Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pancreatology ; 22(8): 1167-1174, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36220755

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A definition of pancreatic fistula specifically addressing pancreas transplantation (PT) is lacking. This study sought to characterize pancreatic fistula in this setting and to define its clinical relevance on the postoperative course and long-term graft survival (GS). METHODS: Consecutive simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantations were analysed. The global postoperative course was assessed through the comprehensive complication index (CCI). PF was defined according to the original International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Predictors of poor postoperative course and GS were explored. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were analysed. Surgical morbidity was 48.7%, with severe complications occurring in 39.7%. Ninety-day mortality was 2.6%. PF occurred in 56.6% of patients, although its average clinical burden was low and did not correlate with either early or long-term outcomes. Peri-graft fluid collections, postoperative day (POD) 1 drain fluid amylase (DFA) ≥ 2200 U/L, and POD 5 DFA/serum amylase ratio ≥7.0 independently correlated with poor postoperative course. Perigraft fluid collections were associated with reduced GS. CONCLUSION: Conventionally defined pancreatic fistula is frequent following PT, although its clinical impact is negligible. To define clinically relevant PF, novel cut-offs for DFA might be pondered in a future series, while perigraft fluid collections should be strongly considered.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Páncreas , Fístula Pancreática , Humanos , Amilasas/análisis , Drenaje , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Páncreas/efectos adversos , Fístula Pancreática/etiología , Fístula Pancreática/complicaciones , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Factores de Riesgo
2.
Ann Surg ; 258(1): 21-9, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23426348

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence and severity of biliary complications due to liver transplantation after choledochocholedochostomy with or without a T-tube in a single-center, prospective, randomized trial. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The usefulness of the T-tube for end-to-end biliary anastomosis to reduce the incidence of biliary complications in patients undergoing liver transplantation has been controversial. METHODS: A per-protocol analysis was designed for liver recipients, who were randomly assigned to choledochocholedochostomy with (n = 95) or without (n = 92) a T-tube. RESULTS: The overall biliary complication rate was 22.5% (n = 42), with no difference between groups (P = 0.35). The majority (66.7%) of complications in the T-tube group were types I and II, whereas 50% were type IIIa and 44% were type IIIb in the non-T-tube group (P < 0.0001). Fewer anastomotic strictures were found in the T-tube group (n = 2, 2.1%) than in the non-T-tube group (n = 13, 14.1%; P = 0.002). No difference in anastomotic biliary leakage was observed between groups. Biliary complication-free survival rates showed that complications appeared earlier in the T-tube group. Graft and patient survival rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Complications in the T-tube group were less severe and required less aggressive treatment. The incidence of anastomotic strictures was higher in patients with no T-tube. We recommend conducting choledochocholedochostomy with a rubber T-tube during liver transplantation in risky anastomosis and when the bile duct diameter is less than 7 mm. This study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov: Clinical trial ID# NCT01546064.


Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Cadáver , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Cir Esp ; 81(5): 269-75, 2007 May.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17498456

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The best results in the treatment of colorectal cancer metastases to the liver are currently achieved with surgical resection performed under high quality standards. OBJECTIVES. To analyze the results and quality standards of the surgical treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases in a referral liver unit over an 11-year period. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From January 1995 to December 2005, 250 surgical interventions were performed in 221 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer liver metastases, resulting in 201 hepatic resections. RESULTS: Nineteen percent of patients were >/= 70 years old and comorbidity was present in 54%. Of the 201 hepatic resections, 8.5% were second resections. Major hepatectomy was performed in 39% of the patients. R0 resection was achieved in 85% of the patients. Blood transfusions were not required in 80% of the patients. The median length of postoperative stay was 6 days. Postoperative mortality was nil and morbidity was 19%. Morbidity was associated with the number of resected segments and the need for blood transfusion. The estimated 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 96%, 69% and 52%, respectively, while estimated disease-free survival rates were 58%, 32% and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases is an effective therapeutic alternative if high current quality standards are achieved.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...