Family engagement as part of managing patients with mental illness in primary care.

The family unit plays a crucial role in patients with mental illness. Mental health problems have been associated with an assortment of dysfunctional social and psychological processes in one's family of origin, yet families are now expected to be responsible for the care of the patient with mental illness. There are many short- and long-term benefits of engaging the families in the care of patients with mental illness. However, the implementation of family engagement in patients with mental illness is fraught with challenges. The primary care provider possesses several distinctive characteristics that lend an advantage to successfully engaging the families of patients with mental illness, such as better accessibility, better rapport, and being associated with less stigma. Primary care providers could engage the family in various ways, ranging from basic functions such as psychoeducation and supporting the family's needs, to more specialised interventions such as family assessment and family therapy.

Chronobiology and the case for sleep health interventions in the community.

Our sleep-wake cycle is determined by the interaction between our homeostatic sleep drive and circadian rhythm. Each of us has a personalised biological rhythm or chronotype that determines the optimal time to fall asleep and wake up. Chronic sleep deprivation has been linked to the development of several physical and mental health disorders, as well as accidents and occupational errors. Around the world, growing recognition of the importance of sleep has led to the adoption of practices that promote sleep health. Given that Singaporeans were consistently found to be one of the most sleep-deprived populations in the world, we believe that there is an urgent need to pursue the introduction of community-based sleep health interventions here. This includes sleep education and promotion of sleep hygiene, adopting practices to reduce social jetlag and improve sleep health, and enhancing screening and treatment of sleep disorders.

A Pilot Study of Switching Electroconvulsive Therapy for Patients With Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia or Mood Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: Switching of ECT electrode modality is commonly done in clinical practice but outcomes are unclear. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between ECT modality switchers and nonswitchers in a large tertiary psychiatric institution over 1 year. METHODS: Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were used to assess symptoms and cognition. General linear regression was utilized to compare the change of BPRS or MADRS and MoCA score among switchers vs nonswitchers. RESULTS: 21.5% of 209 patients switched ECT. Baseline BPRS scores were lower among nonswitchers. Response rate in schizophrenia, depression and mania were higher for nonswitchers (69.6%, 81.35% and 84.8% respectively / 9.2 (SD 3.3) sessions) compared to switchers (53.8%, 0% and 66.7% respectively / 10.6 (SD 4.5) sessions). Most common ECT switches were Bifrontal (BF) to Bitemporal (BT) (schizophrenia), UB RUL (ultrabrief right unilateral) to BT (depression), and UB RUL to BT / BF (mania). There was no significant difference in the change of BPRS and MoCA scores between nonswitchers and switchers. However, there was significantly more improvement of MADRS scores among nonswitchers [adjusted mean ± SE: (-26.4 ± 2.8)] compared with switchers (-10.6) ±6.6). CONCLUSIONS: ECT switching was commonly done and may result in better or worse outcomes than not switching depending on diagnosis. Controlled trials are required to address this urgent clinical issue.