A Pilot Study of Neoadjuvant Nivolumab, Ipilimumab, and Intralesional Oncolytic Virotherapy for HER2-negative Breast Cancer.

Purpose: Neoadjuvant combination immune checkpoint blockade and intralesional oncolytic virotherapy have the potential to activate antitumor responses in patients with breast cancer. Experimental Design: Eligibility for this pilot phase I trial included patients with localized HER2-negative breast cancer who received systemic nivolumab and ipilimumab and intratumor talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC; NCT04185311). The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and adverse event profile of immunotherapy combined with T-VEC in patients with localized, HER2-negative breast cancer. Results: Six patients were enrolled, 4 having relapses after prior neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 2 who were previously untreated. Toxicities included 1 patient having grade 3 hypotension and type 1 diabetes mellitus, 3 patients with hypothyroidism, and all patients having constitutional symptoms known to be associated with the administration of T-VEC. One patient had a pathologic complete response, 3 patients had pathologic partial responses, 1 showed no significant response, and 1 had disease progression. Biopsies demonstrated increased immune cell infiltration in samples from patients who responded to therapy. Conclusions: This triple immunotherapy regimen provided responses in patients with advanced or relapsed HER2-negative breast cancer, at the expense of long-term toxicities. Significance: Systemic immune checkpoint blockade with a programmed death receptor 1 and a CTL antigen-4 blocking antibody, combined with intralesional oncolytic virotherapy, is a chemotherapy-free combination aimed at inducing an antitumor immune response locally and systemic immunity.

Multicenter phase II study of matured dendritic cells pulsed with melanoma cell line lysates in patients with advanced melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Several single center studies have provided evidence of immune activation and antitumor activity of therapeutic vaccination with dendritic cells (DC) in patients with metastatic melanoma. The efficacy of this approach in patients with favorable prognosis metastatic melanoma limited to the skin, subcutaneous tissues and lung (stages IIIc, M1a, M1b) was tested in a multicenter two stage phase 2 study with centralized DC manufacturing. METHODS: The vaccine (IDD-3) consisted 8 doses of autologous monocyte-derived matured DC generated in serum-free medium with granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin-13 (IL-13), pulsed with lysates of three allogeneic melanoma cell lines, and matured with interferon gamma. The primary endpoint was antitumor activity. RESULTS: Among 33 patients who received IDD-3 there was one complete response (CR), two partial responses (PR), and six patients had stable disease (SD) lasting more than eight weeks. The overall prospectively defined tumor growth control rate was 27% (90% confidence interval of 13-46%). IDD-3 administration had minimal toxicity and it resulted in a high frequency of immune activation to immunizing melanoma antigens as assessed by in vitro immune monitoring assays. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of matured DC loaded with tumor lysates has significant immunogenicity and antitumor activity in patients with limited metastatic melanoma. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00107159.

Dendritic cell vaccination combined with CTLA4 blockade in patients with metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: Tumor antigen-loaded dendritic cells (DC) are believed to activate antitumor immunity by stimulating T cells, and CTL-associated antigen 4 (CTLA4)-blocking antibodies should release a key negative regulatory pathway on T cells. The combination was tested in a phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Autologous DC were pulsed with MART-1(26-35) peptide and administered with a dose escalation of the CTLA4-blocking antibody tremelimumab. Sixteen patients were accrued to five dose levels. Primary end points were safety and immune effects; clinical efficacy was a secondary end point. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of grade 3 diarrhea and grade 2 hypophysitis developed in two of three patients receiving tremelimumab at 10 mg/kg monthly. Four patients had an objective tumor response, two partial responses and two complete responses, all melanoma free between 2 and 4 years after study initiation. There was no difference in immune monitoring results between patients with an objective tumor response and those without a response. Exploratory gene expression analysis suggested that immune-related gene signatures, in particular for B-cell function, may be important in predicting response. CONCLUSION: The combination of MART-1 peptide-pulsed DC and tremelimumab results in objective and durable tumor responses at the higher range of the expected response rate with either agent alone.

Adenovirus MART-1-engineered autologous dendritic cell vaccine for metastatic melanoma.

We performed a phase 1/2 trial testing the safety, toxicity, and immune response of a vaccine consisting of autologous dendritic cells (DCs) transduced with a replication-defective adenovirus (AdV) encoding the full-length melanoma antigen MART-1/Melan-A (MART-1). This vaccine was designed to activate MART-1-specific CD+8 and CD4+ T cells. Metastatic melanoma patients received 3 injections of 10(6) or 10(7) DCs, delivered intradermally. Cell surface phenotype and cytokine production of the DCs used for the vaccines were tested, and indicated intermediate maturity. CD8+ T-cell responses to MART-1 27-35 were assessed by both major histocompatibility complex class I tetramer and interferon (IFN)-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) before, during, and after each vaccine and CD4+ T-cell responses to MART-1 51-73 were followed by IFN-gamma ELISPOT. We also measured antigen response breadth. Determinant spreading from the immunizing antigen MART-1 to other melanoma antigens [gp100, tyrosinase, human melanoma antigen-A3 (MAGE-A3)] was assessed by IFN-gamma ELISPOT. Twenty-three patients were enrolled and 14 patients received all 3 scheduled DC vaccines. Significant CD8+ and/or CD4+ MART-1-specific T-cell responses were observed in 6/11 and 2/4 patients evaluated, respectively, indicating that the E1-deleted adenovirus encoding the cDNA for MART-1/Melan-A (AdVMART1)/DC vaccine activated both helper and killer T cells in vivo. Responses in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells to additional antigens were noted in 2 patients. The AdVMART1-transduced DC vaccine was safe and immunogenic in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Role of dendritic cell phenotype, determinant spreading, and negative costimulatory blockade in dendritic cell-based melanoma immunotherapy.

MART-1(27-35)-peptide-pulsed immature dendritic cells (DCs) resulted in immunologic and clinical activity in a prior phase 1 trial. A phase 2 cohort expansion was initiated to further characterize the phenotype and cytokine milieu of the DC vaccines and their immunologic activity in vitro and to further examine a possible link between clinical activity and determinant spreading. In an open-label phase 2 trial, 10(7) autologous ex vivo generated DCs pulsed with the HLA-A*0201 immunodominant peptide MART-1(27-35) were administered to 10 subjects with stage II-IV melanoma. The experimental vaccines were administered intradermally in a biweekly schedule for a total of three injections, and blood for immunologic assays was obtained before each administration and at three time points after. DC vaccine preparations had wide intra- and interpatient variability in terms of cell surface markers and preferential cytokine milieu, but they did not correlate with the levels of antigen-specific T cells after vaccination. Of four patients with measurable disease, one had stable disease for 6 months and another has a continued complete response for over 2 years, which is confounded by receiving a closely sequenced CTLA4 blocking antibody. The DC vaccines induced determinant spreading in this subject, and CTLA4 blockade reactivated T cells with prior antigen exposure. The DC phenotype and cytokine profile do not correlate with the ability to induce antigen-specific T cells, while determinant spreading after DC immunization may be a marker of an efficient antitumor response. Sequential CTLA4 blockade may enhance the immune activity of DC-based immunotherapy.

Determinant spreading associated with clinical response in dendritic cell-based immunotherapy for malignant melanoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the toxicity and immunological effects of three different doses and two routes of administration of autologous dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with the MART-1(27-35) immunodominant epitope. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Eighteen HLA-A*0201-positive subjects with stage III-IV melanoma received three biweekly i.v. or intradermal injections of ex vivo generated myeloid DCs pulsed with MART-1(27-35) epitope. Repeated blood samples were processed to obtain peripheral blood mononuclear cells for immunological analysis using IFN-gamma ELISPOT, MHC class I tetramer, intracellular cytokine staining, and microcytotoxicity assays. RESULTS: The frequency of MART-1/Melan-A (MART-1) antigen-specific T cells in peripheral blood increased in all dose levels as assessed by ELISPOT and MHC class I tetramer assays, but without a clear dose-response effect. The intradermal route generated stronger MART-1 immunity compared with the i.v. route. MART-1-specific immunity did not correlate with clinical outcome in any of the four immunological assays used. However, analysis of determinant spreading to other melanoma antigens was noted in the only subject with complete response to this single-epitope immunization. CONCLUSIONS: Intradermal immunization with MART-1 peptide-pulsed DCs results in an increase in circulating IFN-gamma-producing, antigen-specific T cells. The frequency of these cells did not correlate with response. In contrast, spreading of immune reactivity to other melanoma antigens was only evident in a subject with a complete response, suggesting that determinant spreading may be an important factor of clinical response to this form of immunotherapy.