The Belun sleep platform to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea in patients with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Current hypertension guidelines recommend that at-risk individuals be screened for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The Belun Ring is a wearable OSA diagnostic device worn on the palmar side of the proximal phalanx of the index finger. METHODS: We recruited 129 participants (age: 60 ±â€Š8 years, male sex: 88%, BMI: 27 ±â€Š4 kg/m 2 ) with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk for a simultaneous polysomnography and Belun Ring monitoring for one night. Epworth Sleepiness Scale score more than 10 was detected in 27 (21.0%) participants. RESULTS: In the 127 participants who completed the study, the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) derived from polysomnography was 18.1 (interquartile range: 33.0) events/h and that derived from the Belun Ring was 19.5 (interquartile range: 23.3) events/h [intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.882, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.837-0.916]. A Bland-Altman plot showed the difference between the Belun Ring and polysomnography AHIs to be -1.3 ±â€Š10.4 events/h. Area under the receiver operating characteristic for the Belun Ring AHI was 0.961 (95% CI: 0.932-0.990, P  < 0.001). When the Belun Ring AHI of at least 15 events/h was used to diagnose OSA, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 95.7, 77.6, 85.3, and 93.8%, respectively. The overall accuracy was 87.4%. The Cohen's kappa agreement was 0.74 ±â€Š0.09 ( P  < 0.001). Similar results were obtained when the oxygen desaturation index was used to diagnose OSA. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of OSA was detected in patients with hypertension and high cardiovascular risk. The Belun Ring is a reliable device for OSA diagnosis similar to polysomnography.

Long-term Prognosis in Patients With Concomitant Acute Coronary Syndrome and Aortic Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis (AS) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) share similar cardiovascular risk factors. The incidence of concomitant AS and ACS is increasing with aging population, yet studies investigating the prognosis of these patients remain scarce. METHODS: This retrospective single-centre cohort study examined consecutive patients who presented with ACS and AS from January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2021. The cohort was divided into mild, moderate, and severe AS based on the index echocardiogram. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of 563 patients, 264 (46.9%) had mild, 193 (34.3%) moderate, and 106 (18.8%) severe AS. The mean follow-up duration was 2.5 years. All-cause mortality was higher among patients with moderate and severe AS compared with mild AS within 30 days (17.0% vs 13.0% vs 6.4%, respectively; P = 0.005) and in the long term (49.7% vs 51.4% vs 35.6%; P = 0.002). Concomitant moderate (hazard ratio [HR] 1.453, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.020-2.068; P = 0.038) or severe AS (HR 1.873, 95% CI 1.176-2.982; P = 0.008) was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated higher mortality in patients with moderate and severe AS compared with mild AS (P < 0.001). Similar survival trends were observed regardless of ACS type and in those with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction had poor prognosis regardless of AS severity. CONCLUSIONS: ACS patients with concomitant moderate or severe AS have similar high long-term mortality, regardless of ACS type. The high early mortality in moderate and severe AS emphasises the imperative to attempt to mitigate this risk urgently.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Risk Factors, Incidence, and Outcomes of Patients With Versus Without Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Current guidelines on the management of patients with aortic valvular disease have widened the use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with an emphasis on avoidance of prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM). This study sought to examine the incidence, risk factors, and all-cause mortality of PPM after TAVI. Medline and Embase databases were searched from inception to August 10, 2021. Patients were compared along 2 arms: (1) any degree of PPM and those without PPM, (2) severe PPM, and nonsevere PPM. A total of 22 articles involving 115,442 patients after TAVI were included. Pooled incidence for any degree of PPM was 30.1% and 10.7% in severe PPM. Incidence was significantly higher (p <0.001) for any degree of PPM in Europe (33.1%) and North America (34.4%) compared with Asia (10.4%). Incidence of severe PPM was higher (p = 0.015) in older generation (13.6%) compared with current-generation valves (6.3%). Severe PPM increased the risk of all-cause mortality relative to nonsevere PPM (hazard ratio: 1.86, 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 3.29, p = 0.034). Patients of younger age, increased body surface area, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and classified New York Heart Association Class III/IV were at greater risk of both any degree and severe PPM. Smaller prosthesis size increased the risk of any degree of PPM, whereas postdilation and larger prostheses were protective factors. In conclusion, all-cause mortality was significantly affected in severe PPM compared with nonsevere cases, whereas this excess mortality was not observed between those with any degree of PPM and those without. Closer attention to patient and bioprosthetic valve factors is required to minimize the occurrence of severe PPM.