Atypical Vancouver B1 Periprosthetic Fractures: The Unsolved Problem.

Atypical femoral fractures (AFF) are stress or insufficiency fractures induced by low energy trauma or no trauma, frequently correlated with prolonged bisphosphonate therapy. The diagnosis follows major and minor criteria, originally described by the Task Force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research in 2010 and updated in 2014. However, the definition of AFFs in the report excluded periprosthetic fractures. When atypical fractures occur close to a prosthetic implant the situation become critical, the surgical treatment is often demolitive and supported by medical treatment. Moreover, acute ORIF as a first line treatment is frequently burdened by a high failure rate , and often a stem revision is required as second line treatment. The healing process is long and difficult with poor functional results and impairing outcomes. We present a case treated at our institution of a 78 year old woman with a history of a femoral atypical periprosthetic fracture, complicated by multiple surgical revisions. Its arduous management reflects all the difficulties that these type of fractures could present to the surgeon, while its good final result may teach us how to approach them in a correct way.

Choice of treatments of the coronal shear fractures of the humerus. A national survey of Italian AO members.

INTRODUCTION: Coronal shear fractures of the distal humerus are uncommon injuries representing 6% of distal humeral fractures. There is no univocal consensus about the correct management of this type of fracture. A national survey was conducted to gain more insight into the current classification, diagnosis and treatment of coronal shear fractures in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A postal survey was sent to all AO Italian members including residency orthopaedic surgeons. The survey consisted of general questions about personal experience in the management of these fractures: types of classification systems used, surgical approaches, treatment options and rehabilitation programs. RESULTS: 114 orthopaedic surgeons answered a 13-items questionnaire. The most used classification system was AO/OTA (72,8%). Independent screws and if necessary plates were the most answered regarding surgical treatment (81,6%). The most encountered post-surgical complication was stiffening of the elbow (81,6%). CONCLUSION: An algorithm of treatment has been proposed. To better classify coronal shear fractures, the authors recommended the integration of two classification systems: AO and Dubberley classifications. In the case of posterior wall comminution, a Kocher extensile approach is recommended, otherwise, if a posterior wall is intact, Kocher or Kaplan approach can be used. The posterior transolecranic approach can be reserved to Dubberley type III or AO 13B3.3. The best treatment choice is represented by independent screws and plates placed according to fracture patterns while arthroplasty is indicated when a stable ORIF is not possible. Mobilization is postponed for about 2 weeks.

A Newly Identified Complication of Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: Case Report and Literature Review.

Background: Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) is a surgical option for patients older than 40 years old who are affected by patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Regarding the complications of PFAs, few studies have investigated periprosthetic fractures. The purpose of this literature review was to highlight a previously overlooked complication of primary prosthetic surgery of the patellofemoral joint. Methods: Three literature databases were searched for studies published between 2000 to 2020 using relevant keywords. A total of 4,942 articles were originally identified. After excluding duplicates and analysing the titles and abstracts, 20 studies were considered. From these, data regarding the number of cases, clinical outcomes and complications were extracted. Results: Among the 20 selected articles, only one described periprosthetic fractures as a complication of PFAs. Herein, we also report an illustrative case of an unknown fracture complication. No cases in the literature were found that described the type of complications experienced by our patient during the postoperative period. Conclusions: This review confirms the lack of data about clinical outcomes and fracture complications of PFAs. In primary prosthetic surgery of the patellofemoral joint, patient selection and close consideration of demographic factors (such as BMI and age) and intraoperative factors (such as patellar thickness and size of the trochlear component) play a key role in optimising pre-operative planning to avoid intraoperative periprosthetic fractures.

Is the Posterior Approach With Posterior locking compression plate and Anterior Allograft Useful and Safe in the Treatment of Periprosthetic Humeral Fractures Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Introduction: As the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) surgery has dramatically increased in the last few decades, many complications have followed through. The periprosthetic fracture, at the moment, is still a subject of debate in the orthopedic world. In this monocentric study, along with a literature review of periprosthetic humeral fractures, we would present our institutional experience with the treatment of periprosthetic humeral fractures with a posterior humeral approach, posterior cortex plate fixation, anterior strut allograft, screws, and cerclage wires. Materials and Methods: Our study consisted in a prospective monocentric study based on 18 patients, with a mean age of 75.3 years (range 64-88), all following a reverse shoulder total arthroplasty (RTSA). Postoperative follow-ups were taken at 1, 6, and 12 months with objective measurement of shoulder motion and strength, while clinical outcome measures were assessed using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES score) and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain. Together with that, we performed a literature review focused on the management of periprosthetic humeral fractures after shoulder arthroplasty. Results: All fractures consolidated without complication at a mean 4.2 months (range 3-6). At final follow-up, the average active shoulder flexion was 88° (range 62-129°), active abduction 73° (range 52-91°) and active external rotation 22° (range 3-56°). The average ASES score was 73 (range 59-97), while average VAS score was 1.1 (range 0-3). Discussion: Surgical treatment of periprosthetic humeral fractures following a shoulder arthroplasty remains a hard challenge for every surgeon, and their treatment must consider fracture's location, displacement, and local bone quality. Conclusions: The posterior approach with a posterior plate placement and anterior strut allograft, which is appliable only in case of a B or C type fracture according to Worland classification, could be a good treatment option for periprosthetic humeral fractures.

Use of the 95-degree angled blade plate with biological and mechanical augmentation to treat proximal femur non-unions: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric non-union are rare but challenging complications. In the present study, we investigate the use of a 95° blade, in association with biological and mechanical augmentation, in the management of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral non-unions. METHODS: Between October 2015 and February 2021, a retrospective cohort study was conducted at our institution to investigate the use of a 95° blade, in association with biological and mechanical augmentation, in the management of intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral non-unions, following the mechanical failure of the first device. All the patients underwent a clinical and radiographic follow-up at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months; at each follow-up, a plain radiograph of the femur was performed and patients were assessed using Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Short Form-12 (SF-12) questionnaire. RESULTS: From October 2015 and February 2021, 40 proximal femur non-unions were managed at our Institution. Fifteen patients out of forty (37.5%) met the inclusion criteria. The main data of the study are summarized in Table 1; patients' mean was 57 years old (range 19-83); 10 males and 5 females were included in the study. All the patients completely healed clinically and radiologically at an average of 6.1 months (range 4-13). All these patients returned to their pre-injury mobility status. During an average follow-up period of 25 months (range 8-60), the observed complications included wound dehiscence, which was treated with a superficial surgical debridement, a below-the-knee deep vein thrombosis, and a blade plate failure 3 months after the first revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows the treatment of inter-and sub-trochanteric non-unions with a 95° blade plate, medial strut allograft, and bone autograft obtained with RIA system, together with a varus malalignment correction, leads to a high percentage of bone healing, with a low incidence of complications and good clinical outcome.

Modular neck stems in total hip arthroplasty: current concepts.

Modular neck (MN) implants can restore the anatomy, especially in deformed hips such as sequelae of development dysplasia.Early designs for MN implants had problems with neck fractures and adverse local tissue, so their use was restricted to limited indications.Results of the latest generation of MN prostheses seem to demonstrate that these problems have been at least mitigated.Given the results of the studies presented in this review, surgeons might consider MN total hip arthroplasty (THA) for a narrower patient selection when a complex reconstruction is required.Long MN THA should be avoided in case of body mass index > 30, and should be used with extreme caution in association with high offset femoral necks with long or extra-long heads. Cr-Co necks should be abandoned, in favour of a titanium alloy connection.Restoring the correct anatomic femoral offset remains a challenge in THA surgeries.MN implants have been introduced to try to solve this problem. The MN design allows surgeons to choose the appropriate degree and length of the neck for desired stability and range of motion. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:751-758. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200064.

Minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique in the treatment of transverse patellar fractures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: This prospective study aims to describe our experience in the management of transverse patellar fractures in elderly patients with minimally invasive osteosynthesis technique (MIOT), at 12-months follow-up. METHODS: Patients older than 60, with transverse patellar fracture, type 34-C1 according to the AO/OTA classification system, referred to our trauma centre, between January 2014 and December 2017 were prospectively recruited. All the patients were managed using MIOT surgical procedure and underwent a clinical and radiological follow-up at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and at 3, 6, 12 and 15 months postoperatively. The clinical evaluation was performed using the Lysholm Knee Scoring System (LKSS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain. The hardware removal was planned at 12-months follow-up. The paired t-test was performed. The test was two-tailed with a confidence level of 5%. RESULTS: 61 patients were recruited. The mean VAS was significantly lower in MIOT group until the 3-months follow-up (p = 0.001). ROM in flexion and LKSS score were significantly better in MIOT-group at all follow-ups, whereas ROM in extension showed no differences, between the two groups, starting from the 6-months follow-up. In the open surgery group, a significantly higher rate of delayed wound healing (p = 0.014), broken wires (p = 0.001) and non-cosmetic scar (p = 0.0221) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study shows that MIOT is a safe option for treatment of patellar transverse fractures in elderly patients, since it reduces the intra-operative blood loss, shortens the operating time, and is endowed with lower rates of postoperative complications.

Early surgical treatment of first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocation in a young, active population is superior to conservative management at long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term effectiveness of non-operative treatment with immediate arthroscopic surgical stabilization in young, active patients after first-time anterior glenohumeral dislocation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients aged 15-25 years who suffered primary traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocation were enrolled in this prospective, non-randomized investigation. In total, 160 patients were enrolled-64 opted for surgical stabilization (group A), while 96 opted for conservative treatment (group B). At final follow-up of over 6.5 years, 60 patients in group A (96.7% males, age 22.8 ± 3.2) and 70 patients in group B (90.0% males, age 20.8 ± 2.9) were evaluated with physical examination, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and radiological studies. Recurrence and return to sport (RTS) data were collected, and variables were compared between groups. RESULTS: Recurrence rate in group A was 13.3% at mean latency of 3.3 ± 1.9 years, compared to 71.4% at mean latency of 2.1 ± 1.5 years in group B (P < 0.001 for both recurrence rate and latency). In group A, 70.0% of patients RTS at the pre-injury level, versus 41.4% of patients in group B (P < 0.001). Patients in group A scored significantly higher on all PROMs (all P < 0.001) and had significantly less osteoarthritis (P = 0.004), when compared to group B. CONCLUSION: Acute surgical stabilization of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in young, active patients is more effective than conservative treatment at long-term follow up, based on lower recurrence rate, better RTS, and higher patient-perceived improvement.