Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 58(4S): S64-S68, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29887258

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to quantify the financial impact of a pharmacist-driven pilot medication therapy management (MTM) program within a visiting nurse service (VNS) and identify types of medication-related problems affecting the home health care population. METHODS: Patients were contacted to schedule a home visit with the primary investigator. At the appointment, a comprehensive medication review (CMR) was completed, and data collected included primary reason for VNS care, comorbid diagnoses, number of prescription and nonprescription medications at time of visit, and type of pharmacist-identified medication therapy intervention(s). The VNS is a nonprofit independent home health care agency serving patients of all ages and health conditions. Patients admitted with primary insurance coverage through Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBSRI) Blue Chip for Medicare and 65 years of age and older were eligible for inclusion. Intervention categories were aligned to coordinate with current billable OutcomesMTM claim categories. Dollar allocation for each intervention severity level was assigned according to the predetermined Medicare cost savings predicted value from BCBSRI. Interventions were assigned cost-saving value by the severity level to estimate savings. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients received CMRs. Patients averaged 5.92 chronic health conditions, 8.48 Part D drugs, and 3.88 over-the-counter medications. Two hundred eighteen medication-related problems were identified spanning 13 intervention categories. Intervention severity level was assigned to the medication-related problems, with calculated cost savings from pharmacist interventions totaling $124,352. CONCLUSION: This pilot study demonstrated the positive economic impact of a pharmacist-run MTM program at VNS for patients with multiple chronic conditions and medication-related problems. Potential societal benefits include that community members admitted to VNS will continue to have access to a pharmacist as a standard of care with the continuation of this MTM program.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/economía , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio/estadística & datos numéricos , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/economía , Administración del Tratamiento Farmacológico/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacéuticos/economía , Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/economía , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/estadística & datos numéricos , Ahorro de Costo/economía , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare Part D/economía , Medicare Part D/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Estados Unidos
2.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 58(3): 303-310, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28951137

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe our statewide, pharmacist-led education campaign to increase knowledge and awareness of pneumococcal immunization recommendations. SETTING: Immunization providers and residents in the state of Rhode Island. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: A clinical pathway (i.e., decision-support tool) was developed to educate health professionals about appropriate indications, administration schedules, and frequently asked questions for the 2 different adult pneumococcal vaccines. Academic detailing and distribution of the clinical pathway to health professionals was conducted across Rhode Island. Community outreach activities included radio ads as well as distribution of patient handouts and wallet cards at community events. PRACTICE INNOVATION: To our knowledge, this was the first statewide, pharmacist-driven academic detailing and community outreach campaign to promote adult pneumococcal vaccination. EVALUATION: Academically detailed immunization providers received a 6-question survey. Pneumococcal disease rate differences between the study periods were evaluated with the use of Fisher exact tests, whereas changes in vaccination were assessed with the use of chi-square tests. RESULTS: From November 2013 through July 2015, our academic detailers visited and distributed our vaccination pathway materials to more than 400 practice sites across Rhode Island, including 68% of community pharmacies and all adult acute care hospitals. Of the 413 surveys completed, 92% of respondents agreed that their knowledge of the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine, 13-valent and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine, 23-valent had improved. Pneumococcal vaccination increased significantly (absolute difference 3.9%, percentage change in proportion 5.4%; P = 0.01), and pneumococcal disease decreased significantly between the preintervention and intervention periods (-2.74/10,000 discharges [95% CI -5.15 to -0.32], P = 0.02). Invasive pneumococcal disease decreased by 21 cases per 1,000,000 population per year between the preintervention and postintervention periods (-42.25 to 0.14, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our statewide, pharmacist-driven pneumococcal vaccination educational outreach program resulted in favorable provider feedback relative to knowledge change and perceptions. Vaccination increased and pneumococcal disease decreased during the study period.


Asunto(s)
Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Infecciones Neumocócicas/inmunología , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae/inmunología , Vacunación/métodos , Anciano , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Rhode Island , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Vacunas Conjugadas/administración & dosificación
3.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 54(1): 69-73, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24407743

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES To enhance public access to prophylaxis for Lyme disease following an identified Ixodes scapularis tick bite through pharmacist-initiated antibiotic therapy and to assess patient satisfaction with the pharmacy-based service provided. SETTING Independent community pharmacy in Charlestown, RI, from May to October 2012. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION Under a collaborative practice agreement, trained pharmacists at an independent pharmacy identified patients eligible for postexposure antibiotic prophylaxis following attachment and removal of an I. scapularis tick (commonly known as a deer tick) and dispensed two 100 mg tablets of doxycycline. Patients were included if they were 18 years or older, provided informed consent, had an estimated time of tick attachment of 36 hours or more, had the tick removed within 72 hours of visit, denied contraindications to doxycycline therapy, and reported telephone access for follow-up. Patients enrolled in the study protocol were given counseling related to doxycycline, signs and symptoms of Lyme disease, and future tick prevention strategies. PRACTICE INNOVATION Pharmacist initiation of doxycycline prophylaxis has not been described in the literature previously. Successful pharmacist initiation of antibiotic prophylaxis may have broader implications for states with endemic Lyme disease or other infectious disease public health concerns. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Patient self-reported adverse outcomes and satisfaction with the pharmacy-based service. RESULTS Eight patients enrolled in the study and completed the follow-up survey. The results indicated a high level of satisfaction with the pharmacy services provided, with no reports of the subsequent development of Lyme disease symptoms or major adverse events. CONCLUSION The project has expanded to three community pharmacy sites in southern Rhode Island based on this experience. Similar pharmacy-based collaborative practice models should be considered in highly endemic Lyme disease areas.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Lyme/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacias , Farmacéuticos , Adulto , Animales , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Mordeduras y Picaduras/tratamiento farmacológico , Conducta Cooperativa , Femenino , Humanos , Ixodes/efectos de los fármacos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Profilaxis Posexposición/métodos , Adulto Joven
4.
Med Health R I ; 93(4): 122-4, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20486527

RESUMEN

American adults take many types of vitamin supplements, despite limited evidence of their efficacy, especially in preventing chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease and cancer. Supplements contain significant amounts of vitamins when consumed from multiple sources. Excess consumption of some vitamins may have detrimental health effects. Use of MMVM products appears to be safe; however, clinical outcomes have not been established. Although vitamin D and preconception folic acid may be appropriate for self care, a health care provider should monitor other vitamin supplements for disease prevention, such as niacin. Beyond supplementation as treatment for vitamin deficiencies, evidence is lacking.


Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Vitaminas/administración & dosificación , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...