Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Saudi Med ; 43(1): 1-9, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36739498

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 and solid cancer are both associated with an increased risk of thromboembolism. OBJECTIVES: Assess whether solid cancer is a risk factor for acute ischemic event development among patients with COVID-19. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort SETTING: A tertiary training and research hospital PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were hospitalized for COVID-19 for ≥3 days between 15 March 2020 and 30 March 2021 at Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkiye. were included in the study. Independent predictors of the development of acute ischemic events during hospitalization were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Risk factors for acute ischemic event development. SAMPLE SIZE: 538 patients. RESULTS: Patients diagnosed with solid cancer comprised 11.3% of the cohort (n=61). Forty-one (7.6%) developed an acute ischemic event at a median of 3 (range, 1-15) days after hospitalization. The presence of a solid cancer (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.20-12.03, P=.023) along with length of hospital stay (OR 1.05 per day, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, P=.025) were independent predictors of acute ischemic event development during the course of COVID-19. Mortality was reported in 200 (37%) patients at a median of 5 (range, 3-10) days after hospitalization. The presence of solid tumor increased mortality 5.83 times (95% CI 3.19-10.63, P<.001) while this ratio was 4.59 (95% CI 2.29-9.23, P<.001) for patients who experienced an acute ischemic event. CONCLUSION: Patients with active cancer carry a significant risk for acute ischemic event development during the course of COVID-19 and such patients may require particular attention in terms of anticoagulation therapy. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and small sample size. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitalización , Tiempo de Internación , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias/epidemiología
2.
Int J Clin Pract ; 2022: 5437850, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36105785

RESUMEN

Materials and Methods: Adult patients administered colistin with and without LD for MDR Acinetobacter baumannii VAP/pneumonia in intensive care units (ICUs) in a tertiary teaching hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary endpoint was an assessment of clinical and microbiological success between treatment groups. Secondary endpoints included 14- and 30-day mortality and development of nephrotoxicity. Results: A total of 101 patients were included (colistin with LD, n = 57; colistin without LD, n = 44). No significant difference in clinical success was observed between groups (73.7% versus 77.3%; p=0.670). In patients receiving colistin with LD, the microbiological success rate increased from 65.9% to 71.9%, but there was no statistically significantly difference (p=0.510). In terms of using combination therapies with carbapeneme and/or tigecycline, there was no significant difference between treatment groups (p=0.30). The rates of 14- and 30-day mortality were similar between groups. The colistin with LD group had a higher rate of nephrotoxicity compared to the other group (52.6% versus 20.5% p=0.001). The clinical and microbiological response times were found significantly higher in the colistin with LD group (p=0.001; p=0.017). Conclusion: Colistin with LD was associated with a higher risk of nephrotoxicity and was not related to clinical success, microbiological success, and prolonged survival. Randomized comparative studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of LD colistin regimen on MDR Acinetobacter infection.


Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador , Insuficiencia Renal , Adulto , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Colistina/efectos adversos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/microbiología , Insuficiencia Renal/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 22(10): 1059-1063, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34352189

RESUMEN

Background: Post-operative nosocomial meningitis is a critical complication that develops in patients after neurosurgical interventions and operations. Patients and Methods: Data were collected for 65 patients who were diagnosed as having nosocomial meningitis after neurosurgery. The agent profile, clinical and biochemical differences in gram-negative and gram-positive meningitis, and the effectiveness of intrathecal antibiotic administration in cases with carbapenem-resistant gram-negative agents were evaluated. Results: Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 52.3% of patients. In gram-negative cases of post-operative nosocomial meningitis, white blood cell count (p = 0.015), C-reactive protein (p = 0.001), cerebrospinal fluid leukocyte count (p = 0.0001), and protein (p = 0.0001) were higher, and glucose (p = 0.002) was lower. Concurrent bacteremia (p = 0.041), 14-day mortality (p = 0.022), and 30-day mortality (p = 0.023) were higher in gram-negative cases. Empirical treatment was appropriate in 78.5% of the patients. Seventeen patients (26.2%) received intrathecal antibiotic agents in addition to intravenous antibiotic treatment because of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria. Nine (53%) of the patients receiving intrathecal therapy had Acinetobacter baumannii as the agent, six had Klebsiella pneumoniae (35.4%), one had Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.8%), and one had Providencia rettgeri (5.8%). The mean intravenous treatment duration was 21.4 ± 10.6 (4-60) days, and the mean intrathecal treatment duration was 17.6 ± 14.0 (1-51) days. Eleven patients received colistimethate sodium intrathecally (1 × 10 mg/d), three patients received amikacin intrathecally (1 × 10 mg/d), and three patients received gentamicin intrathecally (1 × 10 mg/d). Clinical and microbiologic treatment success was achieved in nine patients (53%). Conclusions: In cases of meningitis caused by carbapenem-resistant agents, intrathecal administration of antibiotic agents such as gentamicin, amikacin, and colistin with limited blood-brain barrier transition in intravenous administration will increase survival. Therefore, intrathecal antibiotic administration should be considered as a part of routine of nosocomial meningitis.


Asunto(s)
Acinetobacter baumannii , Infección Hospitalaria , Meningitis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Meningitis/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...