Genome-wide meta-analyses of restless legs syndrome yield insights into genetic architecture, disease biology and risk prediction.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) affects up to 10% of older adults. Their healthcare is impeded by delayed diagnosis and insufficient treatment. To advance disease prediction and find new entry points for therapy, we performed meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies in 116,647 individuals with RLS (cases) and 1,546,466 controls of European ancestry. The pooled analysis increased the number of risk loci eightfold to 164, including three on chromosome X. Sex-specific meta-analyses revealed largely overlapping genetic predispositions of the sexes (rg = 0.96). Locus annotation prioritized druggable genes such as glutamate receptors 1 and 4, and Mendelian randomization indicated RLS as a causal risk factor for diabetes. Machine learning approaches combining genetic and nongenetic information performed best in risk prediction (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.82-0.91). In summary, we identified targets for drug development and repurposing, prioritized potential causal relationships between RLS and relevant comorbidities and risk factors for follow-up and provided evidence that nonlinear interactions are likely relevant to RLS risk prediction.

Sex Differences in Dystonia.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies have indicated that female individuals outnumber male individuals for certain types of dystonia. Few studies have addressed factors impacting these sex differences or their potential biological mechanisms. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate factors underlying sex differences in the dystonias and explore potential mechanisms for these differences. METHODS: Data from individuals with various types of dystonia were analyzed in relation to sex. Data came from two different sources. One source was the Dystonia Coalition database, which contains predominantly idiopathic adult-onset focal and segmental dystonias. The second source was the MDSGene database, which contains predominantly early-onset monogenic dystonias. RESULTS: The 3222 individuals from the Dystonia Coalition included 71% female participants and 29% male participants for an overall female-to-male ratio (F:M) of 2.4. This ratio varied according to body region affected and whether dystonia was task-specific. The female predominance was age-dependent. Sex did not have a significant impact on co-existing tremor, geste antagoniste, depression or anxiety. In the 1377 individuals from the MDSGene database, female participants outnumbered male participants for some genes (GNAL, GCH1, and ANO3) but not for other genes (THAP1, TH, and TOR1A). CONCLUSIONS: These results are in keeping with prior studies that have indicated female individuals outnumber male individuals for both adult-onset idiopathic and early onset monogenic dystonias. These results extend prior observations by revealing that sex ratios depend on the type of dystonia, age, and underlying genetics.

A Randomized Phase 2 KINETIC Trial Evaluating SAGE-324/BIIB124 in Individuals with Essential Tremor.

BACKGROUND: SAGE-324/BIIB124 is an investigational positive allosteric modulator of GABAA receptors. OBJECTIVE: KINETIC (NCT04305275), a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study, evaluated SAGE-324/BIIB124 in individuals with essential tremor (ET). METHODS: Individuals aged 18 to 80 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to orally receive 60 mg of SAGE-324/BIIB124 or placebo once daily for 28 days. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale-Performance Subscale (TETRAS-PS) Item 4 (upper-limb tremor) at day 29 with SAGE-324/BIIB124 versus placebo. RESULTS: Between May 2020 and February 2021, 69 U.S. participants were randomly assigned to receive SAGE-324/BIIB124 (n = 34) or placebo (n = 35). There was a significant reduction from baseline in TETRAS-PS Item 4 at day 29 with SAGE-324/BIIB124 versus placebo (least squares mean [standard error]: -2.31 [0.401] vs. -1.24 [0.349], P = 0.0491). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, and balance disorder. CONCLUSION: These results support further development of SAGE-324/BIIB124 for potential ET treatment. © 2024 Sage Therapeutics, Inc and The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

The Clinician's Tardive Inventory (CTI): A New Clinical Tool for Documenting and Rating Tardive Dyskinesia.

Objective: Current clinician-rated tardive dyskinesia (TD) symptom scales have not addressed the expanding clinical signs and functional impact of TD. The study objective was to develop and test the reliability of a new integrated instrument.Methods: A movement disorder neurologist devised the outline of the rating scale. A Steering Committee (5 neurologists and 2 psychiatrists) provided revisions until consensus was reached. The Clinician's Tardive Inventory (CTI) assesses abnormal movements of the eye/eyelid/face, tongue/mouth, jaw, and limb/trunk; complex movements defined as complicated movements different from simple patterned movements or postures; and vocalizations. The CTI rates frequency of symptoms from 0 to 3 (ranging from absent to constant). Functional impairments, including activities of daily living (ADL), social impairment, symptom distress, and physical harm, are rated 0-3 (ranging from unawareness to severe impact). The CTI underwent interrater and test-retest reliability testing between February and June 2022 based on videos and accompanying vignettes, which were reviewed by 2 movement disorder specialists to determine adequacy. Four clinicians rated each video/vignette. Interrater agreement was analyzed via 2-way random-effects intraclass correlation (ICC), and test-retest agreement was assessed utilizing the Kendall tau-b.Results: Forty-five video/vignettes were assessed for interrater reliability and 16 for test-retest reliability. The most prevalent movements were those of the tongue and mouth (77.8%) and jaw (55.6%). ICCs for movement frequency for anatomic symptoms were as follows: anatomic symptom summary score 0.92, abnormal eye movement 0.89, abnormal tongue/mouth movement 0.91, abnormal jaw movement 0.89, abnormal limb movement 0.76, complex movement 0.87, and abnormal vocalization 0.77; ICCs for functional impairments were as follows: total impairment score 0.92, physical harm 0.82, social embarrassment 0.88, ADLs 0.83, and symptom bother 0.92; Retests were conducted a mean (SD) of 15 (3) days later with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.66 to 0.87.Conclusions: The CTI is a new integrated instrument with proven reliability in assessing TD signs and functional impacts. Future validation study is warranted.

Review of the role of the endogenous opioid and melanocortin systems in the restless legs syndrome.

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is responsive to opioid, dopaminergic and iron-based treatments. Receptor blocker studies in RLS patients suggest that the therapeutic efficacy of opioids is specific to the opioid receptor and mediated indirectly through the dopaminergic system. An RLS autopsy study reveals decreases in endogenous opioids, ß-endorphin and perhaps Met-enkephalin in the thalamus of RLS patients. A total opioid receptor knock-out (mu, delta and kappa) and a mu-opioid receptor knock-out mouse model of RLS show circadian motor changes akin to RLS and, although both models show sensory changes, the mu-opioid receptor knock mouse shows circadian sensory changes closest to those seen in idiopathic RLS. Both models show changes in striatal dopamine, anaemia and low serum iron. However, only in the total receptor knock-out mouse do we see the decreases in serum ferritin that are normally found in RLS. There are also decreases in serum iron when wild-type mice are administered a mu-opioid receptor blocker. In addition, the mu-opioid receptor knock-out mouse also shows increases in striatal zinc paralleling similar changes in RLS. Adrenocorticotropic hormone and α-melanocyte stimulating hormone are derived from pro-opiomelanocortin as is ß-endorphin. However, they cause RLS-like symptoms and periodic limb movements when injected intraventricularly into rats. These results collectively suggest that an endogenous opioid deficiency is pathogenetic to RLS and that an altered melanocortin system may be causal to RLS as well.

An Empirical Comparison of Commonly Used Universal Rating Scales for Dystonia.

Background: There are several widely used clinical rating scales for documenting the severity and distribution of various types of dystonia. Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the performance of the most commonly used scales in a large group of adults with the most common types of isolated dystonia. Methods: Global Dystonia Rating Scale (GDRS) and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFM) scores were obtained for 3067 participants. Most had focal or segmental dystonia, with smaller numbers of multifocal or generalized dystonia. These scales were also compared for 209 adults with cervical dystonia that had Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) scores and 210 adults with blepharospasm that had Blepharospasm Severity Scale (BSRS) scores. Results: There were strong correlations between the GDRS and BFM total scores (r = 0.79) and moderate correlations for their sub scores (r > 0.5). Scores for both scales showed positive skew, with an overabundance of low scores. BFM sub-scores were not normally distributed, due to artifacts caused by the provoking factor. Relevant sub-scores of the GDRS and BFM also showed moderate correlations with the TWSTRS (r > 0.5) for cervical dystonia and the BSRS (r > 0.5) for blepharospasm. Conclusions: The BFM is more widely used than the GDRS, but these results suggest the GDRS may be preferable for focal and segmental dystonias. The overabundance of very low scores for both scales highlights challenges associated with discriminating very mild dystonia from other abnormal movements or variants of normal behavior.

Feasibility of home dose optimization of apomorphine sublingual film in Parkinson's disease patients with OFF episodes: results from the dose-optimization phase of an open-label, randomized crossover study.

Background: Dose optimization of sublingual apomorphine (SL-APO), a dopamine agonist for the treatment of OFF episodes in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), has been performed under clinical supervision in clinical trials. SL-APO may be a candidate for home dosing optimization which would be less burdensome for patients. Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of home optimization of SL-APO in patients with PD and OFF episodes. Design: A multicenter, randomized, crossover study comparing SL-APO with subcutaneous apomorphine was conducted, comprising an open-label dose-optimization phase and a treatment phase. This non-comparative analysis focuses on the outcomes of the dose-optimization phase with SL-APO only. Methods: Patients with PD and OFF episodes received SL-APO at an initial dose of 10 mg in the clinic (open-label). Further optimization could continue at home in 5 mg increments during subsequent OFF episodes (maximum dose of 30 mg). Optimization and tolerability were assessed daily by patient-reported feedback via telephone. Patients reporting a FULL ON returned to the clinic for a dose-confirmation visit (DCV). In patients with inadequate response as determined during the DCV, the dose could be further optimized at home. Results: Home optimization was continued by 81.4% (83/102) of patients. Of these, 80.7% identified an effective, tolerable dose. Mean time between initial clinic visit and DCV 1 was 6.8 days, and the final optimized dose of SL-APO was 30 mg (mode). In total, 62.7% of patients reported ⩾1 adverse event; the most common included nausea (31.4%), dizziness (9.8%), somnolence (8.8%), dyskinesia (7.8%), and fatigue (5.9%). The safety profile in this study in which most patients performed home dose optimization was consistent with the study utilizing clinic-based optimization. Conclusion: After the first clinic dose, home dose optimization of SL-APO appears feasible in patients with PD and OFF episodes, with most patients identifying their optimal SL-APO dose at home. Trial registration: This study is registered with EudraCT (2016-003456-7): Clinical Trials register - Search for eudract_number:2016-003456-70.

The Self-Administered Screening Questionnaire for Parkinson's Disease-Associated Psychosis (SASPAP).

BACKGROUND: Psychosis is a common manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD), and a major source of caregiver burden, nursing home placement, and mortality. Psychosis symptoms are often not volunteered during the clinic visit because of embarrassment or lack of insight, and there is no validated screening scale. We compare a new self-administered psychosis screening questionnaire against the Parkinson's Disease Psychosis Scale (PDPS) and physician interview as the gold standard assessments. OBJECTIVE: To create and validate the Self-Administered Screening Questionnaire for PD-Associated Psychosis (SASPAP). METHODS: The questionnaire was developed through a modified Delphi method by a committee of two neurologists, a psychiatrist, a patient, and patient advocate and underwent several rounds of revisions, including patient ß-testing. It was provided by staff at intake to 250 consecutive patients diagnosed with PD, at the Methodist Hospital Movement Disorders Clinic, and separately to their caregivers when available. Later, the PDPS and a general psychosis interview were administered by PD specialists without knowledge of the screening questionnaire responses. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty consecutive patients with PD (mean age, 68.6 ± 7.0; mean age of PD onset, 62.7 ± 10.5 years; 35.2% female) were included. The screening questionnaire was positive for psychosis (any of the four questions positive) in 33.6% of patients. Compared to the gold standard, the SASPAP sensitivity was 87.8% and the specificity 92.3%. CONCLUSION: This four-question self-administered screening questionnaire for PD psychosis demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy compared with the gold standard assessments and can be self-completed at visit intake. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

IPX203 vs Immediate-Release Carbidopa-Levodopa for the Treatment of Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson Disease: The RISE-PD Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Levodopa has a short half-life and a limited window of opportunity for absorption in the proximal small intestine. IPX203 is an oral, extended-release formulation of carbidopa-levodopa developed to address these limitations. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of IPX203 vs immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa in patients with Parkinson disease who are experiencing motor fluctuations. Design, Setting, and Participants: RISE-PD was a 20-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial. The study was conducted between November 6, 2018, and June 15, 2021, at 105 academic and clinical centers in the US and Europe. Patients with Parkinson disease taking a total daily dose of 400 mg or more of levodopa and experiencing an average of 2.5 hours or more daily off-time were included in the study. A total of 770 patients were screened, 140 were excluded (those taking controlled-release carbidopa-levodopa apart from a single daily bedtime dose, Rytary (Amneal Pharmaceuticals), additional carbidopa or benserazide, or catechol O-methyl transferase inhibitors or who had a history of psychosis within the past 10 years), and 630 were enrolled in the trial. Interventions: Following open-label immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa dose adjustment (3 weeks) and conversion to IPX203 (4 weeks), patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to double-blind, double-dummy treatment with immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa or IPX203 for 13 weeks. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary end point was mean change in daily good on-time (ie, on-time without troublesome dyskinesia) from baseline to the end of the double-blind treatment period. Results: A total of 630 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.5 [8.95] years; 396 [62.9%] men) were enrolled, and 506 patients were randomly assigned to receive IPX203 (n = 256) or immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa (n = 250). The study met its primary end point, demonstrating statistically significant improvement in daily good on-time for IPX203 compared to immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa (least squares mean, 0.53 hours; 95% CI, 0.09-0.97; P = .02), with IPX203 dosed a mean 3 times per day vs 5 times per day for immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa. Good on-time per dose increased by 1.55 hours with IPX203 compared to immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa (95% CI, 1.37-1.73; P < .001). IPX203 was well tolerated. The most common adverse events in the double-blind phase (IPX203 vs immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa) were nausea (4.3% vs 0.8%) and anxiety (2.7% vs 0.0%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, IPX203 provided more hours of good on-time per day than immediate-release carbidopa-levodopa, even as IPX203 was dosed less frequently. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03670953.

Task Specific Tremor in Parkinson's Disease Responds to Apomorphine.

Background: Task specific tremor (TST) is a poorly understood entity without any standard treatments, that may subsequently develop tremor during additional tasks, later develop postural/kinetic tremor (essential tremor criteria), and later develop Parkinson's disease. The pathophysiology is not understood as it has features of tremor, dystonia, and parkinsonism. Objectives: To assess response of TST to apomorphine and thus infer pathophysiology. Methods: We administered sublingual apomorphine to 8 patients diagnosed with Parkinson's disease based on clinical criteria and dopamine imaging, who all initially presented with TST and later presented other parkinsonian signs and dopamine imaging deficits. Results: Apomorphine improved TST, which was refractory to oral levodopa and other tremor therapies, in 6/8 subjects. Discussion: These results offer a treatment option for TST, which is usually refractory to other pharmacologic treatments, in patients with other parkinsonian features, and infers a dopaminergic pathophysiology of TST.

Clozapine: Efficacy for Parkinson Disease psychosis in patients refractory to pimavanserin.

Pimavanserin is the only approved drug for Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) and is an increasingly used therapy where available. Clozapine has proven efficacy for PDP but is much less commonly used secondary to frequent blood tests to monitor for agranulocytopenia. We identified 27 patients with PDP (72 ± 7.3 years, 11 (41%) female), with an inadequate response to pimavanserin, who subsequently started clozapine. The final mean daily dose of clozapine was 49.5 mg [range 25-100] at night, and mean duration of follow-up was 17 months [range: 2-50 months]. Patients reported clozapine to be markedly effective in 11 (41%), moderately effective in 6 (22%), somewhat effective in 5 (18%). No patient reported that it was ineffective, but 5 (19%) had inadequate follow-up. Clozapine should be considered in pimavanserin refractory psychosis.

Dose Optimization of Apomorphine Sublingual Film for OFF Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: Is the Prophylactic Use of an Antiemetic Necessary?

BACKGROUND: Nausea is common upon initiating dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD); however, pretreatment with an antiemetic is recommended only when initiating apomorphine formulations. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the need for prophylactic antiemetic use during dose optimization of apomorphine sublingual film (SL-APO). METHODS: A post hoc analysis of a Phase III study evaluated nausea and vomiting treatment-emergent adverse events in patients with PD who underwent SL-APO dose optimization (10-35 mg; 5-mg increments) to achieve a tolerable FULL ON. Frequencies of nausea and vomiting were described for patients who did versus did not use an antiemetic during dose optimization and by patient subgroups based on extrinsic and intrinsic factors. RESULTS: Overall, 43.7% (196/449) of patients did not use an antiemetic during dose optimization; most of these patients (86.2% [169/196]) achieved an effective and tolerable SL-APO dose. In patients who did not use an antiemetic, nausea (12.2% [24/196]) and vomiting (0.5% [1/196]) were uncommon. An antiemetic was used in 56.3% (253/449) of patients, with 17.0% (43/253) and 2.4% (6/253) experiencing nausea and vomiting, respectively. All events of nausea (14.9% [67/449]) and vomiting (1.6% [7/449]) were of mild-to-moderate severity except for 1 event each. Irrespective of antiemetic use, among patients without baseline dopamine agonist use, nausea and vomiting rates were 25.2% (40/159) and 3.8% (6/159); in those already using dopamine agonists, rates were 9.3% (27/290) and 0.3% (1/290). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic treatment with an antiemetic is not necessary for most patients who initiate SL-APO for the treatment of OFF episodes in PD.

Consensus guidelines on the construct validity of rodent models of restless legs syndrome.

Our understanding of the causes and natural course of restless legs syndrome (RLS) is incomplete. The lack of objective diagnostic biomarkers remains a challenge for clinical research and for the development of valid animal models. As a task force of preclinical and clinical scientists, we have previously defined face validity parameters for rodent models of RLS. In this article, we establish new guidelines for the construct validity of RLS rodent models. To do so, we first determined and agreed on the risk, and triggering factors and pathophysiological mechanisms that influence RLS expressivity. We then selected 20 items considered to have sufficient support in the literature, which we grouped by sex and genetic factors, iron-related mechanisms, electrophysiological mechanisms, dopaminergic mechanisms, exposure to medications active in the central nervous system, and others. These factors and biological mechanisms were then translated into rodent bioequivalents deemed to be most appropriate for a rodent model of RLS. We also identified parameters by which to assess and quantify these bioequivalents. Investigating these factors, both individually and in combination, will help to identify their specific roles in the expression of rodent RLS-like phenotypes, which should provide significant translational implications for the diagnosis and treatment of RLS.

Enhancing GABA inhibition is the next generation of medications for essential tremor.

γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the most prevalent inhibitory CNS neurotransmitter. Activating GABA-A receptors hyperpolarizes cells via Cl- influx, which inhibits action potentials. Although the exact pathophysiologies of tremor are incompletely understood, proposed neuroanatomy extensively implicates GABA pathways. Pathological studies and imaging studies also show GABA abnormalities in patients with ET. Most importantly, medications that activate GABA-A receptors, such as primidone, often improve tremor. Ongoing clinical trials and physiology research should further refine potential future GABAergic targets and treatments, which are currently the most promising targets for pharmacological intervention.

Tremor rating scales and laboratory tools for assessing tremor.

The purpose of this review is to characterize and compare validated clinical rating scales and transducers that are used in the clinical assessment of tremor disorders. Tremor is an involuntary oscillatory movement of a body part. Tremor can be characterized in terms of amplitude and frequency of oscillation, and these kinematic properties vary randomly and with activities of daily living. Clinical rating scales are most useful when performing a comprehensive assessment of tremor severity (amplitude), anatomical distribution, activation conditions, and impact on activities of daily living and quality of life. Motion transducers are often used in conjunction with surface electromyography to discern properties of tremor that are important diagnostically. Motion transducers are needed for an accurate determination of tremor frequency and for precise quantification of changes in amplitude and frequency over time. The precision and accuracy of motion transducers exceed that of all clinical rating scales. However, these advantages of transducers are mitigated by the considerable within-subject random variability in tremor amplitude, such that the smallest detectable statistically significant change in tremor amplitude is comparable for scales and transducers. Comprehensive anatomical and behavioral assessment of tremor with transducers is not clinically feasible. Transducers and scales are presently viewed as complementary methods of quantifying tremor amplitude. Transducer measures are logarithmically related to clinical ratings, as predicted by the Weber-Fechner law of psychophysics. This relationship must be considered when interpreting change in clinical ratings, produced by disease or treatment. This article is part of the Special Issue "Tremor" edited by Daniel D. Truong, Mark Hallett, and Aasef Shaikh.

Stroke-related restless legs syndrome: epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and pathophysiology.

Stroke-related restless legs syndrome (RLS) is one of stroke-related sleep disorders, which may be due to de novo RLS after stroke onset or an exacerbation of RLS symptoms after incident stroke. To date, the diagnostic rate of stroke-related RLS is low but it has a significant effect on patients' daily life and functional outcome. This review provides an overview of the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, pathophysiology, and impact on functional outcome of stroke-related RLS.

Exploratory cross-over, trial of augmented RLS with the dopamine receptor 1/5 antagonist ecopipam D1/D5 antagonist ecopipam for augmented RLS.

BACKGROUND: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a common condition that initially responds dramatically to dopaminergic therapy. Over time, however, dopaminergics cause augmentation, where symptoms occur earlier and intensify. Animal models suggest this may result from increased dopamine receptor type-1 affinity in the spinal cord. Ecopipam is a potent, specific dopamine-1/5 receptor antagonist. METHODS: We performed a small (N = 10) exploratory placebo controlled, cross-over safety trial of ecopipam (25-100 mg/day) for patients with augmented RLS currently taking dopamine agonists. RESULTS: Ecopipam was well tolerated with sedation being the most common adverse event in drug and placebo. Safety scales and serology data were similar to placebo. The study was not powered to demonstrate efficacy and exploratory efficacy data showed no significant improvement compared to placebo, but RLS diaries, the international RLS rating scale, and clinical global impressions all favored drug. No subject worsened on drug or demonstrated rebound worsening after drug discontinuation. CONCLUSION: Ecopipam was safe and well tolerated in this initial study for RLS. Given the lack of alternate options, larger efficacy studies for augmented RLS, and potentially de novo RLS are justified.

THN 102 for Excessive Daytime Sleepiness Associated with Parkinson's Disease: A Phase 2a Trial.

BACKGROUND: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a frequent and disabling symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) without approved treatment. THN102 is a novel combination drug of modafinil and low-dose flecainide. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of THN102 in PD patients with EDS. METHODS: The method involved a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial testing two doses of THN102 (200 mg/d modafinil with 2 mg/d [200/2] or 18 mg/d flecainide [200/18]) versus placebo; 75 patients were exposed to treatment. The primary endpoint was safety. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score. RESULTS: Both doses of THN102 were well tolerated. ESS significantly improved with THN102 200/2 (least square means vs. placebo [95% confidence interval, CI]: -1.4 [-2.49; -0.31], P = 0.012) but did not change significantly with the 200/18 dosage. CONCLUSIONS: THN102 was well tolerated and showed a signal of efficacy at the 200/2 dose, supporting further development for the treatment of EDS in PD. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

AbobotulinumtoxinA provides flexibility for the treatment of cervical dystonia with 500 U/1 mL and 500 U/2 mL dilutions.

INTRODUCTION: Cervical dystonia (CD) is a neurologic movement disorder with potentially disabling effects and significant impact on quality of life of those affected. AbobotulinumtoxinA (aboBoNT-A) was initially approved for a dilution of 500 U/1 mL and subsequently for a dilution of 500 U/2 mL, providing flexibility for clinicians to treat CD. Here, we explore the safety and efficacy of the 500 U/2 mL dilution versus 500 U/1 mL dilution of aboBoNT-A in a retrospective analysis based on published clinical trial data. METHODS: The safety and efficacy of aboBoNT-A in patients with CD was evaluated in three multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and open-label extensions. Trials 1 (NCT00257660) and 2 (NCT00288509) evaluated the 500 U/1 mL dilution in 80 and 116 patients, respectively; Trial 3 (NCT01753310) evaluated the 500 U/2 mL dilution in 125 patients. RESULTS: Comparison of the adjusted mean difference in TWSTRS total scores at Week 4 from baseline for aboBoNT-A in Trial 1 (-6.0; 95% CI, -10.8, -1.3), Trial 2 (-8.8; 95% CI, -12.9, -4.7), and Trial 3 (-8.7; 95% CI, -13.2, -4.2) showed similar, significant improvements. Dysphagia and muscle weakness patterns were comparable across the three trials, indicating that an increased dilution of aboBoNT-A does not result in an increased risk of diffusion-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: The results of these trials show that aboBoNT-A is similarly efficacious using either dilution, with similar safety and tolerability across trials. Having the 500 U/1 mL and 500 U/2 mL dilution volumes available provides further flexibility in administration, benefiting patient care.