Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 29(7): e720-e722, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30192295

RESUMEN

Delayed repair of orbital trapdoor fractures can jeopardize the viability of entrapped contents and prolong recovery. Variation in presentations, both clinically and radiographically, complicate prompt diagnosis. The oculocardiac reflex may be the only indication of fracture with entrapped orbital contents, but, unfortunately, the reflex has variable onset patterns and can mimic common diagnoses. Therefore, the authors present the case of a 14-year-old male with a right orbital floor fracture, who presented with delayed symptoms secondary to an oculocardiac reflex. The vagal sequelae of the reflex, including gastric hyperactivity and headache, were experienced approximately 1 week after the injury and caused the patient to be misdiagnosed with gastroenteritis and status migrainosus, on 2 separate hospital visits. After admission to the hospital due to progressive symptoms, a CT scan showed concerns for a subacute orbital blowout fracture. The patient underwent orbital floor exploration with findings of scarred orbital fat herniating into a healing fracture site. Repositioning of the fat into the orbit resulted in immediate resolution of the patient's symptoms. Awareness of the presenting characteristics of the oculocardiac reflex can lead to prompt diagnosis and maximize clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Fracturas Orbitales/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas Orbitales/fisiopatología , Reflejo Oculocardíaco , Adolescente , Errores Diagnósticos , Cefalea/etiología , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Fracturas Orbitales/complicaciones , Gastropatías/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos
2.
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr ; 10(4): 271-277, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29109837

RESUMEN

Care for patients with cleft lip and palate is best managed by a craniofacial team consisting of a variety of specialists, including surgeons, who are generally plastic surgeons or otolaryngologists trained in the United States. The goal of this study was to compare the surgical approaches and management algorithms of cleft lip, cleft palate, and nasal reconstruction between plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists. We performed a retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database between 2012 and 2014 to identify patients undergoing primary repair of cleft lip, cleft palate, and associated rhinoplasty. Two cohorts based on primary specialty, plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists, were compared in relation to patient characteristics, 30-day postoperative outcomes, procedure type, and intraoperative variables. Plastic surgeons performed the majority of surgical repairs, with 85.5% ( n = 1,472) of cleft lip, 79.3% ( n = 2,179) of cleft palate, and 87.9% ( n = 465) of rhinoplasty procedures. There was no difference in the age of primary cleft lip repair or rhinoplasty. However, plastic surgeons performed primary cleft palate repair earlier than otolaryngologists ( p = 0.03). Procedure type varied between the specialties. In rhinoplasty, otolaryngologists were more likely to use septal or ear cartilage, whereas plastic surgeons preferred rib cartilage. Results were similar, with no statistically significant difference in terms of mortality, reoperation, readmission, or complications. Significant variation exists in the treatment of cleft lip and palate based on specialty service with regard to procedure timing and type. However, short-term rates of mortality, wound occurrence, reoperation, readmission, and surgical or medical complications remain similar.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA