Real-Life Effectiveness of Benralizumab, Mepolizumab and Omalizumab in Severe Allergic Asthma Associated with Nasal Polyps.

Biological therapies are available for the treatment of the severe allergic asthma (SAA) with blood eosinophil count ≥ 0.3 × 109/L. Several of them also showed benefits on nasal polyps (NP), one of the most frequent comorbidities of the severe asthma, but comparative studies on their effectiveness in the association SAA-NP are currently lacking. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of benralizumab, mepolizumab and omalizumab in patients with SAA-NP in real-life settings. A retrospective, observational, multicenter real-life study was realized including patients with SAA-NP treated by benralizumab, mepolizumab or omalizumab for 6 months. We analysed the nasal and respiratory symptoms, the number of asthma attacks and salbutamol use/week, acute sinusitis and severe exacerbation rates, the asthma control score, the lung function parameters, the NP endoscopic score, the sinus imaging and the blood eosinophil count 6 months before and after treatment. Seventy-two patients with SAA-NP were included: 16 treated by benralizumab, 21 by mepolizumab and 35 by omalizumab. After 6 months of treatment, almost all studied parameters were improved (except sinus imaging) with a greater effect of omalizumab on the nasal pruritus (p = 0.001) and more benefits of benralizumab on exacerbations rate, asthma attacks per week and lung function (all p < 0.05). Benralizumab and mepolizumab were more effective to improve the NP endoscopic score and the blood eosinophil count (both p < 0.001). All three biological therapies showed effectiveness by improving asthma and nasal outcomes in patients with SAA-NP. Several differences have been found that should be confirmed by larger comparative studies.

Mid-term pulmonary sequelae after hospitalisation for COVID-19: The French SISCOVID cohort.

BACKGROUND: Even though COVID-19 clinical features, pathogenesis, complications, and therapeutic options have been largely described in the literature, long-term consequences in patients remain poorly known. METHODS: The French, multicentre, non-interventional SISCOVID study evaluated lung impairment three (M3) and six months (M6) after hospital discharge in patients recovered from COVID-19. Evaluation was based on clinical examination, pulmonary function tests, and chest computed tomography (CT-scan). RESULTS: Of the 320 included patients (mean age: 61 years; men: 64.1%), 205 had had a severe form of COVID-19, being hospitalised in an intensive care unit (ICU), and requiring high flow nasal cannula, non-invasive ventilation, or invasive mechanical ventilation. At M6, 54.1% of included patients had persistent dyspnoea (mMRC score ≥1), 20.1% severe impairment in gas diffusing capacity (DLCO <60% pred.), 21.6% restrictive ventilatory pattern (total lung capacity <80% pred.), and 40% a fibrotic-like pattern at CT-scan. Fibrotic-like pattern and restrictive ventilatory pattern were significantly more frequent in patients recovered from severe than non-severe COVID-19. Improved functional and radiological outcomes were observed between M3 and M6. At M6, age was an independent risk factor for severe DLco impairment and fibrotic-like pattern and severe COVID-19 form was independent risk factor for restrictive ventilatory profile and fibrotic-like pattern. CONCLUSION: Six months after discharge, patients hospitalised for COVID-19, especially those recovered from a severe form of COVID-19, frequently presented persistent dyspnoea, lung function impairment, and persistent fibrotic-like pattern, confirming the need for long-term post-discharge follow-up in these patients and for further studies to better understand long-term COVID-19 lung impairment.

Phenotyping to Target Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrom (OSAS) in adults patients with severe asthma.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) and severe asthma are frequently associated. This article focuses on the relationship between severe asthma phenotypes and OSAS. METHODS: FASE-CPHG was an observational, cross-sectional, prospective, multicentric study conducted in 104 non-academic hospitals from May-16 to July-17. 1465 patients with severe asthma were analysed and 1424 patients phenotyped. Clusters were compared for OSAS presence; independent factors associated with OSAS were identified by logistic regression. RESULTS: 11% of patients with severe asthma reported OSAS. OSAS incidence differed according to asthma phenotypes. 98% of OSAS patients belonged to the "obese asthma" cluster, and none to the "early onset allergic asthma" cluster. Independent factors associated with OSAS were obesity (OR=5.782 [3.927-8.512]), male gender (OR=3.047 [2.059-4.510]), high blood pressure (OR=2.875 [1.978-4.181]), depression (OR=2.552 [1.607-4.050]), late-onset asthma (OR=1.789 [1.167-2.743]) and atopy (OR=0.622 [0.408-0.948]). Moreover, OSAS patients were more frequently treated with long-term oral corticosteroids (30% vs 15%, p < 0.0001), that may contribute to the high prevalence of obesity in this group of patients. They were more frequently uncontrolled (78% vs 69%, p = 0.03) and they engaged in low level physical activity (vs 80% vs 68% p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study gives an innovative insight into OSAS associated with severe asthma. Most of patients with OSAS belonged to the cluster "obese asthma" and none to the cluster "early onset allergic asthma". In addition to male gender, arterial hypertension and depression, obese asthma, late onset asthma and non-atopic status were identified as specific risk factors. Oral corticosteroids seems to play a deleterious role. Phenotyping asthma can help physicians target severe asthmatic patients with OSAS and may avoid unnecessary examinations.

Updated guidelines (2021) for management and follow-up of asthmatic patients of the French Society of Pneumology (SPLF) and the French Society of Pediatric Pneumology and Allergology (SP2A). Short version.

The therapeutic management strategy is based on the regular evaluation of the control of asthmatic disease, with an effective minimum dose research and the assessment of environmental factors, not to mention the important place of therapeutic education. These professional recommendations relate to the management and follow-up of adult and adolescent asthma patients aged 12 and over. The recommendations answer the following questions: 1. How to make the initial diagnosis of asthma? 2. What allergological check-up should be done in asthmatics 3. How to manage an asthma exacerbation? 4. How to manage difficult asthma? 5. What therapeutic strategies? 6. How to manage a woman's asthma during pregnancy? 7. Environmental factors in asthma management review.

FASE-CPHG Study: identification of asthma phenotypes in the French Severe Asthma Study using cluster analysis.

BACKGROUND: In France, data regarding epidemiology and management of severe asthma are scarce. The objective of this study was to describe asthma phenotypes using a cluster analysis in severe asthmatics recruited in a real world setting. METHODS: The study design was prospective, observational and multicentric. The patients included were adults with severe asthma (GINA 4-5) followed-up in French Non Academic Hospital between May 2016 and June 2017. One hundred and seven physicians included 1502 patients. Both sociodemographic and clinical variables were collected. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed by the Ward method followed by k-means cluster analysis on a population of 1424 patients. RESULTS: Five clusters were identified: cluster 1 (n = 690, 47%) called early onset allergic asthma (47.5% with asthma before 12 years), cluster 2 (n = 153, 10.5%): obese asthma (63.5% with BMI > 30 kg/m2), cluster 3 (n = 299, 20.4%): late-onset asthma with severe obstructive syndrome (89% without atopy), cluster 4 (n = 143, 9.8%): eosinophilic asthma (51.7% had more than 500 eosinophils/mm3), and cluster 5 (n = 139, 9.5%): aspirin sensitivity asthma (63% had severe asthma attacks). CONCLUSIONS: In our population of adults with severe asthma followed by pulmonologists, five distinct phenotypes were identified and are quite different from those mentioned in previous studies.

FASE-CPHG study: a panoramic snapshot of difficult-to-treat, severe asthma in French nonacademic hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data describing management of patients with severe asthma are limited. To address this issue, we conducted FASE-CPHG (France Asthme Sevère - Collège des Pneumologues des Hôpitaux Généraux), a descriptive, multicentric, and observational cross-sectional study. METHODS: French pulmonologists from nonacademic hospitals completed questionnaires on patient characteristics and ongoing asthma treatment for severe asthmatic patients observed during the inclusion period. In addition, we collected data from patients via self-assessment questionnaires. FINDINGS: 104 physicians recruited 1502 patients within 1 year. The mean age of the 1465 patients analysed was 54.4±16.1 years. Severe asthmatic patients were more frequently female (63%), with a history of atopy (65%). Most patients remained poorly controlled or uncontrolled, with an important difference between physicians' opinion and the Global Initiative for Asthma criteria (63% versus 96%). The most common comorbidities included ear, nose and throat diseases (59% of cases); anxiety (40%); and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (39%). Allergic sensitisation tests and/or blood eosinophil count evaluation, and spirometry were performed in 92% and 98% of patients, respectively. The mean eosinophil count and total serum IgE were 437 cells·mm-3 and 546 UI·L-1, respectively. In addition to high doses of inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting ß2-agonists, patients were receiving leukotriene receptor antagonists (52%), anticholinergic drugs (34%), anti IgE (27%) and oral corticosteroids (17%); 65% adhered to their treatment. INTERPRETATION: This study provides insight into the characteristics and management of severe asthma in France and may help improve knowledge on this pathology, which represents a high burden to healthcare.

Health-related quality of life in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer comparing carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy with monotherapy.

In the Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique 0501 trial the carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy increased toxicity (most frequent, decreased neutrophil count, asthenia). We longitudinally compared health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the two treatment arms.In total, 451 patients aged 70-89 years with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomly assigned to receive carboplatin plus paclitaxel or vinorelbine or gemcitabine. HRQoL was assessed by means of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline, week 6 and week 18.Using a five-point decrease as the minimal clinically important difference, patients treated with the chemotherapy doublet exhibited a significant longer time until definitive deterioration (TUDD) for two HRQoL dimensions: physical functioning (median TUDD: 2.04 for the doublet versus 1.71 months for monotherapy; log-rank p=0.01) and nausea and vomiting (median: not reached versus 4.83, respectively; log-rank p=0.046). Cox multivariate analysis revealed the carboplatin and paclitaxel arm to be independently associated with longer TUDD for these two HRQoL dimensions. In addition, TUDD didn't significantly differ between the two arms for all the other HRQoL dimensions.The chemotherapy doublet did not reduce TUDD in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Moreover, TUDD was prolonged for two HRQoL dimensions, namely physical functioning and nausea and vomiting.

The new face of non-small-cell lung cancer in men: Results of two French prospective epidemiological studies conducted 10 years apart.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of epidemiological changes observed in 10 years in men with NSCLC on 1-year mortality; to compare prognosis factors of 1-year mortality according to gender. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The French College of General Hospital Respiratory Physicians conducted two prospective epidemiological multicentre studies at a 10-year interval (KBP-2000-CPHG and KBP-2010-CPHG). These studies included all adult patients with primary lung cancer histologically or cytologically diagnosed between 1(st) January and 31(st) December for the years 2000 and 2010, managed in the pneumology department of the participating hospitals. A standardised form was completed for each patient. A steering committee checked recruitment exhaustiveness. Vital status 1 year after diagnosis was collected. RESULTS: In 2000 and 2010 respectively, 137 and 104 centres included 3921 and 4597 men and 748 and 1486 women with NSCLC. In 2010 compared to 2000, male patients were older but had better performance status (PS); they were less frequently ever-smokers and heavy smokers; their cancer (usually diagnosed at advanced stage) was more often adenocarcinoma (p<0.0001). In 10 years, 1-year mortality has significantly decreased in men (from 61.2% to 56.6%, p<0.0001) and in women (from 58.1% to 50.9%, p<0.0001), but remained higher in men than in women leading to increased difference between men and women. Decreased 1-year mortality remained statistically significant after adjustment on age, PS, smoking, and histology (men: OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.73-0.90, p<0.0001; women: 0.71, 0.57-0.88, p<0.002). Active smoking was not a prognosis factor in men (OR=1.04, CI=0.79-1.37, p=0.78); age (>75 years) had less impact on mortality in men than in women (men: OR=1.43, CI=1.22-1.67, p ≤ 0.0001; women: OR=2.32, CI=1.71-3.15; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The improved 1-year survival in 2010 as compared with 2000 was independent of age, smoking, PS, and histology, suggesting that it reflected new treatment and strategy efficacy. One-year mortality remains higher in men than in women.

Carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy compared with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: IFCT-0501 randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is recommended to treat advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in fit, non-elderly adults, but monotherapy is recommended for patients older than 70 years. We compared a carboplatin and paclitaxel doublet chemotherapy regimen with monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: In this multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised trial we recruited patients aged 70-89 years with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC and WHO performance status scores of 0-2. Patients received either four cycles (3 weeks on treatment, 1 week off treatment) of carboplatin (on day 1) plus paclitaxel (on days 1, 8, and 15) or five cycles (2 weeks on treatment, 1 week off treatment) of vinorelbine or gemcitabine monotherapy. Randomisation was done centrally with the minimisation method. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number NCT00298415. FINDINGS: 451 patients were enrolled. 226 were randomly assigned monotherapy and 225 doublet chemotherapy. Median age was 77 years and median follow-up was 30.3 months (range 8.6-45.2). Median overall survival was 10.3 months for doublet chemotherapy and 6.2 months for monotherapy (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.52-0.78; p<0.0001); 1-year survival was 44.5% (95% CI 37.9-50.9) and 25.4% (19.9-31.3), respectively. Toxic effects were more frequent in the doublet chemotherapy group than in the monotherapy group (most frequent, decreased neutrophil count (108 [48.4%] vs 28 [12.4%]; asthenia 23 [10.3%] vs 13 [5.8%]). INTERPRETATION: Despite increased toxic effects, platinum-based doublet chemotherapy was associated with survival benefits compared with vinorelbine or gemcitabine monotherapy in elderly patients with NSCLC. We feel that the current treatment paradigm for these patients should be reconsidered. FUNDING: Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique, Institut National du Cancer.

Standardization of an ash (Fraxinus excelsior) pollen allergen extract.

BACKGROUND: Ash tree (Fraxinus excelsior) is the main representative of the Oleaceae family in temperate zones. Diagnosis of ash pollen allergy is made difficult due to (1) an overlapping pollinization period with Betulaceae, (2) non-inclusion in current diagnostic assays, and (3) some cross- reactivity with minor allergens from Betulaceae. The aim of this study was to calibrate an ash pollen in-house reference preparation (IHRP) in allergic patients in order to produce standardized products for diagnosis and immunotherapy purposes. METHODS: Ash pollen IHRP was extracted, ultrafiltered and freeze dried. Allergens in the extract were detected after 2-dimensional PAGE using specific sera and a monoclonal antibody. The Fra e 1 content of IHRP was evaluated by quantitative immunoprint. Forty-eight subjects from the North-East of France exhibiting clinical symptoms, a positive skin test and specific IgE levels > or =class 2 to ash pollen were recruited. IgE immunoprints were performed to select patients sensitized to the ash Fra e 1 allergen as opposed to cross-reacting allergens. Serial 10-fold dilutions of the IHRP were tested by skin prick tests in order to determine the concentration inducing a geometrical mean wheal diameter of 7 mm, said to correspond to an index of reactivity (IR) of 100 per millilitre. RESULTS: IgE-reactive molecules in IHRP comprise Fra e 1, Fra e 2, a 9-kDa molecule (presumably Fra e 3), as well as a doublet at 15 kDa and high molecular weight allergens. The 100 IR concentration of IHRP inducing a geometrical mean wheal diameter of 7 mm in 22 patients sensitized to Fra e 1 corresponds to the 1/126 (w/v) extraction ratio (i.e. 259 microg/ml of protein by Bradford) and contains 17 microg/ml of Fra e 1. The variability in total activity of 5 batches of standardized extracts was found to be significantly reduced when compared with 7 non-standardized extracts. CONCLUSION: An ash pollen IHRP was defined and molecularly characterized. Its successful standardization at 100 IR/ml in patients specifically sensitized to Fra e 1 allowed a skin reactivity-based calibration in properly diagnosed patients. Such a standardized ash pollen extract is a reliable tool to support immunotherapy of ash pollen allergy.