Medical expertise as a critical influencing factor on the length of stay in the ED: A retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT: Overcrowding in the emergency departments (ED) is a significant issue associated with increased morbidity and mortality rates as well as decreased patient satisfaction. Length of stay (LOS) is both a cause and a result of overcrowding. In Israel, as there are few emergency medicine (EM) physicians, the ED team is supplemented with doctors from specialties including internal medicine, general surgery, orthopedics etc. Here we compare ED length of stay (ED-LOS), treatment time and decision time between EM physicians, internists and general surgeons.A retrospective cohort study was conducted examining the Emergency Department length of stay (ED-LOS) for all adult patients attending Sheba Medical Center ED, Israel, between January 1st, and December 31st, 2014. Using electronic medical records, data was gathered on patient age, sex, primary ED physician, diagnosis, eventual disposition, treatment time and disposition decision time. The primary outcome variable was ED-LOS relative to case physician specialty and level (ED, internal medicine or surgery; specialist or resident). Secondary analysis was conducted on time to treatment/ decision as well as ED-LOS relative to patient classification variables (internal medicine vs surgical diagnosis). Specialists were compared to specialists and residents to residents for all outcomes.Residents and specialists in either EM, internal medicine or general surgery attended 57,486 (51.50%) of 111,630 visits to Sheba Hospital's general ED. Mean ED-LOS was 4.12 ±â€Š3.18 hours. Mean treatment time and decision time were 1.79 ±â€Š1.82 hours, 2.84 ±â€Š2.17 hours respectively. Amongst specialists, ED-LOS was shorter for EM physicians than for internal medicine physicians (mean difference 0.28 hours, 95% CI 0.14-0.43) and general surgeons (mean difference 0.63 hours, 95% CI 0.43-0.83). There was no statistical significance between residents when comparing outcomes.Increasing the number of EM specialists in the ED may support efforts to decrease ED-LOS, overcrowding and medical errors whilst increasing patient satisfaction and outcomes.

Overuse of Head CT Examinations for the Investigation of Minor Head Trauma: Analysis of Contributing Factors.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to estimate the amount of CT studies performed in the emergency department of a tertiary hospital that are not indicated by Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) guidelines and to analyze factors that contribute to unnecessary examinations. METHODS: A total of 955 brain CT examinations performed for minor head injuries were randomly retrospectively selected. Medical records were assessed for the following parameters: demographics, cause of head trauma, and referring physician's seniority and specialty. For each CT scan, it was determined whether the CT referral met the CCHR criteria. The CT interpretations of patients under 65 years of age were evaluated to assess the sensitivity and negative predictive value of the CCHR criteria. RESULTS: A total of 104 examinations (10.9%) were not indicated according to the CCHR, but in patients younger than 65 years, 104 of 279 examinations (37.3%) were not indicated. Neurologists conducted more unwarranted CT studies (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; P = .011), whereas surgeons tended to order fewer studies (OR, 0.676; P = .126). There was no statistically significant difference between the seniority of the referring physician and over-referral (P = .181). Four-wheel motor vehicle accidents (OR, 2.789; P = .001) and a hit on the head by an object (OR, 2.843; P = .006) were associated with a higher rate of nonindicated CT examinations. The CCHR had sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% for either brain hemorrhage or fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Overuse of CT examinations for minor head injuries was demonstrated, especially in young patients, with an excess of 37.3%. Contributing factors are referring physician specialty and injury mechanism. Analysis of overuse causes can be implemented for education programs and for computerized referring protocols.

Clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of accelerated diagnostic protocol in a chest pain center compared with routine care of patients with chest pain.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare in patients presenting with acute chest pain the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of an accelerated diagnostic protocol utilizing contemporary technology in a chest pain unit versus routine care in an internal medicine department. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospital and 90-day course were prospectively studied in 585 consecutive low-moderate risk acute chest pain patients, of whom 304 were investigated in a designated chest pain center using a pre-specified accelerated diagnostic protocol, while 281 underwent routine care in an internal medicine ward. Hospitalization was longer in the routine care compared with the accelerated diagnostic protocol group (p<0.001). During hospitalization, 298 accelerated diagnostic protocol patients (98%) vs. 57 (20%) routine care patients underwent non-invasive testing, (p<0.001). Throughout the 90-day follow-up, diagnostic imaging testing was performed in 125 (44%) and 26 (9%) patients in the routine care and accelerated diagnostic protocol patients, respectively (p<0.001). Ultimately, most patients in both groups had non-invasive imaging testing. Accelerated diagnostic protocol patients compared with those receiving routine care was associated with a lower incidence of readmissions for chest pain [8 (3%) vs. 24 (9%), p<0.01], and acute coronary syndromes [1 (0.3%) vs. 9 (3.2%), p<0.01], during the follow-up period. The accelerated diagnostic protocol remained a predictor of lower acute coronary syndromes and readmissions after propensity score analysis [OR = 0.28 (CI 95% 0.14-0.59)]. Cost per patient was similar in both groups [($2510 vs. $2703 for the accelerated diagnostic protocol and routine care group, respectively, (p = 0.9)]. CONCLUSION: An accelerated diagnostic protocol is clinically superior and as cost effective as routine in acute chest pain patients, and may save time and resources.

Simulated evaluation of two triage scales in an emergency department in Israel.

At the time of this study, the Sheba Medical Center Emergency Department (ED) in Israel had no formal triage system in place. To evaluate the interobserver reliability of two triage scales among nurses in our ED, the time-based Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) and the resource-based Emergency Severity Index (ESI), 10 nurses participated in a workshop on ATS and ESI. They then independently assessed 100 simulated triage scenarios taken from actual ED patients, and completed a survey. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated. The intraclass correlation coefficient for ATS was 0.64 (95% confidence interval: 0.57, 0.71), whereas for ESI, it was 0.52 (95% confidence interval: 0.45, 0.61). The nurses felt that ESI was slightly easier to use. Using conventional interpretations, the agreement for ATS is considered substantial, whereas that for ESI is considered moderate. Conversely, the nurses found the ESI somewhat easier to use.

Severe hypothermia in myxoedema coma: a rewarming by extracorporeal circulation.

Myxoedema coma is the most lethal manifestation of hypothyroidism. It represents a true medical emergency, especially in the case of cardiovascular instability. Extracorporeal circulation is usually used for rewarming and for providing cardiac support in patients with severe hypothermia and, in addition, cardiovascular instability. We report the case of an 84-year-old woman who presented to the ED with accidental hypothermia associated with myxoedema that was successfully managed by veno-arterial extracorporeal blood rewarming. This case suggests that veno-arterial extracorporeal rewarming appears to achieve a rapid and consistent rewarming rate and is less invasive and more readily available than cardiopulmonary bypass.

Usefulness of mild therapeutic hypothermia for hospitalized comatose patients having out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Mild therapeutic hypothermia has proved beneficial after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the adult population, when the initial rhythm is ventricular fibrillation (VF). In this study, data from 110 consecutive patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to VF (n = 86) or to non-VF rhythm (n = 24), admitted to an intensive cardiac care unit with restoration of spontaneous circulation and who remained unconscious on admission, were analyzed. Patients were cooled using an external cooling system. Of the patients with VF, 66% had favorable outcomes (Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2), and 30% died. Of the patients with non-VF, 8% had favorable outcomes (p <0.001 vs VF), and 63% died (p = 0.004 vs VF). In patients with VF, those with poor outcomes were older than those with favorable outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03 to 2.7, p = 0.001) and had previous ejection fractions <35% (OR 7.72, 95% CI 1.8 to 33, p = 0.002). Outcomes were also worse when patients presented to the emergency room with seizures (OR 20.96, 95% CI 2.48 to 177.42, p = 0.003) or hemodynamic instability (OR 14.4, 95% CI 3.47 to 60, p <0.0001). In the non-VF group, the 2 patients with good outcomes were younger than those with unfavorable outcomes (39 ± 16 vs 65 ± 12 years, respectively, p = 0.04), with good left ventricular function on presentation (100% vs 4.5%, p = 0.0001) and with short asystole and/or short time from collapse to restoration of spontaneous circulation. In conclusion, mild therapeutic hypothermia in the adult population is more effective in patients with VF compared to those with non-VF. Good prognostic factors for patients with non-VF could be young age, good left ventricular function, and short anoxic time.

Fast track evaluation of patients with acute chest pain: experience in a large-scale chest pain unit in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Many patients present to the emergency department with chest pain. While in most of them chest pain represents a benign complaint, in some patients it underlies a life-threatening illness. OBJECTIVES: To assess the routine evaluation of patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain by means of a cardiologist-based chest pain unit using different noninvasive imaging modalities. METHODS: We evaluated the records of 1055 consecutive patients who presented to the ED with complaints of chest pain and were admitted to the CPU. After an observation period and according to the decision of the attending cardiologist, patients underwent myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, multidetector computed tomography, or stress echocardiography. RESULTS: The CPU attending cardiologist did not prescribe non-invasive evaluation for 108 of the 1055 patients, who were either admitted (58 patients) or discharged (50 patients) after an observation period. Of those remaining, 444 patients underwent MDCT, 445 MPS, and 58 stress echocardiography. Altogether, 907 patients (86%) were discharged from the CPU. During an average period of 236 +/- 223 days, 25 patients (3.1%) were readmitted due to chest pain of suspected cardiac origin, and only 8 patients (0.9%) suffered a major adverse cardiovascular event. CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of the CPU enabled a rapid and thorough evaluation of the patients' primary complaint, thereby reducing hospitalization costs and occupancy on the one hand and avoiding misdiagnosis in discharged patients on the other.

Tracking the effects of policy changes in prescribing analgesics in one emergency department: a 10-year analysis.

According to the WHO, the yearly national consumption of opioids is one indicator of a country's investment on relieving moderate-to-severe pain. We implemented guidelines for treatment of pain in our emergency department (ED) and tracked the major analgesics used in this ED to monitor trends in pain management over a decade. The study was carried out in a Level I trauma center ED. Data were obtained from the pharmacy's computerized records before (1998-2002) and after (2003-2007) implementing the guidelines. The hospital's admission system provided accurate patient census data. Parenteral morphine and oral oxycodone use increased significantly (P = 0.016 and P = 0.008, respectively). Meperidine use did not change. In conclusion, our ED patients are now generally receiving more analgesics than 10 years ago. Electronically stored data on analgesics are accurate and easily accessible for tracking the nature and quantity of prescriptions, but not for correlating their association with patient outcome.

Usefulness of routine use of multidetector coronary computed tomography in the "fast track" evaluation of patients with acute chest pain.

Recently published American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines suggest that multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) may be appropriate for investigating acute chest pain (ACP). Only a few small studies have evaluated the use of MDCT in ACP, where it was not part of routine investigation. We sought to evaluate the routine use of MDCT in a large cohort of patients presenting with ACP in a real-world setting. We studied 785 consecutive patients with ACP who underwent evaluation by MDCT or myocardial perfusion scintigraphy after an observation period of > or = 12 hours. Patients with findings suggestive of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) were referred to coronary angiography. Forty-two patients were hospitalized due to evidence of myocardial ischemia and 44 patients were discharged after the observation period. Of the remaining 699 patients, 340 underwent MDCT and 359 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. In 22 patients (7%) multidetector computed tomogram showed significant CAD and in 32 (9%) patients myocardial perfusion scintigram showed significant ischemia. Significant CAD was confirmed by coronary angiography in 65% and 60%, respectively. Multidetector computed tomogram was nondiagnostic in 31 patients (9%). Extracardiac findings that might be related to ACP and/or necessitated further investigation were demonstrated by multidetector computed tomogram in 71 patients (21%). During 3-month follow-up, 1 patient (0.3%) with negative multidetector computed tomographic and 9 (3%) with negative myocardial perfusion scintigraphic findings developed an acute coronary syndrome or died. Rehospitalization, due to recurrent chest pain, occurred in 9 patients (3.3%) and 21 patients (7.2%), respectively. In conclusion, MDCT could be an appropriate alternative to traditional noninvasive techniques for investigating ACP.

Mass medical repatriation of injured civilians after terrorist attack in Mombassa, Kenya: medical needs, resources used, and lessons learned.

INTRODUCTION: On 28 November 2002, three suicide bombers crashed their car into a hotel in Mombassa, Kenya; 12 people were killed, including three Israelis, and 80 were wounded (22 of whom were Israeli). The Israeli Defense Force Airborne Medical Evacuation Flight Teams participated in a repatriation mission to bring the wounded home. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to outline the distinctive aspects of this mission, as well as to share the experiences and lessons learned. METHODS: Israeli Army debriefing reports were used to study the composition of the crew, medical equipment taken, injury distribution, mode of operation, and mission schedule. RESULTS: A total of six fixed-wing aircraft were used--two Boeing 707s and four Hercules C-130s--with a total of 54 medical team members on board. A total of 260 Israelis were repatriated, 22 of whom were wounded, and three were dead. Of the casualties, 14 were conveyed sitting, and eight supine. The time from the first landing in Kenya to the evacuation of the last supine patient was 5.5 hours. Nurses, as well as social workers, played a central role in the mission. A forward team, including five doctors, was used for the initial organization and for gathering information on the medical status of the casualties. CONCLUSIONS: There was redundancy in the medical crew and medical equipment sent. The need for improved infrastructure on the medical aircraft was stressed. Based on this experience, a new mode for operation for similar missions in the future was formulated.

Unexplained fever in the ED: analysis of 139 patients.

This study examined consecutive patients with unexplained fever (UF) presenting to the ED to define their characteristics and to compare distinctive parameters between admitted and discharged patients. During a 3-month period, all adult patients presenting to the ED with UF were prospectively followed for 1 month. Of 139 patients with UF, 58 patients (42%) were admitted to the hospital, whereas 81 patients (58%) were discharged. Whereas most of the discharged patients had self-limited febrile disease and eventually recovered, the admitted patients had more unresolved fever, serious infections, or systemic diseases and a 5% mortality rate. The admitted patients were older, had more comorbidity, higher leukocyte count, and anemia, but not a higher degree of fever. Older age, comorbidity, leukocytosis, and anemia, but not higher degree of fever, should direct the decision toward admission of a patient with UF.