The value of a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay in preoperative staging and followup of patients with prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay is an extremely sensitive technique of detecting cells expressing prostate specific antigen (PSA). Controversy exists regarding the ability of peripheral blood PSA RT-PCR testing to reflect pathological staging or treatment outcome. We examine the phenomenology of RT-PCR results in patients with prostate cancer, with particular emphasis on the RT-PCR test before and after radical prostatectomy, and correlations with pathological staging and treatment outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Peripheral blood was obtained from a wide variety of patients with and without prostate cancer, including before and after radical prostatectomy. After ribonucleic acid isolation, complementary deoxyribonucleic acid was generated and amplified with a hot-start technique. RT-PCR results were compared with pathological stage, Gleason score, tumor volume and disease-free status. Correlations between preoperative and postoperative RT-PCR tests were also made. RESULTS: The RT-PCR test was positive in 1 of 56 controls (1.8%) without suspicion of prostate cancer. A positive test was obtained in 12 of 65 men (18.5%) with a suspicion of prostate cancer but a negative biopsy. Before radical prostatectomy a positive test was obtained in 13 of 75 men (17.3%) with pT2 disease versus 10 of 46 (21.7%) with pT3 disease. There was no significant difference in serum PSA, Gleason score or tumor volume between the men with positive or negative results. With repetitive testing an increasing percentage of men had at least 1 positive test preoperatively. With a median followup of 8 months 6 of the 7 patients in whom radical prostatectomy failed had had negative RT-PCR before treatment. Of patients with known metastatic disease or failed primary treatment a positive test was obtained in 32 to 75%. Radical prostatectomy and prostate needle biopsy appeared to have a negligible effect on RT-PCR tests immediately following these procedures. Following radical prostatectomy results were variable but many men who are RT-PCR positive preoperatively become RT-PCR negative postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: The PSA RT-PCR test in our laboratory cannot be used preoperatively to predict pathological stage of prostate cancer or treatment failure. Most cases that are positive preoperatively become negative postoperatively. While increasing tumor burden increases the likelihood of positive tests, there appears to be significant sampling error associated with the use of this test in the peripheral blood.

Detection of circulating prostate cells by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction of human glandular kallikrein (hK2) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) messages.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical value of human glandular kallikrein (hK2) reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of prostate cells in circulation and to compare the results with those obtained from prostate-specific antigen (PSA) RT-PCR. METHODS: We examined peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples of 13 patients with advanced-stage prostate cancer and 63 patients with clinically localized disease for the presence of circulating prostate cells. An RT-PCR protocol with a two-step amplification cycle and hot-start conditions was used. RESULTS: The limit of detection of the PCR portion is similar for PSA and hK2 (5 to 10 copies of the plasmid containing the cDNA). The RT-PCR limit of detection is one LNCaP cell in 10(8) peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBC) for PSA, and one LNCaP cell in 10(7) PMBC for hK2. Of the BM samples obtained prior to radical prostatectomy, 71.4% were positive for PSA mRNA and 41.3% were positive for hK2 mRNA. In PB, the PSA positivity was 19% and hK2 positivity 12.7%. In advanced-stage patients, there were 76.9% PSA-positive samples in BM versus 38.5% hK2-positive samples; 46.2% of patients were positive in PB for PSA versus 30.8% for hK2. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a sensitive RT-PCR protocol for detection of hK2 mRNA and evaluated the suitability of hK2 mRNA in comparison with PSA mRNA as an additional marker for detection of prostate cells in circulation. Combining results of these two tests increased the sensitivity of detection.

Early tumor cell dissemination in patients with clinically localized carcinoma of the prostate.

Because a significant number of patients with pathologically organ-confined carcinoma of the prostate subsequently develop recurrent disease, metastasis may occur much earlier than previously believed. We have used a reverse transcription-PCR assay for prostate-specific antigen mRNA and an immunocytochemical staining method for cytokeratins to test this hypothesis in paired peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) specimens from 71 patients with clinically localized disease before radical prostatectomy, 14 patients with advanced-stage carcinoma of the prostate, and 30 controls (young healthy volunteers, patients without prostate disease, and patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia). Controls were negative in BM and PB. Fifty-six% of patients with organ-confined tumors (pT2) and 73% of those with extracapsular extension (pT3) were positive in the BM versus 16% of those with pT2 tumors and 27% of those with pT3 tumors in the PB. Patients with advanced-stage disease were positive in 86% of BM versus 71% of PB. The sensitivity of the immunocytochemistry assay to detect tumor cells was lower as compared with the reverse transcription-PCR assay. The results suggest that tumor cell dissemination occurs early during disease progression. Prostate cells seem to preferentially concentrate in the BM rather than the PB, which may be due to sequestration there by homing mechanisms. As the rate of detection in the BM exceeds the proportion of patients with subsequently progressing disease, we hypothesize that only a subset of these cells can survive in the BM and evolve to clinically apparent disease.