Skin manifestations after immunisation with an adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine, Germany, 2020.

BackgroundShortly after the launch of a novel adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV), Shingrix, cases of suspected herpes zoster (HZ) or zoster-like skin reactions following immunisation were reported.AimWe aimed to investigate if these skin manifestations after administration of RZV could be HZ.MethodsBetween April and October 2020, general practitioners (GP) reporting a suspected case of HZ or zoster-like skin manifestation after RZV vaccination to the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, the German national competent authority, were invited to participate in the study. The GP took a sample of the skin manifestation, photographed it and collected patient information on RZV vaccination and the suspected adverse event. We analysed all samples by PCR for varicella-zoster virus (VZV) and herpes-simplex virus (HSV) and genotyped VZV-positive samples. In addition, cases were independently assessed by two dermatologists.ResultsEighty eligible cases were enrolled and 72 could be included in the analysis. Of the 72 cases, 45 were female, 33 were 60-69 years old, 32 had skin symptoms in the thoracic and 27 in the cervical dermatomes. Twenty-seven samples tested PCR positive for VZV (all genotyped as wild-type, WT), three for HSV-1 and five for HSV-2.ConclusionIt may be difficult to distinguish HZ, without a PCR result, from other zoster-like manifestations. In this study, VZV-PCR positive dermatomal eruptions occurring in the first weeks after immunisation with RZV were due to WT VZV, which is not unexpected as HZ is a common disease against which the vaccine is unlikely to provide full protection at this time.

Analysis of Transfusion-Transmitted Bacterial Infections according to German Hemovigilance Data (2011-2020).

Introduction: Following the first assessment of the effects of safety measures taken against transfusion-transmitted bacterial infections (TTBI), the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) decided to newly analyze risk minimization measures (RMM) using German hemovigilance data from 2011 to 2020, focusing on blood components, recipients, and bacterial strains. Materials and Methods: The PEI assessed the imputability of all reported serious adverse reactions (SAR) relying mainly on microbiological test results. Reporting rates (RR) of suspected, confirmed, and fatal confirmed TTBI were calculated and compared to the previous reporting 10-year period (2001-2010) using Poisson regression to estimate RR ratios (RRR). Furthermore, details on blood component age, patients' medical history, and bacterial pathogenicity were collected. Results: With respect to the previous 10-year period, the number of suspected TTBI increased (n = 403), while fewer cases were confirmed (n = 40); the number of deaths remained more or less unchanged (n = 8). The RR for suspected TTBI were 7.9, 18.7, and 1.6 cases per million units transfused for red blood cells (RBC), platelet concentrates (PC), and fresh frozen plasma (FFP), respectively. RRR showed a statistically significant 2.5-fold increase in the RR for suspected TTBI after RBC administration from 2001-2010 to the period under review (p < 0.0001). The RR for confirmed TTBI were 0.4, 5.0, and 0.0 cases per million units transfused for RBC, PC, and FFP, respectively. Compared to the period 2001-2010, there was a statistically significant decrease in the RR of confirmed TTBI by half for PC (p = 0.0052). The RR for confirmed PC-caused TTBI with fatal outcome was 1.4 cases per million units transfused. Regardless of type of blood product transfused and outcome of SAR, the majority of TTBI occurred after administration of a product at the end of shelf life (40.0%) and to recipients of advanced age (median age: 68.5 years) and/or with severe immunosuppression (72.5%) due to decreased myelopoiesis (62.5%). 72.5% of the involved bacteria had a middle/high human pathogenicity. Conclusion: Despite a significant decrease in confirmed TTBI following PC transfusion in Germany after implementation of RMM, the current manufacture of blood products can still not prevent TTBI with fatal outcomes. As demonstrated in various countries, RMM like bacterial screening or pathogen reduction may measurably improve the safety of blood transfusion.

Blood Donation-Related Adverse Reactions: Results of an Online Survey among Donors in Germany (2018).

INTRODUCTION: According to German legislation, reports of suspected serious adverse reactions (AR) associated with the donation of blood and its components are continuously being evaluated by the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut. This survey aimed at providing a more complete picture of the AR associated with the donation of blood and blood components. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible donors had the opportunity to anonymously report all AR occurring during or after their last donation by completing an online questionnaire. Reported AR were classified according to the Standard for Surveillance of Complications Related to Blood Donation. Donors' self-assessment of AR seriousness was compared with the official severity classification as laid down by German legislation. Besides a descriptive statistical analysis, a multiple logistic analysis was performed to identify risk factors for AR. RESULTS: A total of 8,138 data records were evaluated. Slightly more males (57.9%) participated in the survey and, except for donors aged ≥60 years, all age groups were equally represented. The majority of participants were whole blood donors (85.4%), repeat donors (97.2%), and stayed under observation in the blood establishment (BE) for more than 5 min (63.1%) after donation. Most participants did not report any reaction (72.5%), whereas 2,237 reported at least one AR (27.5%), 475 of whom underwent apheresis and 1,762 donated whole blood. Most AR occurred after leaving the BE (64.4%). Only a minority of participants required medical treatment (5.1%) or assessed the experienced AR as serious (3.9%). The most frequently reported donor AR were haematoma and other local reactions (57.6%). Vasovagal reactions without and with loss of consciousness were developed in 17 and 2% of the participants, respectively, whilst 7.6% experienced citrate reactions. New AR (i.e., allergic reactions and symptoms associated with iron deficiency) were reported as well. The occurrence of AR was linked to risk factors (i.e., female gender, young age, first-time donation, and thrombocytapheresis). DISCUSSION: This survey yielded a more comprehensive AR spectrum, revealed a prolonged time to symptom onset, and identified risk factors for AR. This novel information could be implemented in an amended informed consent addressing common and rare AR.