RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intended open abdomen is an option in cases of trauma and non-trauma patients. Nevertheless, after primary closure, incisional hernia rate is high. We describe a novel method, called COmbined and MOdified Definitive Abdominal closure (COMODA), a delayed primary closure which prevents incisional hernia. METHODS: A negative pressure wound therapy system is combined with a condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (cPTFE) mesh. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN72678033. RESULTS: Ten male patients with a median age of 68.8 (43-87) years were included. Primary closure rate was 100% per protocol. The median number of procedures per patient was 5.7 (5-9). Primary closure was obtained in 20.8 (10-32) days and median hospital stay was 36.3 (18-52) days. Only one patient developed incisional hernia during a median follow-up of 27 (8-60) months. CONCLUSION: COMODA method allows for a high rate of delayed primary closure. It is safe and decreases the risk for developing an incisional hernia. However, a large number of patients are needed to support this conclusion.
Asunto(s)
Hernia Ventral/prevención & control , Hernia Incisional/prevención & control , Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/métodos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Pared Abdominal/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hernia Ventral/etiología , Humanos , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Masculino , Metilmetacrilatos/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Técnicas de Abdomen Abierto/efectos adversos , Politetrafluoroetileno/administración & dosificación , Povidona/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although mortality post-pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) has decreased, morbidity rates continue to be high, ranging from 30% to 50%. Among complications, hemorrhage stands out; it is associated with high mortality and there is no standard management. The aim of the present study was to analyze the incidence, diagnosis, and treatment of hemorrhage post-cephalic PD at our center. METHODS: From January 2005 to December 2008, 107 PDs were performed. A retrospective review of characteristics of patients with postoperative hemorrhage was made from our prospective database. Demographic data, diagnosis, treatment (medical, laparotomy, interventional radiology), association with fistula (pancreatic or biliary), intra- or extraluminal hemorrhage, bleeding time (early or late), severity (moderate/severe), and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (18/107; 16.82%) hemorrhaged after PD. Hemorrhage appeared early (< 24 h) in 4 of these 18 patients (22.2%), and it was severe in 13/18 (72%). Hemorrhage-related mortality was 11% (2/18) and hospital mortality was 22.2% (4/18). Arteriography was performed in 8/18 patients (44.4%) and was effective in 6/8 (75%); laparotomy was performed in 8/18 (44.4%). Re-bleeding occurred in 5 of these 18 patients after the first treatment (27.8%). An association between hemorrhage and fistula was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Hemorrhage after pancreatic resection must be considered a complication with relatively high mortality. Diagnosis should be established and treatment applied rapidly. Pancreatic and/or biliary fistulae were significantly associated with a higher risk of postoperative hemorrhage. Interventional radiology is a good therapeutic option.
Asunto(s)
Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Hemorragia Posoperatoria , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/terapia , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Results of surgical treatment for pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma have improved in recent years owing to several factors, particularly the concentration of these patients in specialised surgical units. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective-prospective comparative study of results in 2 groups of patients treated over 2 different periods of time and with different surgical policy: group A, which included 80 patients treated from 1982 to 1992 in a general surgery unit, and group B, which comprised 151 patients treated from 1998 to 2003 in a specialised hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery unit. RESULTS: Surgical treatment in patients of groups A and B, respectively, was: resection in 20% and 53.6% and by-pass in 62.5% and 36.4%. Postoperative morbidity after resection was similar (75% vs 74.1%) but higher after by-pass in group B (41.8% vs 34%). Postoperative mortality after surgical resection and by-pass was 25% and 14.1%, respectively, for group A and 3.7% and 16.3%, respectively, for group B. Mean survival for all patients was 7.0 +/- 7.1 months for group A and 14.1 +/- 15.3 months for group B. Mean survival for patients with surgical resection was 11.8 +/- 9.8 months and 18.7 +/- 15.8 months for groups A and B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreatic and periampullary carcinoma should be surgically treated in specialised pancreatic surgery units in order to offer the best outcome to patients.