Extremely marginal liver grafts from deceased donors have outcome similar to ideal grafts.

BACKGROUND: Although there is a worldwide need to expand the donor pool, many cadaveric marginal livers are usually discarded for transplantation. Herein, we report the outcome of a series of patients receiving marginal grafts. METHODS: We analyzed all patients who underwent liver transplantation in our unit from August 2006 to March 2011 (n = 125) with the use of a prospectively collected database. Patients with ≥3 of donor (prolonged hypotensive episodes, donor age >55 years, high vasopressor drug requirement, hypernatremia, prolonged intensive care unit stay, elevated transaminases) and graft-related (cold ischemia >12 hours, warm ischemia time >40 minutes and steatosis >30%) extended criteria were defined as extremely marginal liver grafts (EMLG). The outcomes of patients receiving EMLG were compared with the recipients of grafts without any marginal criteria (ideal grafts). RESULTS: The EMLG group (n = 36) showed higher operative transfusion requirement (66.6% vs 55.6%) as well as 30-day (11.1% vs 55%) and 1-year (22.2% vs 5.5%) mortality rates, compared with the ideal grafts group (n = 18) but without a significant difference. Other variables, such as major complications, postoperative hemodialysis, ICU and hospital stay, and 1-year survival also were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The liver pool can be safely expanded using EMLG from deceased donors for liver transplantation. These usually discarded liver grafts showed similar early and long-term outcomes compared with ideal organs.

Liver transplantation using Chagas-infected donors in uninfected recipients: a single-center experience without prophylactic therapy.

Organ shortage is the first cause of death on liver transplant waiting lists. As a consequence, we recently decided to expand liver acceptance to those organs that could potentially transmit infectious diseases to their recipients. On January 2010, we initiated a prospective protocol using livers from Chagas-infected donors for transplanting uninfected recipients without using prophylactic therapy. During a 13-month period, 9 of 37 (24%) liver transplants were performed within this protocol. After transplant, each recipient was sequentially and strictly monitored for infection transmission using the Strout method and promptly treated with benznidazole if this occurs. During follow-up, two patients died without Chagas infection and only two (donor-derived T. cruzi transmission rate: 2/9; 22%) patients developed donor-derived Chagas transmission without clinical symptoms. The median follow-up time of the seven live patients was 15 months (range: 13-20). At present, all are symptoms-free with excellent allograft function and without evidence of Chagas disease. In conclusion, we consider that Chagas-infected donors are a promising source of liver grafts that could reduce the growing mortality on liver waiting lists in America. Relevant data from larger prospective studies are required to confirm these preliminary excellent results.