, que se restringem à mucosa oral. Em situações em que as manifestações são decorrentes da ingestão de frutas e vegetais em indivíduos sensibilizados aos pólens, o termo mais específico é síndrome pólen-frutas (SPF). Uma vez que as porções proteicas dos alérgenos envolvidos são degradadas pelo calor e enzimas digestivas, os sintomas são imediatos, restringem-se geralmente à cavidade oral e a forma cozida ou processada dos mesmos alimentos costuma ser bem tolerada.