CD40-CD154 pathway blockade requires host macrophages to induce humoral unresponsiveness to pig hematopoietic cells in baboons.

The effect of CD154 blockade and macrophage depletion or inhibition on baboon humoral and cellular immune responses to pig antigens was studied in a pig-to-baboon peripheral blood mobilized progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation model aimed at inducing tolerance. We infused pig PBPCs in baboons pretreated with a nonmyeloablative regimen along with murine anti-human CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and macrophage-depleting or -inhibiting agents. Group 1 baboons (n=2) underwent a nonmyeloablative regimen and immunoadsorption of anti-Gal(alpha)1,3Gal (Gal) antibody (Ab) before intravenous infusion of high doses (1.3-4.6 x 10(10)cells/kg) of PBPCs. In group 2 (n=5), cyclosporine was replaced by 8 doses of anti-CD154 mAb over 14 days. Group 3 (n=3) received the group 2 regimen plus medronate liposomes (n=2) or commercially available human intravenous immunoglobulin G depleted of anti-Gal Ab (n=1) to deplete/inhibit recipient macrophages. Group 1 developed sensitization to Gal and also developed new Ab to non-Gal porcine antigens within 10 to 20 days. In group 2, no sensitization to Gal or non-Gal determinants was seen, but Gal-reactive antibodies did return to their preleukocyte transplantation levels. CD154 blockade, therefore, induced humoral unresponsiveness to pig cells. In group 3, sensitization to Gal was seen in all three baboons at 20 days, and Abs against new porcine determinants developed in one baboon. The depletion or inhibition of host macrophages, therefore, prevented the induction of humoral unresponsiveness by CD154 blockade. These results suggest that CD154 blockade induces humoral unresponsiveness by a mechanism that involves the indirect pathway of antigen presentation. In vitro investigation of baboon anti-pig mixed lymphocyte reaction confirmed that only the indirect pathway is efficiently blocked by anti-CD154 mAb. The mechanism in which blockade of the CD40-CD154 pathway induces its effect remains to be determined, but it could involve the generation of regulatory cells capable of suppressing the direct pathway.

Plasma perfusion by apheresis through a Gal immunoaffinity column successfully depletes anti-Gal antibody: experience with 320 aphereses in baboons.

BACKGROUND: Anti-Galalpha1-3Gal (Gal) antibodies (Gal Ab) contribute to the rejection of porcine organs transplanted into primates. Extracorporeal immunoadsorption (EIA) has been developed to eliminate Gal Ab from the circulation. METHODS: Between 1995 and 1999 we performed 320 EIAs in baboons using a COBE-Spectra apheresis unit incorporating a synthetic Gal immunoaffinity column. Three plasma volumes were immunoadsorbed on each occasion. The 221 consecutive EIAs performed in 41 immunosuppressed baboons between January 1997 and April 1999 form the basis of this review. Of these 41 baboons, 29 underwent a series of three or four EIAs at daily intervals, seven had multiple series of three EIAs, and the remainder underwent single or double EIAs. Serum Gal Ab levels were monitored by ELISA before and at intervals after the course of EIA. RESULTS: There were two fatal complications, one from a respiratory mishap (unrelated to the EIA) and one from persistent hypotension unresponsive to therapeutic interventions. Seven procedures (3%) were terminated early owing to technical difficulties and/or persistent hypotension. Mean pre-EIA Gal Ab levels in naive baboons were 33.1 microg/ml (IgM) and 14.5 microg/ml (IgG). Immediately after three consecutive EIAs, IgM was depleted by a mean of 97.3% and IgG by 99.4%. By 18 to 24 h later, Gal Ab was returning but depletion remained at 80.1% (IgM) and 84.7% (IgG). The subsequent rate of return of Gal Ab depended on the immunomodulatory protocol used. CONCLUSIONS: (1) With appropriate monitoring, EIA is an acceptably safe procedure, even in small (<10 kg) baboons. (2) Three consecutive EIAs are effective in removing >97% of Gal Ab. (3) In the majority of cases, return of Gal Ab begins within 24 h, irrespective of the immunomodulatory protocol.

High-dose porcine hematopoietic cell transplantation combined with CD40 ligand blockade in baboons prevents an induced anti-pig humoral response.

BACKGROUND: In pig-to-primate organ transplantation, hyperacute rejection can be prevented, but the organ is rejected within days by acute vascular rejection, in which induced high-affinity anti-Gal alpha1-3Gal (alphaGal) IgG and possibly antibodies directed against new porcine (non-alphaGal) antigenic determinants are considered to play a major role. We have explored the role of an anti-CD40L monoclonal antibody in modifying the humoral response to porcine hematopoietic cells in baboons pretreated with a nonmyeloablative regimen. METHODS: Porcine peripheral blood mobilized progenitor cells obtained by leukapheresis from both major histocompatibility complex-inbred miniature swine (n=7) and human decay-accelerating factor pigs (n=3) were transplanted into baboons. Group 1 baboons (n=3) underwent whole body (300 cGy) and thymic (700 cGy) irradiation, T cell depletion with ATG, complement depletion with cobra venom factor, short courses of cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, porcine hematopoietic growth factors, and anti-alphaGal antibody depletion by immunoadsorption before transplantation of high doses (2-4 x 10(10)/cells/kg) of peripheral blood mobilized progenitor cells. In group 2 (n=5), cyclosporine was replaced by eight doses of anti-CD40L monoclonal antibodies over 14 days. The group 3 baboons (n=2) received the group 1 regimen plus 2 doses of anti-CD40L monoclonal antibodies (on days 0 and 2). RESULTS: In group 1, sensitization to alphaGal (with increases in IgM and IgG of 3- to 6-fold and 100-fold, respectively) and the development of antibodies to new non-alphaGal porcine antigens occurred within 20 days. In group 2, no sensitization to alphaGal or non-alphaGal determinants was seen, but alphaGal-reactive antibodies did return to their pre- peripheral blood mobilized progenitor cells transplant levels. In group 3, attenuated sensitization to alphaGal antigens was seen after cessation of cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil therapy at 30 days (IgM 4-fold, IgG 8-30-fold), but no antibodies developed against new porcine determinants. In no baboon did anti-CD40L monoclonal antibodies prevent sensitization to its own murine antigens. CONCLUSIONS: We believe these studies are the first to consistently demonstrate prevention of a secondary humoral response after cell or organ transplantation in a pig-to-primate model. The development of sensitization to the murine elements of the anti-CD40L monoclonal antibodies suggests that nonresponsiveness to cell membrane-bound antigen (e.g., alphaGal) is a specific phenomenon and not a general manifestation of immunological unresponsiveness. T cell costimulatory blockade may facilitate induction of mixed hematopoietic chimerism and, consequently, of tolerance to pig organs and tissues.

Peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization and leukapheresis in pigs.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The pig is being investigated as an organ donor for humans. Induction of immunologic tolerance to pig tissues in primates would overcome the major immunologic barriers to xenotransplantation. A proven method of inducing tolerance to allografts is by the induction of mixed hematopoietic chimerism by bone marrow transplantation. We are therefore investigating induction of mixed hematopoietic chimerism in the pig-to-baboon model. METHODS: To obtain large numbers of pig hematopoietic cells, leukapheresis was used to collect blood cell products in miniature swine (n = 5) after progenitor cell mobilization by use of a course of hematopoietic growth factors (cytokines), consisting of porcine interleukin 3, porcine stem cell factor, and human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. RESULTS: Cytokine therapy and leukapheresis were well tolerated. Cytokine therapy increased the total white blood cell count and allowed large numbers of leukocytes (60 x 10(10)) to be obtained by apheresis, of which approximately 0.1% were granulocyte-erythrocyte-monocyte-megakaryocyte colony-forming units (CFU-GEMMs), which are considered to be representative of hematopoietic progenitors with multi-lineage potential. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cytokine therapy and leukapheresis enables hematopoietic progenitor cells to be obtained safely from miniature swine.