RESUMEN
Scientific concepts and measurements that relate soil and water resources are lacking in several areas, limiting our development of a framework or nexus to assess soil-watershed health. Current research designs rely on land management practices as a proxy for soil condition. Yet, conservation practices are often studied in isolation of each other, and adoption may be driven by state and federal farm programs that can incentivize a given management practice without accounting for current, novel farmer-driven adoption of conservation systems. Despite the value of conservation management, its ability to predict soil health is often limited if based solely on land management because chemical, physical, and biological processes vary across time, discipline, and terrain. Similarly, connections between soil health and water quality are constrained due to several "grand challenges" that include dissimilar scales and the number of metrics required to correlate soil and water systems. Equally important is soil sampling within the critical flow path(s) that determines sediment/contaminant loading. In some instances, most of the sediment/contaminant loading during a portion or entire year results from channel and bank erosion and not overland flow that may not be within conservation management hectares. Additional challenges include legacy effects of prior land management, climate variability, and varying turnover rates of soil and water systems. This special section aims to frame research issues that inspire new approaches and collaborations for tackling the challenge of leveraging soil health to strengthen water management across plot, field, and watershed scales, using models, statistics, and other novel methodologies.
Asunto(s)
Conservación de los Recursos Naturales , Suelo , Conservación de los Recursos Naturales/métodos , Monitoreo del Ambiente , Movimientos del Agua , Calidad del AguaRESUMEN
Soil health and water quality improvement are major goals of sustainable agricultural management systems, yet the connections between soil health and water quality impacts remain unclear. In this study we conducted an initial exploratory assessment of the relationships between soil chemical, physical, and biological properties and edge-of-field water quality across a network of 40 fields in Ohio, USA. Discharge, dissolved reactive P (DRP), total P (TP), and nitrate (NO3 ) losses associated with precipitation events via surface runoff and tile drainage were monitored. Agronomic soil tests and a suite of soil health indicators were measured, then predictive relationships between the field average soil properties and tile drainage and surface runoff discharge and DRP, TP, and nitrate loads were explored with random forest and multiple linear regression approaches. Among the soil health indicators, water extractable C and N were consistently found to be positively related to tile nitrate loads, but other soil health indicators had little or inconsistent importance for water quality impacts. Several other soil properties were important predictors, particularly soil P pools for surface and tile DRP and TP losses as well as Mehlich-3 (M3) extractable Fe and Al for surface and tile discharge. Thus, we did not observe strong evidence that soil health was associated with improved edge-of-field water quality across the edge-of-field monitoring network. However, additional studies are needed to definitively test the relationships between a broader array of soil health metrics and water quality outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Suelo , Calidad del Agua , Ohio , Nitratos , Fósforo/análisis , Movimientos del Agua , AgriculturaRESUMEN
Legacy phosphorus (P) in agricultural soils can be transported to surface waters via runoff and tile drainage, where it contributes to the development of harmful and nuisance algal blooms and hypoxia. However, a limited understanding of legacy P loss dynamics impedes the identification of mitigation strategies. Edge-of-field data from 41 agricultural fields in northwestern Ohio, USA, were used to develop regressions between legacy P concentrations (C) and discharge (Q) for two P fractions: total P (TP) and dissolved reactive P (DRP). Tile drainage TP concentration (CTP ) and DRP concentration (CDRP ) both increased as Q increased, and CTP tended to increase at a greater rate than CDRP . Surface runoff showed greater variation in C-Q regressions, indicating that the response of TP and DRP to elevated Q was field specific. The relative variability of C and Q was explored using a ratio of CVs (CVC /CVQ ), which indicated that tile drainage TP and DRP losses were chemodynamic, whereas losses via surface runoff demonstrated both chemodynamic and chemostatic behavior. The chemodynamic behavior indicated that legacy P losses were strongly influenced by variation in P source availability and transport pathways. In addition, legacy P source size influenced C, as demonstrated by a positive relationship between soil-test P and the CTP and CDRP in both tile drainage and surface runoff. Progress towards legacy P mitigation will require further characterization of the drivers of variability in CTP and CDRP , including weather-, soil-, and management-related factors.
Asunto(s)
Fósforo/análisis , Movimientos del Agua , Agricultura , Ohio , SueloRESUMEN
Soil texture is known to have an influence on the physical and biological processes that produce NO emissions in agricultural fields, yet comparisons across soil textural types are limited by considerations of time and practicality. We used the DayCent biogeochemical model to assess the effects of soil texture on NO emissions from agriculturally productive soils from four counties in Wisconsin. We validated the DayCent model using field data from 2 yr of a long-term (approximately 20-yr) cropping systems trial and then simulated yield and NO emissions from continuous corn ( L.) and corn-soybean ( L.) cropping systems across 35 Wisconsin soil series classified as either silt loam, sandy loam, or loamy sand. Silt loam soils had the highest NO emissions of all soil types, exhibiting 80 to 158% greater mean emissions and 100 to 282% greater emission factors compared with loamy sand and sandy loam soils, respectively. The model predicts that for these soils under these cropping systems, denitrification constituted the majority of the NO flux only in the silt loam soils. However, across all soil textures, locations, and years, denitrification explained the most variation (74-98%) in total NO emissions. Our results suggest that soil texture is an important factor in determining a range of NO emission characteristics and is critical for estimating future NO emissions from agricultural fields.
Asunto(s)
Glycine max , Óxido Nitroso/análisis , Suelo/química , Zea mays , Agricultura , WisconsinRESUMEN
Agriculture in the midwestern United States is a major anthropogenic source of nitrous oxide (NO) and is both a source and sink for methane (CH), but the degree to which cropping systems differ in emissions of these gases is not well understood. Our objectives were to determine if fluxes of NO and CH varied among cropping systems and among crop phases within a cropping system. We compare NO and CH fluxes over the 2010 and 2011 growing seasons from the six cropping systems at the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial (WICST), a 20-yr-old cropping systems experiment. The study is composed of three grain and three forage cropping systems spanning a spectrum of crop diversity and perenniality that model a wide range of realistic cropping systems that differ in management, crop rotation, and fertilizer regimes. Among the grain systems, cumulative growing season NO emissions were greater for continuous corn ( L.) (3.7 kg NO-N ha) than corn-soybean [ (L.) Merr.] (2.0 kg NO-N ha) or organic corn-soybean-wheat ( L.) (1.7 kg NO-N ha). Among the forage systems, cumulative growing-season NO emissions were greater for organic corn-alfalfa ( L.)-alfalfa (2.9 kg NO-N ha) and conventional corn-alfalfa-alfalfa-alfalfa (2.5 kg NO-N ha), and lower for rotational pasture (1.9 kg NO-N ha). Application of mineral or organic N fertilizer was associated with elevated NO emissions. Yield-scaled emissions (kg NO-N Mg) did not differ by cropping system. Methane fluxes were highly variable and no effect of cropping system was observed. These results suggest that extended and diversified cropping systems could reduce area-scaled NO emissions from agriculture, but none of the systems studied significantly reduced yield-scaled NO emissions.