First evidence of oncologic neuropathic pain prevalence after screening 8615 cancer patients. Results of the On study.

BACKGROUND: Thirty percent to ninety percent of cancer patients suffer from pain, including neuropathic pain (NP), which results in great burden for cancer patients. Thus, it was of great interest to determine NP prevalence in cancer patients in Spain, to raise awareness of the condition, and aiming to improve management of cancer NP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 1-month follow-up prospective epidemiological multicenter study was conducted to assess prevalence and management of NP in Spanish oncologic units. The first 10 cancer patients at each unit diagnosed with NP by the validated Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4) were recruited. RESULTS: Of 8615 screened patients, 2567 (30%) suffered from pain. From these, 33% had NP according to investigators and 19% according to DN4 test. Three hundred and sixty-six patients (mean age 62.6 years; 61.2% male) were recruited. Pain decrease at 1 month was greater in patients with metastases (P<0.01) and depended on treatment (P<0.05), with 'oxycodone' showing 50.4% pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: NP prevalence in cancer pain is 33%. DN4 reports only about half the cancer NP cases diagnosed by clinicians. Pharmaceutical treatment of cancer pain, including NP, has a greater effect in patients with metastases and seems to depend on the specific treatment used.

Is it possible to increase pCR in the neoadjuvant treatment with a dose-dense/sequential combination?: results from a phase II Trial combining epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel and gemcitabine ± trastuzumab in stage II and III breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate of a combination of epirubicin (E) and cyclophosphamide (C) followed by paclitaxel (P) and gemcitabine (G) (+ trastuzumab[T]) in Her2+ patients) in a sequential and dose-dense schedule as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stages II and III patients with breast cancer. Secondary endpoints: clinical response rate, disease free survival, safety and correlation between pCR and biologic markers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were treated with E (90 mg/m²) and C (600 mg/m²) for 3 cycles (first sequence) followed by P (150 mg/m²) and G (2500 mg/m²) (second sequence) for 6 cycles. All drugs were administered on day 1, every 2 weeks, with prophylactic growth factor support. Weekly T (2 mg/kg [4 mg/kg first infusion]) was administered concomitantly with P and G in Her2+ patients. A core biopsy was performed before treatment for biologic markers assessment. Patients underwent surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant hormonal therapy according to institutional practice. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were treated. A pCR was achieved in 27 (37%) patients (32.1%, Her2- and 50%, Her2+). pCR was significantly higher in tumors that were hormonal receptor negative, poorly differentiated and positive for Ki67 and p53. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 47 patients (64.4%). Most frequent grade 3/4 hematologic and nonhematological toxicities included neutropenia (12%), nausea/vomiting (17%), and transient liver enzymes elevation (7%). One patient suffered an asymptomatic and reversible decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: These results show a highly effective regimen in terms of pCR with a good toxicity profile in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with breast cancer. The addition of trastuzumab increased pCR rate in Her2+ tumors.