Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Porcine Health Manag ; 8(1): 27, 2022 Jun 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35701849

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The parasite Toxoplasma gondii (T. gondii) causes a substantial human disease burden worldwide. Ingesting improperly cooked pork containing T. gondii is considered one of the major sources of human infection in Europe and North America. Consequently, control of T. gondii infections in pigs is warranted. The European Food Safety Authority advised to perform serological monitoring of pigs and to conduct farm audits for the presence of risk factors. Serological monitoring was implemented in several Dutch slaughterhouses, one to six blood samples (a total of 5134 samples) were taken from each delivery of finishing pigs and samples were tested for the presence of anti-T. gondii antibodies. Using these test results, a cross-sectional study was initiated to assess the association between the within-herd T. gondii seroprevalence and the presence of risk factors for T. gondii infections at 69 conventional finishing pig farms in the Netherlands. RESULTS: A multivariable model showed significant (P ≤ 0.05) association with twelve potential risk factors: type of farm, presence of dogs, presence of ruminants, use of boots, use of shower and farm clothing, mode of rodent control, bedding accessibility for rodents, presence of cats, type of drinking water, heating of the feed, use of goat whey and shielding of birds. CONCLUSIONS: Serological monitoring of finishing pigs for T. gondii in slaughterhouses can be used to identify the presence of T. gondii risk factors on Dutch conventional finishing pig farms and seems a valuable tool to guide and monitor the control of T. gondii in pork production.

2.
Vet Parasitol ; 276S: 100017, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34311944

RESUMEN

Toxoplasma gondii is the causative agent of the parasitic disease toxoplasmosis, which is an important foodborne zoonosis. Eating undercooked meat of infected animals, including pigs, has been considered the major transmission route of T. gondii to humans. Therefore, it is urgent to develop and implement intervention measures in the pork meat chain to reduce risks of acquiring a T. gondii infection. Proposed measures for control of T. gondii in pigs include serological testing of pigs and audits of pig farms on risk factors for T. gondii infection. So far, these ideas have not been tested in practice. In order to generate knowledge about the epidemiology and seroprevalence of T. gondii, as a basis for developing a surveillance system, we studied the long term seroprevalence over years, farming systems and regions, and seasonal patterns of T. gondii seroprevalence in Dutch slaughter pigs. During a five year study period from 2012 to 2016, serum samples were routinely collected in five Dutch pig slaughterhouses. The sera were tested in an ELISA for the presence of antibodies against Toxoplasma. In total 226,340 serum samples were collected and tested during the study period. The observed seroprevalence varied over years, with the highest overall seroprevalence in 2014 (2.8%) and the lowest in 2016 (1.4%). A higher seroprevalence was observed in pigs from organic farms compared to pigs from conventional farms. The overall risk of infection was on average 2.63 times significantly (p < 0.001) higher for organically raised pigs than for conventionally raised pigs. A seasonal pattern in seroprevalence was observed: the results showed a dominant annual periodicity with a seroprevalence peak in winter around week 1 and a minimum seroprevalence in summer around week 27. To our knowledge, this is the first large scale study on the seroprevalence of T. gondii in slaughter pigs. In comparison to other European serological studies, the observed seroprevalence seems to be relatively low. However, care is needed when comparing the results with other studies because of differences in test setup, the number of samples and time period of sampling. The results can be used as a starting point for developing a surveillance system for T. gondii, and for implementation of intervention measures.

3.
Vet Parasitol X ; 2: 100017, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32904761

RESUMEN

Toxoplasma gondii is the causative agent of the parasitic disease toxoplasmosis, which is an important foodborne zoonosis. Eating undercooked meat of infected animals, including pigs, has been considered the major transmission route of T. gondii to humans. Therefore, it is urgent to develop and implement intervention measures in the pork meat chain to reduce risks of acquiring a T. gondii infection. Proposed measures for control of T. gondii in pigs include serological testing of pigs and audits of pig farms on risk factors for T. gondii infection. So far, these ideas have not been tested in practice. In order to generate knowledge about the epidemiology and seroprevalence of T. gondii, as a basis for developing a surveillance system, we studied the long term seroprevalence over years, farming systems and regions, and seasonal patterns of T. gondii seroprevalence in Dutch slaughter pigs. During a five year study period from 2012 to 2016, serum samples were routinely collected in five Dutch pig slaughterhouses. The sera were tested in an ELISA for the presence of antibodies against Toxoplasma. In total 226,340 serum samples were collected and tested during the study period. The observed seroprevalence varied over years, with the highest overall seroprevalence in 2014 (2.8%) and the lowest in 2016 (1.4%). A higher seroprevalence was observed in pigs from organic farms compared to pigs from conventional farms. The overall risk of infection was on average 2.63 times significantly (p < 0.001) higher for organically raised pigs than for conventionally raised pigs. A seasonal pattern in seroprevalence was observed: the results showed a dominant annual periodicity with a seroprevalence peak in winter around week 1 and a minimum seroprevalence in summer around week 27. To our knowledge, this is the first large scale study on the seroprevalence of T. gondii in slaughter pigs. In comparison to other European serological studies, the observed seroprevalence seems to be relatively low. However, care is needed when comparing the results with other studies because of differences in test setup, the number of samples and time period of sampling. The results can be used as a starting point for developing a surveillance system for T. gondii, and for implementation of intervention measures.

4.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 10(9): 4027-38, 2013 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23999550

RESUMEN

Mycobacterium avium (MA) is a potential food safety hazard in pigs. Blood samples of slaughtered pigs in the Netherlands and Germany were tested for the presence of MA antibodies to estimate the serological prevalence in the tested population. In the Dutch and German population 1.0% and 1.7% samples were positive, and 0.5% and 17.4% of the herds were at risk for having a MA infection respectively. The validity of the applied MA-ELISA was evaluated under field conditions. The specificity of the MA-ELISA was high (>98.4%). The average herd sensitivity was 18%. In the affected herds on average 50% of the animals were tested bacteriological positive for MA. It can be concluded that serological screening for the presence of MA antibodies is capable of identifying pig populations that are at risk for a MA infection.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Mycobacterium avium/inmunología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Porcinos/sangre , Tuberculosis/microbiología , Animales , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/epidemiología , Tuberculosis/veterinaria
5.
Vet Microbiol ; 142(3-4): 401-7, 2010 May 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20004067

RESUMEN

The aim of this study is the development and evaluation of a serodiagnostic assay for Mycobacterium avium (MA). After screening MA lipid fractions in an ELISA format, a polar lipid fraction was selected as antigen because of its superior recognition by serum antibodies in experimentally infected pigs. The resulting MA-ELISA was evaluated as an alternative for detection of MA infection by traditional pathological examination of pig lymph nodes for granulomatous lesions by meat inspectors. By comparing with bacteriological examination, the MA-ELISA showed significantly better sensitivity (69%) as compared to pathological examination (31%) in experimentally infected pigs. The MA-ELISA also appeared significantly more specific in a set of serum samples from MA negative pigs: only 1 out of these 153 serum samples reacted positive, whereas 99 (65%) of these had displayed false positive results by detection of lymph nodes lesions that appeared not to be associated with MA (Komijn et al., 2007). The MA-ELISA was subsequently evaluated using serum samples from two farms with pigs known to be infected with MA. Bacteriological examination of the sub-maxillary and mesenteric lymph nodes showed that 56% (103/184) and 35% (41/117) of the pigs, respectively were positive for MA in these farms. In the first farm, 16% (29/184) of the pigs tested positive in MA-ELISA and 31% (57/184) by pathological examination. On the contrary, in the second farm, more pigs tested positive 17% (15/117) in MA-ELISA with 8% (9/117) positivity by pathological examination. Taking the results on both farms together, the sensitivity of the MA-ELISA was 14% and the specificity 83%, whereas the sensitivity of the pathological examination was 31% and the specificity 86%. For practical reasons use of a serological test as the MA-ELISA may be preferred over pathological or bacteriological examinations. Our studies in experimentally infected and negative "field" sera indicate that the MA-ELISA is significantly more specific and more sensitive than detection by classical pathological examination. However, the studies in two MA infected farms show a variable picture with pathological examination overall performing better. Study in a wider range of "positive" farms will be needed to provide a more comprehensive view of the quality of both tests for detection of MA in infected farms. At the same time further optimization of MA-ELISA with use of lipid antigens from a broader range of serotypes may improve its performance in the face of infections with different MA serotypes.


Asunto(s)
Mycobacterium avium , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis/veterinaria , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Pruebas Serológicas/veterinaria , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...