Minimizing Septectomy for Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Approaches to the Sellar and Suprasellar Regions: A Cadaveric Morphometric Study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of posterior septectomy size on surgical exposure and surgical freedom during the endoscopic transsphenoidal approach to the sella and parasellar region. Dissections were performed on 10 embalmed cadaver heads. Dissections started with wide bilateral sphenoidotomies, lateralization of middle turbinates, and a 5-mm posterior septectomy. The posterior septectomy was increased in 5-mm increments to a maximum of 35 mm, followed by bilateral middle turbinectomies. Surgical exposure was defined as the distance between the ipsilateral and contralateral limit of exposure as allowed by the posterior septum along a midsphenoid horizontal meridian. Surgical freedom was defined as the angle between the ipsilateral and contralateral limit. The mean baseline width of the posterior sphenoid sinus was 29.4 ± 3.7 mm. With a 5-mm septectomy, the mean width of surgical exposure was 21.1 ± 2.8 mm. The surgical exposure increased significantly with progressively larger posterior septectomy until a 20-mm posterior septectomy, after which no further increase in surgical exposure or freedom was obtained. Bilateral lateral opticocarotid recesses were accessible with a 15-mm posterior septectomy. The addition of bilateral middle turbinectomies did not significantly increase lateral exposure within the sphenoid sinus compared with middle turbinate lateralization.

Perforation of a nasoseptal flap does not increase the rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak.

BACKGROUND: The nasoseptal flap (NSF) has been shown to be a valuable addition to the reconstructive armamentarium of the endoscopic skull-base surgeon. We aimed to evaluate the rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak after use of a NSF that had a small tear during harvest. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we analyzed our database of patients undergoing skull-base resection. We included all patients who had a NSF reconstruction, septoplasty, and/or spur on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging. We then evaluated video of each procedure to determine if a tear occurred in the NSF during harvest. Patient records were reviewed to determine if a postoperative CSF leak occurred. RESULTS: We evaluated video of 21 patients who underwent a skull-base resection, were reconstructed with a NSF, and had either a septoplasty or evidence of a septal spur on CT imaging. Of these 21 cases, 11 small tears occurred during harvest of the NSF flap and none of the patients with a torn NSF had a postoperative CSF leak. CONCLUSION: Our series shows a 0% postoperative CSF leak rate in patients undergoing skull-base reconstruction with a NSF that was torn during harvest. Small tears in the NSF do not seem to affect postoperative CSF leak rates.