Plasma levels and systemic safety of 0.1% unpreserved timolol maleate gel, 0.5% timolol aqueous solution and 0.5% timolol maleate gel.

PURPOSE: To compare systemic absorption of three formulations of timolol eye drops: 0.1% timolol maleate gel, 0.5% timolol aqueous solution, and 0.5% timolol maleate gel. METHODS: This was a double cross-over phase I study. Cross-over 1: two weeks of 0.1% timolol gel once daily, followed by a 3-week wash-out period and then two weeks of 0.5% timolol aqueous solution twice a day (group 1) or the reverse (group 2). Cross-over 2: two weeks of 0.1% timolol gel once daily, followed by a 3-week wash-out period, and then two weeks of 0.5% timolol gel once daily (group 3) or the reverse (group 4). Subjects underwent tonometry, blood sampling, and heart rate and blood pressure assessments (during bicycle exercise and head-up tilt tests) before and after instillation at the beginning and end of each treatment period. RESULTS: Forty-three healthy volunteers were randomized: 11 subjects in groups 1, 2, and 3, and 10 subjects in group 4. Areas under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values after administration of timolol 0.5% formulations were 15- to 38-fold higher than those seen after administration of timolol 0.1% gel. Maximum timolol concentrations after instillation of 0.1% gel are reduced by almost 90% compared to concentrations obtained after both 0.5% aqueous solution and 0.5% gel instillation. The AUC between 0 and 12 h post-administration were also reduced by up to 93 to 98%. CONCLUSIONS: After treatment with a timolol 0.1% gel formulation, systemic concentrations found were considerably lower than after administration of timolol 0.5% gel or in aqueous solution.

[Evaluation of NAAGA efficacy in dry eye syndrome]. / Evaluation de l'efficacité du NAAGA dans la sécheresse oculaire.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of Naabak((R)) eyedrops in reducing inflammation in dry eye syndrome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This pilot, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel study was carried out in adult patients suffering from moderate dry eye syndrome. Patients were treated for three months with preservative-free NAAGA (Naabak((R))) or with sodium chloride 0.9% without preservative (Larmabak(R)). They received the treatment four to six times a day during the 1(st) month and three to four times a day during the 2(nd) and 3(rd) months. At each visit (D28 and D84), clinical tests were performed as well as a biological evaluation of HLA-DR and MUC5AC expression on conjunctival imprints using flow cytometry. RESULTS: After three months of treatment, the ocular surface symptoms and overall discomfort were improved in patients treated with Naabak(R) and in those treated with Larmabak(R) with no significant difference between the groups. Cytological impression showed a significant decrease in the expression of inflammatory markers, notably antigen HLA-DR, in the Naabak(R) group. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the anti-inflammatory property of preservative-free NAAGA (Naabak(R)) in the context of dry eye syndrome with a similar clinical efficacy compared to sodium chloride solution (Larmabak(R)). Naabak(R) could present an additional advantage compared to artificial tears and could be indicated in the treatment of moderate inflammatory dry eye syndrome.