Changes in corneal thickness, corneal volume, and densitometry after long-term orthokeratology wear.

PURPOSE: To investigate changes in the corneal volume, corneal densitometry and pachymetry of young myopes wearing over-night orthokeratology (OK) contact lenses. METHODS: The medical records of 28 right eyes of young myopes wearing OK between 2013 and 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. The baseline refractive error, best corrected visual acuities at baseline and uncorrected visual acuity at the most recent visit were recorded. Corneal volume of the central 10 mm cornea; densitometry at central, nasal and temporal cornea; and pachymetry along the horizontal and vertical meridians were collected from the Pentacam® HR at baseline, after one night of lens wear, and at the latest visit. RESULTS: The mean age of subjects was 12.03 ± 3.80 years at the time of OK lens fitting and wore OK overnight for a mean duration of 666 days (range 206-1736 days). The baseline spherical equivalent refractive error was -3.03 ± 1.56 D (range -1.00 to -6.00 D). The corneal volume increased significantly after OK wear (p = 0.001). Corneal densitometry increased after OK wear, but the change did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.113). Pachymetry in the central cornea did not change significantly across all visits (p > 0.05) but increased significantly in the mid-peripheral regions of the cornea. Baseline refractive error was not found to be correlated with the changes in corneal volume, corneal densitometry, or pachymetry. CONCLUSION: The increase in corneal volume and densitometry and no significant change in the central corneal thickness may indicate the presence of corneal oedema from long-term OK wear. The baseline refraction was not correlated with the changes in corneal volume, densitometry or pachymetry.

Trends in myopia management attitudes and strategies in clinical practice: Survey of eye care practitioners in Africa.

PURPOSE: There remains a lack of information on the perception and adoption of myopia control strategies among African eye care practitioners (ECPs). This study provides an African perspective to similar previous studies conducted in other parts of the world. METHODS: A self-administered survey in English and French was distributed to ECPs across Africa. The items on the questionnaire assessed their level of concern about the increasing prevalence of paediatric myopia, perceived efficacy, opinions on, and adoption of various myopia management modalities. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 330 ECPs working in 23 African countries. Respondents were highly concerned about the increasing prevalence of paediatric myopia in their clinic (median 8/10) and perceived approved myopia control soft contact lenses as the most effective at slowing myopia progression (mean perceived reduction in myopia progression ± SD; 53.9 ± 27.1%), followed by single vision spectacles (53.1 ± 30.9%), and orthokeratology (52.8 ± 28.0%). Multifocal soft contact lenses (40.4 ± 25.8%) and pharmaceutical agents such as topical atropine drops (39.5 ± 27.1%) were perceived as least effective in slowing myopia progression. Although ECPs reported being aware of various myopia control strategies, they still mainly prescribed single vision spectacles to a large proportion (64.3 ± 29.9%) of young progressing myopes. Nearly one-third (27%) of ECPs who prescribed single vision lenses stated they were concerned about the cost implications to patients. Other reported concerns included safety of, and inadequate information about myopia control options. CONCLUSIONS: African ECPs continue to prescribe single vision lenses for progressing myopes despite being aware of the various myopia control options. Practitioners' perceptions of the efficacy of several modalities to slow myopia progression do not align with the current best evidence. Clear practice guidelines and continuing education on myopia control are warranted to inform and guide the management of myopic patients in Africa.

Practice of orthokeratology in Algeria: a retrospective study

Purpose: To report the practice of orthokeratology (OK) in Algeria and to investigate the visual outcomes, safety and subjective responses with this technique in myopes.MethodsA retrospective chart review of 48 participants using OK lenses since January 2010 were included in the study. Lenses were selected and fitted according to the manufacturer’s recommendations using their respective software and the number of lenses required for a successful fit was recorded. Visual acuity (VA) in logMAR units and biomicroscopic findings were recorded for each visit. Subjective ratings was determined with analogue rating scale was filled in by the investigator, the participants were divided into Group 1 (> 4.00D) and Group 2 (< 3.75D) myopic groups for analysis.ResultsFirst lens fitting success rate of 64.58%. There was also a significant difference between the BCVA at baseline and VA at Day 1 (P < 0.05), and no significant difference at Day 7, Day 30 and the final visit (P = 0.51, P = 0.93, P = 0.62, respectively), for Group 2. There was a significant difference between the BCVA at baseline and VA at Day 1, 7, 30 and the final visit (P < 0.05), for Group 1. the patients of the second group were happier but the results from the survey were not statistically significant (P = 0.10), no serious complication was reported.Conclusionthe technique was efficient and safe as we didn’t have any serious complication, with a high success rate for first lens fitting. (AU)

Practice of orthokeratology in Algeria: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: To report the practice of orthokeratology (OK) in Algeria and to investigate the visual outcomes, safety and subjective responses with this technique in myopes. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 48 participants using OK lenses since January 2010 were included in the study. Lenses were selected and fitted according to the manufacturer's recommendations using their respective software and the number of lenses required for a successful fit was recorded. Visual acuity (VA) in logMAR units and biomicroscopic findings were recorded for each visit. Subjective ratings was determined with analogue rating scale was filled in by the investigator, the participants were divided into Group 1 (> 4.00D) and Group 2 (< 3.75D) myopic groups for analysis. RESULTS: First lens fitting success rate of 64.58%. There was also a significant difference between the BCVA at baseline and VA at Day 1 (P < 0.05), and no significant difference at Day 7, Day 30 and the final visit (P = 0.51, P = 0.93, P = 0.62, respectively), for Group 2. There was a significant difference between the BCVA at baseline and VA at Day 1, 7, 30 and the final visit (P < 0.05), for Group 1. the patients of the second group were happier but the results from the survey were not statistically significant (P = 0.10), no serious complication was reported. CONCLUSION: the technique was efficient and safe as we didn't have any serious complication, with a high success rate for first lens fitting.