A European consensus statement on the use of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for cardiac and non-cardiac surgical patients.

Modern four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate was designed originally for rapid targeted replacement of the coagulation factors II, VII, IX and X. Dosing strategies for the approved indication of vitamin K antagonist-related bleeding vary greatly. They include INR and bodyweight-related protocols as well as fixed dose regimens. Particularly in the massively bleeding trauma and cardiac surgery patient, four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate is used increasingly for haemostatic resuscitation. Members of the Transfusion and Haemostasis Subcommittee of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology performed a systematic literature review on four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate. The available evidence has been summarised for dosing, efficacy, drug safety and monitoring strategies in different scenarios. Whereas there is evidence for the efficacy of four-factor prothrombin concentrate for a variety of bleeding scenarios, convincing safety data are clearly missing. In the massively bleeding patient with coagulopathy, our group recommends the administration of an initial bolus of 25 IU.kg-1 . This applies for: the acute reversal of vitamin K antagonist therapy; haemostatic resuscitation, particularly in trauma; and the reversal of direct oral anticoagulants when no specific antidote is available. In patients with a high risk for thromboembolic complications, e.g. cardiac surgery, the administration of an initial half-dose bolus (12.5 IU.kg-1 ) should be considered. A second bolus may be indicated if coagulopathy and microvascular bleeding persists and other reasons for bleeding are largely ruled out. Tissue-factor-activated, factor VII-dependent and heparin insensitive point-of-care tests may be used for peri-operative monitoring and guiding of prothrombin complex concentrate therapy.

Clinical utility of the Quantra® point-of-care haemostasis analyser during urgent cardiac surgery.

Coagulopathic bleeding during and after cardiac surgery is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Viscoelastic testing is increasingly used instead of laboratory testing. Our aim was to compare a new viscoelastic point-of-care device, the Quantra® System, with thromboelastography and standard laboratory testing. After ethical approval and with written informed consent, we prospectively recruited adult patients undergoing urgent cardiac surgery at increased risk of bleeding. Clot time and clot stiffness values were compared before, during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. We prospectively recruited 52 patients, of whom 34 (65%) were transfused with red blood cells. Our usual transfusion thresholds for fibrinogen (1.5 g.l-1 ), platelets (100,000.µl-1 ), prothrombin time (20 s), activated partial thromboplastin time (48 s) and maximum amplitude on thromboelastography (50 mm) corresponded to Quantra values of fibrinogen clot stiffness 2.0 hPa, platelet clot stiffness 13.5 hPa, clot time 159 s, clot time 183 s and clot stiffness 17.0 hPa, respectively. These Quantra thresholds showed high negative predictive value for low platelets (platelet clot stiffness, 97.4%), prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (clot time, 92.6%) and reduced maximum amplitude on thromboelastography (clot stiffness, 93.6%). The Quantra predicted clinical need for transfusion of platelets (area under the curve 0.71, p = 0.001) but all tests performed poorly at predicting the need for fresh frozen plasma transfusion. We have shown that point-of-care testing using the novel Quantra system provides useful data for guiding transfusion management.

The role of fibrinogen and fibrinogen concentrate in cardiac surgery: an international consensus statement from the Haemostasis and Transfusion Scientific Subcommittee of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology.

To date, data regarding the efficacy and safety of administering fibrinogen concentrate in cardiac surgery are limited. Studies are limited by their low sample size and large heterogeneity with regard to the patient population, by the timing of fibrinogen concentrate administration, and by the definition of transfusion trigger and target levels. Assessment of fibrinogen activity using viscoelastic point-of-care testing shortly before or after weaning from cardiopulmonary bypass in patients and procedures with a high risk of bleeding appears to be a rational strategy. In contrast, the use of Clauss fibrinogen test for determination of plasma fibrinogen level can no longer be recommended without restrictions due to its long turnaround time, high inter-assay variability and interference with high heparin levels and fibrin degradation products. Administration of fibrinogen concentrate for maintaining physiological fibrinogen activity in the case of microvascular post-cardiopulmonary bypass bleeding appears to be indicated. The available evidence does not suggest aiming for supranormal levels, however. Use of cryoprecipitate as an alternative to fibrinogen concentrate might be considered to increase plasma fibrinogen levels. Although conclusive evidence is lacking, fibrinogen concentrate does not seem to increase adverse outcomes (i.e., thromboembolic events). Large prospective multi-centre studies are needed to better define the optimal perioperative monitoring tool, transfusion trigger and target levels for fibrinogen replacement in cardiac surgery.

Validation of viscoelastic coagulation tests during cardiopulmonary bypass.

BACKGROUND: Viscoelastic point-of-care tests such as thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are increasingly used to guide hemostatic therapy after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to assess their clinical utility during cardiopulmonary bypass to predict postbypass coagulation status and to guide therapy. METHODS: In this prospective study, TEG and ROTEM tests were performed in 52 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery at two time points: near the end of cardiopulmonary bypass and after heparin reversal with protamine. The 95% confidence intervals of the mean difference were compared with a prespecified clinically relevant limit of ± 20% of the value after protamine. RESULTS: Both viscoelastic fibrinogen assays were well within the prespecified clinically relevant limit (≥ 79% of patients). The laboratory Clauss fibrinogen was much lower during cardiopulmonary bypass than after protamine (mean difference 1.2 g L(-1) , 95% CI 1.03-1.4, which was outside a clinically acceptable difference. For intrinsically activated tests, clotting times (CT) were different and outside the prespecified limit on TEG (mean difference -1.2 min, 95% CI -1.8 to -0.6) but not on ROTEM (mean difference 2.3 sec, 95% CI -8.6 to 13.2), while clot strength was well within the clinical limit on both devices (≥ 94% of patients). For extrinsically activated tests, clot strength on both TEG and ROTEM was within the pre-specified limit in 98% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Results from TEG and ROTEM tests performed toward the end of cardiopulmonary bypass are similar to results after reversal of heparin. Amplitudes indicating clot strength were the most stable parameters across all tests, whereas CT showed more variability. In contrast, laboratory testing of fibrinogen using the Clauss assay was essentially invalid during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Haemoconcentration of residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood using Hemosep ®: a randomised controlled trial.

Cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass are associated with haemodilution, activation of haemostasis and blood transfusion. We undertook a randomised controlled trial that included 53 patients in order to compare autotransfusion of residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood with residual blood concentrated using the novel Hemosep(®) device. There was no difference in patients' mean (SD) haemoglobin concentration after autotransfusion of unprocessed blood compared with Hemosep; 103.5 (10.2) g.l(-1) vs 106.2 (12.4) g.l(-1), respectively, p = 0.40. The mean (SD) change in haemoglobin concentration after autotransfusion was 5.9 (5.3) g.l(-1) in the control group compared with 4.9 (6.3) g.l(-1) in the Hemosep group, p = 0.545. Adjusted for baseline haemoglobin concentrations, the estimated mean (95% CI) difference in change in haemoglobin concentration (control vs Hemosep) was 0.57 (-2.65 to 3.79) g.l(-1), p = 0.72. This was despite Hemosep's reducing the weight of the blood from a mean (SD) of 778.7 (243.0) g to 607.3 (248.2) g, p < 0.001. The haemoglobin concentration in the processed blood increased from a mean (SD) of 87.0 (15.1) g.l(-1) to 103.7 (17.4) g.l(-1), p < 0.001. We conclude that Hemosep is capable of haemoconcentration when employed to process residual cardiopulmonary bypass blood, but that this is insufficient to increase patient haemoglobin.

Haemostatic management of cardiac surgical haemorrhage.

Almost 30,000 cardiopulmonary bypass operations are performed in the UK every year, consuming a considerable portion of the UK blood supply. Each year, in cardiac surgery, 90% of blood products are used by only 10% of patients, and over the past 25 years, much innovation and research has gone into improving peri-operative diagnosis and therapy for these patients. Visco-elastic tests performed at the bedside, with modifications to allow direct quantification of fibrinogen levels, are probably the biggest advancement. There is no clear advantage of thromboelastometry over thromboelastography, and the published literature remains scarce. Visco-elastic testing has recently been coupled with the systematic replacement of clotting factors by means of factor concentrates, with objective improvement in terms of blood loss, red blood cell usage and surgical re-exploration. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence has reviewed the available evidence and recommended visco-elastic tests as cost effective in cardiac surgery. Factor concentrates, however, carry significant risks, particularly unnecessary donor exposures, potential selective over-correction of partial deficiencies and the possibility that the postoperative risk of venous thromboembolism is increased; as yet there are no data on risk-benefit analysis. There are a number of promising drugs used in topical haemostasis, but the requirement to apply these before major bleeding is manifest limits their use considerably. Hyperfibrinolysis is less important than in the past due to the wide spread adoption of antifibrinolytic agents and close intra-operative monitoring of heparin effect.

Antifibrinolytic agents in current anaesthetic practice.

Antifibrinolytic drugs have become almost ubiquitous in their use during major surgery when bleeding is expected or commonplace. Inhibition of the fibrinolytic pathway after tissue injury has been consistently shown to reduce postoperative or traumatic bleeding. There is also some evidence for a reduction of perioperative blood transfusion. However, evidence of complications associated with exaggerated thrombosis also exists, although this appears to be influenced by the choice of the individual agent and the dose administered. There is controversy over the use of the serine protease inhibitor aprotinin, whose license was recently withdrawn but may shortly become available on the market again. In the UK, tranexamic acid, a tissue plasminogen and plasmin inhibitor, is most commonly used, with evidence for benefit in cardiac, orthopaedic, urological, gynaecological, and obstetric surgery. In the USA, ε-aminocaproic acid, which also inhibits plasmin, is commonly used. We have reviewed the current literature for this increasingly popular class of drugs to support clinical judgement in daily anaesthetic practice.

Ghrelin-induced stimulation of colonic propulsion is dependent on hypothalamic neuropeptide Y1- and corticotrophin-releasing factor 1 receptor activation.

Peptides participating in the hypothalamic control of feeding behaviour are also involved in the central autonomic control of gastrointestinal functions, such as secretion and motility. An anatomical interaction and functional relationship in the central nervous system between the feeding-related peptides neuropeptide Y and ghrelin is well documented. Furthermore, it has been shown that feeding-related peptides can influence digestive function via central corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) pathways. In the present study, we investigated the role of ghrelin in the central autonomic control of colonic motility. Furthermore, we addressed the hypothesis that ghrelin is involved in the hypothalamic control of colonic motor function, utilizing central neuropeptide Y receptors and hypothalamic CRF pathways. Ghrelin (0.03, 0.06 and 0.12 nmol) bilaterally microinjected into the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) induced a significant stimulation of colonic propulsion. In particular, the colonic transit time decreased from 312+/-7 min to 198+/-12 min. Microinjection of the neuropeptide Y1 receptor antagonist, BIBP-3226 (200 pmol), or the nonselective CRF receptor antagonist, astressin (30 pmol), into the PVN abolished the stimulatory effect of ghrelin injected into the PVN on colonic transit time, whereas pretreatment with the selective CRF2 receptor, antisauvagine-30 (28 pmol), failed to affect the effect of PVN-ghrelin injection on colonic propulsion. These results suggest that ghrelin can act as central modulator of gastrointestinal motor functions at the level of the PVN via neuropeptide Y1- and CRF1 receptor-dependent mechanisms.

Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript stimulates colonic motility via central CRF receptor activation and peripheral cholinergic pathways in fed, conscious rats.

Many neuropeptides participating in the hypothalamic control of feeding behaviour and satiety have been shown to be additionally involved in the autonomic control of gastrointestinal (GI) functions. Recently, the neuropeptide cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) has been indicated to function as an anorectic substance in the brain. In the present study we examine the hypothesis that CART is involved in the modulation of GI motility. Colonic transit time was measured after peripheral and central injection of CART in fed and freely moving Sprague-Dawley rats. Intracerebroventricular injection of synthetic CART (55-102) (190 pmol and 1.9 nmol per 10 microL and saline controls) decreased the colonic transit time of conscious rats up to 46%. In contrast, i.p. injection of CART (55-102) (1.9 nmol and 19 nmol kg(-1) BW and saline controls) had no effect on colonic motility. Central administration of a CRF receptor antagonist (2.8 nmol) prior to central CART administration antagonized the CART-induced stimulation of colonic transit. Pretreatment with the peripherally acting cholinergic antagonist atropin methyl nitrate (0.1 mg kg(-1) i.p.) blocked the stimulatory CART effect on colonic motor function. The results suggest that CART acts in the central nervous system to modulate behavioural motor function via a central CRF receptor-dependent mechanism and peripheral cholinergic pathways.

Carcinoma showing thymic-like elements--a rare malignancy of the thyroid gland.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma showing thymic-like elements (CASTLE) is a rare tumour of the thyroid of thymic origin. The histological appearance of this tumour may be similar to that of squamous cell carcinoma of the thyroid, but outcome associated with CASTLE is more favourable. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted for case reports on CASTLE. A text word search of the Medline database was made with a manual search of the citations from these references. Twenty-two case reports were found. RESULTS: In five patients with tumour-negative lymph nodes no local or distant recurrence was observed. Seventeen patients had unknown or involved lymph nodes. Two patients were excluded from further study: one had no follow-up and one was treated by irradiation only. Of the remaining 15, six had local, three had distant and two had local and distant recurrence. In patients with involved or unknown lymph node status, local recurrence was noted in one of five patients treated by surgery and irradiation, and in seven of ten patients treated by surgery alone. Irradiation or systemic chemotherapy was given to four patients with recurrent tumours, with variable response. CONCLUSION: CASTLE with tumour-negative lymph nodes has a low risk of recurrence and surgery without adjuvant therapy is sufficient. Radiotherapy seems indicated when lymph nodes are tumour positive and can be effective for recurrent tumours. In selected patients surgery for recurrent tumour can improve quality of life and outcome.

Dose-volume histograms based on serial intravascular ultrasound: a calculation model for radioactive stents.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radioactive stents are under investigation for reduction of coronary restenosis. However, the actual dose delivered to specific parts of the coronary artery wall based on the individual vessel anatomy has not been determined so far. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) permit an estimation of the actual dose absorbed by the target volume. We present a method to calculate DVHs based on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements to determine the dose distribution within the vessel wall. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten patients were studied by intravascular ultrasound after radioactive stenting (BX Stent, P-32, 15-mm length) to obtain tomographic cross-sections of the treated segments. We developed a computer algorithm using the actual dose distribution of the stent to calculate differential and cumulative DVHs. The minimal target dose, the mean target dose, the minimal doses delivered to 10 and 90% of the adventitia (DV10, DV90), and the percentage of volume receiving a reference dose at 0.5 mm from the stent surface cumulated over 28 days were derived from the DVH plots. Results were expressed as mean+/-SD. RESULTS: The mean activity of the stents was 438+/-140 kBq at implantation. The mean reference dose was 111+/-35 Gy, whereas the calculated mean target dose within the adventitia along the stent was 68+/-20 Gy. On average, DV90 and DV10 were 33+/-9 Gy and 117+/-41 Gy, respectively. Expanding the target volume to include 2.5-mm-long segments at the proximal and distal ends of the stent, the calculated mean target dose decreased to 55+/-17 Gy, and DV 90 and DV 10 were 6.4+/-2.4 Gy and 107+/-36 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of DVHs seems in principle to be a valuable tool for both prospective and retrospective analysis of dose-distribution of radioactive stents. It may provide the basis to adapt treatment planning in coronary brachytherapy to the common standards of radiotherapy.