How general practitioners perceive the aging trajectory of oldest-old - A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: A new population of older people is growing: the oldest-old. The care of the oldest-old (individuals aged 90 and over) is a new challenge in primary care. This study aimed to analyze the perception of General Practitioners (GP) on (1) the aging process of their patients up to a very advanced age, (2) how to adapt their practice to the care of these patients. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using focus group (face to face) and individual (video call) interviews of GPs in southwest France. The sampling was purposive. We analyzed the interviews using an inductive approach based on the phases of thematic analysis. We used researchers' triangulation during the process. Collection was concluded when saturation was reached. RESULTS: Three focus groups and one individual interview were conducted with a total of seventeen general practitioners. GP perception concerning aging and very advanced age were based on their personal experience and their daily clinical practice. Aging was perceived as an individual, unconscious, unpredictable and irreversible phenomenon. The shift towards "very old age" appeared inevitable. It could be a physical or psychological shift, or patients neglecting themselves or lacking a project. The care of the oldest-old became more specific and individual, adapted to the wishes of the patient. Those adaptations involve medical disengagement to focus on the most essential outcomes. The objectives of health care needed to be less strict with limited invasive practices. Prevention needed to focus mainly on prevention of falls and limitation of functional decline. CONCLUSION: GPs identified an inevitable and unpredictable shift from old age to very old age. The adaption of the theory of disengagement allowed us to identify a medical disengagement of the GPs in the care of their oldest patients.

The shift from old age to very old age: an analysis of the perception of aging among older people.

BACKGROUND: The oldest-old (individuals over 90 years) are a fast-growing population. Understanding the perceptions of older people about very old age is the first step towards developing optimal geriatric care for an aging population. This study aimed to explore the potential shift from old age to very old age through the exploration of older people's perception of aging. METHODS: Qualitative study conducted through individual interviews in the homes of older people. We voluntarily chose to include persons a decade under and above 90 years old to explore other factors than age that could participate in the shift from old age to very old age. The sampling was theoretical. We carried out the analyses using an inductive approach based on the phases of grounded theory. The researchers used triangulation. Collection was concluded when theoretical saturation was reached. RESULTS: Fourteen participants were interviewed. The shift from old age to very old age was not based on age but occurred when participants became conscious of the irreversibility of aging and its effects, and when they started living day-by-day, renouncing to any plan in a near future. The transition to very old age seemed to be preceded by a progressive disengagement from non-essentials activities. Participants reported a sensation of progressive social exclusion due to the loss of contemporaries or spouse, the difficulty to connect with younger generations or the absence of relationships in their neighborhood. The last step of life was feared, not because of the idea of death itself but because of the associated suffering and loss of autonomy. CONCLUSION: Precipitating and slowing factors of the shift to very old age were identified to help general practitioners support older patients throughout their life trajectories.

Factors Associated with Potentially Inappropriate Transfer to the Emergency Department among Nursing Home Residents.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors associated with the potentially inappropriate transfer of nursing home (NH) residents to emergency departments (EDs) and to compare hospitalization costs before and after transfer of individuals addressed inappropriately vs those addressed appropriately. DESIGN: Multicenter, observational, case-control study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 17 hospitals in France, 1037 NH residents. MEASURES: All NH residents transferred to the 17 public hospitals' EDs in southern France were systematically included for 1 week per season. An expert panel composed of family physicians, emergency physicians, geriatricians, and pharmacists defined whether the transfer was potentially inappropriate or appropriate. Residents' and NHs' characteristics and contextual factors were entered into a mixed logistic regression to determine factors associated independently with potentially inappropriate transfers. Hospital costs were collected in the national health insurance claims database for the 6 months before and after the transfer. RESULTS: A total of 1037 NH residents (mean age 87.2 ± 7.1, 68% female) were transferred to the ED; 220 (21%) transfers were considered potentially inappropriate. After adjustment, anorexia [odds ratio (OR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-3.71], high level of disability (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99), and inability to receive prompt medical advice (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.20-2.32) were significantly associated with increased likelihood of potentially inappropriate transfers. The existence of an Alzheimer's disease special care unit in the NH (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.92), NH staff trained on advance directives (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.89), and calling the SAMU (mobile emergency medical unit) (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.66) were significantly associated with a lower probability of potentially inappropriate transfer. Although the 6-month hospitalization costs prior to transfer were higher among potentially inappropriate transfers compared with appropriate transfers (€6694 and €4894, respectively), transfer appropriateness was not significantly associated with hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Transfers from NHs to hospital EDs were frequently appropriate. Transfer appropriateness was conditioned by NH staff training, access to specialists' medical advice, and calling the SAMU before making transfer decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02677272.

Evolution of Reactions to Uncertainty Among Residents During a Clinical Rotation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: For residents, uncertainty can be a source of motivation, interest, and stimulation, but it can also cause fear and anxiety that can lead to burn-out. Considering the prevalence of uncertainty in family medicine and the potential reactions from residents, reactions to uncertainty constitute an important research topic. This study sought to measure the evolution of reactions to uncertainty of family medicine residents in their first and second year, during a 6-month clinical rotation in a family physician's office. METHODS: This study utilized a prospective epidemiological cohort design of first- and second-year family medicine residents during a 6-month clinical rotation in a family physician's office during the 2018-2019 academic year. Data were collected at the beginning and end of the clinical rotation for the entire student population using the Physicians' Reactions to Uncertainty (PRU) questionnaire. RESULTS: One hundred-two respondents were matched at the end of the clinical rotation and were included in the analysis. At baseline, there were no significant differences between first- and second-year residents in each dimension of the PRU. Anxiety due to uncertainty decreased significantly in residents of both years. Concern about bad outcomes decreased, but not significantly, in both years. Reluctance to disclose uncertainty to patients decreased in first-year residents. CONCLUSIONS: During a 6-month clinical rotation, anxiety due to uncertainty decreased in first- and second-year residents. The frequency and the type of uncertain situations residents encountered could be investigated in future studies to better understand residents' reactions to uncertainty.

Cognitive, functional, physical, and nutritional status of the oldest old encountered in primary care: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The oldest old (individuals over 90 years) are a fast-growing population. Characterizing their specificity would be helpful to adapt health care. This study aimed to characterize the cognitive, functional, nutritional, and physical status of individuals over 90. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of cross-sectional or cohort studies of individuals aged 90 years old or more, living at home or in a nursing home, in April 2018. Two reviewers selected eligible articles, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias (assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale). RESULTS: The search strategy identified 3086 references; 35 articles were included referring to 8 cross-sectional and 27 longitudinal studies. Dementia was diagnosed in 30-42.9% of study participants, cognitive impairment in 12-50%, and 31-65% had no cognitive impairment. In terms of activities of daily living, 14-72.6% of individuals had no difficulty, 35.6-38% had difficulty, and 14.4-55.5% were dependent. For instrumental activities of daily living, 20-67.9% needed help. Regarding nutritional status, the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form mean score ranged from 10.3 (SD: 1.8) to 11.1 (SD: 2.4). Eight to 32% of individuals could not stand up from a chair, 19-47% could stand without the use of their arms; and 12.9-15% were not able to walk 4 m. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest a heterogeneous population with a certain proportion of oldest old with a low level of disability. These findings suggest that a specific approach in the care of the oldest old could help prevent disability.

Teaching Basic Knowledge on Substance Use Disorders: The Impact of e-Learning on Health Professionals.

PURPOSE: Recent evolution toward a medical perspective on patients with substance use disorders (SUDs) has led to a lack of medical training in substance abuse. To increase this knowledge, a distance learning course ("e-learning") was implemented to teach the general concepts of SUDs to medical residents and health professionals before delivering on-campus courses. The purpose was to evaluate the impact on participants' basic knowledge. METHODS: The e-learning on the general concepts of SUDs was based on short voiced presentations and additional educational material. It was proposed to 2 populations: medical residents in general practice and health professionals in continuing education. All of the participants answered questionnaires before and after the distance learning course to evaluate their basic knowledge of SUDs. These questionnaires were analyzed along with a satisfaction questionnaire to assess both the acquired knowledge about SUDs and the satisfaction level. FINDINGS: Participants moved toward higher test scores independently of their initial background and for all the educational objectives targeted by the teachers. The mean progression on a 20-point scale between the pretest and posttest questionnaires was 5.48 (2.63) for health professionals and 5.90 (2.20) for residents in general practice. Satisfaction was rated 4 or 5 on a 5-point Likert scale by at least 84.2% of participants. IMPLICATIONS: This study is the first evaluation of an online pedagogical tool on SUDs. The positive feedback from participants encourages pursuing development of this e-learning. Used before on-campus courses, it provides an attractive educational option to overcome the usual limitations of online classes.

Patterns of gabapentin and pregabalin use and misuse: Results of a population-based cohort study in France.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the use and factors associated with the misuse of gabapentin and pregabalin in the general French population, through a cohort study in the EGB (General Sample of Beneficiaries), a national representative sample of the French general population. METHODS: New users of gabapentin and pregabalin were identified from June 2006 to December 2014, and new users of duloxetine served as control group. Misuse was defined as a use of higher daily doses than recommended. Cox proportional hazard regression models were performed to identify associated factors of misuse. RESULTS: Misuse was more frequent in the 8692 new users of pregabalin (12.8%) than in the 1963 gabapentin (6.6%) or the 3214 duloxetine new users (9.7%) (P < 0.001). Factors associated with misuse were pregabalin (hazard ratio [HR] 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.29-1.69]), age (HR[18-45] versus > 70 years 1.98 [1.70-2.31] and HR[58-70] versus > 70 years 1.25 [1.06-1.47]), multiple prescribers (HR2 or 3 versus 1 prescriber 1.29 [1.15-1.45]; HR4 or more versus 1 prescriber 1.54 [1.30-1.83]), cancer (1.28 [1.11-1.47]), multiple sclerosis (1.53 [1.07-2.18]), neuropathy (1.85 [1.19-2.89]), depression (1.26 [1.07-1.49]) and methadone (2.61 [1.16-5.84]). After this first episode of drug misuse, 11.6% of gabapentin and 10.7% of pregabalin misusers developed a primary addiction. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of new users, misuse is more likely to occur in new users of pregabalin, with different associated factors of misuse compared to gabapentin and duloxetine. Health professionals and prescribers must be aware of this misuse potential, which could lead to abuse and dependence.

[General practitioners' satisfaction after a geriatric assessment into primary care: data from FAP study]. / Ressentis des médecins généralistes ayant participé à un projet d'évaluation gériatrique en soins premiers : données issues de l'étude FAP.

In response to demographic challenges, primary care need to get familiar with the concept of frailty and the early detection of cognitive impairment. The « Frailty and Alzheimer's disease prevention into primary care ¼ (FAP) project introduced a geriatric evaluation with a nurse in primary care in order to assess older patients. Our work aimed to evaluate the general practitioner's (GPs) opinion involved in FAP project. METHODS: This is an observational descriptive study performed in Occitanie region. 26 GPs have involved in this project. The gathering of information was performed through an online survey. RESULTS: GPs estimated that most of the patients benefiting from a primary care geriatric evaluation would have declined hospital evaluation. 92% of the surveyed GPs gave a strongly positive or positive opinion regarding the detection of previously unidentified health issues and the improvement of patient care following this evaluation. 42% of the GPs found that the personalized plan of cares is difficult or very difficult to do. 73% of the GPs considered that they have a better knowledge of frailty syndrome and cognitive impairment after the evaluation. CONCLUSION: GPs feedback was very positive and promising for the future. It could be interesting to develop this geriatric evaluation in primary care into new regions.

Becoming frail: a major turning point in patients' life course.

BACKGROUND: The frailty concept requires that practices should be adapted to meet the challenge of dependence. The GP is in the front line of management of frail elderly patients. OBJECTIVES: To explore the perception of elderly persons of the term and concept of frailty and to understand their perception of the risk of loss of independence. METHODS: Two qualitative studies by individual interviews in the homes of elderly persons identified as potentially frail by their GP, or diagnosed as frail and at risk of loss of independence. The sampling was theoretical. The analysis was carried out using an inductive approach following the phases of thematic analysis. The researchers used triangulation and collection was concluded when theoretical saturation had been reached. RESULTS: The concept of frailty was seen as forming an integral part of physiological ageing and appeared to be irreversible. The term of frailty had a negative connotation. The physical, cognitive and psychological components of frailty were present in the participants' discourse. Nutritional and sensory components were less present. Frailty due to inappropriate medication was not cited. Seven risk factors for loss of independence were identified: social isolation, poor physical health, poor mental health, loss of mobility, unsuitable living conditions, unsuitable environment, and low resources. CONCLUSIONS: Becoming frail is a major turning point in patients' life course. Coordinated multiprofessional management that takes account of patients' perceptions could help in negotiating a feasible care plan adapted to the patient's needs.

Patients' satisfaction after a geriatric assessment into primary care: data from FAP study.

Given the current demographic situation, the primary care must consider the frailty concept. The « Frailty and Alzheimer's disease prevention into Primary care ¼ project (FAP) enabled geriatric assessment by a nurse in general practitioner's office to assess older persons. The aim of our study was to evaluate patients' satisfaction after geriatric assessment into primary care. METHODS: This is an observational descriptive study performed in the Occitanie area on a population of 268 older patients. Gathering of information was performed through a phone survey. RESULTS: A total of 133 questionnaires were filled in. Average age was 80 (±6) years old and 60% were women. 75.2% (n=100) were frail or pre-frail; 72% (n=89) of participants have been completely satisfied by this assessment; 71% (n=24) have been completely satisfied about their personalized plan of care; 79% (n=89) of them thought the general practitioners' office as the best place for geriatric assessment; 42% (n=52) would have refused the evaluation in the hospital. DISCUSSION: Patient's feedback is very encouraging. They were favorable to the development of the geriatric assessment into primary care and the generalization of the FAP project in other areas. Further studies must be carried out in order to evaluate the medico-economic effect of this care model.

Intensity of previous teaching but not diagnostic skills influences stigmatization of patients with substance use disorder by general practice residents. A vignette study among French final-year residents in general practice.

BACKGROUND: High levels of stigma towards patients with substance use disorder (SUD) have been found in health professionals and medical students. OBJECTIVES: To assess the capability of residents in general practice to diagnose SUD correctly; to assess their stigmatization of patients with SUD and to assess the correlation between both variables. We hypothesized a negative correlation. METHODS: In 2014, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among French residents in general practice, using a self-administered questionnaire. First, a clinical case of SUD (tramadol) was presented, to assess the diagnosis and retained diagnostic criteria. A second clinical vignette was presented (intravenous heroin user) to assess stigmatization with the Attitudes to Mental Illness Questionnaire (AMIQ). Its score ranges from -10 (negative attitude) to +10 (positive attitude). AMIQ scores of residents who diagnosed SUD correctly versus incorrectly, and who had received at least six hours versus less than six hours of teaching on this topic, were compared using Student's t-test. RESULTS: Of 1284 solicited residents, 303 participated (23.6%), 249 residents diagnosed SUD correctly (82.2%). The mean AMIQ score was -3.91 (SD 2.4) without significant difference regarding the correct diagnosis of SUD; but with a significant difference between residents who had received training in SUD for at least six hours versus residents less trained (AMIQ scores -3.76 (SD 2.46) versus -4.50 (SD 2.27), p = .0354). CONCLUSION: Residents in general practice had a good capacity to diagnose SUD correctly but on average expressed negative attitudes toward people with SUD. More SUD teaching seems to help in reducing stigmatizing attitudes.

Management of first depression or generalized anxiety disorder episode in adults in primary care: A systematic metareview.

CONTEXT: General Practitioners (GPs) are the leading antidepressants prescribers in Europe and in France. Difficulties in implementing existing recommendations in daily practice have been described. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to elaborate two algorithms to guide GPs in the patient management for a first major depressive disorder (MDD) or generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) episode in primary care. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane, and ISI Web of Science were explored using mainly the following keywords: depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, antidepressive agents or antidepressant. PubMed was explored using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Grey literature was also considered through the analysis of articles references, congress publications, guidelines and clinical practice recommendations. STUDY SELECTION: A systematic meta-review (overview of reviews) including systematic reviews, meta-analyses, guidelines and clinical practice recommendations, published from January 2002 to December 2015, was performed. The methodological and report qualities were assessed by the AGREE II, PRISMA checklist and R-AMSTAR grid. Each step was performed independently by two researchers following a process derived from the PRISMA statement. A narrative synthesis on main clinical data to collect before prescription in primary care, key information for patients, and recommended follow-up was realized. RESULTS: Thirty articles were included: 11 meta-analyses, 19 guidelines. For moderate to severe MDD, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) should be associated with psychotherapy (cognitive behavioral therapy). For GAD, SSRI or CBT should be proposed if functional impairment is marked. Two algorithms to guide GPs for the management of MDD and or the management of GAD were created based on the data synthesis of this review. A GPs expert group discussed and adapted the algorithms to match with GPs expectancies. LIMITS: Few articles dealt specifically with primary care practice, and only one meta-analysis of clinical trial on antidepressants in primary care was found. CONCLUSIONS: From the best evidence-based data, we created two algorithms to guide GPs for the management of MDD and or the management of GAD. These algorithms will be implemented through a website available for GPs consultation.

Reliability and validity of the script concordance test for postgraduate students of general practice.

BACKGROUND: The script concordance test (SCT) is a validated method of examining students' clinical reasoning. Medical students' professional skills are assessed during their postgraduate years as they study for a specialist qualification in general practice. However, no specific provision is made for assessing their clinical reasoning during their postgraduate study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to demonstrate the reliability and validity of the SCT in general practice and to determine if this tool could be used to assess medical students' progress in acquiring clinical reasoning. METHODS: A 135-question SCT was administered to postgraduate medical students at the beginning of their first year of specialized training in general practice, and then every six months throughout their three-year training, as well as to a reference panel of 20 expert general practitioners. For score calculation, we used the combined scoring method as the calculator made available by the University of Montreal's School of Medicine in Canada. For the validity, student' scores were compared with experts, p <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Ninety students completed all six assessments. The experts' mean score (76.7/100) was significantly higher than the students' score across all assessments (p <.001), with a Cronbach's alpha value of over 0.65 for all assessments. CONCLUSION: The SCT was found to be reliable and capable of discriminating between students and experts, demonstrating that this test is a valid tool for assessing clinical reasoning skills in general practice.

Le premier examen gynécologique idéal imaginé par les jeunes filles: Recherche qualitative par entrevues semi-dirigées.

OBJECTIF: Explorer les représentations sur l'examen gynécologique (EG) et identifier les critères nécessaires à son bon déroulement chez des adolescentes n'ayant pas encore vécu cet examen. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Enquête qualitative par entrevues semi-dirigées. CONTEXTE: Midi-Pyrénées (France) et Auvergne (France). PARTICIPANTS: Jeunes filles de 15 à 19 ans qui n'ayant pas vécu l'EG. MÉTHODES: Le mode de recrutement de l'échantillon a été double : sélection des jeunes filles par la technique boule-de-neige et sélection par la technique d'échantillonnage ciblé jusqu'à l'obtention de la saturation des données tout en cherchant la variation maximale dans les profils des sujets. Les questions ouvertes portaient sur les sources d'informations, les connaissances, les critères de bon déroulement et l'imaginaire autour de l'EG. Le verbatim a fait l'objet d'une analyse longitudinale immédiate rassemblant le contexte (notes des chercheurs) et les idées principales de l'entretien. Une analyse transversale thématique a été réalisée. PRINCIPALES CONSTATATIONS: Une méconnaissance générale des jeunes filles sur l'EG entretenait l'imaginaire autour de cet examen perçu comme obligatoire. L'EG idéal, selon les jeunes filles interrogées, aurait lieu chez une jeune fille qui se sentirait prête, informée préalablement, pouvant être accompagnée selon son souhait. Cet examen se déroulerait dans un environnement chaleureux et confortable afin de diminuer le sentiment de vulnérabilité. La qualité du lien avec le médecin conditionnerait l'acceptation de cet examen par les jeunes filles. CONCLUSION: Une consultation dédiée à l'information, préalable à la consultation où a lieu l'EG, permettrait de diminuer les appréhensions, d'améliorer les connaissances des jeunes filles et de favoriser le bon déroulement du futur premier EG tant pour le médecin que pour la patiente.

Young women describe the ideal first pelvic examination: Qualitative research using semistructured interviews.

OBJECTIVE: To explore representations of the first pelvic examination (PE) among adolescents who had not yet had this examination and to identify their criteria for a positive experience of it. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. SETTING: Midi-Pyrénées and Auvergne in France. PARTICIPANTS: Adolescents aged 15 to 19 years who had never had a PE. METHODS: Participants were recruited through snowball sampling and targeted sampling until data saturation was reached. Maximum variation was sought in the profiles of the study participants. Open-ended questions dealt with the interviewee's sources of information, knowledge of the PE, criteria for a positive PE experience, and representations of the PE itself. Verbatim transcripts were immediately subjected to longitudinal analysis with the context (researchers' notes) and key themes of the interview. Cross-sectional analysis was then performed. MAIN FINDINGS: Many adolescents lack knowledge about the PE and believe that it is mandatory. According to study participants, the ideal PE would take place when they felt ready. They would be given adequate information in advance and the option of being accompanied by a friend or family member. They described the ideal examining room as warm, comfortable, and reassuring. The quality of their relationship with the examining physician would also affect their acceptance of this examination. CONCLUSION: An information session before the consultation for the PE would make it possible to reduce the patient's apprehension, improve her level of knowledge, and set the right tone for the upcoming PE, both for her and for the physician.

Mortality Associated With Time in and Out of Buprenorphine Treatment in French Office-Based General Practice: A 7-Year Cohort Study.

In France, most cases of opioid use disorder are treated with buprenorphine by general practitioners in private practice. Using reimbursement data of a representative sample of the French population, Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires, we investigated mortality during periods when patients were in and out of treatment in a cohort of 713 new users of buprenorphine having a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.5 (1.5) years. The mortality rate was 0.63 per 100 person-years (95% CI, 0.40-0.85) overall. In a multivariate Cox regression model, compared with being in treatment, being out of treatment was associated with a markedly increased risk of death (hazard ratio = 29.04; 95% CI, 10.04-83.99). Buprenorphine appears to be a strong protective factor against mortality.

General Practitioners' Clinical Impression in the Screening for Frailty: Data From the FAP Study Pilot.

BACKGROUND: The progression of frailty is marked by an increased risk of adverse health outcomes in the elderly including falls, physical and/or cognitive disability, hospitalizations, and mortality. In primary care, the general practitioner's (GP's) clinical impression about their elderly patients' frailty state seems to be a key point in identifying frail individuals in their clinical practice. The aim of this article is to examine if GPs' clinical impressions regarding frailty concurs with objective measures of the gold standard frailty phenotype as described by Fried in community-dwelling older persons. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study in 14 primary care GP offices in the Toulouse area from May 1st to October 31st, 2015. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen GPs screened their patients ≥70 years old. MEASUREMENTS: GPs' "frailty impression" was based on the Gérontopôle Frailty Screening Tool. "Objective measures of the five Fried frailty criteria" were obtained by a geriatric nurse through standardized testing. The capacity of the GPs' clinical impression to detect participants objectively measured as frail was examined with diagnostic values of observed sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). RESULTS: A total of 268 participants were screened by GPs and assessed by a nurse. Mean age was 81 years and 62.3% were female. According to the objective measures of Fried's criteria, frailty (three to five criteria) and pre-frailty (one to two criteria) states were identified in 31% and 45.2% of participants, respectively. The Se of the GPs' impression was good (80.39%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 74.27%-85.61%), and the Sp was moderate (64.06%; 95% CI, 5.10%-75.68%). The overall PPV of the GPs' impression was 87.70% (95% CI, 82.12%-92.04%), and the NPV was 50.51% (95% CI, 39.27%-61.91%). Although the PPV increased with age reaching 93.33% (95% CI, 85.12%-97.80%) among patients ≥ 85 years old, the NPV decreased accordingly to a minimal 21.43% (95% CI, 4.66%-50.80%) in that subgroup. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights the importance of the GPs' clinical impression on frailty as a fair means to identify this syndrome in community-dwelling older patients in primary care. This clinical impression may not be sufficient, however, and some objective tests could be added to improve the accuracy of frailty detection in older patients in primary care.