RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Implementation of care bundles was shown to reduce the incidence of device-associated infections (DAIs). Substantial improvements in the rate of infection have been achieved by applying educational programs for infection control. Objectives: To demonstrate the impact of a comprehensive care bundle educational program (CCBEP) on DAIs, mortality rates in an emergency Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and improving healthcare workers (HCWs') knowledge, compliance to care bundle, and infection control practice. METHODS: A quasi-experimental study was carried out in an 15-beds emergency ICU, from May 2017 to October 2018. A comprehensive care bundle educational program was implemented. It covers items regarding device care bundle and infection control. RESULTS: Device care bundle compliance was variable between different bundle items. There was a significant improvement in HCWs' knowledge after the educational program intervention especially in hand hygiene, catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) bundle, and total knowledge. There was a higher risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and CAUTI in the pre-intervention phase compared to post-intervention (RR: 1.4, 1.4, and 1.9 respectively). The total mortality rate decreased from 24.2/100 to 16.7/100 patients after intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant improvement in compliance with device care bundles with a decrease in the incidence of DAIs.
RESUMEN
Improving the practices of antimicrobial use in hospitals, especially in developing countries, is a challenging duty. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the effect of certain stewardship actions on the use of antibiotics for device-associated infections in the emergency intensive care unit in Egypt. MEHODS: The intervention included establishment of AS team, design an antibiogram and preparation of antibiotic use guidelines, education, and infection prevention and control measures. Pre- and postinterventions surveys tookplace including: antibiotic prescription compliance, antibiotic cost, bacterial profile and antibiotic resistance rates. RESULTS: Antibiotic prescription compliance improved, especially for prophylactic antibiotics prescription; in preintervention phase, 27.4% of cases received unindicated antibiotic prophylaxis vs 5.8% after intervention. A statistically significant decrease in cost after the intervention was reported (p = 0.04). Acinetobacter baumannii and Klebsiella pneumonia were the most frequently isolated pathogens (25.6%) and (21.8%) in pre and post-intervention phases respectively. A statistically significant decrease in the prevalence of MDR (X² = 11.9, p = 0.009) was observed. The most prevalent XDR is K-pneumonia (45% vs 17%) in phase 1&3. No pan drug-resistant isolates were detected. CONCLUSION: Sound antibiotic guidelines coupled with effective infection control precautions and education would be a good intervention, particularly with a leadership commitment. The use of microbiology tests to direct prescribing decisions should be a underscored. Sustained research initiatives may support the proper implementation of AS programmes in limited resource settings.
