Valoración de usuarios y profesionales sanitarios sobre la teleconsulta en Atención Primaria: estudio transversal / Evaluation of users and health professionals on teleconsultation in primary care: A cross-sectional study

Objetivo: Conocer la valoración y preferencias de usuarios y profesionales sanitarios sobre la teleconsulta en Atención Primaria. Diseño: Estudio transversal mediante encuesta, telefónica a usuarios y presencial a profesionales, en 2021. Emplazamiento: Atención Primara urbana. Sujetos: Muestra aleatoria de usuarios con teleconsultas en el último año, estratificados por sexo y edad, y médicos y enfermeros de los centros participantes. Mediciones: Variables Likert valorando la teleconsulta según motivos de consulta, preferencias y aspectos relacionados. Análisis descriptivo y comparación de proporciones y medias. Resultados: Responden 300 pacientes y 48 profesionales. Ambos valoran positivamente la teleconsulta para gestionar la receta electrónica (RE) (el 83 y el 83%, respectivamente), la incapacidad temporal (IT) (el 80 y el 64%) y cuestiones relacionadas con la COVID-19 (el 71 y el 58%). La valoración positiva de la teleconsulta disminuye para el tratamiento de las enfermedades agudas (el 47 y el 25%) y crónicas (el 49 y el 33%). Globalmente las personas <70 años valoran mejor la teleconsulta (p <0,001), sin diferencias entre sexos. Usuarios y profesionales prefieren la presencialidad para enfermedades crónicas (el 82 y el 83%) y agudas (el 82 y el 94%), y teleconsulta para RE (el 68,7% y el 88,6%). El 52% de los usuarios prefieren visita presencial para IT frente al 29% de los profesionales (p <0,05). Conclusiones: La teleconsulta se ha implementado con una buena valoración tanto de pacientes como profesionales. La visita presencial es la preferida para la enfermedad crónica y aguda, especialmente en personas mayores. Habrá que definir en qué casos la teleconsulta es la mejor herramienta según las características de cada población.(AU)

Objective: To evaluate the perceptions and preferences of users and health professionals on teleconsultation in primary care. Design: Cross-sectional study with a telephone survey of users and a face-to-face survey of professionals carried out at 2021. Setting: Urban primary health care. Participants: Random sample of users with teleconsultations in the last year, stratified by sex and age, and doctors and nurses from participating centres. Measurements: Likert variables assessing teleconsultation according to consultation motives, preferences and related aspects. Descriptive analysis and comparison of proportions and means. Results: Three hundred patients and 48 professionals answered the questionnaire. Both groups value positively the teleconsultation for the management of the electronic prescription (EP) (83% and 83%, respectively), sick leave (SL) (80% and 64%) and issues related to COVID-19 (71% and 58%). The positive assessment of teleconsultation decreases for the treatment of acute pathologies (47% and 25%) and chronic diseases (49% and 33%). Globally, people <70 years value teleconsultation more highly (P<.001), without differences between sexes. Users and professionals prefer face-to-face consultation for chronic diseases (82% and 83%) and acute pathologies (82% and 94%), and teleconsultation for EP (68.7% and 88.6%). 52% of users prefer face-to-face visits for SL compared to 29% of professionals (P<.05). Conclusions: Teleconsultation implementation has been well valued by both patients and professionals. The face-to-face visit is preferred for chronic and acute pathologies, especially in the elderly. It will be necessary to define in which cases teleconsultation is the best tool according to the characteristics of each population.(AU)

[Evaluation of users and health professionals on teleconsultation in primary care: A cross-sectional study]. / Valoración de usuarios y profesionales sanitarios sobre la teleconsulta en Atención Primaria: estudio transversal.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perceptions and preferences of users and health professionals on teleconsultation in primary care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with a telephone survey of users and a face-to-face survey of professionals carried out at 2021. SETTING: Urban primary health care. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of users with teleconsultations in the last year, stratified by sex and age, and doctors and nurses from participating centres. MEASUREMENTS: Likert variables assessing teleconsultation according to consultation motives, preferences and related aspects. Descriptive analysis and comparison of proportions and means. RESULTS: Three hundred patients and 48 professionals answered the questionnaire. Both groups value positively the teleconsultation for the management of the electronic prescription (EP) (83% and 83%, respectively), sick leave (SL) (80% and 64%) and issues related to COVID-19 (71% and 58%). The positive assessment of teleconsultation decreases for the treatment of acute pathologies (47% and 25%) and chronic diseases (49% and 33%). Globally, people <70 years value teleconsultation more highly (P<.001), without differences between sexes. Users and professionals prefer face-to-face consultation for chronic diseases (82% and 83%) and acute pathologies (82% and 94%), and teleconsultation for EP (68.7% and 88.6%). 52% of users prefer face-to-face visits for SL compared to 29% of professionals (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Teleconsultation implementation has been well valued by both patients and professionals. The face-to-face visit is preferred for chronic and acute pathologies, especially in the elderly. It will be necessary to define in which cases teleconsultation is the best tool according to the characteristics of each population.

Impacto de la fragilidad y COVID-19 en una cohorte de gente mayor de la ciudad de Barcelona / Frailty impact on COVID-19 disease in an older cohort from the city of Barcelona

Objetivo: Describir la incidencia y mortalidad de COVID-19, durante la primera ola, en la población de personas mayores de Barcelona, según sus niveles previos de fragilidad. Diseño: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo. Emplazamiento y participantes: Población de 65 o más años asignada a los centros de Atención Primaria de Barcelona del Institut Català de la Salut, seguidos entre marzo y junio de 2020. Mediciones principales: Fragilidad calculada al inicio a partir de la historia clínica informatizada. Resultados durante el seguimiento: diagnóstico de COVID-19, posible o confirmado con PCR y mortalidad por todas las causas. Resultados: Se analizaron 251788 mayores de 64 años. Un 61,3% tenían algún nivel de fragilidad, 27,8% moderada o grave. La incidencia de COVID-19 fue de 3,13 casos por 100 habitantes (N = 7883) y la mortalidad por COVID-19 fue del 21,5% (N =1 691). Tanto la incidencia como la mortalidad por COVID-19 fueron superiores a mayor edad, en hombres, a mayor privación y a mayor nivel de fragilidad. Los individuos con fragilidad leve, moderada y grave tuvieron un hazard ratio ajustado de enfermedad por COVID-19 de 1,47, 2,08 y 3,50 respectivamente. Entre los sujetos con COVID-19, aquéllos con fragilidad leve, moderada y grave tuvieron un hazard ratio ajustado de mortalidad por COVID-19 de 1,44, 1,69 y 2,47 respectivamente. Conclusiones: Consideramos necesario el abordaje de la fragilidad también en situación de pandemia, dado que es una condición tratable y a su vez factor de riesgo de COVID-19 más grave, donde el papel de la Atención Primaria es primordial, por su accesibilidad y longitudinalidad.(AU)

Objetive: To describe the incidence and mortality of the first wave of COVID-19 in the elderly population of Barcelona, according to their previous levels of frailty. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting and participants: Population aged 65 or over assigned to the Barcelona Primary Care centres of the Institut Català de la Salut, followed between March and June 2020. Main measurements: Frailty was calculated at baseline from the computerised medical records. Results during follow-up: diagnosis of COVID-19, possible or confirmed with PCR and all-cause mortality. Results: 251788 patients over 64 years of age were analysed, 61.3% had some level of frailty, 27.8% moderate or severe. The incidence of COVID-19 was 3.13 cases per 100 inhabitants (N=7883) and the mortality from COVID-19 was 21.5% (N=1691). Both the incidence and mortality from COVID-19 were higher at older age, in men, at greater deprivation and at a higher level of frailty. Individuals with mild, moderate, and severe frailty had an adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) for COVID-19 disease of 1.47, 2.08, and 3.50, respectively. Among subjects with COVID-19, those with mild, moderate, and severe frailty had an adjusted HR for COVID-19 mortality of 1.44, 1.69, and 2.47, respectively. Conclusions: We consider it necessary to address frailty also in a pandemic situation, since it is a treatable condition and in turn a more serious risk factor for COVID-19, where the role of primary care is essential, due to its accessibility and longitudinal character.(AU)

Dynamics of multimorbidity and frailty, and their contribution to mortality, nursing home and home care need: A primary care cohort of 1 456 052 ageing people.

Background: Prevalence of both multimorbidity and frailty increases with age, but more evidence is needed to elucidate their relationship and their association with other health-related outcomes. We analysed the dynamics of both conditions as people age and calculate the associated risk of death, nursing home admission, and need for home care. Methods: Data were drawn from the primary care electronic health records of a longitudinal cohort of people aged 65 or older in Catalonia in 2010-2019. Frailty and multimorbidity were measured using validated instruments (eFRAGICAP, a cumulative deficit model; and SNAC-K, respectively), and their longitudinal evolution was described. Cox regression models accounted for the competing risk of death and adjusted by sex, socioeconomical status, and time-varying age, alcohol and smoking. Findings: We included 1 456 052 patients. Prevalence of multimorbidity was consistently high regardless of age, while frailty almost quadrupled from 65 to 99 years. Frailty worsened and also changed with age: up to 84 years, it was more related to concurrent diseases, and afterwards, to frailty-related deficits. While concurrent diseases contributed more to mortality, frailty-related deficits increased the risk of institutionalisation and the need for home care. Interpretation: The nature of people's multimorbidity and frailty vary with age, as does their impact on health status. People become frailer as they age, and their frailty is more characterised by disability and other symptoms than by diseases. Mortality is most associated with the number of comorbidities, whereas frailty-related deficits are associated with needing specialised care. Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III through PI19/00535, and the PFIS Grant FI20/00040 (Co-funded by European Regional Development Fund/European Social Fund).

[Frailty impact on COVID-19 disease in an older cohort from the city of Barcelona]. / Impacto de la fragilidad y COVID-19 en una cohorte de gente mayor de la ciudad de Barcelona.

Objetive To describe the incidence and mortality of the first wave of COVID-19 in the elderly population of Barcelona, according to their previous levels of frailty. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Population aged 65 or over assigned to the Barcelona Primary Care centres of the Institut Català de la Salut, followed between March and June 2020. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Frailty was calculated at baseline from the computerised medical records. Results during follow-up: diagnosis of COVID-19, possible or confirmed with PCR and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: 251788 patients over 64 years of age were analysed, 61.3% had some level of frailty, 27.8% moderate or severe. The incidence of COVID-19 was 3.13 cases per 100 inhabitants (N=7883) and the mortality from COVID-19 was 21.5% (N=1691). Both the incidence and mortality from COVID-19 were higher at older age, in men, at greater deprivation and at a higher level of frailty. Individuals with mild, moderate, and severe frailty had an adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) for COVID-19 disease of 1.47, 2.08, and 3.50, respectively. Among subjects with COVID-19, those with mild, moderate, and severe frailty had an adjusted HR for COVID-19 mortality of 1.44, 1.69, and 2.47, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We consider it necessary to address frailty also in a pandemic situation, since it is a treatable condition and in turn a more serious risk factor for COVID-19, where the role of primary care is essential, due to its accessibility and longitudinal character.

Mortality, Falls, and Fracture Risk Are Positively Associated With Frailty: A SIDIAP Cohort Study of 890 000 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Frail subjects are at increased risk of adverse outcomes. We aimed to assess their risk of falls, all-cause mortality, and fractures. METHOD: We used a retrospective cohort study using the Sistema d'Informació per al Desenvolupament de l'Investigació en Atenció Primària database (>6 million residents). Subjects aged 75 years and older with ≥1 year of valid data (2007-2015) were included. Follow-up was carried out from (the latest of) the date of cohort entry up to migration, end of the study period or outcome (whichever came first). The eFRAGICAP classified subjects as fit, mild, moderate, or severely frail. Outcomes (10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases) were incident falls, fractures (overall/hip/vertebral), and all-cause mortality during the study period. Statistics: hazard ratios (HRs), 95% CI adjusted (per age, sex, and socioeconomic status), and unadjusted cause-specific Cox models, accounting for competing risk of death (fit group as the reference). RESULTS: A total of 893 211 subjects were analyzed; 54.4% were classified as fit, 34.0% as mild, 9.9% as moderate, and 1.6% as severely frail. Compared with the fit, frail had an increased risk of falls (adjusted HR [95% CI] of 1.55 [1.52-1.58], 2.74 [2.66-2.84], and 5.94 [5.52-6.40]), all-cause mortality (adjusted HR [95% CI] of 1.36 [1.35-1.37], 2.19 [2.16-2.23], and 4.29 [4.13-4.45]), and fractures (adjusted HR [95% CI] of 1.21 [1.20-1.23], 1.51 [1.47-1.55], and 2.36 [2.20-2.53]) for mild, moderate, and severe frailty, respectively. Severely frail had a high risk of vertebral (HR of 2.49 [1.99-3.11]) and hip fracture (HR [95% CI] of 1.85 [1.50-2.28]). Accounting for competing risk of death did not change results. CONCLUSION: Frail subjects are at increased risk of death, fractures, and falls. The eFRAGICAP tool can easily assess frailty in electronic primary care databases in Spain.

Burnout y trabajo en equipo en los profesionales de Atención Primaria / Burnout and Teamwork in Primary Care Teams

OBJETIVO: Estimar la prevalencia de burnout y percepción de trabajo en equipo en los equipos de Atención Primaria (EAP) de Barcelona ciudad. DISEÑO: Transversal multicéntrico. Emplazamiento: EAP del Institut Català de la Salut (ICS) en Barcelona. PARTICIPANTES: Trabajadores fijos e interinos, de todas las categorías profesionales de 51 EAP (N = 2398). Respondieron 879 (36,7%). Mediciones: Se envió por correo electrónico el cuestionario «Maslach Burnout Inventory», con las dimensiones agotamiento emocional, despersonalización y realización personal. Se consideró burnout la afectación en grado alto de 2 o más dimensiones. La percepción del trabajo en equipo y la valoración de jefaturas se midió con un cuestionario diseñado ad hoc. RESULTADOS: La prevalencia de burnout fue del 17,2%. El 46,2% presentaron una o más subescalas alteradas. Presentan alto grado de agotamiento emocional 38,2%, 23,8% despersonalización y 7,7% baja realización personal. Un 49,2% consideran que se fomenta bastante o mucho el trabajo en equipo. Globalmente, trabajadores sociales presentan mayor media de dimensiones afectadas en grado alto, seguidas de administrativos, odontólogos, médicos y enfermeras (p < 0,001). El personal fijo presenta mayor grado de agotamiento emocional (p < 0,002). Los que peor valoraron a sus jefaturas y los que menos consideraban trabajar en equipo presentaron más agotamiento emocional, más despersonalización y mayor nivel de burnout en general (p < 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: El nivel de burnout entre los profesionales es considerable, existiendo diferencias entre categorías profesionales. El trabajo en equipo y una buena valoración de sus jefaturas protegen del burnout

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of burnout and the perception of teamwork in Primary Care teams from Barcelona. DESIGN: Multicenter cross-sectional. LOCATION: Primary Health Care Teams from Barcelona. Institut Català de la Salut. PARTICIPANTS: All permanent employees or temporary professionals of all categories from 51 teams (N = 2398). A total of 879 responses (36.7%) were obtained. Measurements: The Maslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire, with 3 dimensions, was sent by emotional exhaustion (AE), depersonalization (DP), and personal accomplishment (RP). Burnout is considered present when two or more dimensions scored high marks. Perception of teamwork and evaluation of leaders was evaluated using an ad hoc questionnaire. RESULTS: The prevalence of burnout was17.2% (two or more dimensions affected), and 46.2% had at least one of the three dimensions with a high level. A high level of AE was found in 38.2%, of DP in 23.8%, and 7.7% had low RP. Almost half (49.2%) believe that teamwork is encouraged in their workplace. Social workers overall, have a higher average of dimensions affected at a high level, followed by administrative personnel, dentists, doctors and nurses (p < 0 .001). Permanent staff have a greater degree of emotional exhaustion (p < 0 .002). Those who rated their leaders worst and least rated teamwork had more emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and higher level of burnout in general (p < 0 .001). CONCLUSIONS: The level of burnout among professionals is considerable, with differences existing between occupational categories. Teamwork and appreciating their leaders protect from burnout

[Burnout and teamwork in primary care teams]. / Burnout y trabajo en equipo en los profesionales de Atención Primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of burnout and the perception of teamwork in Primary Care teams from Barcelona. DESIGN: Multicenter cross-sectional. LOCATION: Primary Health Care Teams from Barcelona. Institut Català de la Salut. PARTICIPANTS: All permanent employees or temporary professionals of all categories from 51 teams (N=2398). A total of 879 responses (36.7%) were obtained. MEASUREMENTS: The Maslach Burnout Inventory questionnaire, with 3 dimensions, was sent by emotional exhaustion (AE), depersonalization (DP), and personal accomplishment (RP). Burnout is considered present when two or more dimensions scored high marks. Perception of teamwork and evaluation of leaders was evaluated using an ad hoc questionnaire. RESULTS: The prevalence of burnout was17.2% (two or more dimensions affected), and 46.2% had at least one of the three dimensions with a high level. A high level of AE was found in 38.2%, of DP in 23.8%, and 7.7% had low RP. Almost half (49.2%) believe that teamwork is encouraged in their workplace. Social workers overall, have a higher average of dimensions affected at a high level, followed by administrative personnel, dentists, doctors and nurses (p<0.001). Permanent staff have a greater degree of emotional exhaustion (p<0.002). Those who rated their leaders worst and least rated teamwork had more emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and higher level of burnout in general (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The level of burnout among professionals is considerable, with differences existing between occupational categories. Teamwork and appreciating their leaders protect from burnout.

Hábitos de consumo de plantas medicinales en un centro de salud de Barcelona / Habits of consumption of medicinal plants in a Elath care center in Barcelona

El objetivo de este studio fue describer los hábitos de consumo de plantas medicinales de una muestra de pacientes atendidos durante el 2007 en un Centro de Atención Primaria de Barcelona (CAP Ciutat Meridiana). Se realizó un estudio descriptivo transversal mediante una encuesta llevada a cabo por los médicos de familia y las enfermeras del grupo de trabajo. Los resultados confirman la omisión del dato de consumo en la consulta, tanto por parte de los pacientes como del equipo sanitario: un 59,6% de los entrevistados manifestó que consumía plantas medicinales y un 74,8% de los consumidores no se lo había comentado al médico o enfermera, quienes, a su vez no habían preguntado acerca del posible consumo a un 89,8% de los entrevistados. A partir del dato de que un 58% de los consumidores tomaban a la vez medicación crónica, se calculó en un 18,8% la probabilidad de aparición de interacciones entre plantas y otros medicamentos (AU)

The aim of this study was to describe the medicinal plant consumption habits of a sample of the patients who attended a social security primary health care in Barcelona (CAP od Ciutat Meridiana) along 2007. A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out by family doctors and nurses of the workgroup. The results confirm the missing of consumption data in the medical consultation, by both patients and practitioner. On one hand, 59,6% of the interviewed patients consume medicinal plants, and 74,8% of these did not mention it to their doctor. On the other hand, 89,6% of the doctos did not ask their patients if they consumed medicinal plants. Additionally, 58% of the patients that consumed medicinal plants, also followed a chronic drug treatment at the same time, allowing as to calculate a 18,8% of potential interactions (AU)