Anorectal malformations in low and middle-income countries- spectrum, burden and management.

The clinical presentation, diagnosis and management of anorectal malformation has been well described in the literature, however the experience with these conditions in low-and middle-income countries is often shaped in unique ways due to the social, cultural and economic factors at work in these regions. This leads to adaptation of modifications in management options for these babies that usually present as delayed cases with added poor prognostic factors like sepsis leading to need for emergency resuscitation and overall increased morbidity and mortality. This article explores the anomaly from a global surgery lens and outlines the spectrum of the anomaly, burden faced in the resource constrained environment and the management options adopted for successful management under the available circumstances.

Surgical multicenter collaborative studies: ¿What happen in Latin America?

BACKGROUND: GlobalSurg is an international group of researchers whose purpose is to conduct and disseminate robust collaborative, international and multicenter studies. OBJECTIVE: To expose the necessary strategies and the barriers crossed in conducting massive multicenter studies in surgery. METHOD: During the second semester of 2020, the study Surg-Week Prospective International Cohort Study was carried out. Surg-Week has been the largest international study in the field of surgery to date, with 141,582 patients included. A total of 4975 mini-teams, of between 1 and 5 members, collected data from 116 countries on all continents. RESULTS: The creation of an official website for the study, reports with relevant information via email or groups via WhatsApp, formation of a Dissemination Committee of the protocol, delivery of webinars on recent team publications, appointment of leaders at the national and international level, and outreach through partnerships, were the strategies used for the development of the research. However, the barriers turned out to involve different aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Collaborative work allows establishing networks between different professionals with the goal of improving the quality of management, health policies and care of our patients in a timely manner of constant change.

ANTECEDENTES: GlobalSurg es un grupo internacional de investigadores que tiene como propósito la conducción y la diseminación de robustos estudios colaborativos, internacionales y multicéntricos. OBJETIVO: Exponer las estrategias necesarias y las barreras encontradas en la conducción de estudios multicéntricos masivos en cirugía. MÉTODO: Durante el segundo semestre del año 2020 se llevó a cabo el estudio Surg-Week Prospective International Cohort Study, hasta la fecha el estudio internacional más grande en el campo de la cirugía, con 141,582 pacientes incluidos. Un total de 4975 miniequipos, de uno a cinco integrantes, recopilaron datos de 116 países de todos los continentes. RESULTADOS: La creación de un sitio web oficial del estudio, reportes con información relevante vía e-mail o grupos vía WhatsApp, conformación de un comité de diseminación del protocolo, dictado de webinars sobre publicaciones recientes del equipo, designación de líderes nacionales e internacionales, y la divulgación por medio de sociedades, fueron las estrategias utilizadas para el desarrollo de la investigación. Sin embargo, las barreras detectadas para llevar a cabo el estudio multicéntrico fueron variadas. CONCLUSIONES: Los trabajos colaborativos permiten establecer redes entre diferentes profesionales con el fin de mejorar la calidad de la gestión, las políticas sanitarias y la atención a los pacientes en tiempos de constante cambio.

Current practice of rectal biopsies for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease in Latin America: an international online survey.

PURPOSE: The gold standard for the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease (HD) is a rectal biopsy. The sample may be obtained using a transanal excisional biopsy (TEB) or suction technique. Rectal suction biopsy (RSB) is not a standard procedure in Latin-America. AIM: To evaluate the current practice in rectal biopsy for HD among pediatric surgeons. METHODS: We distributed an online questionnaire among Latin-American pediatric surgeons. RESULTS: One hundred forty-nine pediatric surgeons from 15 countries completed the anonymous survey (71.4% of Latin-American countries), grouped into 81.9% pediatric surgeons; 8.9% pediatric colorectal surgeons, 8.9% trainees, and 1 pediatric colorectal surgeon fellow. 50.4% reported less than 5 new patients with HD per year, 36.2% 5-10 new cases, and 13.4% more than 10. Only 14.1% of surgeons have access to perform a RSB in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected HD, 90% in our study perform an TEB under general anesthesia. When we ask if they could perform both procedures in babies up to 6 months, 52.3% indicate that they prefer an RSB, and for patients older than 6 months, 35.4% favor an RSB. Regarding the number of samples obtained performing an TEB, 30.9% get one biopsy, 29.5% two biopsies, and 39.6% three or more samples. Surgeons obtained the most proximal biopsy at a median of 2.3 cm (range 1-4 cm) above the pectinate line. 67.8% of surgeons prescribed antibiotic prophylaxis. Overall, 16.1% experienced complications, including rectal blood loss (n = 18), and rectal perforation (n = 3). The most frequently used staining methods for rectal biopsies are hematoxylin/eosin (87%), calretinin (56, 8%), and acetylcholinesterase (21.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In Latin-America, the accessibility for RSB is limited only 18 out of 149 surgeons have access to rectal suction tool. There is no consensus regarding sample number, site of proximal biopsy, and antibiotics use. The complications associated with the procedure seems to be less than reported with RSB. Therefore, we should standardize this common surgical practice and establish universal guidelines for rectal biopsy procedure (RBP).

Primary anastomosis in necrotizing enterocolitis: the first option to consider.

INTRODUCTION: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most frequent gastrointestinal emergency in preterm newborns. Thirty percent of all cases will require surgical intervention. Following resection of the involved segment, most patients will undergo a diverting enterostomy. OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety and effectiveness of primary anastomosis in patients with complicated NEC. METHODS: This study was a retrospective chart review. The study participants were obtained from both public and private health systems between December 2004 and December 2009 in Santiago, Chile. The inclusion criteria were any patient who underwent a laparotomy for necrotizing enterocolitis. The following variables were evaluated: gestational age, birth weight, use of peritoneal drains, macroscopic features of the intestinal segment, number of anastomoses, parenteral nutrition requirements and post-surgical complications. RESULTS: Seventy patients were identified. Sixty patients (85%) underwent primary anastomosis. The remaining 10 patients underwent a resection with enterostomy. In the primary anastomosis group (n = 60), twelve percent weighed <1,000 g and 22% weighed 1,000-1,500 g. Two anastomoses were required in 18 patients. Post-surgical complications included infection of the surgical wound in three cases and anastomotic dehiscence in only one case. Seven percent developed short bowel syndrome. Overall mortality was 11.6%, all secondary to sepsis. CONCLUSION: In this series, primary anastomosis was a safe alternative in the management of complicated NEC, with low morbidity and mortality, independent of age, weight, intraperitoneal contamination or extent of disease.