Quality of life and decisional regret after total glossectomy with laryngectomy: A single-institution case series.

OBJECTIVES: Total glossectomy with total laryngectomy is a life-altering procedure reserved for extensive or recurrent head and neck cancer. There is minimal literature describing quality of life in these patients, partly due to high mortality rates. METHODS: Patients who had undergone a total glossectomy with laryngectomy between 2014 and 2021 at our institution, identified by chart review, were eligible. Four validated scales were used to assess quality of life and satisfaction with decision. RESULTS: Four of five survivors agreed to participate. The average scores for the Satisfaction with Decision scale and the University of Washington Quality of Life scale were 4.4/5 and 70/100, respectively, showing that patients were satisfied with their decision and quality of life. However, the average function score for the UW-QoL scale, 36.4/100, highlights negative effects of the procedure on mood, oral function, and activity. CONCLUSIONS: This case description provides a picture of patients' quality of life after total glossectomy with laryngectomy, which may be useful for counseling future patients.

Survival and functional outcomes after total glossectomy with total laryngectomy: Case series from a high-volume tertiary institution.

OBJECTIVES: Total glossectomy with total laryngectomy (TGTL) is indicated for some cases of advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. However, this procedure is rarely performed, as quality of life outcomes are often considered poor. Consequently, few studies to date have reported survival and functional outcomes in patients undergoing TGTL. Here, we present the largest cases series to date of TGTL patients and provide relevant data on survival and functional outcomes. METHODS: Patients met inclusion criteria if they underwent TGTL (concurrent or staged) indicated for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Patient demographics and disease characteristics, survival outcomes, functional oral intake scores, time to oral intake, gastrostomy tube dependence, and communication methods post-surgery were retrospectively extracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Survival in patients undergoing TGTL was poor. Most patients in this study were eventually approved for some oral intake of restricted consistencies but remained gastrostomy tube dependent for most of their nutritional needs. Baseline oral intake was suboptimal in most patients but often re-achieved approximately 12 months following surgery. Communication methods following surgery included writing, text-to-speech, and augmentative and alternative communication devices. CONCLUSION: Our data provide new insights comparing survival and functional outcomes of patients undergoing TGTL. Additional investigation particularly on patient-perceived quality of life following TGTL is needed to better understand the risks and benefits for patients who are candidates for TGTL.

Survival, functional, and quality of life outcomes between total glossectomy with and without total laryngectomy: A narrative review.

BACKGROUND: A total glossectomy (TG) may be required for advanced tongue tumors. TG with total laryngectomy (TGL) may be indicated in some cases with tumor extension into the larynx or high risk of aspiration. Total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation (TGLP) may preserve phonation ability relative to TGL, yet TGLP may increase the risk of aspiration. METHODS: For this narrative review, we performed a comprehensive literature search of studies relevant to TG and TGL. Clinical studies investigating survival, functional outcomes, and quality of life in following TGLP or TGL were of particular interest. RESULTS: Few studies in the literature directly compare survival, functional, and quality of life (QOL) outcomes between TGLP and TGL. TGLP is associated with intelligible speech. However, studies investigating gastrostomy tube dependence following TGLP versus TGL have generated conflicting results. CONCLUSION: Further research on functional and QOL outcomes in patients undergoing TGL or TGLP is needed.

TORS elective lingual tonsillectomy has less acute morbidity than therapeutic base of tongue TORS.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of diagnostic TORS lingual tonsillectomy (DTLT) on objective swallowing measures for carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). METHODS: Between 10/2016-1/2020, 27 patients with p16+ squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) level 2a nodal disease underwent DTLT and ipsilateral neck dissection for CUP. No patient had a history of cutaneous SCC. Patients participated in Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) three weeks post-TORS, which were then compared to those from a contemporaneous cohort of 40 patients with clinically-identified p16+ base of tongue (BOT) primary tumors. DIGEST scores were retrospectively calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis performed, stratified by BOT glossectomy (n = 40) versus lingual tonsillectomy for CUP (n = 27). Radiation to the resected primary or potential primary sources was omitted if margins were ≥3 mm or if no primary identified. RESULTS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients with clinical stage cT0N1 HPV-associated OPSCC had a BOT primary pathologically identified in 18/27 (67%). Univariate analysis of functional swallow assessment on MBSImP correlated with improved post-TORS DIGEST scores for CUP. On multivariate analysis (MVA) DIGEST safety scores were improved for CUP than cT1 BOT glossectomy [Odds Ratio (OR) 0.28, p = 0.038]. MVA on matched pT1 CUP (n = 27) vs. pT1 BOT (n = 19), OR of moderate/severe dysphagia for CUP was 0.54 [0.12-2.38, p = 0.417] for DIGEST safety scores and 0.27 [0.06-1.18, p = 0.082] for DIGEST efficiency scores. Moderate/severe dysphagia as determined by DIGEST overall scores for CUP compared to cT1 and pT1 yielded an OR of 0.39 (p = 0.081) and 0.42 (p = 0.195), respectively. Twenty-six total patients received adjuvant RT, and 18 (11 with ≥3 mm margins, 9 with negative specimens) were spared intentional RT to the oropharynx. Median follow-up was 22.6 months with 100% PFS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing DTLT for CUP demonstrated acute swallow defecits in the post-operative setting. A comparison of long-term functional results between DTLT and elective irradiation of the primary site should be studied. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Characterizing postoperative physiologic swallow function following transoral robotic surgery for early stage tonsil, base of tongue, and unknown primary human papillomavirus-associated squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Data objectively evaluating acute post-transoral robotic surgery (TORS) swallow function are limited. Our goal was to characterize and identify clinical variables that may impact swallow function components 3 weeks post-TORS. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Pre/postoperative use of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was completed on 125 of 139 TORS patients (2016-2019) with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scores were retrospectively calculated. Uni/multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Dysfunctional pre-TORS DIGEST scores were predictive of post-TORS dysphagia (p = 0.015). Pre-TORS MBSImP deficits in pharyngeal stripping wave, swallow initiation, and clearing pharyngeal residue correlated with airway invasion post-TORS based on PAS scores (p = 0.012, 0.027, 0.048, respectively). Multivariate analysis of DIGEST safety scores declined with older age (p = 0.044). Odds ratios (ORs) for objective swallow function components after TORS were better for unknown primary and tonsil primaries compared to base of tongue (BOT) (OR 0.35-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative impairments in specific MBSImP components, older patients, and BOT primaries may predict more extensive recovery in swallow function after TORS.

Functional outcomes and quality of life after total laryngectomy with noncircumferential radial forearm free tissue transfer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare long-term functional and quality of life (QOL) outcomes after total laryngectomy with primary closure and those who underwent reconstruction with noncircumferential radial free forearm tissue transfer (RFFTT). METHODS: Sixty-seven patients were identified by chart review and underwent long-term follow-up using QOL surveys and standardized interviews. RESULTS: The RFFTT group had significantly higher rates of chemotherapy, gastric tube (G-tube) at surgery, and postoperative stricture. At follow-up, most patients (88%) had a tracheoesophageal prosthesis (TEP) and were using it as their primary communication method. Diet and swallowing outcomes were comparable and no one had a G-tube. Device life and TEP complications did not differ significantly. Only voice-related QOL differed significantly between the RFFTT group and those who had undergone total laryngectomy without adjuvant treatment. CONCLUSION: Despite more extensive treatment, the reconstructed group achieved comparable outcomes to those who had undergone total laryngectomy with adjuvant treatment.

Dysphagia after Stroke: an Overview.

Dysphagia affects the vast majority of acute stroke patients. Although it improves within 2 weeks for most, some face longstanding swallowing problems that place them at risk for pneumonia, malnutrition, dehydration, and significantly affect quality of life. This paper discusses the scope, the disease burden, and the tools available for screening and formal evaluation of dysphagia. The most common and recently developed treatment interventions that might be useful in the treatment of this population are discussed.