Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
2.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 62(3): 363-370, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30489324

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital readmission is common after ileostomy formation and frequently associated with dehydration. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate a previously published intervention to prevent dehydration and readmission. DESIGN: This is a randomized controlled trial. SETTING: This study was conducted in 3 hospitals within a single health care system. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing elective or nonelective ileostomy as part of their operative procedure were selected. INTERVENTION: Surgeons, advanced practice providers, inpatient and outpatient nurses, and wound ostomy continence nurses participated in a robust ileostomy education and monitoring program (Education Program for Prevention of Ileostomy Complications) based on the published intervention. After informed consent, patients were randomly assigned to a postoperative compliance surveillance and prompting strategy that was directed toward the care team, versus usual care. OUTCOME MEASURES: Unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days of discharge, readmission for dehydration, acute renal failure, estimated direct costs, and patient satisfaction were the primary outcomes measured. RESULTS: One hundred patients with an ileostomy were randomly assigned. The most common indications were rectal cancer (n = 26) and ulcerative colitis (n = 21), and 12 were emergency procedures. Although intervention patients had better postdischarge phone follow-up (90% vs 72%; p = 0.025) and were more likely to receive outpatient intravenous fluids (25% vs 6%; p = 0.008), they had similar overall hospital readmissions (20.4% vs 19.6%; p = 1.0), readmissions for dehydration (8.2% vs 5.9%; p = 0.71), and acute renal failure events (10.2% vs 3.9%; p = 0.26). Multivariable analysis found that weekend discharges to home were significantly associated with readmission (OR, 4.5 (95% CI, 1.2-16.9); p = 0.03). Direct costs and patient satisfaction were similar. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the heterogeneous patient population and by the potential effect of the intervention on providers taking care of patients randomly assigned to usual care. CONCLUSIONS: A surveillance strategy to ensure compliance with an ileostomy education program tracked patients more closely and was cost neutral, but did not result in decreased hospital readmissions compared with usual care. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A812.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Adhesión a Directriz , Ileostomía , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Cuidado de Transición , Anciano , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/organización & administración , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Ileostomía/economía , Ileostomía/métodos , Ileostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Alta del Paciente/normas , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/clasificación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo
3.
World J Gastroenterol ; 20(36): 13052-9, 2014 Sep 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25278699

RESUMEN

Anal cancer represents less than 1% of all new cancers diagnosed annually in the United States. Yet, despite the relative paucity of cases, the incidence of anal cancer has seen a steady about 2% rise each year over the last decade. As such, all healthcare providers need to be cognizant of the evaluation and treatment of anal squamous cell carcinoma. While chemoradiation remains the mainstay of therapy for most patients with anal cancer, surgery may still be required in recurrent, recalcitrant and palliative disease. In this manuscript, we will explore the diagnosis and management of squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Ano/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Ano/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Neoplasias del Ano/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/secundario , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am ; 42(4): 801-13, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24280401

RESUMEN

Pruritus ani is a common condition with multiple causes. Primary causes are thought to be fecal soiling or food irritants. Secondary causes include malignancy, infections including sexually transmitted diseases, benign anorectal diseases, systemic diseases, and inflammatory conditions. A broad differential diagnosis must be considered. A reassessment of the diagnosis is required if symptoms or findings are not responsive to therapy. The pathophysiology of itching, an overview of primary and secondary causes, and various treatment options are reviewed.


Asunto(s)
Prurito Anal/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Ano/complicaciones , Neoplasias del Ano/diagnóstico , Candidiasis/complicaciones , Candidiasis/diagnóstico , Carcinoma in Situ/complicaciones , Carcinoma in Situ/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Seborreica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Seborreica/diagnóstico , Herpes Zóster/complicaciones , Herpes Zóster/diagnóstico , Humanos , Liquen Plano/complicaciones , Liquen Plano/diagnóstico , Liquen Escleroso y Atrófico/complicaciones , Liquen Escleroso y Atrófico/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Paget Extramamaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Paget Extramamaria/diagnóstico , Prurito Anal/etiología , Prurito Anal/terapia , Psoriasis/complicaciones , Psoriasis/diagnóstico , Uremia/complicaciones , Uremia/diagnóstico
5.
Minn Med ; 92(11): 47-9, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20069999

RESUMEN

One of the challenges all hospitals, especially designated trauma centers, face is how to make sure they have adequate staffing on various days of the week and at various times of the year. A number of studies have explored whether factors such as weather, temporal variation, holidays, and events that draw mass gatherings may be useful for predicting patient volume. This article looks at the effects of weather, mass gatherings, and calendar variables on daily trauma admissions at the three Level I trauma hospitals in the Minneapolis-St. Paul metropolitan area. Using ARIMA statistical modeling, we found that weekends, summer, lack of rain, and snowfall were all predictive of daily trauma admissions; holidays and mass gatherings such as sporting events were not. The forecasting model was successful in reflecting the pattern of trauma admissions; however, it's usefulness was limited in that the predicted range of daily trauma admissions was much narrower than the observed number of admissions. Nonetheless, the observed pattern of increased admission in the summer months and year-round on Saturdays should be helpful in resource planning.


Asunto(s)
Vacaciones y Feriados , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodicidad , Estaciones del Año , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo (Meteorología) , Predicción/métodos , Humanos , Minnesota , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos/estadística & datos numéricos , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos/tendencias
7.
Thorac Surg Clin ; 14(3): 409-16, 2004 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15382771

RESUMEN

In the literature on thoracic surgery, return to work has received little attention in QOL investigations. At present, it is difficult to appreciate clinically meaningful trends in return to work after thoracic surgery, even within a specialized area, such as lung cancer resection. It is evident, however, that return to work is not a simple variable, easily measured; rather, it is a complex construct that is influenced by a multitude of personal and societal factors. Focusing only on disease-related or treatment-related symptoms renders QOL studies limited in scope and perhaps in usefulness. Return to work is not a trivial component of global postsurgical QOL; it should be recognized as a major factor. Patients have indicated that maintaining return-to-work ability is as highly valued as their overall health. Surgical societies should design, validate, and implement a simple data collection instrument to characterize better return to work after thoracic surgery.


Asunto(s)
Empleo , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...