Symptoms of Phytoplasma Diseases.

Phytoplasmas are associated with diseases in several hundreds of cultivated herbaceous and woody plants. Their impact in agriculture and the periodical outbreak of worrying epidemics make very important, besides precise laboratory-based diagnosis, the direct in-field recognition of phytoplasma disease symptoms. Even if some symptoms are typical of this kind of pathogens, in-field diagnosis requires the knowledge of the host plant, strong field experience, and awareness of the symptom variability of the various organs of the plant during different seasons and under various environmental conditions. It is therefore very important to be familiar with factors like environmental conditions, agronomical features, and disease progression that influence symptom expression. Therefore, a satisfactory diagnosis should be based on repeated and complete observations scored over the entire plant and across different times of the year. A more suitable diagnosis is possible if the observer is able to recognize and distinguish the symptoms of other biotic or abiotic diseases. A general rule is to observe three different symptoms, at least, and to seek input from the grower about the initial development, frequency, diffusion, and particular characteristics of the disease.After a short introduction the following symptoms are presented: the most common and representative symptoms caused by phytoplasmas; the most common symptoms of phytoplasma diseases occurring in particular plant organs, with some references to specific diseases; phytoplasma symptoms on the model plant periwinkle (Vinca rosea or Catharanthus roseus); the main factors influencing phytoplasma symptoms expression; and several practical procedures that should be followed for suitable diagnosis. A series of original photos have been included to illustrate typical symptoms.

On the role of H2O2 in the recovery of grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Prosecco) from Flavescence dorée disease.

In the present work, we compared hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) localisation and the activities/contents of antioxidant enzymes and metabolites in the leaf tissues of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Prosecco) plants showing different sanitary status, namely diseased by Flavescence dorée, healthy or recovered. Polymerase chain reaction analysis revealed that the pathogen associated with Flavescence dorée (proposed as 'Candidatus Phytoplasma vitis') was detected in the leaf tissues of symptomatic plants, but was not observed in either the healthy or recovered plants. Hydrogen peroxide accumulated in the phloem plasmalemma of recovered grapevine leaves, but was not detected in either healthy or diseased material. When compared to diseased or healthy plants, recovered plants had distinctly lower extractable levels of catalase and ascorbate peroxidase, two enzymes primarily involved in the scavenging of excess H2O2 generated in different cell compartments. Among healthy, diseased and recovered leaves there was no significant difference in the amount of 2-thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances, which are assumed to reflect the extent of peroxidative breakdown of membrane lipids. Therefore, it is suggested that recovery from Flavescence dorée disease in grapevine might be associated with a long-term, sustained and tissue-specific accumulation of H2O2 in leaves, which reduces numbers or prevents further infection by Flavescence dorée phytoplasma. Recovered grapevine plants might be able to achieve such H2O2 accumulation through a selective and presumably stable downregulation of enzymatic H2O2 scavengers, without altering the levels of other antioxidant systems and without incurring an increased oxidative risk.