Translation and validation of the Norwegian version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.

BACKGROUND: As patient-centered care gains more attention, assessing the patient's perspective on their recovery has become increasingly important. In response to the need for a reliable and valid patient reported outcome measurement tool for major surgical resections in Norway. The Norwegian Registry for Gastrointestinal Surgery (NORGAST) initiated a project to translate and evaluate QoR-15's psychometric properties for patients going through general, gastrointestinal (GI), and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) resectional surgery. METHODS: After a translation and adaption of the original version of QoR-15 into Norwegian, the QoR-15NO was psychometrically evaluated including a confirmatory factor analysis to test for unidimensionality, as well as tests for content validity, internal consistency, measurement error, construct validity, feasibility, and responsiveness. This process included cognitive interviews using a structured interview guide. Further, patients who underwent various types of GI/HPB surgery at five hospitals in different parts of Norway completed the QoR-15NO before surgery and on the first or second day after surgery. The impact of surgery was classified according to Surgical Outcome Risk Tool v2 (SORT), in extra major/complex, major, intermediate, and minor. RESULTS: This study included 324 patients with 83% return rate with both pre- and postoperative forms. There were negative correlations between duration of surgery and postoperative QoR-15 score and the difference between post- and preoperative score (change score). Individuals who had gone through surgery with major impact had a lower postoperative mean QoR-15 score (97) than their counterparts who had experienced either medium (QoR-15: 110) or minor (QoR15: 119) impact surgery. Cronbach's alpha (0.88) and Omega Alpha Total (ωt = 0.90) indicate that the scale has good to very good internal consistency. Test-retest reliability was measured by Intra-class Correlation Coefficient to ICC = 0.70. Confirmatory factor analyses supported that a one-factor model with correlated residuals had a good fit to data. CONCLUSION: This study supports QoR-15NO as a valid, essentially unidimensional, feasible, and responsive instrument among patients undergoing general, GI, and HPB resectional surgery in Norway. The total QoR-15NO score provides important information that can be used in an everyday clinical setting and integrated into NORGAST.

The association between perception of noise from a mechanical heart valve and symptoms of anxiety and depression.

AIM: Patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis are efficiently treated by aortic valve replacement (AVR), using a biological or mechanical valve. For some patients with mechanical valves, the metallic clicking sound may be problematic. The aim of this study was to investigate the perceived disturbance from the sound of a mechanical valve and the association between noise perception and symptoms of anxiety and depression. METHODS: and results: The study had a cross-sectional design. In April 2013, all patients who had undergone AVR at one university hospital during the period 2000-2012 were invited by post to participate. The primary variables were assessed using a valve-specific questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).Of the 912 (77%) respondents, 245 had mechanical valves. Of these, fifty-nine (24%) were women, the mean (standard deviation: SD) age was 61 (11) years, and the mean time since surgery was 7 (3) years. The valve-specific questionnaire showed that 84% of the patients could sometimes or often hear the valve sound. A moderate positive correlation was found between valve prosthesis noise disturbance and anxiety, r = 0.35 (p = 0.001), and depression, r = 0.27 (p = 0.001). In a multiple linear regression analysis, valve noise perception was only significantly associated with anxiety among several other biopsychosocial factors. CONCLUSION: This study shows an association between valve noise disturbance and symptoms of anxiety, and highlights the importance of preparing all patients for the sound from the mechanical valves that arises after surgery.

Point-of-care examinations using handheld ultrasound devices performed by intensive care nurses in a cardiac intensive care unit.

AIMS: Having nurses to perform point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) when physically examining patients to assess for early signs of decompensation and fluid overload has been proven to be feasible, provide extra information, and improve quality of care. To date, few studies have analyzed whether it is feasible for intensive care nurses to perform POCUS on critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate whether the findings of briefly trained intensive care nurses' ultrasound examinations agreed with conventional examinations performed by physicians. METHODS AND RESULTS: This comparative cross-sectional inter-rater agreement study comprised 50 patients admitted to a cardiac intensive care unit (CICU), with signs and symptoms of acute dyspnoea and suspected cardiac disease. After a brief training session, the study nurses performed standardized examinations of each patient's inferior vena cava (IVC) and the pleural and pericardial cavities using a handheld ultrasound device. A blinded physician repeated the same examinations using conventional ultrasound. Analysis using Gwet's agreement coefficient with quadratic weights showed moderate agreement for the IVC respiration variation [0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.82], and substantial agreement for the IVC diameter (0.70; 95% CI: 0.50-0.90) and right-sided pleural effusion (0.70; 95% CI: 0.52-0.88). For left-sided pleural effusion (0.85; 95% CI: 0.75-0.95) and pericardial effusion (0.95; 95% CI: 0.90-1.01), the agreement was almost perfect. CONCLUSIONS: Briefly trained intensive care nurses in a CICU can perform POCUS examinations of the IVC and pleural and pericardial cavities with moderate to almost perfect agreement with identical examinations performed by physicians.

Correlated physical and mental health composite scores for the RAND-36 and RAND-12 health surveys: can we keep them simple?

BACKGROUND: The RAND-36 and RAND-12 (equivalent to versions 1 of the SF-36 Health Survey and SF-12 Health Survey, respectively) are widely used measures of health-related quality of life. However, there are diverging views regarding how to create the physical health and mental health composite scores of these questionnaires. We present a simple approach using an unweighted linear combination of subscale scores for constructing composite scores for physical and mental health that assumes these scores should be free to correlate. The aim of this study was to investigate the criterion validity and convergent validity of these scores. METHODS: We investigated oblique and unweighted RAND-36/12 composite scores from a random sample of the general Norwegian population (N = 2107). Criterion validity was tested by examining the correlation between unweighted composite scores and weighted scores derived from oblique principal component analysis. Convergent validity was examined by analysing the associations between the different composite scores, age, gender, body mass index, physical activity, rheumatic disease, and depression. RESULTS: The correlations between the composite scores derived by the two methods were substantial (r = 0.97 to 0.99) for both the RAND-36 and RAND-12. The effect sizes of the associations between the oblique versus the unweighted composite scores and other variables had comparable magnitudes. CONCLUSION: The unweighted RAND-36 and RAND-12 composite scores demonstrated satisfactory criterion validity and convergent validity. This suggests that if the physical and mental composite scores are free to be correlated, the calculation of these composite scores can be kept simple.

Cardiovascular nurses' adherence to practice standards in in-hospital telemetry monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Correct electrode placement and proper skin preparation for cardiac telemetry monitoring of patients at risk for arrhythmias increase the quality of the arrhythmic surveillance. Inconsistent arrhythmia surveillance can compromise patient safety and care outcomes. An inspection of international literature demonstrates that nurses generally do not adhere to cardiac monitoring standards. AIM: The aims of this study were to determine cardiovascular nurses' knowledge of and adherence to practice standards for cardiac surveillance and whether their knowledge and practice improves over time. STUDY DESIGN: A comparative study design was applied, and data were obtained by survey methodology. METHODS: Nurse delegates at the Annual National Congress on Cardiovascular Nursing in Norway completed surveys in 2011 and 2017 (delegates from 44 and 38 hospitals, respectively). RESULTS: In total, 363 cardiac nurses (70%) responded to the questionnaires. Of these, 95% were female, with a mean age of 41 years. In 2011, 97% of participants were unaware of international practice standards. However, by 2017 unawareness decreased to 78% (P < .001). Despite their lack of knowledge of practice standards, 94% of participants often or always prepared patients' skin for telemetry; this improved from 2011 to 2017 (P = .001). Overall, 73% of nurses never or seldom scrubbed or washed the patients' skin before electrode placement, and 38% of the electrodes were misplaced. In 2011, 49% of nurses used protective telemetry covers; this increased to 80% in 2017 (P < .001). Overall, 64% always informed patients of the purpose of cardiac monitoring. CONCLUSION: A significant percentage of nurses fail to adhere to recommendations for electrode placement, skin preparation and providing patients with telemetry information. In order to raise the quality of arrhythmic surveillance, investment in educational programmes in cardiac telemetry monitoring is required. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Improved in-hospital telemetry practice is required to ensure patient safety and better care outcomes.

Patients' experiences 1-6 months after atrial fibrillation ablation: An holistic perspective.

AIM: To describe patients' experiences from a holistic perspective 1-6 months after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) is an invasive treatment for AF. While CA has Class 1A indication, the latest guidelines for AF management state there is an urgent need to better understand complications in clinical practice to improve the quality of AF ablation procedures. DESIGN: A qualitative analytic approach based on a deductive and descriptive design was used. METHODS: Interviews of 19 patients, carried out from September 2016 to February 2017, were analysed using qualitative content analysis. FINDINGS: Five themes were identified; one in each life dimension due to the deductive design based on a holistic model: (a) having unexpected complications with a slower recovery; (b) discovering one's own self-management strategies when lacking information and insufficient follow-up; (c) managing resentment through different coping strategies while emotional reactions depended on feeling better or worse; (d) failing to receive full understanding and support from close ones, with social consequences when the biophysical level did not return to normal; (e) gradually adopting new life perspectives with a hope for a better future, despite having unmet expectations and uncertainty, leading to discovering existential matters. CONCLUSION: Patients' post CA experiences could be understood in terms of a holistic model. Their feelings of uncertainty caused by a lack of medical follow-up led to emotional reactions, the magnitude of which depended on feeling-well or worse. Patients' need more information about possible complications, suggesting follow-up and patient education needs improvement.

Self-reported health status, treatment decision and survival in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with aortic stenosis in a Western Norway population undergoing conservative treatment: a cross-sectional study with 18 months follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate symptoms and self-reported health of patients conservatively treated for aortic stenosis (AS) and to identify factors associated with treatment decision and patient outcomes. DESIGN: A cross-sectional survey with an 18-month follow-up. SETTING: One tertiary university hospital in Western Norway. PARTICIPANTS: In all, 1436 patients were diagnosed with AS between 2000 and 2012, and those 245 still under conservative treatment in 2013 were included in this study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measures were symptoms and self-reported health status. Secondary outcomes were treatment decision and patient survival after 18 months. RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with mean (SD) age 79 (12) years, 52% men responded. Among conservatively treated patients 77% were symptomatic. The symptom most frequently experienced was dyspnoea. Symptomatic patients reported worse physical and mental health compared with asymptomatic patients (effect size 1.24 and 0.74, respectively). In addition, symptomatic patients reported significantly higher levels of anxiety and depression compared with asymptomatic patients. However, symptom status did not correlate with haemodynamic severity of AS. After 18 months, 117 (86%) were still alive, 20% had undergone surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) and 7% transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). When adjusting for age, gender, symptomatic status, severity of AS and European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE), patients with severe AS had more than sixfold chance of being scheduled for AVR or TAVI compared with those with moderate AS (HR 6.3, 95% CI 1.9 to 21.2, p=0.003). Patients with EuroSCORE ≥11 had less chance for undergoing AVR or TAVI compared with those with EuroSCORE ≤5 (HR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.46, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms affected both physical and mental health in conservatively treated patients with AS. Many patients with symptomatic severe AS are not scheduled for surgery, despite the recommendations in current guidelines. The referral practice for AVR is a path for further investigation.

Premedication and preoperative information reduces pain intensity and increases satisfaction in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation. A randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Pain and discomfort are common during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation. AIMS: To compare and evaluate the effect of premedication, standardised preoperative information and preoperative anxiety on pain intensity, drug consumption and patients' satisfaction. METHODS: Preoperative anxiety at baseline, pain intensity during RFA, and patient satisfaction after the procedure were measured in 3 random groups. Group A (n=20) received standard pain management, group B (n=20) received premedication and group C (n=20) received premedication and standardised preoperative information. RESULTS: Patients in groups B and C experienced less pain intensity (p<0.001) and needed fewer anxiolytics (p=0.023) and analgesics (p=0.031) compared to group A. Patient satisfaction was higher in group C (p=0.005) compared to group A. Increased preoperative anxiety is related to elevated drug demand (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Premedication alone or combined with preoperative information reduces and higher preoperative anxiety increases pain intensity and drug consumption during RFA. Preoperative information improves patient satisfaction.

Factors associated with poor self-reported health status after aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant bypass surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Improving patients' health status is a central goal for cardiac surgery. Knowledge remains sparse on how combined CABG or other factors influence long-term, self-reported health status after aortic valve replacement (AVR). The aims of this study were (i) to identify significant factors influencing self-reported health status of patients assessed up to 13 years after AVR; and (ii) to compare their health with the age- and gender-matched general population. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was sent to 1191 patients who had undergone AVR with or without concomitant CABG between 2000 and 2012. Physical and mental sum scores of Short Form 12 were used as dependent variables and 34 independent variables including the Minnesota living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) were evaluated by hierarchical linear regression. A comparison was made with the Norwegian general population. Clinical data were obtained from the local cardiac surgery database. RESULTS: In all, 912 patients (77%) responded (mean age: 73 years; 63% men). Of these, 59% had an isolated AVR. The mean assessment interval since surgery was 6 years. Several factors significantly predicted worse physical health: low education level (b: -2.8, P = 0.005), higher preoperative EuroSCORE (b: -0.88, P = 0.007), high NYHA class (b: -4.5, P < 0.001), depression (b: -5.62, P = 0.012), worse MLHFQ physical scores (b: -0.70, P < 0.001), arthritis (b: -5.13, P = 0.003), osteoporosis (b: -6.96, P = 0.010) and cancer (b: -4.48, P = 0.047) accounting for 60% of the variation (P < 0.001). Living alone (b: -3.60, P < 0.001), anxiety (b: -12.99, P < 0.001), depression (b: -6.82, P < 0.001) and worse MLHFQ emotional score (b: -0.50, P < 0.001) predicted poor mental health status, and explained 58% of the variation among AVR patients (P < 0.001). Both genders had poorer physical and mental health than their age-matched general population peers, particularly those in older age groups. CONCLUSIONS: AVR patients, regardless of gender, had worse physical and mental health than the general population. Living alone, educational level, physical symptom status, anxiety and depression were the most important predictors of physical and mental health status after AVR. Implementing new screening protocols for psychosocial risk factors and individualized rehabilitation programmes may contribute to improved health in AVR patients.

European cardiac nurses' current practice and knowledge on anticoagulation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Successful management of warfarin, new anti-thrombotic agents and self-monitoring devices requires that health care professionals effectively counsel and educate patients. Previous studies indicate that health care professionals do not always have the knowledge to provide patients with the correct information. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to investigate European cardiovascular nurses' knowledge on the overall management of anticoagulation therapy and examine if this knowledge was influenced by level of education and years in clinical practice. METHODS: A questionnaire including 47 items on practice patterns and knowledge on warfarin, new anticoagulants, warfarin-drug and warfarin-food interactions, and self-management of International Normalized Ratio (INR) was distributed to the attendants at a European conference in 2012. RESULTS: The response rate was 32% (n=206), of whom 84% reported having direct patient contact. Warfarin was the most common used oral anticoagulation in daily practice. One third offered their patients both patient self-testing and patient self-management of INR. The mean total score on the knowledge questions was 28±6 (maximum possible score 53). Nurses in direct patient care had a higher mean score (p=0.011). Knowledge on warfarin and medication-interactions were low, but knowledge on warfarin-diet interactions and how to advise patients on warfarin as somewhat better. CONCLUSION: European cardiac nurses need to improve their knowledge and practice patterns on oral anticoagulation therapy. This area of knowledge is important in order to deliver optimal care to cardiac patients and to minimise adverse effects of the treatment.

Adapting to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve: a phenomenographic study.

AIM: To describe how patients adapt to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve. BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis is preferred for patients with life expectancy of more than 10 years as they are more durable than bioprosthetic valves. Mechanical valves have some disadvantages, such as higher risk of thrombosis and embolism, increased risk of bleeding related to lifelong oral anticoagulation treatment and noise from the valve. DESIGN: An explorative design with a phenomenographic approach was employed. METHODS: An explorative design with a phenomenographic approach was applied. Interviews were conducted over 4 months during 2010-2011 with 20 strategically sampled patients, aged 24-74 years having undergone aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis during the last 10 years. FINDINGS: Patients adapted to living with a mechanical aortic heart valve in four ways: 'The competent patient' wanted to stay in control of his/her life. 'The adjusted patient' considered the implications of having a mechanical aortic valve as part of his/her daily life. 'The unaware patient' was not aware of warfarin-diet-medication interactions. 'The worried patient' was bothered with the oral anticoagulation and annoyed by the sound of the valve. Patients moved between the different ways of adapting. CONCLUSIONS: The oral anticoagulation therapy was considered the most troublesome consequence, but also the sound of the valve was difficult to accept. Patient counselling and adequate follow-up can make patients with mechanical aortic heart valves more confident and competent to manage their own health. We recommend that patients should participate in a rehabilitation programme following cardiac surgery.

The relationship between in-hospital information and patient satisfaction after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Rehabilitation after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) presupposes that patients are provided with sufficient information and education to cope with the consequences of the disease. Furthermore, patient information is an important premise for patient satisfaction. AIMS: To explore and describe the relationship between received information and satisfaction with health care after AMI. In addition, we wanted to describe areas for improvement of patients' health care. METHODS: A questionnaire comprising 1) the Information Questionnaire and 2) the Patient Experience Questionnaire was sent to AMI patients, 6 weeks after discharge from hospital. One hundred and eleven patients participated. RESULTS: In general patients were highly satisfied with their health care and the more information the patient reported to receive, the more satisfied he/she was with the hospital stay. Patients were least satisfied with information about medication and possible future problems. These were the areas that patients received least information about and were also identified as the areas with greatest potential for improvement. Amount of information received was not associated to length of hospital stay. Although, younger patients reported receiving more information than older patients during the hospital stay, it was the youngest that missed information after discharge. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that it is necessary to examine the current provision of in-hospital information and education to AMI patients. Patients want more information at discharge and after returning home.